-
1.
Duodenal mucosal resurfacing with a GLP-1 receptor agonist increases postprandial unconjugated bile acids in patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes.
Meiring, S, Meessen, ECE, van Baar, ACG, Holleman, F, Nieuwdorp, M, Olde Damink, SW, Schaap, FG, Vaz, FM, Groen, AK, Soeters, MR, et al
American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2022;(2):E132-E140
Abstract
Duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a new endoscopic ablation technique aimed at improving glycemia and metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DMR appears to improve insulin resistance, which is the root cause of T2DM, but its mechanism of action is largely unknown. Bile acids function as intestinal signaling molecules in glucose and energy metabolism via the activation of farnesoid X receptor and secondary signaling [e.g., via fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)], and are linked to metabolic health. We investigated the effect of DMR and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) on postprandial bile acid responses in 16 patients with insulin-dependent T2DM, using mixed meal tests performed at the baseline and 6 mo after the DMR procedure. The combination treatment allowed discontinuation of insulin treatment in 11/16 (69%) of patients while improving glycemic and metabolic health. We found increased postprandial unconjugated bile acid responses (all P < 0.05), an overall increased secondary bile acid response (P = 0.036) and a higher 12α-hydroxylated:non-12α-hydroxylated ratio (P < 0.001). Total bile acid concentrations were unaffected by the intervention. Postprandial FGF19 and 7-α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) concentrations decreased postintervention (both P < 0.01). Our study demonstrates that DMR with GLP-1 modulates the postprandial bile acid response. The alterations in postprandial bile acid responses may be the result of changes in the microbiome, ileal bile acid uptake and improved insulin sensitivity. Controlled studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism linking the combination treatment to metabolic health and bile acids.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Glycemic and metabolic improvements are seen in patients with type 2 diabetes after replacing their insulin therapy with DMR and GLP-1. These changes are accompanied by changes in postprandial bile acid concentrations: increased unconjugated and secondary bile acids.
-
2.
Liraglutide Treatment Does Not Induce Changes in the Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.
Arendt Nielsen, T, Sega, R, Uggerhøj Andersen, C, Vorum, H, Drewes, AM, Jakobsen, PE, Brock, B, Brock, C
Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2022;(1):114-121
Abstract
Purpose: Liraglutide treatment has shown promising anti-inflammatory and nerve regenerative results in preclinical and clinical trials. We sought to assess if liraglutide treatment would induce nerve regeneration through its anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic mechanisms by increasing peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in individuals with long-term type 1 diabetes. Methods: Secondary analyses were performed on a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on adults with type 1 diabetes, distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN), and confirmed diabetic retinopathy, who were randomized 1:1 to either 26 weeks placebo or liraglutide treatment. The primary endpoint was a change in peripapillary RNFL thickness between treatments, assessed by optical coherence tomography. Results: Thirty-seven participants were included in the secondary analysis. No differences in mean peripapillary RNFL thickness (overall ΔMean RNFL thickness; liraglutide -1 (±8) μm (-1%) vs. placebo -1 (±5) μm (-1%), P = 0.78, n = 37) or any of the quadrants. Peripapillary RNFL thicknesses were shown between treatments in either nonproliferative (ΔMean RNFL thickness; liraglutide -1 (±5) μm (-1%) vs. placebo 0 (±4) μm (0%), P = 0.80, N = 26) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy subgroup (ΔMean RNFL thickness; liraglutide -2 (±14) μm (-3%) vs. placebo -1 (±6) μm (-2%), P = 0.88, N = 11). Conclusions: In this study, 26 weeks of liraglutide treatment did not induce measurable changes in the assessed optic nerve thickness. Thus, this methodology does not support the induction of substantial nerve regeneration in this cohort with established retinopathy and DSPN. The trial was approved by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. TODINELI study: EUDRA CT 2013-004375-12, Ethics Ref: N-20130077 Clinical trial registration number: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02138045.
-
3.
Liraglutide Improves Forced Vital Capacity in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Data From the Randomized Crossover LIRALUNG Study.
