-
1.
FDG PET correlates weakly with HIF-1α expression in solid tumors: a meta-analysis.
Surov, A, Schmidt, SA, Prasad, V, Beer, AJ, Wienke, A
Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987). 2021;(4):557-564
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α plays a key role in hypoxic adaptation of tumor cells. Overexpression of HIF-1α is associated with tumor aggressiveness and worse prognosis in several malignancies. Presumably, expression of HIF-1a may be reflected by positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2 [fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG PET). There are inconsistent data about relationships between FDG PET and HIF-1α. PURPOSE To provide evident data about associations between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and HIF-1α expression in solid tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were screened for relationships between SUV and HIF-1α up to August 2019. Overall, 21 studies with 1154 patients were identified. The following data were extracted from the literature: authors; year of publication; number of patients; and correlation coefficients. RESULTS Correlation coefficients between SUVmax and HIF-1α were in the range of -0.51-0.71. The pooled correlation coefficient was 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.14-0.41). Furthermore, correlation coefficients for some tumor entities were calculated. For this sub-analysis, data for primary tumors with >2 reports were included. The calculated correlation coefficients in the analyzed subgroups were as follows: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: ρ = 0.25 (95% CI = 0.07-0.42); non-small lung cell cancer: ρ = 0.27 (95% CI = -0.14-0.67); uterine cervical cancer: ρ = -0.09 (95% CI = -0.89-0.71); thymic tumors: ρ = 0.39 (95% CI = 0.04-0.58). CONCLUSION SUVmax of FDG PET correlated weakly with expression of HIF-1α both in overall sample and tumor subgroups. Therefore, FDG PET cannot be used for prediction of hypoxia in clinical practice.
-
2.
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-Fluorocholine PET and 11C-Methionine PET for parathyroid localization in primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bioletto, F, Barale, M, Parasiliti-Caprino, M, Prencipe, N, Berton, AM, Procopio, M, Deandreis, D, Ghigo, E
European journal of endocrinology. 2021;(1):109-120
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary hyperparathyroidism is characterized by an autonomous hypersecretion of parathyroid hormone by one or more parathyroid glands. Preoperative localization of the affected gland(s) is of key importance in order to allow minimally invasive surgery. At the moment, 11C-Methionine and 18F-Fluorocholine PET studies appear to be among the most promising second-line localization techniques; their comparative diagnostic performance, however, is still unknown. METHODS PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were searched up to October 2020 for studies estimating the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-Methionine PET or 18F-Fluorocholine PET for parathyroid localization in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Pooled sensitivity and positive predictive value were calculated for each tracer on a 'per-lesion' basis and compared using a random-effect model subgroup analysis. RESULTS In total, 22Twenty-two studies were finally considered in the meta-analysis. Of these, 8 evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-Methionine and 14 that of 18F-Fluorocholine. No study directly comparing the two tracers was found. The pooled sensitivity of 18F-Fluorocholine was higher than that of 11C-Methionine (92% vs 80%, P < 0.01), while the positive predictive value was similar (94% vs 95%, P = 0.99). These findings were confirmed in multivariable meta-regression models, demonstrating their apparent independence from other possible predictors or confounders at a study level. CONCLUSION This was the first meta-analysis that specifically compared the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-Methionine and 18F-Fluorocholine PET for parathyroid localization in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Our results suggested a superior performance of 18F-Fluorocholine in terms of sensitivity, while the two tracers had comparable accuracy in terms of positive predictive value.
-
3.
The value of four imaging modalities to distinguish malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules: a study based on 73 cohorts incorporating 7956 individuals.
