-
1.
Safety and efficacy of heparin during dialysis in the context of systemic anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications.
Brunelli, SM, Cohen, DE, Marlowe, G, Liu, D, Njord, L, Van Wyck, D, Aronoff, G
Journal of nephrology. 2019;(3):453-460
Abstract
Heparin is widely used to prevent coagulation during hemodialysis. Although systemic anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents are commonly prescribed in the hemodialysis population, the safety and efficacy of heparin in the presence of these medications is unclear. This retrospective cohort study considered adult hemodialysis patients treated in the United States (August 2015-July 2017). For each month, patients were ascribed a three-part exposure status (heparin use, anticoagulant use, antiplatelet agent use) based on electronic health records. Outcomes included anemia measures, peri-treatment bleeding and clotting, and hospitalization for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Within systemic medication exposure categories, associations of heparin use were examined using adjusted generalized linear, negative binomial, or Poisson models. Across all systemic medication exposures, heparin use was associated with lower erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) dose, higher hemoglobin levels, and lower monthly intravenous (IV) iron dose; lower rates of clotting during treatment and hospitalization for GI bleeding; and similar rates of peri-treatment bleeding. Associations with respect to ESA, IV iron, hemoglobin, and clotting were approximately twofold more potent in the absence of a systemic anticoagulant; the presence of an antiplatelet agent had little impact. Neither medication type influenced associations between heparin use and peri-treatment or GI bleeding. These results suggest that heparin use is safe and effective in the presence and absence of systemic anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. Clinical judgment must be applied to assess bleeding risk in individual patients; however, the decision to withhold heparin should not solely be based upon the concurrent use of anticoagulant or antiplatet agents.
-
2.
Vitamin E-Coated and Heparin-Coated Dialyzer Membranes for Heparin-Free Hemodialysis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Trial.
Islam, MS, Hassan, ZA, Chalmin, F, Vido, S, Berrada, M, Verhelst, D, Donnadieu, P, Moranne, O, Esnault, VL
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2016;(5):752-762
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemodialysis requires effective anticoagulation to avoid blood circuit clotting. In patients at high risk for bleeding, several alternative methods have been developed. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, prospective, randomized, crossover study evaluating the noninferiority of vitamin E-coated compared with heparin-coated dialyzers in a 4-hour heparin-free hemodialysis strategy. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS 32 adult long-term hemodialysis patients from 2 French hemodialysis units with well-functioning fistulas or double-lumen catheters. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly allocated to a first period using either vitamin E- or heparin-coated dialyzers. After a washout period of 2 hemodialysis sessions, each patient was switched to the alternative dialyzer for a second period. Each study period started with 2 hemodialysis sessions with reduced heparin dose (50% and 25% of usual heparin dose, respectively, for sessions 1 and 2) followed by 2 heparin-free sessions. OUTCOMES The primary end point was the percentage of successful study periods, defined as no circuit-clotting event leading to premature interruption of any of the 4 dialysis sessions. Secondary end points included total number and cumulative duration of hemodialysis sessions without clotting, number of saline solution flushes, dialysis circuit bubble trap status and dialyzer membrane status by visual inspection, and dialysis adequacy. RESULTS The percentage of success with vitamin E-coated dialyzers (25/32 study periods [78%]) was not inferior to that with heparin-coated dialyzers (26/32 study periods [81%]). Visual inspection showed equal numbers of clean dialysis circuit bubble traps (vitamin E-coated, 34/121; heparin-coated, 32/120), whereas clean fiber bundles were more frequently noted with the vitamin E-coated compared with heparin-coated dialyzers (25/121 vs 2/120; P=0.002). LIMITATIONS Results may not extrapolate to critically ill patients. Differences in dialyzer transparency may account for visual inspection scores. CONCLUSIONS The success rate of 4-hour heparin-free hemodialysis sessions is lower than that previously claimed in uncontrolled studies. Vitamin E-coated and heparin-coated dialyzers exposed patients to similar and unacceptable high failure rates. Further studies are required to improve heparin-free hemodialysis.
-
3.
Gender Differences in Associations Between Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adverse Outcomes.
