0
selected
-
1.
Effect of Nasogastric Tube on Aspiration Risk: Results from 147 Patients with Dysphagia and Literature Review.
Kim, G, Baek, S, Park, HW, Kang, EK, Lee, G
Dysphagia. 2018;(6):731-738
Abstract
Nasogastric tube (NGT) is a common feeding strategy for patients at risk of endotracheal aspiration with an oral diet. With NGT feeding, however, swallowing of small amounts saliva cannot be avoided. We investigated whether the aspiration rate when swallowing 1 mL of fluid increased in patients using an NGT in different dysphagia severities. One hundred forty-seven patients who had been receiving NGT feeding underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). During VFSS, subjects were offered 1 mL of fluid twice: initially, with the tube inserted (NGT-in) and, subsequently, with the tube removed (NGT-out). Aspiration depth was determined using the 8-point Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) (0 points, no aspiration/penetration; 8 points, aspiration passing the vocal cords with no ejection efforts). PAS-diff was computed (PASNGT-in - PASNGT-out), and a positive PAS-diff (PAS-diff > 0) meant increased aspiration depth in the presence of NGT. After VFSS, diet recommendations were made according to dysphagia severity assessment: non-oral feeding (n = 59), diet modification (n = 74), and diet as tolerated (n = 13). Cognitive level (mini-mental state examination, MMSE) and general functional level (Modified Barthel Index, MBI) were compared between the PAS-diff > 0 and PAS-diff ≤ 0 groups. Aspiration severity did not significantly change after NGT removal (PASNGT-in, 2.45 ± 2.40; PASNGT-out, 2.57 ± 2.58; P = .50). Regardless of recommended diet, PAS-diff values were not significantly different (P = .49). MMSE and MBI were not significantly different (P = .23 and .94) between subjects with PAS-diff > 0 (n = 25) and PAS-diff ≤ 0 (n = 121). In conclusion, the risk of aspirating a small amount of fluid was not significantly different before and after NGT removal, regardless of swallowing function, cognitive level, or general functional level.
-
2.
Complications Associated With Nasogastric Tube Placement in the Acute Phase of Stroke: A Systematic Review.
Nascimento, A, Carvalho, M, Nogueira, J, Abreu, P, Nzwalo, H
The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2018;(4):193-198
Abstract
This systematic review explores the frequency of complications associated with nasogastric tube (NGT) placement in patients with acute stroke. The unique condition of the dysphasic, immobile, confused immunosuppressed patient who has had an acute stroke hampers any consistent inference from other neurological or nonneurological condition in which NGT placement is used. Twelve studies including 921 patients fed by NGT in the acute phase (first 4 weeks) were included in the analysis. The overall quality of the included studies was good. The main limitation was the heterogeneity and small size of most studies. The occurrence of NGT placement failure and malposition, hypoxemia, and regurgitation was addressed in the selected studies. Recurrent NGT dislodgement and a combination of tube dislodgement and blockage of the tube were the main reasons for NGT placement failure. In the absence of chronic hypoxemic pulmonary or cardiac disorders, NGT feeding was not associated with clinically significant hypoxemia in patients who have had an acute stroke. Data are scarce on the topic. Research about the frequency of local and systemic NGT complications and strategies for prevention will certainly contribute to enhance evidence-based management of dysphagia in acute stroke.
-
3.
Nutritional considerations in the care of conjoined twins.
Bergner, EM, Gollins, L, Massieu, LA, Hurst, N, Hair, AB
Seminars in perinatology. 2018;(6):355-360
Abstract
Conjoined twins represent an interesting nutritional challenge as nutrient delivery and absorption is greatly affected by anatomy and, therefore, unique to each twin pair. Nutritional support is essential to optimize growth and development in the neonatal period; however, very little data exists on the topic in this population. Conjoined twins require individualized nutritional assessment that focuses on the interaction between the metabolic rate, nutrient uptake, and nutrient delivery of each twin in the dyad. This report describes one center's experience with monitoring growth, establishing nutrient requirements, and determining substrate utilization in three sets of conjoined twins.
-
4.
Risk of tumor implantation in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the upper aerodigestive tumors.
