-
1.
Probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy versus oral immunotherapy and placebo in children with peanut allergy in Australia (PPOIT-003): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2b trial.
Loke, P, Orsini, F, Lozinsky, AC, Gold, M, O'Sullivan, MD, Quinn, P, Lloyd, M, Ashley, SE, Pitkin, S, Axelrad, C, et al
The Lancet. Child & adolescent health. 2022;(3):171-184
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral immunotherapy is effective at inducing desensitisation to allergens and induces sustained unresponsiveness (ie, clinical remission) in a subset of patients, but causes frequent reactions. We aimed to investigate whether addition of a probiotic adjuvant improved the efficacy or safety of peanut oral immunotherapy. METHODS PPOIT-003, a multicentre, randomised, phase 2b trial, was conducted in three tertiary hospitals in Australia (Adelaide [SA], Melbourne [VIC], and Perth [WA]) in children aged 1-10 years, weighing more than 7 kg, with peanut allergy confirmed by a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (cumulative 4950 mg dose of peanut protein) and positive peanut skin prick test (≥3 mm) or peanut-specific IgE (≥0·35 kU/L). Children were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT), placebo probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT), or placebo probiotic and placebo OIT (placebo) for 18 months, and were followed up until 12 months after completion of treatment. Oral immunotherapy consisted of increasing doses of peanut protein (commercially available food-grade 12% defatted peanut flour [50% peanut protein]) until a 2000 mg daily maintenance dose was reached. The probiotic adjuvant was a daily dose of 2 × 1010 colony-forming units of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53103. Placebo immunotherapy comprised maltodextrin, brown food colouring, and peanut essence, and placebo probiotic was maltodextrin. Dual primary outcomes were 8-week sustained unresponsiveness, defined as no reaction to a cumulative dose of 4950 mg peanut protein at treatment completion and 8 weeks after treatment completion, in the PPOIT versus placebo groups and the PPOIT versus OIT groups, analysed by intention to treat. Safety endpoints were adverse events during the treatment phase, and peanut ingestion and reactions in the 12-month post-treatment period. This study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, 12616000322437. FINDINGS Between July 4, 2016, and Sept 21, 2020, 201 participants were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. 36 (46%) of 79 children in the PPOIT group and 42 (51%) of 83 children in the OIT group achieved sustained unresponsiveness compared with two (5%) of 39 children in the placebo group (risk difference 40·44% [95% CI 27·46 to 53·42] for PPOIT vs placebo, p<0·0001), with no difference between PPOIT and OIT (-5·03% [-20·40 to 10·34], p=0·52). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 72 (91%) of 79 children in the PPOIT group, 73 (88%) of 83 children in the OIT group, and 28 (72%) of 39 children in the placebo group. Exposure-adjusted incidence of adverse events was 10·58 in the PPOIT group, 11·36 in the OIT, and 2·09 in the placebo group (ratio 0·92 [95% CI 0·85 to 0·99] for PPOIT vs OIT, p=0·042; 4·98 [4·11-6·03] for PPOIT vs placebo, p<0·0001; 5·42 [4·48-6·56] for OIT vs placebo, p<0·0001), with differences seen primarily in gastrointestinal symptoms and in children aged 1-5 years. During the 12-month post-treatment period, 60 (85%) of 71 participants in the PPOIT group, 60 (86%) of 70 participants in the OIT group, and six (18%) of 34 participants in the placebo group were eating peanut; rescue epinephrine use was infrequent (two [3%] of 71 in the PPOIT group, four [6%] of 70 in the OIT group, and none in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION Both PPOIT and OIT were effective at inducing sustained unresponsiveness. Addition of a probiotic did not improve efficacy of OIT, but might offer a safety benefit compared with OIT alone, particularly in preschool children. FUNDING National Health and Medical Research Council Australia and Prota Therapeutics.
-
2.
Pregnancy outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab, anti-TNF or conventional therapy: results of the European CONCEIVE study.