López-Cano, C, Ciudin, A, Sánchez, E, Tinahones, FJ, Barbé, F, Dalmases, M, García-Ramírez, M, Soto, A, Gaeta, AM, Pellitero, S, et al
Diabetes. 2022;(2):315-320
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, on pulmonary function and serum levels of surfactant protein D (SP-D) in type 2 diabetes. A double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial comprising 76 patients with a baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s <90% of that predicted. Liraglutide was administered for 7 weeks (2 weeks of titration plus 5 weeks at 1.8 mg daily). This short duration was intentional to minimize weight loss as a potential confounding factor. Serum level of SP-D was used as a biomarker of alveolar-capillary barrier integrity. Liraglutide exerted a positive impact on forced vital capacity (FVC) in comparison with placebo (ΔFVC 5.2% of predicted [from 0.8 to 9.6]; P = 0.009). No differences in the other pulmonary variables were observed. Participants under liraglutide treatment also experienced a decrease in serum SP-D (P = 0.038). The absolute change in FVC correlated with final serum SP-D in participants receiving liraglutide (r = -0.313, P = 0.036). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis showed that final serum SP-D independently predicted changes in FVC. In conclusion, liraglutide increased FVC in patients with type 2 diabetes. This effect was associated with a significant decrease of circulating SP-D, thus pointing to a beneficial effect in the alveolar-capillary function.
-
4.
Liraglutide after diet-induced weight loss for pain and weight control in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
Gudbergsen, H, Overgaard, A, Henriksen, M, Wæhrens, EE, Bliddal, H, Christensen, R, Nielsen, SM, Boesen, M, Knop, FK, Astrup, A, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2021;(2):314-323
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight loss is critical for preventing and managing obesity-related diseases. There is a notable lack of valid and reliable means to manage patients with overweight/obesity and knee osteoarthritis (KOA). OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in a 30 mg/d dosing in patients with overweight/obesity and KOA. METHODS The trial was designed as a randomized controlled trial including patients between the age of 18 and 74 y with KOA and a BMI ≥27 (measured in kg/m2).Patients underwent a pre-random assignment diet intervention (week -8 to 0). At week 0, patients having lost >5% of their body weight were randomly assigned to liraglutide 3 mg/d or placebo for 52 wk. The coprimary outcomes were changes in body weight and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale from week 0 to 52. RESULTS In total, 168 patients enrolled and 156 were randomly assigned to receive liraglutide or placebo. Patients experienced a significant reduction in body weight and KOOS pain during the pre-random assignment dietary intervention period (week -8 to 0). From week 0 to 52 there was a significant difference in body weight between the liraglutide and placebo group (mean changes: -2.8 and +1.2 kg, respectively; group difference, 3.9 kg; 95% CI: -6.9, -1.0; P = 0.008). There was, however, no group difference in KOOS pain (mean changes: 0.4 and -0.6 points, respectively; group difference, 0.9 points; 95% CI: -3.9, 5.7; P = 0.71). Treatment-emergent adverse events related to the gastrointestinal system were experienced by 50.2% and 39.2% of patients in the liraglutide and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with KOA and overweight/obesity liraglutide added after an 8-wk pre-random assignment diet induced a significant weight loss at >52 wk but did not reduce knee pain compared to placebo. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02905864.
-
5.
Anti-interleukin-21 antibody and liraglutide for the preservation of β-cell function in adults with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
von Herrath, M, Bain, SC, Bode, B, Clausen, JO, Coppieters, K, Gaysina, L, Gumprecht, J, Hansen, TK, Mathieu, C, Morales, C, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2021;(4):212-224
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 1 diabetes is characterised by progressive loss of functional β-cell mass, necessitating insulin treatment. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that combining anti-interleukin (IL)-21 antibody (for low-grade and transient immunomodulation) with liraglutide (to improve β-cell function) could enable β-cell survival with a reduced risk of complications compared with traditional immunomodulation. METHODS This randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind, phase 2 trial was done at 94 sites (university hospitals and medical centres) in 17 countries. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-45 years with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes and residual β-cell function. Individuals with unstable type 1 diabetes (defined by an episode of severe diabetic ketoacidosis within 2 weeks of enrolment) or active or latent chronic infections were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), with stratification by baseline stimulated peak C-peptide concentration (mixed-meal tolerance test [MMTT]), to the combination of anti-IL-21 and liraglutide, anti-IL-21 alone, liraglutide alone, or placebo, all as an adjunct to insulin. Investigators, participants, and funder personnel were masked throughout the treatment period. The primary outcome was the change in MMTT-stimulated C-peptide concentration at week 54 (end of treatment) relative to baseline, measured via the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over a 4 h period for the full analysis set (intention-to-treat population consisting of all participants who were randomly assigned). After treatment cessation, participants were followed up for an additional 26-week off-treatment observation period. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02443155. FINDINGS Between Nov 10, 2015, and Feb 27, 2019, 553 adults were assessed for eligibility, of whom 308 were randomly assigned to receive either anti-IL-21 plus liraglutide, anti-IL-21, liraglutide, or placebo (77 assigned to each group). Compared with placebo (ratio to baseline 0·61, 39% decrease), the decrease in MMTT-stimulated C-peptide concentration from baseline to week 54 was significantly smaller with combination treatment (0·90, 10% decrease; estimated treatment ratio 1·48, 95% CI 1·16-1·89; p=0·0017), but not with anti-IL-21 alone (1·23, 0·97-1·57; p=0·093) or liraglutide alone (1·12, 0·87-1·42; p=0·38). Despite greater insulin use in the placebo group, the decrease in HbA1c (a key secondary outcome) at week 54 was greater with all active treatments (-0·50 percentage points) than with placebo (-0·10 percentage points), although the differences versus placebo were not significant. The effects diminished upon treatment cessation. Changes in immune cell subsets across groups were transient and mild (<10% change over time). The most frequently reported adverse events included gastrointestinal disorders, in keeping with the known side-effect profile of liraglutide. The rate of hypoglycaemic events did not differ significantly between active treatment groups and placebo, with an exception of a lower rate in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group during the treatment period. No events of diabetic ketoacidosis were observed. One participant died while on liraglutide (considered unlikely to be related to trial treatment) in connection with three reported adverse events (hypoglycaemic coma, pneumonia, and brain oedema). INTERPRETATION The combination of anti-IL-21 and liraglutide could preserve β-cell function in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. The efficacy of this combination appears to be similar to that seen in trials of other disease-modifying interventions in type 1 diabetes, but with a seemingly better safety profile. Efficacy and safety should be further evaluated in a phase 3 trial programme. FUNDING Novo Nordisk.
-
6.
Real-world study on the effectiveness and safety of basal insulin IDegLira in type 2 diabetic patients previously treated with multi-injective insulin therapy.
Persano, M, Nollino, L, Sambataro, M, Rigato, M, Negro, I, Marchetto, S, Paccagnella, A
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2021;(2):923-931
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Achieving glycemic target is paramount to control diabetes mellitus (DM) and reduce micro-vascular and macro-vascular complications. Despite the mostly recent-developed drugs, most patients still show an above desired glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level due to DM complex pathophysiology, therapeutic and dietary compliance and clinical inertia in introducing or intensifying insulin therapy. To support the promising results of clinical trials on the effectiveness and safety of the degludec/liraglutide combination (IDegLira) in type 2 DM patients with C-peptide values >1 ng/ml who were previously treated with basal-bolus multiple daily-dose insulin injections. PATIENTS AND METHODS This observational, prospective and non-randomized trial enrolled type 2 DM patients referred to our outpatient clinic between January 2019 and December 2019, who were shifted from multiple daily-dose insulin injection therapy to degludec/liraglutide combination as per the physician's decision. The main assessment was HbA1c variation at 6 months from baseline. Secondary assessments included variation in fasting glycemia, routine anthropometric assessments, blood chemistry, blood pressure and patients' quality of life (measured by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ]), from baseline to 6 months. RESULTS HbA1c (8.4 vs. 7.4%; p<0.0001) and body weight (94.1 vs. 93 kg; p<0.0001) were significantly lower after 6 months for patients on the degludec/liraglutide combination. A similar trend was observed in fasting glycemia levels (159 vs. 125 mg/dl; p<0.0001). An improved glycemic control was achieved with degludec/liraglutide despite a reduction in total daily insulin units (42 U at 6 months vs. 22 U at baseline; p<0.0001). In addition, higher scores in the DTSQ were registered after 6 months on degludec/liraglutide (mean score: 27 vs. 20; p<0.0001). The combination therapy also proved more convenient than basal-bolus therapy in terms of costs, with an average per-patient cost difference of €-0.41±0.59/die (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS These real-world findings show that degludec/liraglutide seems to be more effective than basal-bolus insulin in achieving glycemic control, allowing cost sustainability and improving patient satisfaction.
-
7.
