-
1.
Evocalcet with vitamin D receptor activator treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism.
Shigematsu, T, Asada, S, Endo, Y, Kawata, T, Fukagawa, M, Akizawa, T
PloS one. 2022;(2):e0262829
Abstract
This ad hoc analysis of a previously conducted phase 3 head-to-head comparison study of evocalcet and cinacalcet in secondary hyperparathyroidism patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined once-daily oral evocalcet and intravenous vitamin D receptor activator treatment stratified by weekly vitamin D receptor activator dose (117, 45, and 91 patients in no, low [< 1.5 μg], and high [≥ 1.5 μg] dose groups, respectively). Effects of vitamin D receptor activator were assessed on the basis of intact parathyroid hormone, corrected calcium, phosphorus, and fibroblast growth factor-23 levels; percent changes from baseline; proportions of patients who achieved target intact parathyroid hormone, corrected calcium, and phosphorus at Weeks 28-30; and adverse drug reactions. Intact parathyroid hormone, corrected calcium, phosphorus, and fibroblast growth factor-23 levels decreased in all groups; phosphorus and fibroblast growth factor-23 levels remained high in the high dose group. In the low and high dose groups, greater proportions of patients achieved the corrected calcium target compared with the no dose group (p = 0.043). Ratios of intact-to-C-terminal fibroblast growth factor-23 decreased in all groups. In low and high dose groups, hypocalcemia was less common than in the no dose group (p = 0.014). Evocalcet with concomitant vitamin D receptor activator demonstrated benefits such that more patients achieved the corrected calcium target and exhibited decreased fibroblast growth factor-23 synthesis; the incidence of hypocalcemia also decreased. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02549391) and JAPIC (JapicCTI-153013).
-
2.
Effects of Grapefruit and Pomegranate Juices on the Pharmacokinetic Properties of Dapoxetine and Midazolam in Healthy Subjects.
Abdlekawy, KS, Donia, AM, Elbarbry, F
European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. 2017;(3):397-405
Abstract
BACKGROUND The package leaflet for dapoxetine, an effective treatment for premature ejaculation, includes a strict warning against coadministration with drugs or herbal remedies that strongly induce or inhibit the activity of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme. OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of multiple daily consumption of grapefruit juice (GFJ) and pomegranate juice (PJ) on the pharmacokinetics of dapoxetine, we conducted an open-label, three-way crossover study in 12 healthy subjects using midazolam as a probe substrate for CYP3A4. METHODS Participants received a single oral dose of dapoxetine (60 mg) and midazolam (7.5 mg) after pretreatment with 250 ml of either water, undiluted GFJ, or PJ for three consecutive days. All subjects were monitored for adverse effects during the study period. RESULTS Compared to pretreatment with water, GFJ increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (C max) of dapoxetine by 60 and 80 %, respectively, and prolonged its elimination half-life (t 1/2) by 43 %. Similar effects of GFJ on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam were observed with a significant increase in AUC0-∞ (75 %), C max (40 %), and t 1/2 (92 %). Slight but not statistically significant changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of dapoxetine and midazolam after pretreatment with PJ. Time to reach C max (T max) did not differ among the three phases. CONCLUSION These results suggest that GFJ increases the extent of absorption and reduces clearance of dapoxetine possibly by inhibition of both intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4, whereas PJ has little effect on dapoxetine pharmacokinetics. Although the impact of GFJ on the pharmacokinetics of dapoxetine was mild, a great caution should be considered when they are concomitantly administered.
-
3.
Cinacalcet, Fibroblast Growth Factor-23, and Cardiovascular Disease in Hemodialysis: The Evaluation of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) Trial.
Moe, SM, Chertow, GM, Parfrey, PS, Kubo, Y, Block, GA, Correa-Rotter, R, Drüeke, TB, Herzog, CA, London, GM, Mahaffey, KW, et al
Circulation. 2015;(1):27-39
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with kidney disease have disordered bone and mineral metabolism, including elevated serum concentrations of fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23). These elevated concentrations are associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The objective was to determine the effects of the calcimimetic cinacalcet (versus placebo) on reducing serum FGF23 and whether changes in FGF23 are associated with death and cardiovascular events. METHODS AND RESULTS This was a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing cinacalcet to placebo in addition to conventional therapy (phosphate binders/vitamin D) in patients receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism (intact parathyroid hormone ≥300 pg/mL). The primary study end point was time to death or a first nonfatal cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina, heart failure, or a peripheral vascular event). This analysis included 2985 patients (77% of randomized) with serum samples at baseline and 2602 patients (67%) with samples at both baseline and week 20. The results demonstrated that a significantly larger proportion of patients randomized to cinacalcet had ≥30% (68% versus 28%) reductions in FGF23. Among patients randomized to cinacalcet, a ≥30% reduction in FGF23 between baseline and week 20 was associated with a nominally significant reduction in the primary composite end point (relative hazard, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.98), cardiovascular mortality (relative hazard, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.87), sudden cardiac death (relative hazard, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.86), and heart failure (relative hazard, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.99). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with cinacalcet significantly lowers serum FGF23. Treatment-induced reductions in serum FGF23 are associated with lower rates of cardiovascular death and major cardiovascular events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00345839.
