1.
The effect of running on knee joint cartilage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dong, X, Li, C, Liu, J, Huang, P, Jiang, G, Zhang, M, Zhang, W, Zhang, X
Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine. 2021;:147-155
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although running causes inevitable stress to the joints, data regarding its effect on the cartilage of the knee are conflicting. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of running on knee joint cartilage. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, SportDiscus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. The outcome indicators were cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), cartilage volume and thickness, and T2. RESULTS A total of two RCTs and 13 cohort studies were included. There was no significant difference in cartilage volume between the running and control groups (MD, -115.88 U/I; 95% CI, -320.03 to 88.27; p = 0.27). However, running would decrease cartilage thickness (MD, -0.09 mm; 95%CI, -0.18 to -0.01; p = 0.03) and T2 (MD, -2.78 ms; 95% CI, -4.12 to -1.45; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that COMP immediately or at 0.5 h after running was significantly increased, but there were no significant changes at 1 h or 2 h. CONCLUSIONS Running has advantages in promoting nutrition penetrating into the cartilage as well as squeezing out the metabolic substance, such as water. Our study found that running had a short-term adverse effect on COMP and did not affect cartilage volume or thickness.
2.
A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mud-bath therapy on knee osteoarthritis.
Mennuni, G, Fontana, M, Perricone, C, Nocchi, S, Rosso, R, Ceccarelli, F, Fraioli, A
La Clinica terapeutica. 2021;(4):372-387
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Osteoarthritis (OA) results from loss of cartilage in-tegrity in association with changes to the structure of the entire joint. Treatment of OA is based on different pharmaceutical and no phar-maceutical approaches and the latter include the use of spa-therapy. The biological effects of mud-bath therapy are mainly secondary to heat stimulation and to physic-chemical properties of mineral waters and mud-packs. Mud-bath therapy likely exerts its effects modulating several cytokines and other molecules involved in inflammation and cartilage degradation. Our aim was to perform an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the mud-bath therapy on knee osteoarthritis and briefly to discuss the mechanisms of action of this treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A MEDLINE on PubMed for articles on knee OA and spa therapy published from 1995 through up to April 2019 was performed. Then, we checked the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to find additional references included up to April 2019. Articles were included if in accordance with the eligibility cri-teria. Sample size and effect sizes were processed with the MedCalc software package. RESULTS Twenty one studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in meta-analysis. We examined WOMAC Index and VAS pain. We found significant improvements in function scores and painful symptoms after mud-bath therapy in patients with knee joint osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS Spa therapy is a non-drug treatment modalities, non invasive, complication-free, and cost-effective alternative modality for the conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis. It cannot substitute for conventional therapy but can integrated or alternated to it. Treatment with mud-bath therapy may relieve pain, stiffness and improve functio-nal status in patients with knee OA.
3.
Influence of Ketorolac Supplementation on Pain Control for Knee Arthroscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Wan, RJ, Liu, SF, Kuang, ZP, Ran, Q, Zhao, C, Huang, W
Orthopaedic surgery. 2020;(1):31-37
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The efficacy of ketorolac supplementation on pain control for knee arthroscopy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of ketorolac supplementation on pain intensity after knee arthroscopy. METHODS We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through September 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of ketorolac supplementation vs placebo on pain management after knee arthroscopy. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model. RESULTS Ten RCTs involving 402 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for knee arthroscopy, ketorolac supplementation is associated with notably reduced pain scores at 1 h (MD = -0.66; 95% CI = -1.12 to -0.21; P = 0.004) and 2 h (MD = -0.90; 95% CI = -1.74 to -0.07; P = 0.03), prolonged time for first analgesic requirement (MD = 1.94; 95% CI = 0.33 to 3.55; P = 0.02) and decreased number of analgesic requirement (RR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.75; P = 0.003), but has no obvious impact on analgesic consumption (MD = -0.56; 95% CI = -1.14 to 0.02; P = 0.06), as well as nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.21; P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS Ketorolac supplementation is effective to produce pain relief for knee arthroscopy.