Wu, Q, Zhong, L, Xie, X
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico. 2021;(2):296-310
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) frequently bother oncologists. The differentiation of malignant from benign nodules with non-invasive approach remains a tough challenge. This study was designed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomography (CT), dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and technetium 99 m (99mTc) depreotide single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for SPNs. METHODS Electronic databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant trials. The primary evaluation index of diagnostic accuracy was areas under the summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curve. The results were analyzed utilizing Stata 12.0 statistical software. RESULTS Seventy-three trials incorporating 7956 individuals were recruited. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic score, diagnostic odds ratios, and areas under the SROC curve with 95% confidence intervals were, respectively, 0.92 (0.89-0.95), 0.64 (0.54-0.74), 2.60 (1.98-3.42), 0.12 (0.08-0.17), 3.10 (2.62-3.59), 22.24 (13.67-36.17), and 0.91 (0.88-0.93) for CT; 0.92 (0.86-0.95), 0.85 (0.77-0.90), 6.01 (3.90-9.24), 0.10 (0.06-0.17), 4.12 (3.41-4.82), 61.39 (30.41-123.93), and 0.94 (0.92-0.96) for MRI; 0.90 (0.86-0.93), 0.73 (0.65-0.79), 3.28 (2.56-4.20), 0.14 (0.10-0.19), 3.16 (2.69-3.64), 23.68 (14.74-38.05), and 0.90 (0.87-0.92) for 18F-FDG PET; and 0.93 (0.88-0.96), 0.70 (0.56-0.81), 3.12 (2.03-4.81), 0.10 (0.06-0.17), 3.43 (2.63-4.22), 30.74 (13.84-68.27), and 0.93 (0.91-0.95) for 99mTc-depreotide SPECT. CONCLUSION The dynamic MRI, dynamic CT, 18F-FDG PET, and 99mTc-depreotide SPECT were favorable non-invasive approaches to distinguish malignant SPNs from benign. Moreover, from the viewpoint of cost-effectiveness and avoiding radiation, the dynamic MRI was recommendable for SPNs.
-
4.
Diagnostic Accuracy of PET Tracers for the Differentiation of Tumor Progression from Treatment-Related Changes in High-Grade Glioma: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.
de Zwart, PL, van Dijken, BRJ, Holtman, GA, Stormezand, GN, Dierckx, RAJO, Jan van Laar, P, van der Hoorn, A
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2020;(4):498-504
Abstract
Posttreatment high-grade gliomas are usually monitored with contrast-enhanced MRI, but its diagnostic accuracy is limited as it cannot adequately distinguish between true tumor progression and treatment-related changes. According to recent Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology recommendations, PET overcomes this limitation. However, it is currently unknown which tracer yields the best results. Therefore, a systematic review and metaanalysis were performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the different PET tracers in differentiating tumor progression from treatment-related changes in high-grade glioma patients. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched systematically. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 authors. Metaanalysis was performed using a bivariate random-effects model when at least 5 studies were included. Results: The systematic review included 39 studies (11 tracers). 18F-FDG (12 studies, 171 lesions) showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 84% (95% confidence interval, 72%-92%) and 84% (95% confidence interval, 69%-93%), respectively. O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) (7 studies, 172 lesions) demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% (95% confidence interval, 81%-95%) and specificity of 85% (95% confidence interval, 71%-93%). For S-11C-methyl)-l-methionine (11C-MET) (8 studies, 151 lesions), sensitivity was 93% (95% confidence interval, 80%-98%) and specificity was 82% (95% confidence interval, 68%-91%). The numbers of included studies for the other tracers were too low to combine, but sensitivity and specificity ranged between 93%-100% and 0%-100%, respectively, for 18F-FLT; 85%-100% and 72%-100%, respectively, for 3,4-dihydroxy-6-18F-fluoro-l-phenylalanine (18F-FDOPA); and 100% and 70%-88%, respectively, for 11C-choline. Conclusion:18F-FET and 11C-MET, both amino-acid tracers, showed a comparably higher sensitivity than 18F-FDG in the differentiation between tumor progression and treatment-related changes in high-grade glioma patients. The evidence for other tracers is limited; thus, 18F-FET and 11C-MET are preferred when available. Our results support the incorporation of amino-acid PET tracers for the treatment evaluation of high-grade gliomas.
-
5.