Schoos, MM, Mehran, R, Dangas, GD, Yu, J, Baber, U, Clemmensen, P, Feit, F, Gersh, BJ, Guagliumi, G, Ohman, EM, et al
The American journal of cardiology. 2016;(11):1661-1668
Abstract
Women are frequently reported to have increased morbidity after presentation with acute coronary syndromes and myocardial infarction; however, whether a greater thrombotic tendency contributes to gender differences in clinical outcomes of urgent percutaneous coronary intervention is unknown. Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events (IPTEs) are defined as new or increasing thrombus, abrupt vessel closure, no reflow or slow reflow, or distal embolization at any time during percutaneous coronary intervention. IPTEs were evaluated in this pooled analysis of 6,591 patients with stent implantation and blinded quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis, from the ACUITY and HORIZONS-AMI trials. We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year follow-up and major bleeding at 30 days according to gender and the presence or absence of IPTE. IPTE was identified in 507 patients (7.7%), with 119 of 1,744 (6.8%) occurring in women and 388 of 4,847 (8.0%) in men (p = 0.12). IPTE, but not gender, was independently associated with MACE at in-hospital and 30-day follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, the adjusted hazard of MACE was higher in women and in patients with IPTE; however, the risk of MACE associated with IPTE was similar among women and men. There was no significant interaction between IPTE and gender for 1-year MACE or 30-day bleeding. IPTE predicted major bleeding only in women. In conclusion, in acute coronary syndromes, women have increased risk of adverse outcome at 1 year. IPTEs are common, occur at similar frequency, and are associated with similar degree of increased MACE in both genders at short- and long-term follow-up. Higher thrombotic propensity does not offer a mechanistic explanation for the worse outcomes noted in women.
-
4.
Normal saline versus heparin solution to lock totally implanted venous access devices: Results from a multicenter randomized trial.
Dal Molin, A, Clerico, M, Baccini, M, Guerretta, L, Sartorello, B, Rasero, L
European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society. 2015;(6):638-43
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to determine the non-inferiority of normal saline flushing compared to heparin flushing in maintaining the patency of totally implanted venous access devices (TIVADs). METHOD Four hundred and thirty patients were recruited from 14 Italian centres. Patients were randomized to heparin group or to normal saline group. The primary outcome of the study was TIVAD occlusion. RESULTS After randomisation, 203 patients were assigned to normal saline group and 212 to heparin group. Median follow up time was 204 days in normal saline group and 294 in the heparin group. We observed 24 withdrawal occlusions (5.78%): 10 in the heparin group and 14 in the normal saline group. One total occlusion was observed in the normal saline group. Taking as reference the arm treated with heparin, the absolute risk difference was 2.67 with the 90% CI including the non - inferiority margin of 4%. No significant difference between hazards of occlusion was found. CONCLUSIONS This study failed to demonstrate that normal saline flushing is not inferior to heparin flushing, even if a significant difference between the two treatments was not found. The use of heparin is controversial and other prospective trials are necessary in this field. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT number: 2009-013620-22.
-
5.
A randomized trial comparing gentamicin/citrate and heparin locks for central venous catheters in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
Moran, J, Sun, S, Khababa, I, Pedan, A, Doss, S, Schiller, B
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2012;(1):102-7
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central venous catheters (CVCs) are used for vascular access in hemodialysis patients who have no alternative access or are awaiting placement or maturation of a permanent access. The major complications of CVCs are catheter-related bloodstream infection and clotting in the catheter lumen. STUDY DESIGN Parallel-group, randomized, multicenter clinical trial, with patients blinded to study intervention. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS 16 free-standing dialysis facilities in Northern California belonging to a single provider. 303 adult maintenance hemodialysis patients who were using a tunneled cuffed CVC for vascular access. INTERVENTION The treatment group received an antibiotic lock containing gentamicin 320 μg/mL in 4% sodium citrate, whereas the control group received the standard catheter lock containing heparin 1,000 U/mL. Both groups received triple-antibiotic ointment on the catheter exit site during dressing changes at each dialysis treatment. OUTCOMES Catheter-related bloodstream infection and catheter clotting. MEASUREMENTS Catheter-related bloodstream infection was defined as the occurrence of symptoms consistent with bacteremia together with positive blood culture results in the absence of another obvious source of infection. Catheter clotting was measured as the rate of thrombolytic agent use required to maintain adequate blood flow. A single patient could contribute more than one infection or clotting episode. RESULTS The rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.91 episodes/1,000 catheter-days in the control group and 0.28 episodes/1,000 catheter-days in the treatment group (P = 0.003). The time to the first episode of bacteremia was significantly delayed (P = 0.005). The rates of tissue plasminogen activator use were similar in the treatment and control groups: 2.36 versus 3.42 events/1,000 catheter-days, respectively (P = 0.2). LIMITATIONS The requirement for dialysis facility staff to prepare the treatment intervention prevented a completely blinded study. CONCLUSION Gentamicin 320 μg/mL in 4% sodium citrate used as a routine catheter lock in CVCs in patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy markedly decreases the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection and is as effective as heparin 1,000 U/mL in preventing catheter clotting.
