-
1.
Abaloparatide is an Effective Treatment Option for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Review of the Number Needed to Treat Compared with Teriparatide.
Reginster, JY, Hattersley, G, Williams, GC, Hu, MY, Fitzpatrick, LA, Lewiecki, EM
Calcified tissue international. 2018;(5):540-545
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Abaloparatide (ABL) is a 34-amino acid peptide designed to be a selective activator of the parathyroid hormone receptor type 1 signaling pathway. In the Abaloparatide Comparator Trial In Vertebral Endpoints (ACTIVE), subcutaneous ABL reduced the risk of new vertebral, nonvertebral, clinical, and major osteoporotic fracture compared with placebo and of major osteoporotic fracture compared with teriparatide. To further evaluate the effectiveness of ABL, we calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one fracture using ACTIVE data. To estimate the potential effectiveness of ABL in populations at higher fracture risk than in ACTIVE, we calculated NNT for vertebral fracture using reference populations from historical placebo-controlled trials, assuming an 86% relative risk reduction in vertebral fracture with ABL treatment as observed in ACTIVE. NNT was calculated as the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction in ACTIVE. The projected NNT for ABL in other populations was calculated based on incidence rate (IR) for vertebral fractures in the placebo arms of the FREEDOM (placebo IR 7.2%), FIT-1 (placebo IR 15.0%), and FIT-2 (placebo IR 3.8%) trials. NNT for ABL in ACTIVE was 28 for vertebral, 55 for nonvertebral, 37 for clinical, and 34 for major osteoporotic fracture. NNT for these fracture types for teriparatide in ACTIVE were 30, 92, 59, and 75, respectively. Using placebo IRs from FREEDOM, FIT-1, and FIT-2, projected NNTs for vertebral fracture with ABL were 17, 8, and 31. These data are useful for further evaluating ABL for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
-
2.
Continuous treatment with odanacatib for up to 8 years in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: a phase 2 study.
Rizzoli, R, Benhamou, CL, Halse, J, Miller, PD, Reid, IR, Rodríguez Portales, JA, DaSilva, C, Kroon, R, Verbruggen, N, Leung, AT, et al
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2016;(6):2099-107
Abstract
UNLABELLED The efficacy and safety of weekly oral odanacatib (ODN) 50 mg for up to 8 years were assessed in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD). Treatment with ODN for up to 8 years resulted in continued or maintained increases in BMD at multiple sites and was well tolerated. INTRODUCTION ODN is a selective inhibitor of cathepsin K. In a 2-year phase 2b study (3/10/25/50 mg ODN once weekly [QW] or placebo) and extensions (50 mg ODN QW or placebo), ODN treatment for 5 years progressively increased BMD and decreased bone resorption markers in postmenopausal women with low BMD ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00112437). METHODS In this prespecified interim analysis at year 8 of an additional 5-year extension (years 6 to 10), patients (n = 117) received open-label ODN 50 mg QW plus weekly vitamin D3 (5600 IU) and calcium supplementation as needed. Primary end points were lumbar spine BMD and safety. Patients were grouped by ODN exposure duration. RESULTS Mean (95 % confidence interval [CI]) lumbar spine BMD changes from baseline were 4.6 % (2.4, 6.7; 3-year continuous ODN exposure), 12.9 % (8.1, 17.7; 5 years), 12.8 % (10.0, 15.7; 6 years), and 14.8 % (11.0, 18.6; 8 years). Similar patterns of results were observed for BMD of trochanter, femoral neck, and total hip versus baseline. Geometric mean changes from baseline to year 8 for bone resorption markers were approximately -50 % (uNTx/Cr) and -45 % (sCTx), respectively (all groups); bone formation markers remained near baseline levels. No osteonecrosis of the jaw, delayed fracture union, or morphea-like skin reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with ODN for up to 8 years resulted in gains in BMD at multiple sites. Bone resorption markers remained reduced, with no significant change observed in bone formation markers. Treatment with ODN for up to 8 years was well tolerated.
-
3.
Overlapping and continued alendronate or raloxifene administration in patients on teriparatide: effects on areal and volumetric bone mineral density--the CONFORS Study.