-
4.
Effects of Cinacalcet on Fracture Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: The EVOLVE Trial.
Moe, SM, Abdalla, S, Chertow, GM, Parfrey, PS, Block, GA, Correa-Rotter, R, Floege, J, Herzog, CA, London, GM, Mahaffey, KW, et al
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2015;(6):1466-75
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Fractures are frequent in patients receiving hemodialysis. We tested the hypothesis that cinacalcet would reduce the rate of clinical fractures in patients receiving hemodialysis using data from the Evaluation of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events trial, a placebo-controlled trial that randomized 3883 hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism to receive cinacalcet or placebo for ≤64 months. This study was a prespecified secondary analysis of the trial whose primary end point was all-cause mortality and non-fatal cardiovascular events, and one of the secondary end points was first clinical fracture event. Clinical fractures were observed in 255 of 1935 (13.2%) patients randomized to placebo and 238 of 1948 (12.2%) patients randomized to cinacalcet. In an unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis, the relative hazard for fracture (cinacalcet versus placebo) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75 to 1.07). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and multiple fractures, the relative hazard was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98). Using a prespecified lag-censoring analysis (a measure of actual drug exposure), the relative hazard for fracture was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90). When participants were censored at the time of cointerventions (parathyroidectomy, transplant, or provision of commercial cinacalcet), the relative hazard was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.87). Fracture rates were higher in older compared with younger patients and the effect of cinacalcet appeared more pronounced in older patients. In conclusion, using an unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis, cinacalcet did not reduce the rate of clinical fracture. However, when accounting for differences in baseline characteristics, multiple fractures, and/or events prompting discontinuation of study drug, cinacalcet reduced the rate of clinical fracture by 16%-29%.
-
5.
Effects of calcium carbonate, sevelamer hydrochloride or pantoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of cinacalcet.
Padhi, D, Harris, R, Sullivan, JT
Clinical drug investigation. 2014;(8):537-44
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common consequence of chronic kidney disease. Cinacalcet (Sensipar(®)) is often prescribed in combination to reduce elevated levels of parathyroid hormone, calcium and phosphorus. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of concomitantly administered therapies of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3); TUMS(®)), sevelamer hydrochloride (HCl; Renagel(®)) and pantoprazole sodium (Protonix(®)) on the pharmacokinetics and safety of cinacalcet in healthy subjects. METHODS Three randomized, open-label, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in healthy subjects. Participants received single doses of cinacalcet alone or in combination with either CaCO(3), sevelamer HCl or pantoprazole. The pharmacokinetic profile of cinacalcet was characterized. Safety assessments including adverse event reporting, changes in vital signs and clinical laboratory measurements were conducted throughout the studies. RESULTS The 90 % confidence intervals for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(last)), area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of cinacalcet were within the accepted range of 80-125 % for both CaCO(3) and sevelamer HCl co-administration with cinacalcet. No severe or serious adverse events or clinically relevant changes in physical or laboratory findings occurred during the studies. CONCLUSION The pharmacokinetic parameters of cinacalcet were not affected by co-administration of CaCO(3), sevelamer HCl or pantoprazole. Co-administration of these agents with cinacalcet does not require an adjustment of the dose of cinacalcet.
-
6.
A prospective randomized pilot study on intermittent post-dialysis dosing of cinacalcet.