Effects of liraglutide on visceral and ectopic fat in adults with overweight and obesity at high cardiovascular risk: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
Neeland, IJ, Marso, SP, Ayers, CR, Lewis, B, Oslica, R, Francis, W, Rodder, S, Pandey, A, Joshi, PH
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2021;(9):595-605
Abstract
BACKGROUND Visceral and ectopic fat are key drivers of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes in obesity. We aimed to evaluate the effects of injectable liraglutide 3·0 mg daily on body fat distribution in adults with overweight or obesity without type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular disease risk. METHODS In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 4, single centre trial, we enrolled community-dwelling adults, recruited from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, with BMI of at least 30 kg/m2 or BMI of at least 27 kg/m2 with metabolic syndrome but without diabetes and randomly assigned them, in a 1:1 ratio, to 40 weeks of treatment with once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide 3·0 mg or placebo, in addition to a 500 kcal deficient diet and guideline-recommended physical activity counselling. The primary endpoint was percentage reduction in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) measured with MRI. All randomly assigned participants with a follow-up imaging assessment were included in efficacy analyses and all participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03038620. FINDINGS Between July 20, 2017 and Feb 21, 2020 from 235 participants assessed for eligibility, 185 participants were randomly assigned (n=92 liraglutide, n=93 placebo) and 128 (n=73 liraglutide, n=55 placebo) were included in the final analysis (92% female participants, 37% Black participants, 24% Hispanic participants, mean age 50·2 years (SD 9·4), mean BMI 37·7 kg/m2). Mean change in VAT over median 36·2 weeks was -12·49% (SD 9·3%) with liraglutide compared with -1·63% (SD 12·3%) with placebo, estimated treatment difference -10·86% (95% CI -6·97 to -14·75, p<0·0001). Effects seemed consistent across subgroups of age, sex, race-ethnicity, BMI, and baseline prediabetes. The most frequently reported adverse events were gastrointestinal-related (43 [47%] of 92 with liraglutide and 12 [13%] of 93 with placebo) and upper respiratory tract infections (10 [11%] of 92 with liraglutide and 14 [15%] of 93 with placebo). INTERPRETATION In adults with overweight or obesity at high cardiovascular disease risk, once-daily liraglutide 3·0 mg plus lifestyle intervention significantly lowered visceral adipose tissue over 40 weeks of treatment. Visceral fat reduction may be one mechanism to explain the benefits seen on cardiovascular outcomes in previous trials with liraglutide among patients with type 2 diabetes. FUNDING NovoNordisk.
-
8.
Effect of 26 Weeks of Liraglutide Treatment on Coronary Artery Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetes Quantified by [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT: Results from the LIRAFLAME Trial.
Jensen, JK, Zobel, EH, von Scholten, BJ, Rotbain Curovic, V, Hansen, TW, Rossing, P, Kjaer, A, Ripa, RS
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2021;:790405
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantification of coronary artery inflammation and atherosclerosis remains a challenge in high-risk individuals. In this study we sought to investigate if the glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide has a direct anti-inflammatory effect in the coronary arteries using positron emission tomography (PET) with a radioactive tracer targeting activated macrophages in the vessel-wall. METHODS Thirty randomly selected participants with type 2 diabetes from the placebo-controlled trial LIRAFLAME were enrolled in this sub-study. Participants were, prior to enrollment in this sub-study, randomized to either treatment with daily liraglutide (n=15) or placebo (n=15). Both groups underwent a combined [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE positron emission tomography and computed tomography scan of the heart at baseline and after 26 weeks of treatment. Coronary artery uptake of [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE were measured as maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax); and means of the maximum values (mSUVmax), both values were calculated at the level of each participant and each individual coronary-segment. RESULTS SUVmax and mSUVmax values decreased significantly in the liraglutide group both at the participant level (SUVmax: p=0.013; mSUVmax: p=0.004) and at the coronary-segment level (SUVmax: p=0.001; mSUVmax: p<0.0001). No change was observed in the placebo group neither at the participant level (SUVmax: p=0.69; mSUVmax: p=0.67) or at the coronary-segment level (SUVmax: p=0.49; mSUVmax: p=0.30). When comparing the mean change in uptake values between the two groups at both the participant level (SUVmax: p=0.076; mSUVmax: p=0.077) and the coronary segment level (SUVmax: p=0.13; mSUVmax: p=0.11) a borderline significant difference was observed. Baseline SUVmax [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE uptake values showed a weak positive correlation with the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity c-reactive protein (τ =0.26, p=0.045). CONCLUSION Liraglutide treatment for 26-weeks caused a significant reduction in [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE uptake in the coronary arteries whereas this was not seen in the placebo treated group. In addition, [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT as a marker of coronary inflammation correlated with the systemic inflammation marker hs-CRP.