Vincenzi, F, De Caro, G, Gaiani, F, Fornaroli, F, Minelli, R, Leandro, G, Di Mario, F, De' Angelis, GL
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis. 2018;(8-S):117-121
Abstract
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has become a mainstay in providing enteral access for patients with obstructive head, neck and esophageal tumors. Tumor cell implantation is a rare complication in patients with aerodigestive cancers, who have undergone PEG tube placement. The objective of this review is to determine the incidence and contributing risk factors leading to the implantation of metastases into the abdominal wall following PEG placement. A comprehensive review of the literature in PUBMED (2008-2018) was performed. The literature search revealed reports of more than 50 cases of abdominal wall metastases after PEG placement. As most of these studies were case reports, the exact rate of metastasis remains unknown. Generally pharyngoesophageal location of primary cancer (100%), squamous cell histology (98%), poorly differentiated tumor cells (92%), advanced pathological stage (97%), and large primary cancer size were identified as strong risk factors for the development of stomal metastasis. Abdominal wall metastases following PEG placement are a rare but serious complication in patients with head and neck malignancy.
-
5.
Review of the Effectiveness of Enteral Feeding in Pediatric Oncology Patients [Formula: see text].
Trimpe, K, Shaw, MR, Wilson, M, Haberman, MR
Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses. 2017;(6):439-445
Abstract
Enteral supplementation for nutritional support in pediatric oncology patients remains nonstandardized across institutions and between providers. Pediatric oncology patients frequently fail to meet their growth curve percentiles, lose weight, and/or are malnourished due to both the oncologic process as well as side effects from chemotherapy and radiation treatments. Methods of increasing weight include enteral feeding (nasogastric, nasoduodenal/jejunal, or gastrostomy), parenteral intravenous feeding, and oral supplementation. Indications for feeding and feeding protocols are highly variable, in part due to parental and familial choices, and in part due to the lack of guidelines available for providers. This article provides a comprehensive literature review of 8 published studies regarding the effectiveness and safety of enteral feeding in maintaining or increasing weight in pediatric oncology patients to help inform practice. The review concludes that enteral feeding in pediatric oncology patients is an effective and safe method to affect weight positively. However, further research is needed for developing treatment guidelines, including establishing a timeline for initiation of feeding, and determining which patients are most likely to benefit from enteral feeding.
-
6.
Administering Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Solution Via a Nasogastric Tube: Pulmonary Complications.
Metheny, NA, Meert, KL
American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. 2017;(2):e11-e17
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients sometimes require insertion of a nasogastric tube for the administration of a large volume of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution. If the tube is malpositioned, the risk for direct instillation of the solution into the lung increases. The risk for aspiration also increases if the infusion rate exceeds gastrointestinal tolerance. PURPOSE To review published cases of patients' experiencing adverse pulmonary events after administration of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution via a nasogastric tube and to offer suggestions to prevent these outcomes. METHODS A search of the literature from 1993 through 2014 was performed by using the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus databases. RESULTS In the 12 case reports located, none of the patients had radiographs to verify tube location before infusion of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution. After symptoms developed in 3 children (ages 8-11 years), radiographs showed their tubes incorrectly positioned in the bronchus, lung, or esophagus; ports of a fourth child's tube were in the oropharynx. The remaining 8 patients (ages 5-86 years) never had radiographs to determine tube placement. Pulmonary complications from the infusions of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution contributed to the death of 5 of the patients. CONCLUSION Relatively simple maneuvers to reduce the likelihood of adverse pulmonary events following the administration of large volumes of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution via a nasogastric tube are well worth the cost and effort to protect patients from potential serious injury.
-
7.
Nasogastric Tube Placement in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.
Lyman, B
Critical care nurse. 2017;(6):86-87
-
8.
Primary laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy tubes as a feeding modality in the pediatric population.