Moens, A, van der Woude, CJ, Julsgaard, M, Humblet, E, Sheridan, J, Baumgart, DC, Gilletta De Saint-Joseph, C, Nancey, S, Rahier, JF, Bossuyt, P, et al
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2020;(1):129-138
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) often receive biologicals during pregnancy to maintain disease remission. Data on outcome of vedolizumab-exposed pregnancies (VDZE) are sparse. AIMS To assess pregnancy and child outcomes of VDZE pregnancies and to compare these results to anti-TNF exposed (TNFE) or both immunomodulatory and biologic unexposed (CON IBD) pregnancies. METHODS A retrospective multicentre case-control observational study was performed. RESULTS VDZE group included 79 pregnancies in 73 IBD women. The TNFE and CON IBD group included 186 pregnancies (162 live births) in 164 IBD women and 184 pregnancies (163 live births) in 155 IBD women, respectively. At conception, cases more often had active disease ([VDZE: 36% vs TNFE 17%, P = .002] and [VDZE: 36% vs CON IBD 24%, P = .063]). No significant difference in miscarriage rates were found between groups (VDZE and TNFE 16% vs 13%, P = .567; VDZE and CON IBD 16% vs 10%, P = .216). In live-born infants, median gestational age and birthweight were similar between groups. Median Apgar score at birth was numerically equal. Prematurity was similar in the VDZE group compared to the control groups, even when correcting for disease activity during pregnancy. The frequency of congenital anomalies was comparable between groups as were the percentages of breastfed babies. During the first year of life, no malignancies were reported and infants' infection risk did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSION No new safety signal was detected in VDZE pregnancies although larger, prospective studies are required for confirmation.
-
3.
A double-blind phase III trial of immunomodulating nutritional formula during adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients: IMPATOX.
Boisselier, P, Kaminsky, MC, Thézenas, S, Gallocher, O, Lavau-Denes, S, Garcia-Ramirez, M, Alfonsi, M, Cupissol, D, de Forges, H, Janiszewski, C, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2020;(6):1523-1531
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a previous phase II study an immunonutrient supplement was found to reduce severe acute toxicities for head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) patients treated with concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate efficacy of the same immunonutrient supplement on severe mucositis. Secondary objectives included tolerance, compliance to oral supplementation, chemotherapy interruptions and delays, quality of life, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 2, and 3 y. METHODS Between November 2009 and June 2013, 180 HNSCC patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery with curative intent were included in our double-blind phase III multicenter trial. They were assigned to receive oral supplementation (3 sachets/d) of either a formula enriched with l-arginine and omega-3 (n-3) fatty and ribonucleic acids (experimental arm), or an isocaloric isonitrogenous control (control arm), for 5 d before each of 3 cycles of cisplatin. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were undertaken, along with subgroup analyses of ≥75% compliant patients, to compare the incidence of acute mucositis (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and WHO scales) and 36-mo survival. RESULTS At 1 mo after terminating chemoradiotherapy (CRT), no differences were observed in the incidence of grade 3-4 mucositis between treatment groups, in the ITT, PP (172 patients), and subgroup (≥75% compliance, n = 112) analyses. The immunomodulating supplement did not significantly improve survival in the ITT and PP analyses at 3 y after CRT. Among ≥75% compliant patients, however, OS at 3 y was significantly improved in the immunomodulating formula group (81%; 95% CI: 67%, 89%) compared with controls (61%; 95% CI: 46%, 73%; P = 0.034), as well as PFS (73%; 95% CI: 58%, 83% compared with 50%; 95% CI: 36%, 63%; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Although this immunomodulating formula failed to reduce severe mucositis during CRT, the findings suggest that the long-term survival of compliant HNSCC patients was improved.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01149642.
-
4.
Immune function testing in sepsis patients receiving sodium selenite.
