-
1.
Urine protein:creatinine ratio vs 24-hour urine protein for proteinuria management: analysis from the phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Evans, TRJ, Kudo, M, Finn, RS, Han, KH, Cheng, AL, Ikeda, M, Kraljevic, S, Ren, M, Dutcus, CE, Piscaglia, F, et al
British journal of cancer. 2019;(3):218-221
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proteinuria monitoring is required in patients receiving lenvatinib, however, current methodology involves burdensome overnight urine collection. METHODS To determine whether the simpler urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR) calculated from spot urine samples could be accurately used for proteinuria monitoring in patients receiving lenvatinib, we evaluated the correlation between UPCR and 24-hour urine protein results from the phase 3 REFLECT study. Paired data (323 tests, 154 patients) were analysed. RESULTS Regression analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between UPCR and 24-hour urine protein (R2: 0.75; P < 2 × 10-16). A UPCR cut-off value of 2.4 had 96.9% sensitivity, 82.5% specificity for delineating between grade 2 and 3 proteinuria. Using this UPCR cut-off value to determine the need for further testing could reduce the need for 24-hour urine collection in ~74% of patients. CONCLUSION Incorporation of UPCR into the current algorithm for proteinuria management can enable optimisation of lenvatinib treatment, while minimising patient inconvenience. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01761266.
-
2.
[The efficacy and safety of high-dose irbesartan in treatment of clinical proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney disease].
Li, X, Chen, XD, Li, ZX
Zhonghua nei ke za zhi. 2011;(12):1034-8
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose irbesartan in the treatment of mild and moderate proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS A single center, prospective, observational study was performed. A total of 96 subjects were given irbesartan 150 mg/d for 4 weeks. Twenty-six were divided into single-dose (150 mg/d) irbesartan group when their clinical efficacy were eligible for improvement criteria and 70 were divided into high-dose (300 - 600 mg/d) irbesartan group when there were no effect for single-dose treatment. Both groups received treatment for 48 weeks. Then 24-hour quantitative urine protein, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, TC, LDL-C, plasma albumin, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, blood uric acid, serum potassium and ALT were determined. RESULTS The proteinuria level after treatment in the single-dose irbesartan group was decreased by 68.3% with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). In the high-dose group, the dose of irbesartan was increased based on the ineffectiveness when treating with single-dose, and the proteinuria was decreased by 63.4% (P < 0.001). Total effective rate in treating proteinuria in high-dose group was 72.9% (51/70). Among the blood pressure sub-groups, the effective rates for the normal blood pressure group and hypertension group in treating proteinuria were 68.2% and 76.9% respectively (P > 0.05). However, in the normal blood pressure group and hypertension group, the proteinuria was decreased by 61.9% and 67.5% respectively after treatment (P < 0.001, P < 0.01), while without difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The effective rates of high doses of 300, 450 and 600 mg/d of irbesartan in treating proteinuria were 70.8%, 63.6% and 66.7%, respectively. The difference in effective rates of treating proteinuria among different doses had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). No obvious increase of SCr value before and after treatment in high-dose group (P = 0.583). The increasing level of serum potassium in high-dose group after treatment was higher than that in the single-dose group (P < 0.05), but the highest concentration (4.8 mmol/L) was still within the normal range. The blood pressure of 3 cases who quit observation because of low blood pressure in high-dose group returned to normal after drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION High-dose irbesartan can effectively lower the mild and moderate proteinuria in CKD patients with a good safety and tolerance and the efficacy is independent of lowering blood pressure.
-
3.
Doxycycline: a pilot study to reduce diabetic proteinuria.
