-
1.
Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Nicorandil Application in Patients With Acute Heart Failure With Low Baseline Blood Pressure.
Zhang, Y, Cai, Z, Ke, X, Qiu, W, Ke, S, Wu, Y
Heart, lung & circulation. 2022;(1):95-100
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous nicorandil application in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) with low baseline blood pressure (systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg). METHOD This prospective, controlled, single-centre study randomised 147 patients with AHF with low baseline blood pressure (including both emergent admission and newly developed low blood pressure while in hospital) to one of the following two groups: (1) control group (conventional diuretics, positive inotropic agents, and related therapy according to the guidelines); and (2) intervention group (intravenous [IV] nicorandil application plus routine care). Dyspnoea severity, the ratio of E to e' (E/e'), the incidence of side effects and adverse events, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; left ventricular systolic function) before discharge, average length of hospitalisation, LVEF and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) at 3 months after discharge, incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and readmission rate within 3 months were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS Compared to the control group, nicorandil relieved dyspnoea effectively and improved E/e' significantly; the level of NT-proBNP was lower, LVEF was higher before discharge, and average length of hospital stay was shorter in the intervention group. After 3 months, the LVEF was higher, sST2 was lower, and the readmission rate was lower in the intervention group; there was no statistically significant difference in MACCE. CONCLUSIONS Patients with AHF with low baseline blood pressure could benefit from IV nicorandil application in the urgent phase, but the long-term profits remained to be confirmed.
-
2.
Standard vs. double dose of intravenous nicorandil in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing elective coronary procedures.
Zeng, Z, Zhang, H, Zhang, P, Li, Y, Fu, N
Coronary artery disease. 2021;(3):256-257
-
3.
Achieving Optimal Medical Therapy: Insights From the ORBITA Trial.
Foley, M, Rajkumar, CA, Shun-Shin, M, Ganesananthan, S, Seligman, H, Howard, J, Nowbar, AN, Keeble, TR, Davies, JR, Tang, KH, et al
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;(3):e017381
Abstract
Background In stable coronary artery disease, medications are used for 2 purposes: cardiovascular risk reduction and symptom improvement. In clinical trials and clinical practice, medication use is often not optimal. The ORBITA (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina) trial was the first placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous coronary intervention. A key component of the ORBITA trial design was the inclusion of a medical optimization phase, aimed at ensuring that all patients were treated with guideline-directed truly optimal medical therapy. In this study, we report the medical therapy that was achieved. Methods and Results After enrollment into the ORBITA trial, all 200 patients entered a 6-week period of intensive medical therapy optimization, with initiation and uptitration of risk reduction and antianginal therapy. At the prerandomization stage, the median number of antianginals established was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). A total of 195 patients (97.5%) reached the prespecified target of ≥2 antianginals; 136 (68.0%) did not stop any antianginals because of adverse effects, and the median number of antianginals stopped for adverse effects per patient was 0 (interquartile range, 0-1). Amlodipine and bisoprolol were well tolerated (stopped for adverse effects in 4/175 [2.3%] and 9/167 [5.4%], respectively). Ranolazine and ivabradine were also well tolerated (stopped for adverse effects in 1/20 [5.0%] and 1/18 [5.6%], respectively). Isosorbide mononitrate and nicorandil were stopped for adverse effects in 36 of 172 (20.9%) and 32 of 141 (22.7%) of patients, respectively. Statins were well tolerated and taken by 191 of 200 (95.5%) patients. Conclusions In the 12-week ORBITA trial period, medical therapy was successfully optimized and well tolerated, with few drug adverse effects leading to therapy cessation. Truly optimal medical therapy can be achieved in clinical trials, and translating this into longer-term clinical practice should be a focus of future study. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02062593.
-
4.
Impact of administration of nicorandil prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, W, Zhang, G
Medicine. 2021;(17):e25565
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to provide new evidence-based medical evidence for clinical treatment, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of nicorandil prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two reviewers independently will search randomized controlled trials or observational studies about the treatment of nicorandil on AMI patients. Retrieved databases include Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. And retrieval time is limited from inception to June 2021. Key words are nicorandil, myocardial infarction, or similar expansion words without publication limitation. Biomechanical studies, in vitro studies, review articles, techniques, case reports, letters to the editor, and editorials are excluded. RESULTS The results of our review will be reported strictly following the PRISMA criteria and the review will add to the existing literature by showing compelling evidence and improved guidance in clinic settings. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER 10.17605/OSF.IO/UEPKB.
