-
1.
Panretinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy in the RIDE and RISE Trials: Not "1 and Done".
Gonzalez, VH, Wang, PW, Ruiz, CQ
Ophthalmology. 2021;(10):1448-1457
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatment and re-treatment patterns in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 RIDE (clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00473382) and RISE (clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00473330) clinical trials of ranibizumab for the treatment of DME. PARTICIPANTS Seven hundred fifty-nine patients were randomized for treatment. METHODS Panretinal photocoagulation treatment patterns and clinical experiences were assessed by baseline PRP treatment status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number and timing of on-study PRP treatment sessions undergone through month 24. Time to new proliferative event (composite end point) was also assessed. RESULTS At baseline, approximately 25% of patients in RIDE and RISE had undergone PRP treatment before enrollment (22.2%, 24.4%, and 25.4% of patients in the sham, ranibizumab 0.3 mg, and ranibizumab 0.5 mg arms, respectively). In patients without prior PRP at baseline (n = 577), 9.5% of sham-treated patients underwent 1 or more PRP treatments through month 24, compared with 1.1% and 1.6% of patients receiving ranibizumab 0.3 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg, respectively (P < 0.001 for both ranibizumab arms vs. sham). In patients with prior PRP at baseline (n = 182), 19.3% of sham-treated patients underwent 1 or more PRP treatments through month 24. No ranibizumab-treated patients with prior PRP at baseline required additional on-study PRP through month 24 (P < 0.001 for both ranibizumab arms vs. sham). Ranibizumab treatment also significantly reduced clinical DR progression among patients who underwent prior PRP. By month 24 in patients with prior PRP at baseline, the probability of experiencing a new proliferative event was 10.3% and 9.9% in patients receiving ranibizumab 0.3 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg treatment, respectively, compared with 39.4% in sham-treated patients (P < 0.0001). Overall, sham-treated patients, including those patients who were PRP naïve at baseline who went on to require PRP, experienced more clinical events than ranibizumab-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS In RIDE and RISE, PRP treatment was not a "1 and done" procedure, with on-study PRP re-treatment occurring in patients both with and without prior PRP treatment at baseline. Ranibizumab treatment reduced on-study PRP treatment and DR progression regardless of prior PRP treatment status at baseline.
-
2.
Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Panretinal Photocoagulation Use after Protocol S for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
Azad, AD, Chen, EM, Hinkle, J, Rayess, N, Wu, D, Eliott, D, Mruthyunjaya, P, Parikh, R
Ophthalmology. Retina. 2021;(2):151-159
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the rates of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications before and after publication of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network protocol S. DESIGN A retrospective, cross-sectional study from January 2012, through September 2019, using a nationally representative claims-based database, Clinformatics Data Mart Database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN). PARTICIPANTS Eyes newly diagnosed with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), continuous enrollment, and no prior treatment with PRP or anti-VEGF agents. METHODS Interrupted time series regression analysis was performed to identify the annual change in treatment rates before and after the publication of Protocol S (November 2015). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Annual rates of anti-VEGF or PRP treatments per 1000 treated eyes with PDR. RESULTS From 2012 through 2019, 10 035 PRP or anti-VEGF treatments were administered to 3685 PDR eyes. Of these, 63.6% (n = 6379) were anti-VEGF agents, and 36.4% (n = 3656) were PRP treatments. Throughout treatment, 88.7% of eyes treated with anti-VEGF received the same agent and 7.7% were treated with both PRP and anti-VEGF agents. Panretinal photocoagulation rates declined from 784/1000 treated eyes in 2012 to 566/1000 in 2019 (pre-Protocol S: β = -32 vs. post-Protocol S: -77; P = 0.005), whereas anti-VEGF rates increased from 876/1000 in 2012 to 1583/1000 in 2019 (β = -48 vs. 161, respectively; P = 0.001). Panretinal photocoagulation rates in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes did not significantly differ from 474/1000 in 2012 to 363/1000 in 2019 (β = -9 vs. -58 respectively; P = 0.091), and anti-VEGF rates increased from 1533/1000 in 2012 to 2096/1000 in 2019 (β = -57 vs. 187; P = 0.043). In eyes without DME, PRP use declined from 1017/1000 in 2012 to 707/1000 in 2019 (β = -31 vs. -111, respectively; P < 0.001), and anti-VEGF use increased from 383/1000 in 2012 to 1226/1000 in 2019 (β = -48 vs. 140, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Following the publication of Protocol S, PRP rates decreased, while anti-VEGF rates increased. Panretinal photocoagulation rates did not significantly change among eyes with DME. Our findings indicate the impact that randomized controlled trials can have on real-world practice patterns.
