-
1.
Outcomes in relation to early parenteral nutrition use in preterm neonates born between 30 and 33 weeks' gestation: a propensity score matched observational study.
Webbe, JWH, Longford, N, Battersby, C, Oughham, K, Uthaya, SN, Modi, N, Gale, C
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 2022;(2):131-136
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether in preterm neonates parenteral nutrition use in the first 7 postnatal days, compared with no parenteral nutrition use, is associated with differences in survival and other important morbidities. Randomised trials in critically ill older children show that harms, such as nosocomial infection, outweigh benefits of early parenteral nutrition administration; there is a paucity of similar data in neonates. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using propensity matching including 35 maternal, infant and organisational factors to minimise bias and confounding. SETTING National, population-level clinical data obtained for all National Health Service neonatal units in England and Wales. PATIENTS Preterm neonates born between 30+0 and 32+6 weeks+days. INTERVENTIONS The exposure was parenteral nutrition administered in the first 7 days of postnatal life; the comparator was no parenteral nutrition. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was survival to discharge from neonatal care. Secondary outcomes comprised the neonatal core outcome set. RESULTS 16 292 neonates were compared in propensity score matched analyses. Compared with matched neonates not given parenteral nutrition in the first postnatal week, neonates who received parenteral nutrition had higher survival at discharge (absolute rate increase 0.91%; 95% CI 0.53% to 1.30%), but higher rates of necrotising enterocolitis (absolute rate increase 4.6%), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (absolute rate increase 3.9%), late-onset sepsis (absolute rate increase 1.5%) and need for surgical procedures (absolute rate increase 0.92%). CONCLUSIONS In neonates born between 30+0 and 32+6 weeks' gestation, those given parenteral nutrition in the first postnatal week had a higher rate of survival but higher rates of important neonatal morbidities. Clinician equipoise in this area should be resolved by prospective randomised trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03767634.
-
2.
Early versus later initiation of parenteral nutrition for very preterm infants: a propensity score-matched observational study.
Uthaya, S, Longford, N, Battersby, C, Oughham, K, Lanoue, J, Modi, N
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 2022;(2):137-142
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of timing of initiation of parenteral nutrition (PN) after birth in very preterm infants. DESIGN Propensity-matched analysis of data from the UK National Neonatal Research Database. PATIENTS 65 033 babies <31 weeks gestation admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales between 2008 and 2019. INTERVENTIONS PN initiated in the first 2 days (early) versus after the second postnatal day (late). Babies who died in the first 2 days without receiving PN were analysed as 'late'. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome measure was morbidity-free survival to discharge. The secondary outcomes were survival to discharge, growth and other core neonatal outcomes. FINDINGS No difference was found in the primary outcome (absolute rate difference (ARD) between early and late 0.50%, 95% CI -0.45 to 1.45, p=0.29). The early group had higher rates of survival to discharge (ARD 3.3%, 95% CI 2.7 to 3.8, p<0.001), late-onset sepsis (ARD 0.84%, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.2, p<0.001), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (ARD 1.24%, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.17, p=0.01), treated retinopathy of prematurity (ARD 0.50%, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.84, p<0.001), surgical procedures (ARD 0.80%, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.40, p=0.01) and greater drop in weight z-score between birth and discharge (absolute difference 0.019, 95% CI 0.003 to 0.035, p=0.02). Of 4.9% of babies who died in the first 2 days, 3.4% were in the late group and not exposed to PN. CONCLUSIONS Residual confounding and survival bias cannot be excluded and justify the need for a randomised controlled trial powered to detect differences in important functional outcomes.
-
3.
Clinical Results of the Implementation of a Breast Milk Bank in Premature Infants (under 37 Weeks) at the Hospital Universitario del Valle 2018-2020.
Torres-Muñoz, J, Jimenez-Fernandez, CA, Murillo-Alvarado, J, Torres-Figueroa, S, Castro, JP
Nutrients. 2021;(7)
Abstract
Breast milk is widely recognized as the best source of nutrition for both full term and premature babies. We aimed to identify clinical results of the implementation of a breast milk bank for premature infants under 37 weeks in a level III hospital. 722 neonates under 37 weeks, hospitalized in the Neonatal intensive care unit (ICU), who received human breast milk from the institution's milk bank 57% (n = 412) vs. mixed or artificial 32% (n = 229), at day 7 of life. An exploratory data analysis was carried out. Measures of central tendency and dispersion were used, strength of association of odds ratio (OR) and its confidence intervals (95% confidence interval (CI)). 88.5% had already received human milk before day 7 of life. Those who received human milk, due to their clinical condition, had 4 times a greater chance of being intubated (OR 4.05; 95% CI 1.80-9.11). Starting before day 7 of life decreases the opportunity to develop necrotizing enterocolitis by 82% (adjusted odds ratio (ORa) 0.18; 95% CI 0.03-0.97), intraventricular hemorrhage by 85% (ORa 0.15; 95% CI 0.06-0.45) and sepsis by 77% (ORa 0.23; 95% CI 0.15-0.33). Receiving human milk reduces the probability of complications related to prematurity, evidencing the importance that breast milk banks play in clinical practice.