-
6.
Regional citrate versus systemic heparin for anticoagulation in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofiltration: a prospective randomized multicentre trial.
Hetzel, GR, Schmitz, M, Wissing, H, Ries, W, Schott, G, Heering, PJ, Isgro, F, Kribben, A, Himmele, R, Grabensee, B, et al
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2011;(1):232-9
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) in the intensive care setting requires anticoagulation to prevent clotting of the extracorporeal circuit. Several protocols avoiding heparin and using regional citrate anticoagulation have been developed to diminish bleeding risks. However, data from randomized trials comparing citrate anticoagulation with systemic heparinization are very limited. METHODS One hundred and seventy-four patients on mechanical ventilation, requiring renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure, were included in this prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing regional citrate with systemic heparin. The study was performed at nine different intensive care units at university or academic teaching hospitals. The participants were randomized to either CVVH using regional citrate anticoagulation or CVVH using systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin. The primary outcome was to compare treatment efficacy represented by the patients' acid base status on Day 3 and on each consecutive day. Several parameters of safety and efficacy were analysed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS Comparison of standard bicarbonate from Day 3 to Day 11 revealed no difference between both treatment modalities. Use of citrate resulted in less systemic anticoagulation, a lower risk of bleeding and a longer haemofilter patency. Episodes of hypercalcaemia, hypocalcaemia and the need for additional bicarbonate infusions occurred more often under citrate. The patients' high mortality was not influenced by the mode of anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS Citrate may be used as a regional anticoagulant and the only buffering agent in CVVH with adequate treatment efficacy and safety. However, neither citrate nor heparin anticoagulation should be regarded as a therapeutic standard, since there is no advantage of one of these substances with regard to patient mortality.
-
7.
Can oral vitamin K before elective surgery substitute for preoperative heparin bridging in patients on vitamin K antagonists?
Steib, A, Barre, J, Mertes, M, Morel, MH, Nathan, N, Ozier, Y, Treger, M, Samama, CM
Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2010;(3):499-503
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND After a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) overdose, 1-2 mg of oral vitamin K can lower the International Normalized Ratio (INR) to the therapeutic range. OBJECTIVE To establish whether oral vitamin K can substitute for heparin bridging and decrease the INR to < or = 1.5 before elective surgery. METHODS Patients on long-term VKAs were randomized either to heparin bridging after the last VKA dose on day -5 before surgery (group H) or to VKA treatment until day -2, followed by 1 mg of oral vitamin K on the day before surgery (group K). Blood clotting variables were assessed on days -5/-2, 1 and 0, and postoperatively. If the target INR was not achieved 2 h before incision, surgery was deferred or performed after injection of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). RESULTS In 30 of 94 included patients, baseline INR was outside the chosen range (18, INR < 2; 12, INR > 3.5), leaving 34 eligible patients in group H and 30 in group K. The groups were balanced in terms of body mass index, VKA treatment duration and indication, scheduled surgery, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, and blood loss. The INR was significantly higher in group K on days -1 and 0 than in group H. An INR < or = 1.5 was not achieved in 20 group K patients (66%). Surgery was postponed or performed after PCC injection in 12 of these 20 patients. CONCLUSIONS Oral vitamin K (1 mg) cannot substitute for heparin bridging before surgery. In addition, one-third of patients on VKAs were exposed to a risk of bleeding (overdose) or thrombosis (underdose), thus highlighting the need for new oral anticoagulants.
-
8.
Bone density changes in women who receive thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy.
