1.
Association of circulating manganese levels with Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis.
Du, K, Liu, MY, Pan, YZ, Zhong, X, Wei, MJ
Neuroscience letters. 2018;:92-98
Abstract
Whether systemic manganese (Mn) dysfunctions in Parkinson's Disease (PD) is still under ongoing debate. The recent reported studies on the circulating Mn levels in PD showed inconsistent results. A meta-analysis study was conducted to evaluate the association of circulating Mn levels with PD, and to clarify whether Mn should be considered as a potential risk factor for PD. A systematic searching was performed based on PubMed, web of science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Finally, 22 studies were identified, involving 637 PD patients and 802 health controls (HC) individuals for serum Mn, 1258 PD patients and 1304 HC individuals for peripheral blood Mn, and 195 PD patients and 196 HC individuals for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Mn. Forest plots were adopted to represent the comparison of the groups by assessing standardized mean difference with random effects model. This meta-analysis revealed a significantly increased serum Mn levels in PD patients (SMD=0.78; 95% CI [0.32, 1.24]; P=0.001), and it was further confirmed when serum, plasma and whole blood studies were analyzed together (SMD=0.58; 95% CI [0.25, 0.91]; P=0.001). Instead, no significant differences of CSF Mn were observed between PD patients and HC individuals (SMD=-0.09; 95% CI [-0.47, 0.29]; P=0.644). These results supported the notion that elevated Mn level should be a potential risk factor for PD, although the high heterogeneity and methodological limitations recommended caution in the interpretations for the present findings.
2.
[Protons and ions in the treatment of cancer; a systematic review of the literature].
Pijls-Johannesma, MC, de Ruysscher, DK, Dekker, AL, Lambin, P
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2006;(44):2435-41
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the present role of proton and ion therapy, also referred to as 'charged particle therapy', in the treatment of cancer. DESIGN Systematic literature study. METHOD Systematic electronic searches were carried out in 12 databases according to the Cochrane Collaboration criteria, without restriction as to year of publication or study design. Manual searches of bibliographies and journals were also performed. The inclusion criteria were: at least 20 patients and a follow-up of at least 2 years. In addition, experts on the subject were consulted by correspondence for their opinion. RESULTS The search identified 36 relevant articles on proton therapy and 15 on ion therapy. Based on prospective and retrospective studies, proton irradiation emerged as the treatment of choice for ocular tumours, chordomas and skull-base tumours. For prostate cancer, the results were comparable with the best results of photon therapy. Ion therapy was still in an experimental phase. CONCLUSION According to the current literature, proton therapy is looked upon as the preferred treatment modality for certain rare tumours, such as ocular tumours, chordoma, and skull-base tumours. However, charged particle therapy as a whole, and especially ion therapy, is not supported as the treatment of choice for cancer by published evidence. Nevertheless, the potential theoretical benefit of this treatment is great.