Guo, A, Srinath, J, Feuerecker, M, Crucian, B, Briegel, J, Boulesteix, AL, Kaufmann, I, Choukèr, A
Journal of critical care. 2019;:208-212
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined in a longitudinal study the role of sodium selenite in sepsis patients in strengthening the immune performance in whole blood samples using immune functional assays. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a sub-study from a randomized, double blinded multicenter clinical trial (SISPCT) registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00832039) and with data collected at our center. Full blood samples were incubated with various recall antigens and the supernatants were measured for their cytokine concentrations as markers for immune response. Data from days 0, 4, 7, 14, and 21 (from sepsis onset) were analyzed using a generalized least squares model in R to appropriately take the longitudinal structure and the missing values into account. RESULTS From the 76 patients enrolled in the study at our center, 40 were randomized to selenium therapy and 36 to placebo. The analyses of immune response assay data showed no statistical difference between the selenium and placebo groups at each of the time points. There was however an overall dampening of cytokine release, which tended to recover over time in both groups. CONCLUSION Selenium has long been an adjuvant therapy in treating sepsis. Recently, it was proven to not have beneficial effects on the mortality outcome. Using data from our center in this sub-cohort study, we identified no relative improvement in cytokine release of stimulated blood immune cells ex vivo from patients with selenium therapy over a three-week period. This offers a potential explanation for the lack of beneficial effects of selenium in sepsis patients.
-
5.
Effects of Immunonutrition in Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial (Promaltia Study).
Serrano-Villar, S, de Lagarde, M, Vázquez-Castellanos, J, Vallejo, A, Bernadino, JI, Madrid, N, Matarranz, M, Díaz-Santiago, A, Gutiérrez, C, Cabello, A, et al
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2019;(1):120-130
Abstract
BACKGROUND While nutritional interventions with prebiotics and probiotics seem to exert immunological effects, their clinical implications in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) at advanced HIV disease remain unclear. METHODS This was a pilot multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in which 78 HIV-infected, ART-naive subjects with <350 CD4 T cells/μL or AIDS were randomized to either daily PMT25341 (a mixture of synbiotics, omega-3/6 fatty acids and amino acids) or placebo for 48 weeks, each in combination with first-line ART. Primary endpoints were changes in CD4 T-cell counts and CD4/CD8 ratio from baseline to week 48 and safety. Secondary endpoints were changes in markers of T-cell activation, bacterial translocation, inflammation, and α and β microbiota diversity. RESULTS Fifty-nine participants completed the follow-up with a mean CD4+ T-cell count of 221 ± 108 cells/μL and mean CD4/CD8 ratio of 0.26 ± 0.19. PMT25341 was well tolerated, without grade 3-4 adverse effects attributable to the intervention. While most of the assessed biomarkers improved during the follow-up in both arms, PMT25341-treated subjects did not experience any significant change, compared to placebo-treated subjects, in mean CD4+ T-cell count change (278 vs 250 cells/μL, P = .474) or CD4/CD8 ratio change (0.30 vs 0.32, P = .854). Similarly, we did not detect differences between treatment arms in secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS In HIV-infected patients initiating ART at advanced disease, the clear immunological benefits of ART were not enhanced by this nutritional intervention targeting the gut-associated lymphoid tissue and microbiota. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT00870363.
-
6.
Study of immunotherapy in antibody positive psychosis: feasibility and acceptability (SINAPPS1).
Lennox, BR, Tomei, G, Vincent, SA, Yeeles, K, Pollard, R, Palmer-Cooper, E, Jones, P, Zandi, MS, Coles, A
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2019;(3):365-367
-
7.