Naini, AE, Harandi, AA, Moghtaderi, J, Bastani, B, Amiran, A
American journal of nephrology. 2007;(3):269-73
Abstract
BACKGROUND Activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the enzymes primarily responsible for the deposition of extracellular matrix proteins, contributes to the pathogenesis of diabetic proteinuria. We evaluated the effect of doxycycline, a potent nonselective MMPs inhibitor, on reduction of proteinuria in diabetic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a self-control clinical trial, 35 patients with overt diabetic nephropathy (proteinuria >300 mg/24 h) received oral doxycycline 100 mg/day for 2 months. Twenty-four-hour urine volume, Cr and protein excretion were measured at baseline, after 1 and 2 months of treatment, and after 4 months of its discontinuation. Treatment-related side effects were closely monitored and documented. RESULTS Mean (+/-SD) 24-hour urine protein was 888 +/- 419 mg at baseline, 884 +/- 368 mg after 1 month, and 643 +/- 386 mg after the 2 months of doxycycline treatment. There was statistically significant reduction in proteinuria at 2 months of treatment vs. at the baseline (p < 0.001). Mean 24-hour urine protein excretion increased to 1,021 +/- 422 mg 4 months after doxycycline was discontinued. The changes in serum sodium, potassium, BUN and Cr concentrations, and blood pressure measurements during the 2 months of treatment and follow-up period were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy can be reduced with low dose doxycycline therapy over a 2-month period of drug administration. Further studies are necessary to determine the long-term effect, the optimal dose, and the optimal duration of this potentially novel therapy.
-
4.
Renal-protective effect of T-and L-type calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients: an Amlodipine-to-Benidipine Changeover (ABC) study.
Ohishi, M, Takagi, T, Ito, N, Terai, M, Tatara, Y, Hayashi, N, Shiota, A, Katsuya, T, Rakugi, H, Ogihara, T
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2007;(9):797-806
Abstract
Both strict blood pressure control and efferent artery dilatation are critical in reducing proteinuria, which in turn helps to regulate blood pressure. Benidipine, an L- and T-type calcium channel blocker, has the potential for increased effectiveness compared with L-type-dominant calcium channel blockers such as amlodipine. Therefore, we evaluated blood pressure and proteinuria after changeover from amlodipine to benidipine in poorly controlled hypertensive patients. Fifty-eight hypertensive outpatients undergoing amlodipine treatment and unable to achieve optimal blood pressure as determined by Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertention (JSH 2004) were changed over to benidipine treatment. We measured blood pressure and pulse rate and assessed urinary protein excretion before and after changeover. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure dropped from 151/90 mmHg to 140/81 mmHg (p<0.0001). Mean blood pressure (p<0.0001) and pulse pressure (p=0.0069) were also reduced, but pulse rate increased from 75 bpm to 78 bpm (p=0.0047). Urinary protein excretion adjusted for urinary creatinine was reduced from 0.35 +/- 0.82 to 0.22 +/- 0.55 g/g creatinine (p=0.0119). The urinary protein reduction was observed only in patients with renin-angiotensin inhibition (p=0.0216). By switching from amlodipine to benidipine treatment, more than 80% of patients reduced their blood pressure, and more than 40% achieved optimal blood pressure. Higher urinary protein excretion (p<0.0001), lower glomerular filtration rate (p=0.0011) and presence of diabetes (p=0.0284) were correlated with reduction of urinary proteins during changeover. Taken together, our results suggest that benidipine may have greater efficacy than amlodipine in reducing blood pressure and proteinuria.
-
5.
Diuretic and enhanced sodium restriction results in improved antiproteinuric response to RAS blocking agents.
Esnault, VL, Ekhlas, A, Delcroix, C, Moutel, MG, Nguyen, JM
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2005;(2):474-81
Abstract
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and diuretics may exert synergistic antiproteinuric effects. Eighteen patients with a proteinuria >1 g/24 h after 6 mo of treatment with ramipril at 5 mg/d were assigned to receive in random order ramipril at 10 mg/d, valsartan at 160 mg/d, or combined ramipril at 5 mg/d and valsartan at 80 mg/d in addition to their antihypertensive treatment. The treatment periods lasted 4 wk and were separated by a 4-wk washout with ramipril at 5 mg/d. At the end of this crossover sequence, patients received combined ramipril at 5 mg/d, valsartan at 80 mg/d, and an increased furosemide dosage for an additional 4-wk period. The primary end point was the urinary protein/creatinine ratio for two 24-h urine collections at the end of each treatment period. No significant differences were noted between the study end points of the ramipril 10, valsartan 160, and combined ramipril 5 and valsartan 80 treatment groups. However, the urinary protein/creatinine ratio was lower with combined ramipril 5 and valsartan 80-increased furosemide dosage than with valsartan 160 and combined ramipril 5 and valsartan 80, with a similar tendency compared with ramipril 10. Combined ramipril 5 and valsartan 80-increased furosemide dosage decreased systolic home BP and increased serum creatinine but did not significantly increase the number of symptomatic hypotension cases compared with the other three treatments. Thus, in patients with severe proteinuria and hypertension, a cautious increase in diuretic dosage in addition to combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers decreases proteinuria and BP but may expose the patient to prerenal failure.
