-
1.
Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate in Acute Stroke.
Avgerinos, KI, Chatzisotiriou, A, Haidich, AB, Tsapas, A, Lioutas, VA
Stroke. 2019;(4):931-938
Abstract
Background and Purpose- Acute stroke treatment is challenging, and stroke remains a major cause of death and disability. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the effects of postacute stroke intravenous administration of the neuroprotectant magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) on global outcome, functional outcome, and mortality 90 days poststroke (ischemic and nonischemic). Methods- We searched in Pubmed, Science Direct, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov, up to November 11, 2017, and we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We synthesized results by using random-effects model, weighted mean differences, standardized mean differences, and odds ratios. Results- Seven randomized controlled trials (4347 patients) met our criteria. Compared with placebo, treatment did not improve functional outcome defined as Barthel Index >60 (odds ratio =1.05; 95% CI, 0.92-1.19) and >95 (odds ratio =0.95; 95% CI, 0.76-1.20), 90 days poststroke. It also did not improve global outcome measured with modified Rankin Scale (standardized mean difference =-0.01; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.10), 90 days poststroke. In an additional subgroup meta-analysis that exclusively included ischemic stroke patients, intravenous MgSO4 resulted in lower modified Rankin Scale score (improved global outcome; weighted mean difference =-0.96; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.58; I2=0%], 90 days poststroke. Finally, mortality stayed unaltered (odds ratio =1.10; 95% CI, 0.94-1.29). Conclusions- The findings of our meta-analysis showed that intravenous MgSO4 generally did not improve global/functional outcomes and mortality at 90 days after stroke (combined ischemic stroke and nonischemic stroke). The finding of favorable neurological outcome, selectively in ischemic stroke patients, should be viewed with extreme caution given the limited number of patients included in this subgroup meta-analysis.
-
2.
Topical application of magnesium to prevent intubation-related sore throat in adult surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kuriyama, A, Maeda, H, Sun, R
Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2019;(9):1082-1094
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative sore throat negatively affects patient satisfaction and recovery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of preoperative topical administration of magnesium sulfate in preventing postoperative sore throat in adult patients. METHODS We searched Medline, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 6 October, 2018. We included randomized-controlled trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of topical application of magnesium preoperatively in adult patients who underwent endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia. We then pooled the data using a random-effects model and conducted a trial sequential analysis on the incidence of sore throat. Our primary outcome was the incidence of sore throat at 24 hr after surgery/extubation. Our secondary outcomes included the severity of sore throat at 24 hr after surgery/extubation and adverse events. RESULTS Eleven randomized-controlled trials involving 1,096 patients were included in this study. Topical application of magnesium was associated with reduced incidence of postoperative sore throat (risk ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.45) as well as reduced severity of postoperative sore throat (standardized mean difference, - 2.66; 95% CI, - 3.89 to - 1.43). Three studies reported that significant adverse events were not associated with topical magnesium. The trial sequential analysis suggested that there is adequate evidence supporting the efficacy of topical magnesium in preventing postoperative sore throat. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that preoperative topical magnesium can effectively prevent postoperative sore throat. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42018110019); registered 26 September, 2018.
-
3.
A meta-analysis of pharmacological neuroprotection in noncardiac surgery: focus on statins, lidocaine, ketamine, and magnesium sulfate.
Zeng, ZW, Zhang, YN, Lin, WX, Zhang, WQ, Luo, R
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2018;(6):1798-1811
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-cardiac surgery is associated with perioperative cerebral complications (delirium, postoperative cognition dysfunction, stroke). While rare, these complications can lead to disabilities and deaths. Information is ambiguous as to whether pharmacological preoperative treatment exerts neuroprotection. We wished to systematically assess potential modulation by statins, lidocaine, ketamine or magnesium sulfate of the relative risk of cerebral complications in noncardiac surgery. Selection of these pharmacological agents was based on their known neuroprotective abilities. PATIENTS AND METHODS By searching Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, we identified 4 suitable publications that collectively enrolled 1358 patients (intent-to-treat population), of which 679 patients were treated preoperatively with statins (404 patients on atorvastatin and 275 on rosuvastatin) and 679 patients with preoperative placebo. The reported cerebral outcome was stroke, assessed either within 30 days (4 publications) or 6 months (2 publications) after surgery. RESULTS Episodes of stroke within 30 days and 6 months postoperatively were observed in several publications, enabling aggregate analyses. No modulation by statins of the relative risk of stroke at 30 days was observed (risk ratio 1.59, 95% confidence interval 0.08-30.97; p = 0.76). At 6 months, statins showed an insignificant trend toward neuroprotection (risk ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.05-2.10; p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS The available clinical data are still scarce. Our analyses indicate no protective effects by statins against perioperative stroke but some favorable trends toward delayed stroke. Further randomized trials are needed to unequivocally assess the neuroprotective potential of current pharmacological agents in non-cardiac surgery.
