1.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Utilization of Ethanol Locks in Pediatric Patients With Intestinal Failure.
Rahhal, R, Abu-El-Haija, MA, Fei, L, Ebach, D, Orkin, S, Kiscaden, E, Cole, CR
JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. 2018;(4):690-701
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal failure is a chronic condition related to loss of bowel length and/or function, resulting in dependence on central venous catheters for fluids and nutrition. Catheter use can be associated with significant complications, including catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), which can lead to loss of vascular access, advancing intestinal failure associated-liver disease and death. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ethanol locks as compared with standard heparin locks in pediatric intestinal failure. METHODS Databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched until March 2017. Titles and abstracts were reviewed independently and relevant articles reassessed by full-text review. The main outcome was the rate of CRBSIs, while secondary outcomes were catheter replacement and repair. RESULTS Nine observational studies were included. The mean difference in rate of CRBSIs was 6.27 per 1000 catheter days (95% CI, 4.89-7.66) favoring ethanol locks, with a 63% overall reduction in infection rate. The mean difference in catheter replacement rate (per 1000 catheter days) was 4.56 (95% Cl, 2.68-6.43) favoring ethanol locks. The overall effect on catheter repair rate (per 1000 catheter days) was -1.67 (95% CI, -2.30 to -1.05), indicating lower repair rate with heparin locks. CONCLUSION Sufficient evidence was noted showing that ethanol locks reduced CRBSIs and catheter replacements. Our findings raise questions about the effect of the ethanol lock on catheter integrity based on the noted increase in repair rate. This requires further prospective evaluation and may support selective application of ethanol locks to patients with documented CRBSIs.
2.
Systematic review and meta-analysis: is bowel preparation still necessary in small bowel capsule endoscopy?
Yung, DE, Rondonotti, E, Sykes, C, Pennazio, M, Plevris, JN, Koulaouzidis, A
Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2017;(10):979-993
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Optimal bowel preparation for small bowel capsule endoscopy(SBCE) is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of laxatives in SBCE. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies investigating the use of laxatives in SBCE. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield(DY) for SB findings; secondary outcomes SB visualization quality(SBVQ) and completion rate(CR). Pooled odds ratios(ORs) with 95% confidence intervals(CIs) and number needed to treat(NNT) were calculated. RESULTS Forty studies (4380 patients with laxatives, 2185 without) were included. Laxative use did not improve DY of SB findings overall (OR 1.11 (95%CI 0.85-1.44)) or for significant SB findings (OR 1.10 (95%CI 0.76-1.60)). However, SBVQ improved with the use of laxatives (OR 1.60 (95%CI 1.08-2.06)), NNT 14. The OR for completed SBCE was 1.30 (95%CI 0.95-1.78). Patients given polyethylene glycol(PEG) had lower DY than sodium phosphate(NaP). SBVQ improved more with NaP (NNT 7) than PEG (NNT 53). CONCLUSIONS Laxatives do not significantly improve DY or CR in SBCE, but do improve SBQV. The use of laxatives may be beneficial in patients likely to have subtle findings. There are significant differences in methodology/definitions between studies, hence the need for standardized visualization scoring and recording of SBCE findings.
3.
Single versus double balloon enteroscopy for small bowel diagnostics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lipka, S, Rabbanifard, R, Kumar, A, Brady, P
Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2015;(3):177-84
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) are 2 types of commonly used balloon-assisted enteroscopic techniques for "deep enteroscopy." Although there are several randomized controlled trials assessing the superiority of DBE compared with SBE, the results from individual randomized controlled trials seem conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of DBE compared with SBE. METHODS Primary outcomes were diagnostic and therapeutic yield. Secondary outcomes were failure rates, adverse events, complete enteroscopy, anterograde/retrograde insertion depths, and procedure times. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception until February 28, 2014, as well as other databases. For quality assurance purposes throughout the systematic review process, dual extraction was performed. The systematic review was performed as per the standards of Cochrane collaboration. RESULTS Four trials enrolling a total of 375 patients were included. DBE did not offer an advantage over SBE in therapeutic yield [risk ratio (RR), 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90, 1.37; P=0.33)] or diagnostic yield (RR=1.08; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.32; P=0.42), failure rates (RR=0.68; 95% CI: 0.23, 2.05; P=0.5), overall adverse events (RR=1.41; 95% CI: 0.32, 6.3; P=0.65), or complete enteroscopy rates (RR=1.73; 95% CI: 0.86, 3.48; P=0.12). No evidence existed for an advantage of anterograde or retrograde procedure time between these 2 modalities [mean difference (MD), 3.78; 95% CI, -30.76, 38.32; P=0.83; and MD, -0.53; 95% CI: -7.66, 6.59; P=0.88, respectively]. Neither anterograde nor retrograde insertion depths appeared to differ between the 2 studies analyzed (MD, -7.36; 95% CI: -40.36, 25.64; P=0.66 and MD, 7.86; 95% CI: -12.68, 28.40; P=0.45, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Performance of SBE and DBE appears to be similar in terms of diagnostic/therapeutic yield, insertion depths, procedure time, complete enteroscopy, failure rates, or adverse events.
4.
Ethanol locks to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections in parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis.
Oliveira, C, Nasr, A, Brindle, M, Wales, PW
Pediatrics. 2012;(2):318-29
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with pediatric intestinal failure (IF) depend on parenteral nutrition for growth and survival, but are at risk for complications, such as catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). CRBSI prevention is crucial, as sepsis is an important cause of IF-associated liver disease and mortality. We aim to estimate the pooled effectiveness and safety of ethanol locks (ELs) in comparison with heparin locks (HLs) with regard to CRBSI rate and catheter replacements for pediatric IF patients with chronic parenteral nutrition dependence. METHODS A systematic review without language restriction was performed on Medline (1948-2010), Embase (1980-2010), and conference programs and trial registries up to December 2010. Search terms included "Catheter-Related Infections," "Catheter," "Catheters, Indwelling," "alcohol," "ethanol," and "lock." Two authors identified 4 retrospective studies for the pediatric IF population. Double, independent data extraction using predefined data fields and risk of bias assessment (Newcastle-Ottawa scale) was performed. RESULTS In comparison with HLs, ELs reduced the CRBSI-rate per 1000 catheter days by 7.67 events and catheter replacements by 5.07. EL therapy decreased the CRBSI rate by 81% and replacements by 72%. One hundred eight to 150 catheter days of EL exposure were necessary to prevent 1 CRBSI and 122 to 689 days of exposure avoided 1 catheter replacement. Adverse events were rare and included thrombotic events. CONCLUSIONS In pediatric patients with IF, EL is a more effective alternative to HL. Adverse events include thrombotic events.