Haq, N, Chaaban, A, Gebran, N, Khan, I, Abbachi, F, Hassan, M, Bernsen, R, Abouchacra, S
International urology and nephrology. 2014;(1):113-9
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is important in management of patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (HD). Calcimimetic agent, cinacalcet provides an option for control of SHPT in patients who fail traditional therapy. It may not have optimal results in non-compliant patients. To enhance compliance, we evaluated effectiveness of post-dialysis dosing of cinacalcet (group AD) as compared to daily home administration (group D) in a prospective randomized trial of HD patients with refractory SHPT. METHODS After 2-week run-in phase, patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. In group AD (N = 12), patients were administered cinacalcet on the day of dialysis (3 times/week) by dialysis staff, while in control group D (N = 11), cinacalcet was prescribed daily to be taken by patients at home. Intact parathyroid hormone (i-PTH), serum calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase were followed for 16 weeks and compared to baseline in both groups. Data were analyzed using between-groups linear regression for repeated measures. RESULTS No significant decline in i-PTH occurred in group AD at 16 weeks as compared to a significant drop in group D (p = 0.006). However, subgroup analysis showed effectiveness of post-dialysis dosing in patients with less severe SHPT (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Although daily dosing overall was more effective for treatment of SHPT, dialysis dosing was effective in patients with less severe SHPT. This warrants a larger study considering the limitations of this pilot trial. In the meantime, dialysis dosing can be considered in non-compliant patients with less severe SHPT.
-
7.
Effects of cinacalcet on atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic cardiovascular events in patients receiving hemodialysis: the EValuation Of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower CardioVascular Events (EVOLVE) trial.
Wheeler, DC, London, GM, Parfrey, PS, Block, GA, Correa-Rotter, R, Dehmel, B, Drüeke, TB, Floege, J, Kubo, Y, Mahaffey, KW, et al
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2014;(6):e001363
Abstract
BACKGROUND Premature cardiovascular disease limits the duration and quality of life on long-term hemodialysis. The objective of this study was to define the frequency of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events attributable to atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic mechanisms, risk factors for these events, and the effects of cinacalcet, using adjudicated data collected during the EValuation of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower CardioVascular Events (EVOLVE) Trial. METHODS AND RESULTS EVOLVE was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial that randomized 3883 hemodialysis patients with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism to cinacalcet or matched placebo for up to 64 months. For this post hoc analysis, the outcome measure was fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events reflecting atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. During the trial, 1518 patients experienced an adjudicated cardiovascular event, including 958 attributable to nonatherosclerotic disease. Of 1421 deaths during the trial, 768 (54%) were due to cardiovascular disease. Sudden death was the most frequent fatal cardiovascular event, accounting for 24.5% of overall mortality. Combining fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, randomization to cinacalcet reduced the rates of sudden death and heart failure. Patients randomized to cinacalcet experienced fewer nonatherosclerotic cardiovascular events (adjusted relative hazard 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.96), while the effect of cinacalcet on atherosclerotic events did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Accepting the limitations of post hoc analysis, any benefits of cinacalcet on cardiovascular disease in the context of hemodialysis may result from attenuation of nonatherosclerotic processes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION Unique identifier: NCT00345839. URL: ClinicalTrials.gov.
-
8.
Paricalcitol- or cinacalcet-centred therapy affects markers of bone mineral disease in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT-SHPT study.
Cozzolino, M, Ketteler, M, Martin, KJ, Sharma, A, Goldsmith, D, Khan, S
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2014;(4):899-905
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this Phase 4 international study, efficacy and safety of paricalcitol-centred therapy were compared with that of cinacalcet-centred therapy for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients undergoing haemodialysis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00977080). METHODS Patients ≥ 18 years of age with Stage 5 CKD and SHPT [intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level of 300-800 pg/mL, calcium level of 8.4-10.0 mg/dL and phosphate concentration of ≤ 6.5 mg/dL] who were undergoing haemodialysis were included. Patients were randomized by mode of paricalcitol administration [i.e. intravenous (IV) or oral strata] to receive paricalcitol- or cinacalcet-centred therapy for ≤ 28 weeks. Changes in metabolic markers [total alkaline phosphatase (AP), bone-specific AP and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23)] and the proportion of patients in each treatment group who achieved an iPTH level of 150-300 pg/mL during Weeks 8, 16 and 21-28 as a composite value were evaluated. RESULTS Compared with cinacalcet-centred therapy, levels of both bone turnover markers were significantly reduced from baseline with IV and oral paricalcitol-centred treatment (P < 0.05 for both dosing strata) at Weeks 8, 16 and 28. Levels of FGF-23 were increased with paricalcitol versus cinacalcet-centred treatment. A greater proportion of patients receiving paricalcitol-centred therapy achieved target iPTH levels (i.e. 150-300 pg/mL) throughout the study in the IV and oral dosing strata compared with patients receiving cinacalcet-centred treatment. CONCLUSIONS In patients with CKD and SHPT undergoing haemodialysis, paricalcitol-centred therapy reduced circulating bone turnover markers and iPTH levels and increased FGF-23 levels compared with cinacalcet-centred treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00977080.