-
4.
Preventing Brain Injury in the Preterm Infant-Current Controversies and Potential Therapies.
Yates, N, Gunn, AJ, Bennet, L, Dhillon, SK, Davidson, JO
International journal of molecular sciences. 2021;(4)
Abstract
Preterm birth is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality including brain damage and cerebral palsy. The development of brain injury in the preterm infant may be influenced by many factors including perinatal asphyxia, infection/inflammation, chronic hypoxia and exposure to treatments such as mechanical ventilation and corticosteroids. There are currently very limited treatment options available. In clinical trials, magnesium sulfate has been associated with a small, significant reduction in the risk of cerebral palsy and gross motor dysfunction in early childhood but no effect on the combined outcome of death or disability, and longer-term follow up to date has not shown improved neurological outcomes in school-age children. Recombinant erythropoietin has shown neuroprotective potential in preclinical studies but two large randomized trials, in extremely preterm infants, of treatment started within 24 or 48 h of birth showed no effect on the risk of severe neurodevelopmental impairment or death at 2 years of age. Preclinical studies have highlighted a number of promising neuroprotective treatments, such as therapeutic hypothermia, melatonin, human amnion epithelial cells, umbilical cord blood and vitamin D supplementation, which may be useful at reducing brain damage in preterm infants. Moreover, refinements of clinical care of preterm infants have the potential to influence later neurological outcomes, including the administration of antenatal and postnatal corticosteroids and more accurate identification and targeted treatment of seizures.
-
5.
Using Nature to Nurture: Breast Milk Analysis and Fortification to Improve Growth and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants.
Ottolini, KM, Schulz, EV, Limperopoulos, C, Andescavage, N
Nutrients. 2021;(12)
Abstract
Premature infants are born prior to a critical window of rapid placental nutrient transfer and fetal growth-particularly brain development-that occurs during the third trimester of pregnancy. Subsequently, a large proportion of preterm neonates experience extrauterine growth failure and associated neurodevelopmental impairments. Human milk (maternal or donor breast milk) is the recommended source of enteral nutrition for preterm infants, but requires additional fortification of macronutrient, micronutrient, and energy content to meet the nutritional demands of the preterm infant in attempts at replicating in utero nutrient accretion and growth rates. Traditional standardized fortification practices that add a fixed amount of multicomponent fortifier based on assumed breast milk composition do not take into account the considerable variations in breast milk content or individual neonatal metabolism. Emerging methods of individualized fortification-including targeted and adjusted fortification-show promise in improving postnatal growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.
-
6.
The Use of Postnatal Weight Gain Algorithms to Predict Severe or Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Athikarisamy, S, Desai, S, Patole, S, Rao, S, Simmer, K, Lam, GC
JAMA network open. 2021;(11):e2135879
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The currently recommended method for screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, which requires frequent eye examinations entailing a heavy clinical workload. Weight gain-based algorithms have the potential to minimize the need for binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and have been evaluated in different setups with variable results to predict type 1 or severe ROP. OBJECTIVE To synthesize evidence regarding the ability of postnatal weight gain-based algorithms to predict type 1 or severe ROP. DATA SOURCES PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies published between January 2000 and August 2021. STUDY SELECTION Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the ability of these algorithms to predict type 1 or severe ROP were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently extracted data. This meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane guidelines and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Ability of algorithms to predict type 1 or sever ROP was measured using statistical indices (pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, as well as pooled negative likelihood ratios and positive likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios). RESULTS A total of 61 studies (>37 000 infants) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.92) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.51-0.63) for WINROP (Weight, IGF-1 [insulinlike growth factor 1], Neonatal, ROP), 1.00 (95% CI, 0.88-1.00) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.15-0.93) for G-ROP (Postnatal Growth and ROP), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.71-0.99) and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.36-0.68) for CHOP ROP (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia ROP), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.73-1.00) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.03-0.74) for ROPScore, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.22-0.51) for CO-ROP (Colorado ROP). The original PINT (Premature Infants in Need of Transfusion) ROP study reported a sensitivity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.91-0.99) and a specificity of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.30-0.42). The pooled negative likelihood ratios were 0.19 (95% CI, 0.13-0.27) for WINROP, 0.0 (95% CI, 0.00-0.32) for G-ROP, 0.10 (95% CI, 0.02-0.53) for CHOP ROP, 0.03 (95% CI, 0.00-0.77) for ROPScore, and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.16) for CO-ROP. The pooled positive likelihood ratios were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-2.4) for WINROP, 2.5 (95% CI, 0.7-9.1) for G-ROP, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.6) for CHOP ROP, 1.9 (95% CI, 1.1-3.3) for ROPScore, and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2-1.9) for CO-ROP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study suggests that weight gain-based algorithms have adequate sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios to provide reasonable certainty in ruling out type 1 ROP or severe ROP. Given the implications of missing even a single case of severe ROP, algorithms with very high sensitivity (close to 100%) and low negative likelihood ratios (close to zero) need to be chosen to safely reduce the number of unnecessary examinations in infants at lower risk of severe ROP.