-
4.
Intravenous and Nebulized Magnesium Sulfate for Treating Acute Asthma in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Su, Z, Li, R, Gai, Z
Pediatric emergency care. 2018;(6):390-395
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous (IV) and nebulized magnesium sulfate in acute asthma in children. METHODS The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials of IV and nebulized magnesium sulfate in pediatric acute asthma were included. The outcomes subject to meta-analysis were pulmonary function, hospitalization, and further treatment. If statistical heterogeneity was significant, random-effects models were used for meta-analysis, otherwise, fixed-effects models were applied. RESULTS Ten randomized and quasi-randomized trials (6 IV, 4 nebulized) were identified. Intravenous magnesium sulfate treatment is associated with significant effects on respiratory function (standardized mean difference, 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-3.08; P = 0.0008) and hospital admission (risk ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.95; P = 0.03). But nebulized magnesium sulfate treatment shows no significant effect on respiratory function (standardized mean difference, 0.19; 95% CI, -0.01-0.40; P = 0.07) or hospital admission (risk ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86-1.44; P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS The meta-analysis revealed that IV magnesium sulfate is an effective treatment in children, with the pulmonary function significantly improved and hospitalization and further treatment decreased. But nebulized magnesium sulfate treatment showed no significant effect on respiratory function or hospital admission and further treatment.
-
5.
Influence of the perioperative administration of magnesium sulfate on the total dose of anesthetics during general anesthesia. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rodríguez-Rubio, L, Nava, E, Del Pozo, JSG, Jordán, J
Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2017;:129-138
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnesium sulfate displays numerous characteristics that make it a useful drug in anesthesiology (N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, vasodilator, antiarrhythmic, inhibitor of catecholamine release and of acetylcholine in the terminal motor plate). The perioperative use of this drug as an adjuvant capable of decreasing the required dose of anesthetics, has been proposed. OBJECTIVES To assess the influence of intravenous magnesium sulfate administration during general anesthesia on the overall dose of required anesthetics. DESIGN A systematic review of controlled randomized trials and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES An electronic bibliography search in MEDLINE and in the Cochrane Database of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) up to 2015. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS Randomized, double-blind trials relating to general anesthesia in elective surgery using intravenous magnesium sulfate that provide information about the anesthetic requirements in ASA I and II patients. RESULTS 20 clinical trials were selected for the qualitative analysis and 19 for the quantitative one. The use of perioperative intravenous magnesium sulfate reduces the requirement of the anesthetic, propofol during induction (-28.52mg; CI 95% -35.22-1.82; p<0.001) and maintenance (-213.56mg; CI 95% -322.93, -104.18; p<0.001) of anesthesia. Additionally, magnesium sulfate reduces the requirement of neuromuscular non-despolarizing blocking agents (-2.99mg; CI 95% -44.47, -1.99; p<0.001) and the intraoperative consumption of fentanile(-53.57 mcg; CI 95% -75.01, -32.12; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that perioperative magnesium sulfate acts as a coadjuvant drug capable of reducing anesthetic requirements.
-
6.
Intravenous magnesium sulfate for treating children with acute asthma in the emergency department.