Burosumab versus conventional therapy in children with X-linked hypophosphataemia: a randomised, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Imel, EA, Glorieux, FH, Whyte, MP, Munns, CF, Ward, LM, Nilsson, O, Simmons, JH, Padidela, R, Namba, N, Cheong, HI, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2019;(10189):2416-2427
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND X-linked hypophosphataemia in children is characterised by elevated serum concentrations of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), hypophosphataemia, rickets, lower extremity bowing, and growth impairment. We compared the efficacy and safety of continuing conventional therapy, consisting of oral phosphate and active vitamin D, versus switching to burosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against FGF23, in paediatric X-linked hypophosphataemia. METHODS In this randomised, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial at 16 clinical sites, we enrolled children with X-linked hypophosphataemia aged 1-12 years. Key eligibility criteria were a total Thacher rickets severity score of at least 2·0, fasting serum phosphorus lower than 0·97 mmol/L (3·0 mg/dL), confirmed PHEX (phosphate-regulating endopeptidase homolog, X-linked) mutation or variant of unknown significance in the patient or a family member with appropriate X-linked dominant inheritance, and receipt of conventional therapy for at least 6 consecutive months for children younger than 3 years or at least 12 consecutive months for children older than 3 years. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either subcutaneous burosumab starting at 0·8 mg/kg every 2 weeks (burosumab group) or conventional therapy prescribed by investigators (conventional therapy group). Both interventions lasted 64 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in rickets severity at week 40, assessed by the Radiographic Global Impression of Change global score. All patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the primary and safety analyses. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02915705. FINDINGS Recruitment took place between Aug 3, 2016, and May 8, 2017. Of 122 patients assessed, 61 were enrolled. Of these, 32 (18 girls, 14 boys) were randomly assigned to continue receiving conventional therapy and 29 (16 girls, 13 boys) to receive burosumab. For the primary endpoint at week 40, patients in the burosumab group had significantly greater improvement in Radiographic Global Impression of Change global score than did patients in the conventional therapy group (least squares mean +1·9 [SE 0·1] with burosumab vs +0·8 [0·1] with conventional therapy; difference 1·1, 95% CI 0·8-1·5; p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events considered possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment by the investigator occurred more frequently with burosumab (17 [59%] of 29 patients in the burosumab group vs seven [22%] of 32 patients in the conventional therapy group). Three serious adverse events occurred in each group, all considered unrelated to treatment and resolved. INTERPRETATION Significantly greater clinical improvements were shown in rickets severity, growth, and biochemistries among children with X-linked hypophosphataemia treated with burosumab compared with those continuing conventional therapy. FUNDING Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical and Kyowa Kirin International.
-
8.
A phase III randomized trial of gantenerumab in prodromal Alzheimer's disease.
Ostrowitzki, S, Lasser, RA, Dorflinger, E, Scheltens, P, Barkhof, F, Nikolcheva, T, Ashford, E, Retout, S, Hofmann, C, Delmar, P, et al
Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2017;(1):95
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gantenerumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds aggregated amyloid-β (Aβ) and removes Aβ plaques by Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis. In the SCarlet RoAD trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of gantenerumab in prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study, we investigated gantenerumab over 2 years. Patients were randomized to gantenerumab 105 mg or 225 mg or placebo every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 104 in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score. We evaluated treatment effects on cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (all patients) and amyloid positron emission tomography (substudy). A futility analysis was performed once 50% of patients completed 2 years of treatment. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose. RESULTS Of the 3089 patients screened, 797 were randomized. The study was halted early for futility; dosing was discontinued; and the study was unblinded. No differences between groups in the primary (least squares mean [95% CI] CDR-SB change from baseline 1.60 [1.28, 1.91], 1.69 [1.37, 2.01], and 1.73 [1.42, 2.04] for placebo, gantenerumab 105 mg, and gantenerumab 225 mg, respectively) or secondary clinical endpoints were observed. The incidence of generally asymptomatic amyloid-related imaging abnormalities increased in a dose- and APOE ε4 genotype-dependent manner. Exploratory analyses suggested a dose-dependent drug effect on clinical and biomarker endpoints. CONCLUSIONS The study was stopped early for futility, but dose-dependent effects observed in exploratory analyses on select clinical and biomarker endpoints suggest that higher dosing with gantenerumab may be necessary to achieve clinical efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01224106 . Registered on October 14, 2010.
-
9.
Safety and in vivo immune assessment of escalating doses of oral laquinimod in patients with RRMS.