Comparison of gallium-68 somatostatin receptor and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu, X, Li, N, Jiang, T, Xu, H, Ran, Q, Shu, Z, Wu, J, Li, Y, Zhou, S, Zhang, B
Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine. 2020;(2):188-200
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A meta-analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance of gallium-68 (18Ga) somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography (68Ga-SSTR PET) and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and whether the two imaging modalities can be mutually substituted in clinical work. METHODS We performed electronic literature searches of the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for English-language articles from the earliest available date of indexing through 30 July 2019. We calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of 68Ga-SSTR PET and 18F-FDG PET in NET. We drew a summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve and calculated the area under the curve (AUC) to measure the accuracy of 68Ga-SSTR PET and 18F-FDG PET in patients or lesions with NET. RESULTS Thirty studies comprising 3401 patients and 5793 lesions with NET were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, sensitivity, DOR and AUC for 68Ga-SSTR PET or PET/computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of NET, based on lesion patient, were 0.92(0.89-0.95), 0.91(0.83-0.95),119(51-282) and 0.96(0.94-0.98), and based on lesion, were 0.95(0.86-0.98), 0.93(0.83-0.97), 229(43-1205) and 0.98(0.96-0.99), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, sensitivity, DOR and AUC for 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in NET were 0.70(0.41-0.89), 0.97(0.70-1.00), 67(7-612) and 0.94(0.92-0.96), respectively, when analyzed on a per-patient basis.The pooled sensitivities of 68Ga-SSTR PET/CT were 0.923 (95% CI: 0.884-0.952), 0.902 (0.862-0.934) and 0.578 (0.482-0.669) in the G1(ki67,≤2%), G2(ki67,>3%,≤20% and G3(ki67,>20%) groups based on patients with NET, respectively. The pooled sensitivities of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 0.378 (0.319-0.440), 0.554 (0.492-0.615) and 0.712 (0.633-0.783) in the G1, G2 and G3 groups based on patients with NET, respectively. CONCLUSION The 68Ga-SSTR PET has highly sensitive and had a greater diagnostic value than 18F-FDG PET for patients with NET. Fluorine-18-FDG PET, however, had significant specificity than 68Ga-SSTR PET. The 68Ga-SSTR has high sensitivity in G1/G2 NET, while 18F-FDG has a low positive rate. In G3 NET, however, the opposite is true. Therefore, the 68Ga-SSTR PET and 18F-FDG PET modalities are complementary rather than substitutive in clinical practice.
-
6.
Evidence-Based Data About Prevalence and Risk of Malignancy of Thyroid Incidentalomas Detected by Different PET Radiopharmaceuticals.
Signore, G, Albano, D, Giovanella, L, Bertagna, F, Treglia, G
Current radiopharmaceuticals. 2020;(2):89-93
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, several meta-analyses and systematic reviews have reported data about the prevalence and risk of malignancy of thyroid incidentalomas detected by different PET radiopharmaceuticals. OBJECTIVE This article aims to summarize the published evidence-based data about the prevalence and risk of malignancy of thyroid incidentalomas detected by different PET radiopharmaceuticals. METHODS A comprehensive computer literature search of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published up to July 2019 in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases regarding the prevalence and risk of malignancy of thyroid incidentalomas detected by different PET radiopharmaceuticals was carried out. RESULTS We have summarized the data about prevalence and risk of malignancy of thyroid incidentalomas detected by different PET radiopharmaceuticals (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose, radiolabelled choline and prostate-specific membrane antigen) taking into account 8 evidence-based articles. CONCLUSION Evidence-based data demonstrated that thyroid incidentalomas detected by different PET radiopharmaceuticals are not infrequent and their risk of malignancy is not negligible, in particular if focal pattern is evident at PET, thus requiring further clinical and instrumental evaluation.
-
7.
Diagnostic and grading accuracy of 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiao, J, Jin, Y, Nie, J, Chen, F, Ma, X
BMC cancer. 2019;(1):767
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging with 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F] fluoro-L-phenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) has been used in the evaluation of gliomas. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain the diagnostic and grading accuracy of 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 May 2019. We included studies reporting the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDOPA PET or PET/CT in glioma patients. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated from eligible studies on a per-lesion basis. RESULTS Eventually, 19 studies were included. Across 13 studies (370 patients) for glioma diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT were 0.90 (95%CI: 0.86-0.93) and 0.75 (95%CI: 0.65-0.83). Across 7 studies (219 patients) for glioma grading, 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.81-0.93) and a pooled specificity of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.64-0.81). CONCLUSIONS 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT demonstrated good performance for diagnosing gliomas and differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs). Further studies implementing standardized PET protocols and investigating the grading parameters are needed.