-
3.
Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, panretinal photocoagulation and combined treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Fallico, M, Maugeri, A, Lotery, A, Longo, A, Bonfiglio, V, Russo, A, Avitabile, T, Pulvirenti, A, Furino, C, Cennamo, G, et al
Acta ophthalmologica. 2021;(6):e795-e805
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment alone or in combination with PRP, for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were searched for RCTs comparing PRP versus intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and/or combined PRP and intravitreal anti-VEGF for PDR. The primary outcome measures were the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change and the regression of neovascularization. Mean change of central macular thickness (CMT), the subgroup analyses of patients without diabetic macular oedema (DME) and the rate of vitreous haemorrhage and vitrectomy were secondary outcomes. Frequentist NMAs were performed. RESULTS Twelve RCTs were included. For the 12-month mean BCVA change, NMA showed a better visual outcome in both the anti-VEGF group and combined group compared to PRP [anti-VEGF vs PRP, mean difference (MD) = 3.42; standard error (SE) = 1.5; combined vs PRP, MD = 3.92; SE = 1.65], with no difference between combined group and anti-VEGF (MD = -0.50; SE = 1.87). No difference in neovascularization regression was found between PRP and anti-VEGF alone or in combination with PRP, but there was significant inconsistency (p = 0.016). Subgroup analyses in patients without DME yielded no difference for the 12-month visual outcome between the three interventions, but with significant inconsistency (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION This NMA showed limited evidence of comparable efficacy in terms of neovascularization regression between PRP and anti-VEGF therapy alone or in combination with PRP, but better visual outcomes were associated with anti-VEGF use. Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy could be a valid therapeutic option in association with PRP.
-
4.
Pre-Emptive Topical Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.5% for Panretinal Photocoagulation.
Chewa Raja, JS, Singh, S, Ismail, F
Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2021;(5):313-317
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of topical ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% given pre-emptively a day before, for alleviating pain in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatment. Methods: A controlled single-blinded study was conducted on 33 patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR; severe nonproliferative DR, proliferative DR, or advanced diabetic eye disease) who required PRP treatment in both eyes simultaneously. Each eye of the patients was randomly assigned for ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% eyedrop or placebo. Both eyedrop bottles were randomly labeled. Eyedrops were self-administered by the patients, 4 times a day before the procedure (at 6 am, 12 noon, 6 pm, and 12 midnight) and every 15 min for 1 h (4 times) before the laser. Each patient was subjected to PRP using a Visulas 532s Zeiss device set to spot size 200 μm, time 0.10 s, and ∼600 burns in each eye. The pain score was evaluated immediately after treatment in each eye independently with Scott's visual analog scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Results: VAS pain score in ketorolac-treated eyes (median 3.0, interquatile range [IQR] ±2.5) was lower than in placebo-treated eyes (median 5.0, IQR ±3.0). Total Pain Rate Index score from MPQ was lower in ketorolac-treated eyes (median 3.0, IQR ±3.0) than in placebo-treated eyes (median 3.0, IQR ±2.5). Both pain score differences are statistically significant with P ˂ 0.05. Conclusion: Topical ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% given pre-emptively a day before is effective in alleviating pain in patients undergoing PRP treatment.
-
5.
Changes in entropy on polarized-sensitive optical coherence tomography images after therapeutic subthreshold micropulse laser for diabetic macular edema: A pilot study.