-
6.
Antiproteinuric effect of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.
Haneda, M, Kikkawa, R, Sakai, H, Kawamori, R, ,
Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2004;(1):87-95
Abstract
The effect of the angiotensin II receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil, on proteinuria was examined in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes. This study enrolled diabetic subjects with confirmed proteinuria into four groups for 12 weeks of treatment with placebo or candesartan cilexetil 2, 4, or 8 mg. The contribution of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism to the effect of candesartan cilexetil was also examined. In 127 subjects, candesartan cilexetil showed a dose-related reduction in proteinuria after 12 weeks of treatment (F = 9.45, P = 0.0013), with a 18.1% reduction in the 4-mg group, and a 5.8% reduction in the 8-mg group, in contrast to a 32.2% increase in the placebo group, and a 0.8% increase in the 2-mg group. These results indicate that candesartan cilexetil is useful in reducing proteinuria in diabetic subjects when compared with placebo. In addition, candesartan cilexetil seems to be effective in subjects with both the II and DD genotypes of the ACE gene.
-
7.
Comparison between cilnidipine and amlodipine besilate with respect to proteinuria in hypertensive patients with renal diseases.
Kojima, S, Shida, M, Yokoyama, H
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2004;(6):379-85
Abstract
Unlike other dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), cilnidipine has been reported to exert an N-type calcium-channel-blocking activity and to reduce sympathetic hyperactivity. This study compared cilnidipine and amlodipine with respect to their effects on renal function and proteinuria. Twenty-eight proteinuric hypertensive outpatients (13 men and 15 women, aged 62+/-2 years) who had been maintained on CCBs for more than 3 months were randomly assigned to a group receiving amlodipine besilate (14 patients) or a group receiving cilnidipine (14 patients). CCBs were increased in dosage or other drugs were added until blood pressure decreased below 140/90 mmHg, but no inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin (RA) system were added or changed in dosage. Before and at 6 and 12 months after randomization, the concentrations of urine protein, urine albumin, serum and urine creatinine (Cr), and serum beta2-microglobulin were determined. The amlodipine group showed a significant increase in proteinuria, while the increase was suppressed in the cilnidipine group. The rate of increase in proteinuria at 12 months was 87% (95% confidence interval (CI) -10 to 184) of the baseline value with amlodipine and 4% (95% CI -69 to 77) of baseline with cilnidipine, a significant intergroup difference (p<0.05). The mean blood pressure remained in the 96-99 mmHg range until 12 months after randomization, showing no significant difference between the two groups. The cilnidipine group showed an increase in serum Cr levels (baseline vs. 12 months, 1.36+/-0.20 vs. 1.50+/-0.23 mg/dl, p<0.01). Overall, an inverse correlation existed between the changes in Cr and proteinuria (r= -0.477, p<0.01). These results suggest that cilnidipine results in a greater suppression of the increase in proteinuria and greater reduction in glomerular filtration rate than amlodipine, and that these effects are similar between cilnidipine and RA inhibitors. However, additional large-cohort and longer-term studies will be needed to clarify whether cilnidipine is superior to other CCBs in maintaining renal function.
-
8.
Ganoderma lucidum suppresses endothelial cell cytotoxicity and proteinuria in persistent proteinuric focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) nephrosis.
Futrakul, N, Panichakul, T, Butthep, P, Futrakul, P, Jetanalin, P, Patumraj, S, Siriviriyakul, P
Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation. 2004;(4):267-72
Abstract
A persistent proteinuria is commonly observed in nephrotic patient with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) under treatment with prednisolone+/-cyclophosphamide or with vasodilators (ACEI+AII receptor antagonist, calcium channel blocker and antiplatelet agent). Fourteen such patients with persistent proteinuria were subject to be treated with Ganoderma lucidum. Initial study revealed an enhanced endothelial cell cytotoxicity induced by patient's serum, and an altered immunocirculatory balance with predominant proinflammatory cytokine TNF alpha activity in the presence of defective anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10. Treatment with Ganoderma lucidum suppressed endothelial cell cytotoxicity, restored immunocirculatory balance and successfully suppressed proteinuria in all of these 14 patients.