-
9.
Efficacy and safety of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients complicated with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Wang, L, Xin, Q, Wang, Y, Chen, Z, Yuan, R, Miao, Y, Zhang, G, Cong, W
Pharmacological research. 2021;:105765
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) complicated with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese VIP Information (VIP), Wanfang Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 7 October 2020. A total of 18 RCTs including 1557 patients with T2DM complicated with CAD were included. Meta-analysis revealed liraglutide reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (WMD = -0.67; 95% CI[-0.94 to -0.39]; P < 0.00001), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (WMD = -0.80; 95% CI[-1.06 to -0.54]; P < 0.00001) and 2 h plasma glucose (2hPG) (WMD = -1.64; 95% CI[-2.12 to -1.16]; P<0.00001); improved left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) (WMD = 4.79; 95% CI[4.08-5.51]; P < 0.00001), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (WMD = -5.70; 95% CI[-6.67 to -4.72]; P<0.00001), E/A (WMD = 0.13; 95% CI[0.11-0.14]; P < 0.00001) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) (WMD = -1.86; 95% CI[-2.16 to -1.55]; P < 0.00001); reduced total cholesterol (TC) (WMD = -0.48; 95% CI[-0.56 to -0.39]; P < 0.00001), triglycerides (TG) (WMD = -0.42; 95% CI[-0.59 to -0.26]; P < 0.00001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (WMD = -0.41; 95% CI[-0.55 to -0.26]; P < 0.00001), and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (WMD = -0.19; 95% CI[0.13-0.24]; P = 0.0005). As for safety assessment, liraglutide did not increase the incidence of hypoglycemia (OR = 0.75, 95% CI[0.32-1.77], P = 0.51) and gastrointestinal (OR = 1.15, 95% CI[0.72-1.85], P = 0.55) events. Consequently, liraglutide had favorable effects on blood glucose, cardiac function, lipid profile and an acceptable safety profile.
-
10.
Effectiveness of liraglutide 3 mg for the treatment of obesity in a real-world setting without intensive lifestyle intervention.
Park, JH, Kim, JY, Choi, JH, Park, HS, Shin, HY, Lee, JM, Kim, JW, Ko, HJ, Chon, S, Kim, BK, et al
International journal of obesity (2005). 2021;(4):776-786
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated the efficacy and safety of liraglutide 3 mg daily in combination with diet and exercise 2, 4, and 6 months after initiation in real-world settings in Korea. METHODS People first using liraglutide starting in 2018 were recruited from ten sites in Korea. Body weight and body mass index (BMI) were measured after 2, 4, and 6 months and compared with baseline values. RESULTS The full cohort comprised 769 participants: 672 in the 2-month group, 427 in the 4-month group, and 219 in the 6-month group. The baseline mean ± standard deviation of BMI and body weight were 32.2 ± 5.1 kg/m2, and 87.5 ± 18.8 kg, respectively. Body weight and BMI decreased after initiation of liraglutide treatment: -2.94 kg and -1.08 kg/m2 at 2 months; -4.23 kg and -1.55 kg/m2 at 4 months, and -5.14 kg and -1.89 kg/m2 at 6 months (all P < 0.001). In the 6-month cohort, 52.5% and 18.3% of subjects lost ≥5% and ≥10% of body weight, respectively. After 6 months, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly by 3.90 and 1.93 mmHg, respectively. In those with diabetes mellitus, HbA1c and fasting glucose levels decreased significantly by 1.14% and 27.8 mg/dl, respectively. Among all participants, 27.6% experienced adverse effects, including nausea (20.8%), vomiting (5.2%), diarrhoea (2.5%), and skin rash (3.6%). Documented reasons for discontinuation of treatment were lack of effect (4.4%), adverse events (4.3%), and high cost (3.1%). CONCLUSIONS In real-world settings in Korea, daily treatment with liraglutide 3 mg was associated with clinically meaningful weight loss without serious adverse events.