Muschitz, C, Kocijan, R, Fahrleitner-Pammer, A, Pavo, I, Haschka, J, Schima, W, Kapiotis, S, Resch, H
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2014;(8):1777-85
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Nine month teriparatide (TPTD) monotherapy followed by co-administration of raloxifene (RAL) or alendronate (ALN) for another nine 9 months resulted in incremental bone mineral density (BMD) increase. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of continued antiresorptive treatments for 12 months in the extension phase. Postmenopausal women (n = 125) with severe osteoporosis on ongoing TPTD treatment for 9 months were randomized into three open-label groups for another 9 months: ALN (70 mg/week, n = 41), RAL (60 mg/d, n = 37) in addition to TPTD or no additional medication (n = 47) except Ca and vitamin D. After discontinuation of TPTD the respective antiresorptives were continued for a further 12 months, while patients in the TPTD monotherapy group received Ca and vitamin D. Amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) and cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX), areal and volumetric BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) and hip were assessed. ALN resulted in continued BMD increase in LS (4.3 ± 1.5%; mean ± SD), femoral neck (4.2 ± 1.6%) and total hip (4 ± 1.6%; p < 0.001 for all), while RAL was only effective at the LS (2.4 ± 1.7%, p < 0.001) but no changes at the femoral neck (0.4 ± 1.4%) or total hip (-0.8 ± 1.5%) were observed. Cortical bone only increased in the ALN group (femoral neck 6.7 ± 2.7% and -1.3 ± 2.5%; total hip 13.8 ± 2.9% and -2.3 ± 2.5% for ALN and RAL, p < 0.001 for all; respectively). Analyzing the entire 30 months of therapy, the ALN group revealed the largest BMD increase in all regions. Our results suggest that the addition of ALN to ongoing TPTD and continuing ALN after TPTD was stopped may be beneficial for patients in terms of areal and volumetric BMD increase. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal timing of the initiation of the combination treatment, the respective antiresorptive medication and the potential benefit of this BMD increase regarding fracture prevention.
-
4.
Monitoring bone strontium intake in osteoporotic females self-supplementing with strontium citrate with a novel in-vivo X-ray fluorescence based diagnostic tool.
Moise, H, Chettle, DR, Pejović-Milić, A
Bone. 2014;:48-54
Abstract
Ten female volunteers were recruited as part of the Ryerson and McMaster University Strontium (Sr) in Bone Research Study to have their bone Sr levels measured as they self-supplemented with Sr supplements of their choice. Of the ten volunteers, nine were suffering from osteopenia and/or osteoporosis. Non-invasive bone Sr measurements were performed using an in vivo x-ray fluorescence (IVXRF) I-125 based system. Thirty minute measurements were taken at the finger and ankle, representing primarily cortical and trabecular bone, respectively. For analysis, the 14.2keV Sr K-alpha peak normalized to the Coherent peak at 35.5keV was used. Baseline readings, representing natural bone Sr levels were acquired since all volunteers had no previous intake of Sr based supplements or medications. Once Sr supplements were started, a 24h reading was taken, followed by frequent measurements ranging from weekly, biweekly to monthly. The longest volunteer participation was 1535days. The mean baseline Sr signal observed for the group was 0.42±0.13 and 0.39±0.07 for the finger and ankle, respectively. After 24h, the mean Sr signal rose to 1.43±1.12 and 1.17±0.51, for the finger and ankle, respectively, representing a statistically significant increase (p=0.0043 & p=0.000613). Bone Sr levels continued to increase throughout the length of the study. However the Sr signal varied widely between the individuals such that after three years, the highest Sr signal observed was 28.15±0.86 for the finger and 26.47±1.22 for the ankle in one volunteer compared to 3.15±0.15 and 4.46±0.36, for the finger and ankle, respectively in another. Furthermore, while it was previously reported by our group, that finger bone Sr levels may plateau within two years, these results suggest otherwise, indicating that bone Sr levels will continue to rise at both bone sites even after 4years of Sr intake.
-
5.
Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density.
McClung, MR, Grauer, A, Boonen, S, Bolognese, MA, Brown, JP, Diez-Perez, A, Langdahl, BL, Reginster, JY, Zanchetta, JR, Wasserman, SM, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2014;(5):412-20
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sclerostin is an osteocyte-derived inhibitor of osteoblast activity. The monoclonal antibody romosozumab binds to sclerostin and increases bone formation. METHODS In a phase 2, multicenter, international, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, eight-group study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of romosozumab over a 12-month period in 419 postmenopausal women, 55 to 85 years of age, who had low bone mineral density (a T score of -2.0 or less at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck and -3.5 or more at each of the three sites). Participants were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous romosozumab monthly (at a dose of 70 mg, 140 mg, or 210 mg) or every 3 months (140 mg or 210 mg), subcutaneous placebo, or an open-label active comparator--oral alendronate (70 mg weekly) or subcutaneous teriparatide (20 μg daily). The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine at 12 months. Secondary end points included percentage changes in bone mineral density at other sites and in markers of bone turnover. RESULTS All dose levels of romosozumab were associated with significant increases in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, including an increase of 11.3% with the 210-mg monthly dose, as compared with a decrease of 0.1% with placebo and increases of 4.1% with alendronate and 7.1% with teriparatide. Romosozumab was also associated with large increases in bone mineral density at the total hip and femoral neck, as well as transitory increases in bone-formation markers and sustained decreases in a bone-resorption marker. Except for mild, generally nonrecurring injection-site reactions with romosozumab, adverse events were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS In postmenopausal women with low bone mass, romosozumab was associated with increased bone mineral density and bone formation and with decreased bone resorption. (Funded by Amgen and UCB Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00896532.).