-
9.
Cinacalcet lowering of serum fibroblast growth factor-23 concentration may be independent from serum Ca, P, PTH and dose of active vitamin D in peritoneal dialysis patients: a randomized controlled study.
Kim, HJ, Kim, H, Shin, N, Na, KY, Kim, YL, Kim, D, Chang, JH, Song, YR, Hwang, YH, Kim, YS, et al
BMC nephrology. 2013;:112
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elevated serum level of fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23) is associated with adverse outcomes in dialyzed patients. OBJECTIVES The CUPID study compared the efficacy of a cinacalcet-based regimen with conventional care (vitamin D and P binders) for achieving the stringent NKF-K/DOQI targets for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Additionally, we analyzed change in FGF23 levels between two treatments to explore the cinacalcet effect in lowering FGF23. DESIGN Multicenter, open-labeled, randomized controlled study. SETTING Seven university-affiliated hospitals in Korea. PARTICIPANTS Overall, 66 peritoneal dialysis patients were enrolled. INTERVENTION Sixty six patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either cinacalcet + oral vitamin D (cinacalcet group, n = 33) or oral vitamin D alone (control group, n = 33) to achieve K/DOQI targets. CUPID included a 4-week screening for vitamin D washout, a 12-week dose-titration, and a 4-week assessment phases. We calculated mean values of iPTH, Ca, P, Ca x P, during assessment phase and final FGF23 to assess the outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Achievement of >30% reduction of iPTH from baseline (primary) and FGF23 reduction (secondary). RESULTS 72.7% (n = 24) of the cinacalcet group and 93.9% (n = 31) of the control group completed the study. Cinacalcet group received 30.2 ± 18.0 mg/day of cinacalcet and 0.13 ± 0.32 μg/d oral vitamin D (P < 0.001 vs. control with 0.27 ± 0.18 μg/d vitamin D). The proportion of patients who reached the primary endpoint was not statistically different (48.5% vs. 51.5%, cinacalcet vs. control, P = 1.000). After treatment, cinacalcet group experienced a significant reduction in FGF23 levels (median value from 3,960 to 2,325 RU/ml, P = 0.002), while an insignificant change was shown for control group (from 2,085 to 2,415 RU/ml). The percent change of FGF23 after treatment was also significantly different between the two groups (- 42.54% vs. 15.83%, P = 0.008). After adjustment, cinacalcet treatment was independently associated with the serum FGF23 reduction. CONCLUSION Cinacalcet treatment was independently associated with the reduction of FGF23 in our PD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Controlled trials NCT01101113.
-
10.
Efficacy of cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D in incident haemodialysis subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism.
Ureña-Torres, P, Bridges, I, Christiano, C, Cournoyer, SH, Cooper, K, Farouk, M, Kopyt, NP, Rodriguez, M, Zehnder, D, Covic, A
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2013;(5):1241-54
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment with cinacalcet improves the control of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and the achievement of calcium and phosphorus targets. Most data come from subjects receiving cinacalcet after several years of dialysis treatment. We therefore compared the efficacy of treatment with cinacalcet and low doses of active vitamin D to flexible doses of active vitamin D alone for the management of SHPT in patients recently initiating haemodialysis. METHODS This open-label trial randomized subjects (n = 309) with parathyroid hormone (PTH) >300 pg/mL on dialysis for 3-12 months to either cinacalcet with low-dose active vitamin D, if prescribed (cinacalcet); or usual care without cinacalcet (control). Randomized subjects were stratified by PTH at screening (300-450, >450-600, >600 pg/mL) and by the use of active vitamin D at enrolment. Treatment duration was 12 months, with primary efficacy endpoint (mean PTH reduction ≥ 30% from baseline) assessed at 6 months. RESULTS The mean [standard deviation (SD)] haemodialysis vintage at enrolment was 7.2 (2.7) months; 53% of subjects were not receiving active vitamin D at enrolment. There was a significant difference in the achievement of the primary endpoint (≥ 30% PTH reduction at 6 months) between cinacalcet-treated subjects and controls in both the entire cohort (63 versus 38%; n = 304; P < 0.0001) and the subgroup of subjects not receiving active vitamin D at enrolment (70 versus 44%; n = 161; P < 0.01). Hypocalcaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events were more commonly observed in cinacalcet-treated subjects. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that cinacalcet with low-dose active vitamin D, if prescribed, provides a more effective treatment approach than usual care without cinacalcet for SHPT in incident haemodialysis patients, even in relatively treatment-naive patients.