Casele, H, Haney, EI, James, A, Rosene-Montella, K, Carson, M
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006;(4):1109-13
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare unfractionated heparin therapy to the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin sodium, and their effects on bone mineral density over the course of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN Pregnant patients whose condition required thromboprophylaxis were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial and were assigned to receive either unfractionated heparin therapy or low molecular weight heparin therapy. Bone mineral density was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at the proximal femur on enrollment and again shortly after delivery. RESULTS One hundred twenty women were enrolled, and 98 women completed the study. There was no difference in the change in bone mineral density at the femoral neck (P = .054) or total proximal femur (P = .584) between groups. Only 1 of 40 patients (2.5%) who received unfractionated heparin therapy and 1 of 49 patients (2.0%) who received low molecular weight heparin therapy (P = 1.0) experienced bone loss of > or = 10% at the femoral neck. CONCLUSION In this study, the incidence of clinically significant bone loss (> or = 10%) in the femur in women who received thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy is approximately 2% to 2.5% and appears to be similar, regardless of whether the patient receives low molecular weight heparin therapy or unfractionated heparin therapy.
-
9.
Escin/diethylammonium salicylate/heparin combination gels for the topical treatment of acute impact injuries: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study.
Wetzel, D, Menke, W, Dieter, R, Smasal, V, Giannetti, B, Bulitta, M
British journal of sports medicine. 2002;(3):183-8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of escin-containing gels in the topical treatment of blunt impact injuries. METHODS Competitors in soccer, handball, or karate competitions were enrolled within two hours of sustaining a strain, sprain, or contusion and treated three times with the trial gel within a period of eight hours. Patients were randomised to three parallel groups consisting of two active treatment gels, containing escin (1% or 2%), 5% diethylammonium salicylate, and 5000 IU heparin, or placebo gel. Tenderness produced by pressure was measured at 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after enrollment (within two hours of the injury). Tenderness was defined as the amount of pressure (measured by a calibrated caliper at the centre of the injury) that first produced a pain reaction as reported by the patient. RESULTS A total of 158 patients were enrolled; 156 were evaluated in the intention to treat analysis. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve for tenderness over a six hour period. The gel preparations containing 1% and 2% escin were significantly more effective (a priori ordered hypotheses testing controlling the multiple alpha = 5% significance level) than placebo (p(1) = 0.0001 and p(2) = 0.0002 respectively). The treatment effects were 5.7 kp h/cm(2) (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9 to 8.5) and 5.9 kilopond (kp) h/cm(2) (95% CI 2.9 to 8.8) between 1% escin and placebo and between 2% escin and placebo respectively. These results were supported by secondary efficacy variables. The time to reach the baseline contralateral tenderness value (resolution of pain) at the injured site was shorter in the treatment groups than in the placebo group (p<0.0001). Both active gel preparations produced more rapid pain relief than the placebo gel. No relevant differences were detected between the two active gels. The safety and tolerability of the escin-containing gels were excellent. CONCLUSIONS Escin/diethylammonium salicylate/heparin combination gel preparations are effective and safe for the treatment of blunt impact injuries.
-
10.
Increased thromboxane production in women with a history of venous thromboembolic event: effect of heparins.
Kaaja, R, Pettilä, V, Leinonen, P, Ylikorkala, O
British journal of haematology. 2001;(3):655-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
We investigated the production of prostacyclin and thromboxane in pregnant women with a previous venous thromboembolic event before, during and after the use of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin). Twenty women were studied before starting heparin prophylaxis (before 20 weeks of gestation), during heparin prophylaxis (at 30 weeks of gestation) and after heparin prophylaxis (16 weeks after delivery). Ten pregnant women with no history of thromboembolism were studied as the control group. Urinary output of the stable metabolite of prostacyclin (2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1alpha) and that of thromboxane A2 (2,3-dinor-TxB2), as well as a number of markers of thrombophilia were measured and expressed as mean (+/-SEM). Women with a history of thromboembolism were characterized by normal prostacyclin production but elevated thromboxane production (44.0 +/- 4.1 versus 19.0 +/- 3.6 ng/mmol creatinine, P < 0.001) at 12 weeks of pregnancy. Heparin prophylaxis (regardless of the type) had abolished elevated thromboxane concentrations at 30 weeks of gestation. Four months after delivery, thromboxane dominance had returned (25.2 +/- 3.5 versus 13.6 +/- 2.1 ng/mmol creatinine, P < 0.01). The presence of hereditary thrombophilia (9/20) was not associated with any changes in prostanoid concentrations. Thus, women with a history of venous thromboembolic events have thromboxane dominance during and after pregnancy, but this dominance can be eliminated through the use of heparins.