-
5.
Myocardial protective effect of intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil via targeted perfusion microcatheter in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial.
Zhang, W, Dai, J, Zheng, X, Xu, K, Yang, X, Shen, L, Wang, X, Hao, Z, Qiu, X, Jiang, L, et al
Medicine. 2021;(15):e25551
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of nicorandil and alprostadil on myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study, 90 consecutive patients scheduled for elective PCI for de novo coronary lesions were assigned to the nicorandil, alprostadil, and nitroglycerin groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. Drugs were administered intracoronary via a targeted perfusion microcatheter. The primary endpoint was the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion frame count (TMPFC). Additionally, the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), and incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) were assessed. RESULTS Both nicorandil and alprostadil were significantly effective in reducing TMPFC (114.6 ± 33.7 vs 93.4 ± 30.9, P = .016; 114.3 ± 34.3 vs 94.7 ± 33.3, P = .029, respectively). Similar findings were observed in the improvement of cTFC (20.3 ± 10.5 vs 13.5 ± 5.0, P = .003; 20.2 ± 7.4 vs 15.2 ± 5.2, P = .003, respectively) and percentage of TMPG 3 (100% vs 82.8%, P = .052; 83.3% vs 96.7%, P = .196, respectively); whereas, nitroglycerin produced a limited effect on TMPFC (114.4 ± 30.9 vs 112.1 ± 31.9, P = .739), cTFC (19.4 ± 7.2 vs 19.3 ± 7.2, P = .936), and percentage of TMPG 3 (86.7% vs 86.7%, P = 1.000). No significant difference was found in the incidence of PMI (16.7% vs 16.0% vs 27.6%, P = .537), though it was comparatively lower in the nicorandil and alprostadil groups. Furthermore, the intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil had a mild effect on blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS The intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil via a targeted perfusion microcatheter was more effective in improving myocardial perfusion in patients undergoing elective PCI than nitroglycerin.
-
6.
Prophylactically injection of Nicorandil to reduce no-reflow phenomenon during PCI in acute STEMI patients: Protocol of a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
An, S, Huang, H, Wang, H, Jiang, Y
Medicine. 2021;(15):e25500
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a very serious type of heart attack and a profoundly life-threatening medical emergency, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred strategy. However, in patients undergoing primary PCI, 30% to 40% may suffer the no-reflow phenomenon (NRP), and it could expand the myocardial infarction area and accompanied with high rehospitalization rate and fatality rate. In this study, we try to conduct a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to observe whether the prophylactically intracoronary administration of Nicorandil could reduce the occurrence of NRP in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. METHODS Simple randomization in a 1:1 ratio will be made in blocks of variable size according to a random numbers generated by Excel 2010 to divide the patients to treatment group (Nicorandil) and control group (Saline). The outcomes are the occurrence of NRP, levels of interleukin-6 and HS-CRP, cTnT, and CK-MB before, and every 4 hours following PCI, and major adverse cardiovascular events at day 30. SPSS 23.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL) will be used, and P-value < .05 will be considered statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The findings will determine the efficacy of prophylactically intracoronary administration of Nicorandil to reduce the occurrence of NRP during PCI in acute STEMI patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION OSF Registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/QPF3V.
-
7.
Preventive Effects of Nicorandil Against Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Moderate Renal Insufficiency Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Zhang, P, Li, WY, Yang, SC, Fu, NK, Liu, XG, Zhang, X, Cong, HL, Lin, WH, Tian, FS, Lu, CZ, et al
Angiology. 2020;(2):183-188
Abstract
We investigated the preventive effect of nicorandil on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with moderate renal insufficiency undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 250 patients with a creatinine clearance (crCl) ≤60 mL/min undergoing PCI were randomly assigned to either a nicorandil group (nicorandil 10 mg 3 times/d and hydration; n = 125) or a control group (hydration only; n = 125). The first end point was the incidence of CIN defined as an increase in serum creatinine (Scr) levels by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25% within 72 hours after exposure to the contrast medium. The secondary end points were (1) changes in Scr, blood urea nitrogen, and crCl and (2) the incidence of major adverse events during hospitalization. The incidence of CIN was 1.6% (2/125) in the nicorandil group and 9.6% (12/125) in the control group (P = .011). There was no obvious difference in the incidence of major adverse events during hospitalization between the nicorandil and the control group (4.0% vs 4.8%, P = 1.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that nicorandil was a protective factor for CIN (odds ratios = 0.126, 95% confidence interval: -19.996 to -0.932, P = .012). Prophylactic administration of nicorandil may prevent against CIN in patients with moderate renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.