Ueda, K, Shiraya, T, Araki, F, Hashimoto, Y, Yamamoto, M, Yamanari, M, Ueta, T, Minami, T, Aoki, N, Sugiyama, S, et al
PloS one. 2021;(9):e0257000
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the dynamics of the healing process after therapeutic subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) for diabetic macular edema (DME) using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT). METHODS Patients with treatment-native or previously-treated DME were prospectively imaged using PS-OCT at baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. The following outcomes were evaluated: changes in the entropy value per unit area (pixel2) in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) on the B-scan image; changes in the entropy value in each stratified layer (retina, RPE, choroid) based on the ETDRS grid circle overlaid with en face entropy mapping, not only the whole ETDRS grid area but also a sector irradiated by the SMPL; and the relationship between edema reduction and entropy changes. RESULTS A total of 11 eyes of 11 consecutive DME patients were enrolled. No visible signs of SMPL treatment were detected on PS-OCT images. The entropy value per unit area (pixel2) in the RPE tended to decrease at 3 and 6 months from baseline (35.8 ± 17.0 vs 26.1 ± 9.8, P = 0.14; vs 28.2 ± 18.3, P = 0.14). Based on the en face entropy mapping, the overall entropy value did not change in each layer in the whole ETDRS grid; however, decrease of entropy in the RPE was observed at 2, 3, and 6 months post-treatment within the SMPL-irradiated sectors (P < 0.01, each). There was a positive correlation between the change rate of retinal thickness and that of entropy in the RPE within the SMPL-irradiated sector at 6 months (r2 = 0.19, P = 0.039). CONCLUSION Entropy measured using PS-OCT may be a new parameter that facilitates objective monitoring of SMPL-induced functional changes in the RPE that could not previously be assessed directly. This may contribute to a more promising therapeutic evaluation of DME. CLINICAL TRIAL This clinical study was registered in UMIN-CTR (ID: UMIN000042420).
-
6.
Comparison of navigated laser and conventional single-spot laser system for induced pain during panretinal photocoagulation.
Polat, O, Inan, S, Baysal, Z, Yigit, S, Inan, UU
Lasers in medical science. 2020;(3):687-693
Abstract
To compare the panretinal photocoagulation (PRP)-induced pain response between novel navigated laser (Navilas) and conventional single-spot laser. The eyes were randomly assigned to Navilas or conventional laser. Contralateral eyes underwent PRP with the other system with 30 min resting interval. Pulse duration was 100 ms in conventional laser and 30 ms or 100 ms in Navilas and power setting was enough to create gray-white light burn on both devices. Pain response was evaluated by verbal scale (VS) (0-4) and visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10) after each PRP application. The mean age of 70 patients (140 eyes) was 62.52 ± 9.49 years. Mean power and spot numbers for Navilas and conventional laser were 291.9 ± 85.3 mW vs 368.4 ± 72.0 mW, and 375.4 ± 108.4 vs 374.2 ± 105.0 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.53, respectively). Pain scores for Navilas and conventional laser were 1.19 ± 0.73 and 1.99 ± 0.84 for VS and 2.41 ± 1.65 and 4.74 ± 2.17 for VAS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). More comfortable PRP is achieved with Navilas system in comparison with conventional single-spot laser system. However, small number of patients treated with same pulse duration and different contact lenses used for two systems should be taken into consideration. Besides, we did not report comparative clinical efficiency of either laser system.
-
7.
Changes of visual fields in treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review.
Vergmann, AS, Grauslund, J
Acta ophthalmologica. 2020;(8):763-773
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to compare certain side-effects [visual fields (VF), dark adaptation, colour vision (CV) and contrast sensitivity (CS)] of conventional panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) with those of other treatments in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). A systematic literature search was conducted on 30 November 2018 in PubMed and Embase. The search comprised the keywords 'proliferative diabetic retinopathy', 'laser', 'treatment' and 'anti-vegf'. We included prospective studies and randomized controlled trials that investigated certain side-effects (VF, dark adaptation, CV, CS) in treatment of PDR (primary outcome). In total, 1867 articles were screened, and 10 studies were included (2176 eyes of 2086 patients examined in the VF studies and 1360 eyes of 1360 patients examined in the CV and CS studies). Visual fields (VF) were investigated in 10 studies, CV in one study and CS in one study. Treatment modalities included conventional PRP, other modalities of laser treatment and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. Four studies demonstrated a worse VF impact of PRP than VEGF inhibitors. Seven studies reported of an overall worsening in VF after laser with no differences between different laser approaches. No differences were found in CV or CS. Overall, we found a trend, confirmed in four large studies, towards VEGF inhibitors causing less harm to VF compared to conventional PRP. Whilst VF was generally depressed after laser, it did not differ between different treatment approaches. Furthermore, it was not possible to make certain conclusions of CV or CS, with only one study in each field.
-
8.
Longitudinal analysis of subfoveal choroidal thickness after panretinal laser photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy using swept-source optical coherence tomography.