Onwubiko, C, Weil, BR, Bairdain, S, Hall, AM, Perkins, JM, Thangarajah, H, McSweeney, ME, Smithers, CJ
Journal of pediatric surgery. 2017;(9):1421-1425
Abstract
PURPOSE Outcomes associated with primary laparoscopic gastrojejunal (GJ) tube placement in the pediatric population were evaluated. METHODS A single-institution, retrospective review examined patients undergoing laparoscopic GJ tube placement between June 2011 and December 2014. Outcomes included gastric feeding tolerance, subsequent fundoplication, complications, and mortality. RESULTS Ninety laparoscopic GJ tubes were placed. Median follow-up was 342days (interquartile range [IQR]=141-561days). Median patient age was 5months (IQR=3-11months) and weight was 5.2kg (IQR=4-8.4kg). The most common indications for placement were gastroesophageal reflux (n=85, 94.4%) and/or aspiration (n=40, 44.4%). Most common comorbidities included cardiac (n=34, 37.8%) and respiratory (n=29, 32.2%) diseases. The complication rate was 17.8%, including one case of intestinal perforation. Thirty-four (37.7%) patients transitioned to gastric feeding within 1year; time to conversion was 156days (IQR=117-210days); of those, 18.9% patients transitioned to oral feedings. A fundoplication was later performed in 4 children for persistent reflux. Mortality was 23.3% with no procedural-related deaths. CONCLUSION Primary laparoscopically placed GJ tubes are a reliable means of enteral access for pediatric patients with gastric feeding intolerance. Many of these children are successfully transitioned to gastric and/or oral feedings over time. Further studies are needed to characterize which patients are best served with a GJ tube versus alternatives such as fundoplication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III (treatment) TYPE OF STUDY Retrospective.
-
9.
Methods to determine the internal length of nasogastric feeding tubes: An integrative review.
Santos, SC, Woith, W, Freitas, MI, Zeferino, EB
International journal of nursing studies. 2016;:95-103
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Improper placement of nasogastric tube used for feeding may lead to serious complications, including death of the patient. There are several different methods used to determine the appropriate length of nasogastric tube for optimal placement in adults. This integrative review of the literature was designed to identify the most accurate method to determine the internal length of nasogastric feeding tube in adults. DESIGN An integrative review of the research literature (1979-2015) using the population-intervention-comparison-outcomes strategy. DATA SOURCES The literature search included the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs, PubMed (MEDLINE), SCOPUS, and Web of Science electronic databases. REVIEW METHODS Two researchers evaluated the literature to determine if an article met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Strength of the Evidence critical appraisal tool. RESULTS Twenty studies, published between 1979 and 2014, met inclusion criteria. Of these, nine articles were expert opinion, seven were original research, three were review articles, and one was a guideline. Despite seven original research papers being found, only five reports were about the methods to determine the internal length of nasogastric feeding tube in adults. The literature suggests that four different methods for measuring the tube length are likely to result in proper placement of the tip of the tube in the stomach and all side ports inside it: [nose-to-ear-to-xiphisternum - 50]cm/2+50cm]; [gender-weight and nose-umbilicus-flat]; [xiphisternum-to-ear-to-nose+10cm]; [earlobe to xiphisternum to umbilicus - tip of the nose to earlobe]. Four studies found nose-to-ear-to-xiphisternum was most likely to result in a tube that is positioned incorrectly, either ending in the esophagus, in the stomach but too close to the esophagus, or too far into the stomach or duodenum. CONCLUSIONS The nose-to-ear-to-xiphisternum and Hanson method should no longer be taught in nursing programs or used in practice by the nurse. The [gender-weight and nose-umbilicus-flat] method has been shown to be safer.
-
10.
Gastric Versus Small Bowel Feeding in Critically Ill Adults.
Schlein, K
Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2016;(4):514-22
Abstract
Critically ill patients often require enteral feedings as a primary supply of nutrition. Whether enteral nutrition (EN) should be delivered as a gastric versus small bowel feeding in the critically ill patient population remains a contentious topic. The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM)/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), the European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN), and the Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines (CCPG) are not in consensus on this topic. No research to date demonstrates a significant difference between the two feeding routes in terms of patient mortality, ventilator days, or length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU); however, studies provide some evidence that there may be other benefits to using a small bowel feeding route in critically ill patients. The purpose of this paper is to examine both sides of this debate and review advantages and disadvantages of both small bowel and gastric routes of EN. Practical issues and challenges to small bowel feeding tube placement are also addressed. Finally, recommendations are provided to help guide the clinician when selecting a feeding route, and suggestions are made for future research.