-
6.
Correction of vitamin D insufficiency with combined strontium ranelate and vitamin D3 in osteoporotic patients.
Rizzoli, R, Dawson-Hughes, B, Kaufman, JM, Fardellone, P, Brandi, ML, Vellas, B, Collette, J, Reginster, JY
European journal of endocrinology. 2014;(3):441-50
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral fixed-dose combination of strontium ranelate 2 g/vitamin D₃ 1000 IU daily vs strontium ranelate 2 g daily for correcting vitamin D insufficiency in osteoporosis. DESIGN A 6-month international, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 study. METHODS A total of 518 men and postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years with primary osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5 s.d.) and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) >22.5 nmol/l were included. Patients were allocated to strontium ranelate 2 g/vitamin D₃ 1000 IU daily (n=413) or strontium ranelate 2 g daily (n=105). The participants received calcium 1 g daily. The primary endpoint was serum 25(OH)D at last post-baseline evaluation during 3 months. RESULTS Both groups were comparable at baseline. Mean baseline of 25(OH)D was 44.1 ± 14.6 nmol/l. After 3 months, the percentage of patients with 25(OH)D ≥50 nmol/l was higher with strontium ranelate/vitamin D₃ vs strontium ranelate (84 vs 44%, P<0.001; adjusted between-group odds ratio=6.7; 95% CI, 4.2-10.9). The efficacy of the fixed-dose combination on 25(OH)D was maintained at 6 months (86 vs 40%, P<0.001). Mean 25(OH)D was 65.1 and 49.5 nmol/l, respectively, after 3 months and 66.9 and 45.4 nmol/l after 6 months. Physical performance improved in both groups. Falls were 17 and 20% in the strontium ranelate/vitamin D₃ and strontium ranelate groups respectively. Parathyroid hormone levels were inversely correlated with 25(OH)D. No clinically relevant differences in safety were observed. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination of strontium ranelate 2 g/vitamin D₃ 1000 IU for correction of vitamin D insufficiency in osteoporotic patients.
-
7.
Protective effect of myo-inositol hexaphosphate (phytate) on bone mass loss in postmenopausal women.
López-González, AA, Grases, F, Monroy, N, Marí, B, Vicente-Herrero, MT, Tur, F, Perelló, J
European journal of nutrition. 2013;(2):717-26
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this paper was to evaluate the relationship between urinary concentrations of InsP6, bone mass loss and risk fracture in postmenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 157 postmenopausal women were included in the study: 70 had low (≤0.76 μM), 42 intermediate (0.76-1.42 μM) and 45 high (≥1.42 μM) urinary phytate concentrations. Densitometry values for neck were measured at enrollment and after 12 months (lumbar spine and femoral neck), and 10-year risk fracture was calculated using the tool FRAX(®). RESULTS Individuals with low InsP6 levels had significantly greater bone mass loss in the lumbar spine (3.08 ± 0.65 % vs. 0.43 ± 0.55 %) than did those with high phytate levels. Moreover, a significantly greater percentage of women with low than with high InsP6 levels showed more than 2 % of bone mass loss in the lumbar spine (55.6 vs. 20.7 %). The 10-year fracture probability was also significantly higher in the low-phytate group compared to the high-phytate group, both in hip (0.37 ± 0.06 % vs 0.18 ± 0.04 %) and major osteoporotic fracture (2.45 ± 0.24 % vs 1.83 ± 0.11 %). DISCUSSION It can be concluded that high urinary phytate concentrations are correlated with reduced bone mass loss in lumbar spine over 12 months and with reduced 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture, indicating that increased phytate consumption can prevent development of osteoporosis.
-
8.
Calcium and vitamin D supplementation and risk of kidney stone formation in postmenopausal women.