-
8.
Performance of 18F-FDG, 11C-Methionine, and 18F-FET PET for Glioma Grading: A Meta-analysis.
Katsanos, AH, Alexiou, GA, Fotopoulos, AD, Jabbour, P, Kyritsis, AP, Sioka, C
Clinical nuclear medicine. 2019;(11):864-869
Abstract
PURPOSE Gliomas constitute the most frequent primary brain tumors. Glioblastoma, the most common and malignant glioma in adults, has dismal prognosis with any current therapy. On the other hand, low-grade gliomas, the second most common type of gliomas, are potentially curative with appropriate treatment. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the performance of PET tracers with the best available evidence, namely, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), C-methionine (MET), and F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET), in differentiating low- from high-grade gliomas. RESULTS Twenty-three studies with a total of 994 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of both MET PET and FET PET were found to be significantly higher than of FDG PET (94%, 88%, and 63% respectively, P < 0.001). The pooled specificity of FDG PET was found to be significantly greater compared with both MET PET and FET PET (89%, 55%, and 57%, respectively; P = 0.002). Fluorodeoxyglucose PET was superior in terms of higher positive likelihood ratio values compared with both FET PET and MET PET. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis indicated that both MET and FET were superior to FDG in terms of sensitivity for identifying glioma grade.
-
9.
Diagnostic value of radiolabeled amino acid PET for detection of pseudoprogression of brain tumor after treatment: a meta-analysis.
Kim, SJ, Ryul Shim, S
Nuclear medicine communications. 2019;(9):965-972
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of radiolabeled amino acid PET for detection of pseudoprogression (PsP) of brain tumor after treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS The PubMed and EMBASE database, from the earliest available date of indexing through 15 February 2019, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of radiolabeled amino acid PET for detection of PsP. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios, and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. RESULTS Across seven results from six studies (971 patients), the pooled sensitivity was 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.94] without heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0) and a pooled specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.76-0.94) without heterogeneity (I2=29.4). Likelihood ratio syntheses gave an overall positive likelihood ratio of 7.3 (95% CI: 3.6-14.7) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.07-0.21). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 60 (95% CI: 23-152). Hierarchical SROC curve indicates that the areas under the curve (AUC) was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94). CONCLUSION The current meta-analysis showed the good sensitivity and specificity of radiolabeled amino acid PET for detection of PsP of brain tumor after treatment. Also, the DOR was high and SROC curve showed high AUC value.
-
10.
Prognostic Value of the Metabolic and Volumetric Parameters of 11C-Methionine Positron-Emission Tomography for Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim, YI, Kim, Y, Lee, JY, Jang, SJ
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2018;(9):1629-1634
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have demonstrated that 11C-methionine positron-emission tomography provides information on prognosis. PURPOSE We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic value of the metabolic and volumetric parameters of 11C-methionine-PET for gliomas. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was performed using the following combination of keywords: "methionine," "PET," "glioma," and "prognosis." STUDY SELECTION The inclusion criteria were the use of 11C-methionine-PET as an imaging tool, studies limited to gliomas, studies including metabolic parameters (tumor-to-normal ratio) and/or volumetric parameters (metabolic tumor volume), and studies reporting survival data. The electronic search first identified 181 records, and 14 studies were selected. DATA ANALYSIS Event-free survival and overall survival were the outcome measures of interest. The effect of the tumor-to-normal ratio and metabolic tumor volume on survival was determined by the effect size of the hazard ratio. Hazard ratios were extracted directly from each study when provided or determined by analyzing the Kaplan-Meier curves. DATA SYNTHESIS The combined hazard ratios of the tumor-to-normal ratio for event-free survival was 1.74 with no significance and that of the tumor-to-normal ratio for overall survival was 2.02 with significance. The combined hazard ratio of the metabolic tumor volume for event-free survival was 2.72 with significance and that of the metabolic tumor volume for overall survival was 3.50 with significance. LIMITATIONS The studies selected were all retrospective, and there were only 4 studies involving the metabolic tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis of 11C-methionine-PET suggests that the tumor-to-normal ratio for overall survival and the metabolic tumor volume for event-free survival and overall survival are significant prognostic factors for patients with gliomas.