-
7.
Early Enteral Feeding Improves Tolerance of Parenteral Nutrition in Preterm Newborns.
Boscarino, G, Conti, MG, Di Chiara, M, Bianchi, M, Onestà, E, Faccioli, F, Deli, G, Repole, P, Oliva, S, Cresi, F, et al
Nutrients. 2021;(11)
Abstract
(1) Background: The tolerance of preterm newborns for the high nutritional intakes given by parenteral nutrition (PN) is still debated because of the risk of metabolic complications. Despite enteral nutrition (EN) being the preferred route of nutrition, an exclusive enteral feeding is not always possible, as in preterm newborns, the gut is immature and less tolerant of EN. We aimed to study the impact of a minimal enteral feeding (MEF) on the possible early metabolic complications of PN in a cohort of preterms with gestational age at birth GA ≤ 29 + 6/7 weeks of postmenstrual age. (2) Methods: We divided the study sample in two cohorts: 1) Late-Feeding (cohort 1), newborns who received MEF starting from the 8th day of age, and (2) Early-Feeding (cohort 2), newborns who received MEF, consisting of the administration of at least 4-5 mL/kg/day by the enteral route, in the first 7 days of age. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of at least one metabolic complication, including hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, or metabolic acidosis. (3) Results: We enrolled 80 newborns (Late-Feeding cohort 51 vs. Early-Feeding cohort 29). The rate of all metabolic complications was statistically higher in the Late-Feeding cohort compared to the Early-Feeding cohort. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that late administration of MEF negatively influenced the rate of all metabolic complications. (4) Conclusions: Early minimal administration of EN is associated with less frequent PN-related metabolic side effects and a higher rate of survival in critically ill newborns.
-
8.
Lactoferrin Supplementation to Prevent Late-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis.
Razak, A, Hussain, A
American journal of perinatology. 2021;(3):283-290
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the role of lactoferrin supplementation to prevent late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN Database search include PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane central for randomized clinical trial (RCTs). The Cochrane Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology was used for summarizing the results. RESULTS Ten RCTs involving 3,679 infants were included. Lactoferrin supplementation with or without probiotics decreased all LOS (relative risk [RR]: 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.86; I 2 = 58%; 10 studies; 3,470 subjects; level of evidence [LOE]: low) significantly. Similarly, lactoferrin supplementation without probiotics decreased all LOS (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.29-0.62; I 2 = 0%; 8 studies; 1,209 subjects; LOE: moderate) significantly. Lactoferrin supplementation did not significantly reduce necrotizing enterocolitis (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.29-1.33; I 2 = 43%; 6 studies; 3,079 subjects; LOE: low), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.36-1.53; I 2 = 53%; 8 studies; 3,395 subjects; LOE: very low), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR: 1; 95% CI: 0.90-1.13; I 2 = 0%; 4 studies; 2,570 subjects; LOE: moderate), and threshold retinopathy of prematurity eligible for surgical treatment (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.25-1.51; I 2 = 74%; 2 studies; 2,481 subjects; LOE: very low). CONCLUSION Low to moderate quality evidence suggests that lactoferrin supplementation reduces LOS in preterm infants. Further research is needed to improve the certainty in the evidence.
-
9.
Caffeine for preterm infants: Fixed standard dose, adjustments for age or high dose?
Saroha, V, Patel, RM
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine. 2020;(6):101178
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Caffeine is an effective treatment for apnea of prematurity and has several important benefits, including decreasing respiratory morbidity and motor impairment. In this article, we focus on the dose of caffeine. We review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of standard caffeine dosing and alternative dosing approaches, including the use of high dose caffeine and routine dose adjustments for age. Current evidence suggests high dose caffeine may provide additional benefit in reducing the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and extubation failure, but may also increase the risk of cerebellar hemorrhage and seizures. Increasing the standard caffeine citrate dose every 1-2 weeks to a goal dose of 8 mg per kilogram every 24 h may help maintain therapeutic effect. We conclude by highlighting the need for additional trials before high dose caffeine is routinely used.
-
10.
When to start and stop caffeine and why respiratory status matters.
Davis, PG
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine. 2020;(6):101175
Abstract
Caffeine as tested in the CAP trial is safe and effective for preterm infants with birthweights less than 1250 g. Evidence for its use beyond the indications and timing used in this trial is of low quality and conflicting. Some studies suggest that earlier use of caffeine increases the risk of mortality while others suggest it has important benefits. It appears that infants with apnea of prematurity and those receiving assisted ventilation are the most likely to benefit from caffeine. Based on currently available evidence, routine early prescription of caffeine does not appear to be indicated. Infants continue to have potentially damaging episodes of hypoxia secondary to apnea beyond 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. It is unclear whether prolonged use of caffeine improves outcomes in these infants. Randomized trials to resolve these uncertainties are required. They need to be large, at least the size of the CAP trial, and include neurodevelopmental outcomes.