Ziemssen, T, Tumani, H, Sehr, T, Thomas, K, Paul, F, Richter, N, Samara, E, Spiegelstein, O, Sorani, E, Bar-Ilan, O, et al
Journal of neuroinflammation. 2017;(1):172
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laquinimod is an oral immunomodulator in clinical development to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Laquinimod is in clinical development for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and Huntington Disease (HD). The objective of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and cytoimmunologic effects following escalating doses of laquinimod in patients with RRMS. METHODS One hundred twelve patients were randomly assigned to laquinimod/placebo in a series of separate dose-escalating cohorts starting from a daily oral dose of 0.9 mg/1.2 mg escalating to 2.7 mg, in 0.3 mg increments. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients received placebo and 84 received laquinimod ranging from 0.9 to 2.7 mg. No deaths occurred. One serious adverse event (SAE) of perichondritis was reported, which was unrelated to laquinimod (0.9 mg). There was no increased incidence of adverse events (AEs) with escalating doses. Laquinimod-treated patients showed more abnormal laboratory levels in liver enzymes, P-amylase, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen, but most shifts were clinically non-significant. The exposure of laquinimod was dose proportional and linear in the tested dose range. An immunological substudy showed significant dose-dependent decreases in 6-sulpho LacNAc + dendritic cell (slanDC) frequency following laquinimod compared to placebo. CONCLUSION Laquinimod doses up to 2.7 mg were safely administered to patients with RRMS. An in vivo effect of laquinimod on the innate immune system was demonstrated. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT Number: 2009-011234-99 . Registered 23 June 2009.
-
10.
Effects of pitavastatin and pravastatin on markers of immune activation and arterial inflammation in HIV.
Toribio, M, Fitch, KV, Sanchez, L, Burdo, TH, Williams, KC, Sponseller, CA, McCurdy Pate, M, Aberg, JA, Zanni, MV, Grinspoon, SK
AIDS (London, England). 2017;(6):797-806
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Persistent immune activation is thought to contribute to increased cardiovascular disease risk in HIV and statins may help modulate systemic immune activation. We aimed to compare the effects of two key statins on markers of systemic immune activation and arterial inflammation in the HIV population. DESIGN Double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group comparative trial performed in 45 sites. METHODS Two hundred and fifty-two antiretroviral therapy-treated HIV-infected participants with dyslipidemia were randomized (1 : 1) to pitavastatin 4 mg daily vs. pravastatin 40 mg daily in the HIV-infected patieNts and TREatment with PItavastatin vs. pravastatin for Dyslipidemia (INTREPID) trial. In this analysis of the INTREPID trial, we assessed markers of immune activation and arterial inflammation using a modified intent-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01301066). RESULTS One hundred and twenty-six participants were randomized to receive pitavastatin and 126 to pravastatin. Ninety-nine participants in the pitavastatin group and 91 participants in the pravastatin group completed the study. Median age was 50 (45, 56) years [median (interquartile range)]. Baseline, low-density lipoprotein-cholestrol (LDL-C) was 153 (135, 171) mg/dl, log HIV-1 viral load was 1.1 ± 0.2 copies/ml, and CD4 cell count was 580 (439, 794) cells/μl. At week 52, the pitavastatin group had a significantly greater reduction (% change) compared with pravastatin in soluble CD14 (sCD14), (-10.0 vs. 0.6%, P = 0.02), oxidized LDL (oxLDL) (-26.9 vs. -17.5%, P = 0.02), and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase 2 (Lp-PLA2) (-26.6 vs. -15.5%, P = 0.005) (pitavastatin vs. pravastatin). CONCLUSION Fifty-two weeks of pitavastatin 4 mg daily (vs. pravastatin 40 mg daily) led to a greater reduction in select markers of immune activation and arterial inflammation (sCD14, oxLDL, and LpPLA2) among HIV-infected participants. Further work is needed to assess whether immune-modulatory effects of pitavastatin reduce cardiovascular disease risk in HIV.