Haghighi, A, Samimagham, H, Gohardehi, G
Iranian journal of kidney diseases. 2013;(3):210-3
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Calcium and vitamin D are essential structural components of the skeletal system, which prevent osteoporosis after menopause. However, there is a controversial debate on the association between the intake of calcium and vitamin D supplements and the increased risk of formation of kidney calculi in postmenopausal women. which yet have to be confirmed. This study aimed to compare the metabolic changes after supplementation of calcium and vitamin D and examine the risk of stone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-three postmenopausal women referred to rheumatology clinic who had no history of kidney calculi, bone diseases (apart from osteoporosis), metabolic, and rheumatic disorders and had not been receiving calcium, diuretics and calcitonin were investigated. Renal ultrasonography and blood tests were performed and the urine calcium levels were measured for a period of 24 hours for all patients. The examinations were repeated after a 1- year period of treatment with supplemental calcium (100 mg/d) and vitamin D (400 IU/d) and compared with the data before the treatment. RESULTS After 1 year, asymptomatic lithiasis was confirmed in 1 of 53 patients (1.9%) using ultrasonographic examination. No significant differences were found between the 24-hour urine and blood calcium levels before and after the treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that oral intake of calcium and vitamin D after 1 year has no effect on the urinary calcium excretion rate and the formation of kidney calculi in postmenopausal women.
-
9.
Comparisons of serum sclerostin levels among patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, primary hyperparathyroidism and osteomalacia.
Kaji, H, Imanishi, Y, Sugimoto, T, Seino, S
Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 2011;(7):440-4
Abstract
Wnt-β-catenin signaling is important for bone formation. Sclerostin inhibits bone formation mainly by suppressing this signal, and several studies suggest that the suppression of sclerostin expression contributes to the bone anabolic action of parathyroid hormone (PTH). We therefore examined serum sclerostin levels using enzyme-linked immunosolvent assay in 18 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, 9 postmenopausal women with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) and 7 patients with osteomalacia. Serum levels of sclerostin were significantly lower in the group with pHPT, compared with those with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Moreover, serum sclerostin levels were significantly lower in the group with tumor-induced osteomalacia, but not in the group with osteomalacia without tumor, compared with those with postmenopausal osteoporosis. In patients with pHPT, serum sclerostin levels were significantly and negatively correlated to serum calcium and PTH levels. In patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, serum levels of sclerostin levels were significantly and positively related to serum calcium and creatinine levels. In conclusion, we showed that serum sclerostin levels are decreased presumably through endogenous PTH elevation in postmenopausal women with pHPT, compared with the patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
-
10.
The effect of PTH(1-84) or strontium ranelate on bone formation markers in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis: results of a randomized, open-label clinical trial.
Quesada-Gómez, JM, Muschitz, C, Gómez-Reino, J, Greisen, H, Andersen, HS, Dimai, HP
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2011;(9):2529-37
Abstract
UNLABELLED We explored the effects of PTH(1-84) compared with strontium ranelate on bone remodeling as measured by bone remodeling markers in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Biochemical markers of bone formation were significantly increased after treatment with PTH(1-84) but not strontium ranelate, indicating a different mechanism of action between these agents. INTRODUCTION PTH(1-84) and strontium ranelate (SR) are both known to reduce fracture risk in osteoporosis. Measuring changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover induced by these agents can help in characterizing the action of PTH(1-84) and SR on bone remodeling. METHODS A 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase IV trial was conducted in 81 postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis (≥50 years of age, lumbar spine, or total hip T-score ≤-2.5 SD) to assess the effect of SR as compared to PTH(1-84) on bone formation markers P1NP and BSAP. The bone resorption marker CTX was also measured. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive daily either 100 μg PTH(1-84) (n = 41) (subcutaneous injection) or oral 2 g SR (n = 40) for 24 weeks with daily supplements of 800 IU vitamin D(3) and 1,000 mg calcium. Patient-reported outcomes were collected to investigate the effect of treatment on quality of life (QoL). RESULTS Percentage changes from baseline in P1NP and BSAP were significantly increased for PTH(1-84) by week 24 compared with SR (p < 0.0001). Significant changes from baseline in P1NP and BSAP were noted for PTH(1-84) from week 4 onwards; no significant changes were noted for SR. A trend towards a positive impact on QoL was seen with PTH(1-84) treatment. Safety profiles concur with previous analyses. CONCLUSIONS PTH(1-84) had a more rapid and higher effect on bone formation markers compared to SR, indicating that SR has a different mode of action on bone remodeling than the bone building agent PTH(1-84) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.