Eleiwa, KT, Bayoumy, A, Elhusseiny, MA, Gamil, K, Sharawy, A
Romanian journal of ophthalmology. 2020;(3):285-291
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the central three-dimensional (3D) thickness profile of the macula (CMT) and the subfoveal choroidal region (SFCT) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) following panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Methods: A prospective observational study including 17 eyes with proliferative DR (PDR) and 27 eyes with severe nonproliferative DR (sNPDR)] for whom PRP was done. All subjects received SS-OCT imaging before and 3 months after PRP (POM#3). SFCT and CMT changes were analysed at both visits. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Coefficients of Variation (COV) were used to test the accuracy of thickness data. Results: SFCT has thinned from 233 ± 54 µm before PRP treatment to 216 ± 51 µm 3 months later (p < 0.001). Likewise, CMT declined at POM#3 as compared to pre-PRP status (p<0.001). SFCT was thinner in PDR before and at POM#3 (p<0.05) than sNPDR; whereas, no significant difference was observed in CMT between both groups in the two visits. No significant changes were found between groups in SFCT and CMT at POM#3. Regarding reliability, ICCSFCT=0.98 and ICCCMT=0.99. The COVs for CMT and SFCT were 5.03% and 5.91%, respectively. Conclusion: The mean SFCT and CMT decreased 3 months after PRP. We also reported reliability of SFCT measurements in DR using SS-OCT. Abbreviations: SS = Swept-Source, TD = time domain, SD = spectral domain, FD = Fourier-domain, 3D = three-dimensional, 2D = two-dimensional.
-
9.
Comparison of Subthreshold 532 nm Diode Micropulse Laser with Conventional Laser Photocoagulation in the Treatment of Non-Centre Involved Clinically Significant Diabetic Macular Edema.
Bougatsou, P, Panagiotopoulou, EK, Gkika, M, Dardabounis, D, Konstantinidis, A, Sideroudi, H, Perente, I, Labiris, G
Acta medica (Hradec Kralove). 2020;(1):25-30
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the 532 nm (green) diode subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in the treatment of non-centre involved clinically significant macular edema (CSME) in comparison to the conventional laser photocoagulation (CLP). METHODS A total of 60 eyes of patients diagnosed with non-centre involved CSME were randomly divided into two groups. SML photocoagulation was performed in the first group (G1), while CLP in the second one (G2). Central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured prior to treatment and at 3 and 6 months after intervention. RESULTS G1 participants had significantly better CMT at 6 months after laser application (p = 0.04) compared to G2. Additionally, CMT in both groups was significantly lower 6 months after laser application in comparison to baseline values (G1: p < 0.001, G2: p = 0.002). Moreover, significant improvement was detected 6 months after SML in G1 regarding BCVA compared to values before laser treatment (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION SML was more effective than CLP in reducing CMT and improving BCVA in patients with non-centre involved CSME. Therefore, it seems that SML can be a good substitute for CLP in DME treatment if confirmed in future studies.
-
10.
Aflibercept and navigated versus conventional laser in diabetic macular oedema: a 12-month randomized clinical trial.
Blindbaek, SL, Peto, T, Grauslund, J
Acta ophthalmologica. 2020;(4):347-352
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept and navigated laser as compared to intravitreal aflibercept and conventional laser in diabetic macular oedema (DME) treatment. METHODS In 12-month randomized clinical trial, 48 eyes of 37 patients with centre-involved DME at Odense University Hospital were randomized 1:1 to receive three monthly injections of aflibercept followed by navigated (group A) or conventional (group B) focal/grid laser. From month four through twelve, patients were examined monthly, and additional injections were given pro re nata (PRN) (central retinal thickness [CRT]>20% from lowest measurement or loss in visual acuity [VA]>5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters compared with baseline). Outcome measures; (1) percentage of eyes that needed additional injections after laser in group A and B, (2) mean number of injections in group A and B, and (3) mean change in VA and CRT in group A and B. RESULTS In the PRN phase, 60.5% of patients needed additional injections without differences between groups A and B (58.3 versus 63.2%, p > 0.99). The mean number of injections between baseline and month 12 was 4.4 (4.2 versus 4.6, p = 0.41). From baseline to month 12, VA improved by 8.4 ETDRS letters, and CRT was reduced by 97.4 μm (+9.4 versus +7.1 letters, p = 0.17, and -83.2 versus -115.4 μm, p = 0.21). CONCLUSION No difference in need for retreatment was detected between treatment arms of aflibercept and navigated versus conventional laser.