Griffiths, B, Kew, KM
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;(4):CD011050
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute asthma in children can be life-threatening and must be treated promptly in the emergency setting. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is recommended by various guidelines for cases of acute asthma that have not responded to first-line treatment with bronchodilators and steroids. The treatment has recently been shown to reduce the need for hospital admission for adults compared with placebo, but it is unclear whether it is equally effective for children. OBJECTIVES To assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate (IV MgSO4) in children treated for acute asthma in the emergency department (ED). SEARCH METHODS We identified studies by searching the Cochrane Airways Review Group Specialised Register up to 23 February 2016. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and reference lists of other reviews, and we contacted study authors to ask for additional information. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of children treated in the ED for exacerbations of asthma if they compared any dose of IV MgSO4 with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors screened the results of the search and independently extracted data from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. We resolved disagreements through discussion and contacted study authors in cases of missing data and other uncertainties relating to the studies.We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios and continuous data as mean differences, both using fixed-effect models. We assessed each study for risk of bias and rated the quality of evidence for each outcome with GRADE and presented the results in a 'Summary of findings' table. There was insufficient evidence to conduct the planned subgroup analyses. MAIN RESULTS Five studies (182 children) met the inclusion criteria, and four contributed data to at least one meta-analysis. The included studies were overall at low risk of bias, but our confidence in the evidence was generally low, mainly due to the small sample sizes. Treatment with IV MgSO4 reduced the odds of admission to hospital by 68% (odds ratio (OR) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.74; children = 115; studies = 3; I(2) = 63%). This result was based on data from just three studies including 115 children. Meta-analysis for the secondary outcomes was extremely limited by paucity of data. We performed meta-analysis for the outcome 'return to the emergency department within 48 hours', which showed a very imprecise effect estimate that was not statistically significant (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.02 to 10.30; children = 85; studies = 2; I(2) = 0%). Side effects and adverse events were not consistently reported and meta-analysis was not possible, however few side effects or adverse events were reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS IV MgSO4 may reduce the need for hospital admission in children presenting to the ED with moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma, but the evidence is extremely limited by the number and size of studies. Few side effects of the treatment were reported, but the data were extremely limited.
-
7.
Intravenous magnesium therapy in adult patients with an aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yarad, EA, Hammond, NE
Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses. 2013;(3):105-17
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of magnesium for the prevention of cerebral arterial vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is debatable. We performed a systematic review to collate the available evidence to evaluate the effects of intravenous magnesium for the prevention of cerebral arterial vasospasm. MATERIALS AND METHODS An electronic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest, CINAHL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was undertaken up to 1st October 2012 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of intravenous magnesium for the prevention of vasospasm in adult patients with aneurysmal SAH. Primary outcome measures were risk of vasospasm, functional outcomes and mortality. Results are presented as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Nine of 38 trials were included in this review. Not all trials could be combined for analyses due to differences in reported outcomes and outcome definitions. Of the trials that could be combined we found a statistically significant reduction on the incidence of vasospasm with magnesium (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71, 0.98; P=0.03). No statistical difference for the last reported favourable functional outcome (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.96, 1.05; P=0.84); or mortality (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.77, 1.18; P=0.67) between magnesium treated and standard care/control groups was found. CONCLUSION We identified a benefit in the role of magnesium to reduce the incidence of cerebral vasospasm in patients with an aneurysmal SAH. However no benefit was found regarding improved favourable functional outcome or a reduction of mortality.
-
8.
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.
Powell, C, Dwan, K, Milan, SJ, Beasley, R, Hughes, R, Knopp-Sihota, JA, Rowe, BH
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012;:CD003898
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma exacerbations can be frequent and range in severity from relatively mild to status asthmaticus. The use of magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) is one of numerous treatment options available during acute exacerbations. While the efficacy of intravenous MgSO(4) has been demonstrated, little is known of the role of inhaled MgSO(4). OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy of inhaled MgSO(4) administered in acute asthma on pulmonary functions and admission rates. SPECIFIC AIMS To quantify the effects of inhaled MgSO(4) i) in addition to inhaled β(2)-agonist, ii) in comparison to inhaled β(2)-agonist alone or iii) in addition to combination treatment with inhaled β(2) -agonist and ipratropium bromide. SEARCH METHODS Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials in September 2012. These trials were supplemented with trials found in the reference list of published studies, studies found using extensive electronic search techniques, as well as a review of the grey literature and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised (or pseudo-randomised) controlled trials including adults or children with acute asthma were eligible for inclusion in the review. Studies were included if patients were treated with nebulised MgSO(4) alone or in combination with β(2)-agonist and/or ipratropium bromide and were compared with β(2)-agonist alone or inactive control. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Trial selection, data extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by two review authors. Efforts were made to collect missing data from authors. Results are presented as standardised mean differences (SMD) for pulmonary function and risk ratios (RR) for hospital admission; both are displayed with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS Sixteen trials (21 references) of unclear and high risk of bias were eligible and included 896 patients who were randomised (838 patients completed). Seven of the 16 included studies involved adults exclusively, three included adults and paediatric patients, four studies enrolled paediatric patients and in the remaining two studies the age of participants was not stated.The design, definitions, intervention and outcomes were different in all 16 studies; this heterogeneity made direct comparisons difficult (see additional tables 1-3).The overall risk of bias among the included studies was variable and this is reflected in the 'Summary of findings' table with most outcomes being judged as only moderate or less.Inhaled magnesium sulfate in addition to inhaled β(2)-agonistThere was no statistically significant improvement in pulmonary function when inhaled MgSO(4) and β(2)-agonist was compared with β(2)-agonist alone (SMD 0.23; 95% CI -0.27 to 0.74; three studies, n = 188); however, there was considerable between study heterogeneity. There was no clear advantage in terms of hospital admissions (RR 0.76 95% CI 0.49, 1.16; four studies, n = 249), and there were no serious adverse events reported.Inhaled magnesium sulfate versus inhaled β(2)-agonistThe results of pulmonary function in three studies that compared inhaled MgSO(4) versus β(2)-agonist were too heterogeneous to combine; however, two of the studies found poorer lung function on MgSO(4). There was no significant difference in terms of hospital admissions in a single small study when MgSO(4) was compared to β(2)-agonist (RR 0.53 95% CI 0.05, 5.31; one study, n = 33), and there were no serious adverse events reported.Inhaled magnesium sulfate in addition to inhaled β(2)-agonist and ipratropiumA further comparison has been included in the 2012 update of this review of MgSO(4) given in addition to inhaled ipratropium and β(2)-agonist therapy (as recommended by the GINA guidelines). However, there is not yet enough data for this outcome to come to any definite conclusions, but both small studies in adults with severe asthma exacerbation found improvements in pulmonary function with additional inhaled MgSO(4). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is currently no good evidence that inhaled MgSO(4) can be used as a substitute for inhaled β(2)-agonists. When used in addition to inhaled β(2)-agonists (with or without inhaled ipratropium), there is currently no overall clear evidence of improved pulmonary function or reduced hospital admissions. However, individual study results from three trials suggest possible improved pulmonary function in those with severe asthma exacerbations (FEV1 less than 50% predicted). Heterogeneity among trials included in this review precludes a more definitive conclusion. Further studies should focus on inhaled MgSO(4) in addition to the current guideline treatment for acute asthma (inhaled β(2) -agonist and ipratropium bromide). As the evidence suggests that the most effective role of nebulised MgSO(4) may be in those with severe acute features and this is where future research should be focused. A set of core outcomes needs to be agreed upon both in adult and paediatric studies to allow improved study comparison in future.
-
9.
Magnesium sulphate in the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled trials.
Ma, L, Liu, WG, Zhang, JM, Chen, G, Fan, J, Sheng, HS
Brain injury. 2010;(5):730-5
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Experimental and clinical studies have suggested that magnesium has neuroprotective and vasodilatation properties. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of intravenous magnesium therapy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). RESEARCH DESIGN Meta-analysis. METHODS AND PROCEDURES Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for prospective controlled trials evaluating intravenous magnesium for treating SAH after a ruptured aneurysm without language restrictions. Two researchers performed the literature search and data extraction independently. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS Six prospective controlled trials involving 699 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Magnesium infusion reduced the risk of poor outcome and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI): the relative risk was 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.83) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.53-1.00), respectively. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the meta-analysis. The withdrawal rate for adverse effects was higher in the magnesium-treatment arm compared to the placebo arm, RR 9.98 (95% CI 3.04-32.74). CONCLUSION The meta-analysis suggests that intravenous magnesium therapy reduces the risk of DCI and poor outcome after aneurysmal SAH. Serum magnesium should be routinely monitored for both effectiveness and safety considerations.
-
10.
A meta analysis of treating subarachnoid hemorrhage with magnesium sulfate.
Zhao, XD, Zhou, YT, Zhang, X, Zhuang, Z, Shi, JX
Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2009;(11):1394-7
Abstract
Despite the publication of several randomized controlled studies, there is still much debate on whether magnesium sulfate improves outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Here we present data to assess the clinical effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in the prevention of cerebral vasospasm in patients who have suffered from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched using the following terms: "magnesium sulfate" or "MgSO(4)" with "subarachnoid hemorrhage" or "cerebral vasospasm". A manual search of the bibliographies of relevant articles was also conducted. Two co-authors of the present study designed the meta analysis of published randomized clinical trials and extracted the data. Data were analysed by using Review Manager 4.2 from the Cochrane Collaboration (Oxford, UK). Five published manuscripts were identified according to the screening criteria. The occurrence of poor outcome (death, vegetative state, or dependency) in patients treated with magnesium sulfate was less likely than control group patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.54 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.36-0.81]). Mortality rates did not differ between magnesium sulfate (14%) and control treated (12%) patients (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.51-2.65]). Our results indicate that although there was reduced likelihood of a poor outcome for patients treated with magnesium sulfate after SAH, patient mortality was not improved.