-
9.
Antihypertensive and antiproteinuric efficacy of ramipril in children with chronic renal failure.
Wühl, E, Mehls, O, Schaefer, F, ,
Kidney international. 2004;(2):768-76
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the antihypertensive and renoprotective potency of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is well-established in adults with hypertension and/or chronic renal failure, little experience exists in pediatric chronic kidney disease. METHODS As part of a prospective assessment of the renoprotective efficacy of ACE inhibition and intensified blood pressure (BP) control, 397 children (ages 3 to 18 years) with chronic renal failure [CRF; glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 11 to 80 mL/min/1.73 m2] and elevated or high-normal BP received ramipril (6 mg/m2) following a 6-month run-in period including a two-month washout of any previous ACE inhibitors. Drug efficacy was assessed by two monthly office BP and proteinuria assessments, and by ambulatory BP monitoring at start and after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS In the 352 patients completing six months of treatment, 24-hour mean arterial pressure (MAP) had decreased by a mean of 11.5 mm Hg (-2.2 SDS) in initially hypertensive subjects, but only by 4.4 mm Hg (-0.8 SDS) in patients with initially normal BP. A linear correlation was found between MAP at baseline and the change of MAP during treatment (r= 0.51; P < 0.0001). The antihypertensive response was independent of changes in concomitant antihypertensive medication or underlying renal disease. BP was reduced with equal efficacy during day- and nighttime. Urinary protein excretion was reduced by 50% on average, with similar relative efficacy in patients with hypo/dysplastic nephropathies and glomerulopathies. The magnitude of proteinuria reduction depended on baseline proteinuria (r= 0.32, P < 0.0001), and was correlated with the antihypertensive efficacy of the drug (r= 0.22, P < 0.001). The incidence of rapid rises in serum creatinine and progression to end-stage CRF during treatment did not differ from the pretreatment observation period. Mean serum potassium increased by 0.3 mmol/L. Ramipril was discontinued in three patients due to symptomatic hypotension or hyperkalemia. Hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.6 g/dL in the first two treatment months and remained stable thereafter. CONCLUSION Ramipril appears to be an effective and safe antihypertensive and antiproteinuric agent in children with CRF-associated hypertension. The BP lowering and antiproteinuric effects are greatest in severely hypertensive and proteinuric children.
-
10.
Antiproteinuric effects of enalapril and losartan: a pilot study.
White, CT, Macpherson, CF, Hurley, RM, Matsell, DG
Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 2003;(10):1038-43
Abstract
In this randomized double-blind crossover trial we compared the antiproteinuric effects of enalapril and losartan in six children with proteinuria and underlying renal injury. The primary endpoint was reduction in proteinuria during therapy. The study had two 8-week on-drug arms, with a 4-week washout period between. Baseline proteinuria was similar, enalapril 87 mg/m(2) per hour and losartan 77 mg/m(2) per hour. The mean reduction in proteinuria with enalapril was 48% (37%-57%) with a standard error of the mean of 3%; with losartan it was 31% (14%-52%) with a standard error of the mean of 7%. Although there was a significant reduction in proteinuria with the use of both drugs, the difference in reduction of proteinuria, 48% versus 31%, was not considered clinically significant. Potassium remained below 4.5 mmol/l in all patients. No patient's creatinine rose more than the standard deviation of our assay. Blood pressure (BP) control was acceptable in four of the six patients; two patients had persistently elevated or increased BP on each drug. Side effects were minimal; none requiring withdrawal, one requiring dose reduction. Studies have shown that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors can reduce proteinuria in children with renal disorders. No studies to date have examined the reduction of proteinuria achieved by angiotensin receptor blockers. Our study, although small, suggests that angiotensin receptor blockers may reduce proteinuria as effectively, and as safely, as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.