-
8.
Hypothesis: The potential therapeutic role of nicorandil in COVID-19.
Ashour, H, Elsayed, MH, Elmorsy, S, Harb, IA
Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology. 2020;(11):1791-1797
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
At present, there is yet no specific antiviral treatment or immunization against the newly identified human severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS-CoV2) that results in a rapidly progressive pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We believe in a crucial need for a clinical strategy to counteract this viral pandemic based on the known pathogenesis throughout the disease course. Evidence suggests that exaggerated patient's inflammatory response and oxidative stress are likely to aggravate the disease pathology. The resulting endothelial dysfunction further induces fibrosis and coagulopathy. These disturbances can generate severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that can progress into respiratory and circulatory failure. Nicorandil is an anti-anginal vasodilator drug acts by increasing nitric oxide bioavailability and opening of the KATP channel. Recently, nicorandil has been recognized to possess multiple protective effects against tissue injury. Here, we address a possible modulatory role of nicorandil against COVID-19 pathogenesis. We hypothesise nicorandil would be an effective form of adjuvant therapy against COVID-19.
-
9.
Efficacy of nicorandil on the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Zhang, X, Yang, S, Zhang, P, Fu, N
Coronary artery disease. 2020;(3):284-288
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of nicorandil on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS This study randomized 300 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to receive conventional treatment in the control group (hydration only; n = 150) vs. nicorandil therapy (nicorandil 10 mg three times daily plus hydration; n = 150). The primary endpoint was the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as rise in serum creatinine ≥44.2 μmol/L or >25% above baseline within 72 hours after exposure to contrast administered during percutaneous coronary intervention. Secondary endpoints included differences in post-percutaneous coronary intervention serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine clearance rate, cystatin-C, and occurrence of major adverse events. RESULTS Contrast-induced nephropathy incidence was 3.3% (5/150) in the nicorandil group vs. 10.7% (16/150) in the control group (P < 0.05). At 48 and 72 hours after contrast administration, cystatin-C levels were significantly lower and creatinine clearance rate were significantly higher with nicroandil therapy compared to conventional treatment (all P values <0.05). No statistical difference was observed in the incidence of major post-procedure side effect events in hospital and fourteen days of follow-up period between the nicorandil group and control group (3.3% vs. 4.0%, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared to conventional treatment, oral nicorandil therapy was associated with less contrast-induced nephropathy and improved renal function following contrast administration during percutaneous coronary intervention.
-
10.
Nicorandil for Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials.
Yi, B, Luo, J, Jiang, Y, Mo, S, Xiao, X, Chen, X, Rong, J
Angiology. 2020;(7):609-615
Abstract
The clinical outcomes of nicorandil in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are conflicting. We sought to evaluate the effects of nicorandil on periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) in elective PCI. Eligible studies that reported the effect of nicorandil on PMI in elective PCI were obtained from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (up to October 28, 2019). The outcomes were PMI and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Ten randomized controlled trials with 1304 patients undergoing elective PCI were evaluated. Nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of PMI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; P = .0003); however, there was no significant difference in MACCEs (OR = 0.80; P = .45) between the 2 groups. Subgroup analyses showed that nicorandil significantly lowered the PMI risk when only patients with stable coronary artery disease (OR = 0.41; P = .0008) were considered and when nicorandil was administered intravenously (OR = 0.41; P = .0007) or orally (OR = 0.33; P = .0001). This meta-analysis suggests that nicorandil could reduce the incidence of PMI without increasing the occurrence of MACCEs in elective PCI. The effect of nicorandil in lowering the PMI risk is associated with the diagnosis of the patients and the route of nicorandil administration.