-
1.
Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Effects of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Rabeprazole and Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Lorlatinib in Healthy Participants.
Xu, H, O'Gorman, MT, Nepal, S, James, LP, Ginman, K, Pithavala, YK
Clinical pharmacology in drug development. 2021;(11):1395-1404
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Lorlatinib is approved worldwide as treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive and c-ros oncogene 1-positive non-small cell lung cancer. The objectives of this phase 1, open-label crossover study (NCT02569554) in healthy adult participants were to determine (1) the effects of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) rabeprazole on lorlatinib pharmacokinetics (PK), (2) the effects of a high-fat meal on lorlatinib PK, and (3) the relative bioavailability of an oral solution to tablet formulation of lorlatinib under fasted conditions. Participants were followed on-study for ≥50 days after the first dose of lorlatinib. Participants received treatments over 4 periods, with a washout of ≥10 days between consecutive lorlatinib doses. Twenty-seven participants were enrolled and received lorlatinib, and all were assessed for PK and safety. Results showed no effect of multiple doses of rabeprazole on the total plasma exposure of a single oral dose of lorlatinib 100-mg tablets. The results also indicated that a high-fat meal had no effect on lorlatinib PK after a single 100-mg oral dose. In addition, the relative bioavailability of lorlatinib oral solution compared with lorlatinib tablets was complete (approximately 108%). The safety profile of lorlatinib was consistent with that reported in previous studies, and most treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate. These data indicate that lorlatinib can be administered with drugs that modify gastric acid, including PPIs, without restriction. These results also confirm that lorlatinib can be administered regardless of food intake.
-
2.
Efficacy of vonoprazan in prevention of bleeding from endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcers: a prospective randomized phase II study.
Hamada, K, Uedo, N, Tonai, Y, Arao, M, Suzuki, S, Iwatsubo, T, Kato, M, Shichijo, S, Yamasaki, Y, Matsuura, N, et al
Journal of gastroenterology. 2019;(2):122-130
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vonoprazan, potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to reduce incidence of delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, preliminary data to design a large-scale comparative study are lacking. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of vonoprazan in preventing delayed bleeding after gastric ESD. METHODS In this single-center randomized phase II trial, a modified screened selection design was used with a threshold non-bleeding rate of 89% and an expected rate of 97%. In this design, Simon's optimal two-stage design was first applied for each parallel group, and efficacy was evaluated in comparison with the threshold rate using binomial testing. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vonoprazan 20 mg (VPZ group) or lansoprazole 30 mg (PPI group) for 8 weeks from the day before gastric ESD. The primary endpoint was the incidence of delayed bleeding, defined as endoscopically confirmed bleeding accompanied by hematemesis, melena, or a decrease in hemoglobin of ≥ 2 g/dl. RESULTS Delayed bleeding occurred in three of 69 patients (4.3%, 95% CI 0.9-12.2%, p = 0.047) in the VPZ group, and four of 70 (5.7%, 95% CI 1.6-14.0%, p = 0.104) in the PPI group. As only vonoprazan showed significant reduction in delayed bleeding compared with the threshold rate, it was determined to be efficacious treatment. CONCLUSIONS Vonoprazan efficaciously reduced the delayed bleeding rate in patients with an ESD-induced gastric ulcer. A large-scale, randomized, phase III study is warranted to definitively test the effectiveness of vonoprazan compared with proton pump inhibitors.
-
3.
A Study to Evaluate Doravirine Pharmacokinetics When Coadministered With Acid-Reducing Agents.
Khalilieh, SG, Yee, KL, Sanchez, RI, Fan, L, Vaynshteyn, K, Deschamps, K, Martell, M, Jordan, HR, Iwamoto, M
Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2019;(8):1093-1098
Abstract
Doravirine is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Because of potential concomitant administration with acid-reducing agents, a drug-interaction trial was conducted to evaluate the potential impact of these types of medications on doravirine pharmacokinetics. In an open-label, 3-period, fixed-sequence trial, healthy adult participants received the following: period 1, a single dose of doravirine 100 mg; period 2, coadministration of a single dose of doravirine 100 mg and an antacid (1600 mg aluminum hydroxide, 1600 mg magnesium hydroxide, and 160 mg simethicone); period 3, 40 mg pantoprazole once daily on days 1-5 coadministered with a single dose of doravirine 100 mg on day 5. There was a minimum 10-day washout between periods. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected, and safety was assessed. Fourteen participants (8 male, 6 female) were enrolled, and 13 completed the trial. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for doravirine AUC0-inf , Cmax , and C24 for doravirine + antacid/doravirine were 1.01 (0.92-1.11), 0.86 (0.74-1.01), and 1.03 (0.94-1.12), respectively, and for doravirine + pantoprazole/doravirine were 0.83 (0.76-0.91), 0.88 (0.76-1.01), and 0.84 (0.77-0.92), respectively. Doravirine was generally well tolerated administered alone or with either of the acid-reducing agents. Coadministration of an aluminum/magnesium-containing antacid or pantoprazole did not have a clinically meaningful effect on doravirine pharmacokinetics, supporting the use of acid-reducing agents with doravirine.
-
4.
A Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study of Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-Release Capsules Following Oral Administration with Orange Juice, Water, or Omeprazole in Cystinosis.
Armas, D, Holt, RJ, Confer, NF, Checani, GC, Obaidi, M, Xie, Y, Brannagan, M
Advances in therapy. 2018;(2):199-209
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cystinosis is a rare, metabolic, autosomal recessive, genetic lysosomal storage disorder characterized by an accumulation of cystine in various organs and tissues. Cysteamine bitartrate (CB) is a cystine-depleting aminothiol agent approved in the United States and Europe in immediate-release and delayed-release (DR) formulations for the treatment of nephropathic cystinosis in children and adults. It is recommended that CBDR be administered with fruit juice (except grapefruit juice) for maximum absorption. Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that inhibits gastric acid secretion and, theoretically, may cause the premature release of cysteamine by increasing intragastric pH, thereby affecting the PK of CBDR. METHODS This open-label, three-period, randomized study in healthy adult subjects was designed primarily to compare the pharmacokinetics of CBDR capsules after a single oral dose administered with orange juice, water, or multiple oral doses of omeprazole with water at steady state. A total of 32 subjects were randomly assigned to receive study agents in one of two treatment sequences. RESULTS All subjects completed the study and baseline characteristics of the overall population and the two treatment sequence populations were similar. Peak mean plasma cysteamine concentrations following co-administration of CBDR capsules with orange juice (1892 ng/mL) were higher compared with co-administration with water (1663 ng/mL) or omeprazole 20 mg and water (1712 ng/mL). Mean time to peak plasma concentration was shorter with omeprazole co-administration (2.5 h) compared with orange juice (3.5 h) or water (3.0 h). Statistical comparisons between treatment groups indicated that exposure as assessed by AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax were all within the 80-125% bioequivalence ranges for all comparisons. All treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION Overall, the pharmacokinetics of cysteamine bitartrate DR capsules are not significantly impacted by co-administration with orange juice, water only, or omeprazole (with water). FUNDING Horizon Pharma, Inc.
-
5.
Change of signs, symptoms and voice quality evaluations throughout a 3- to 6-month empirical treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.
Lechien, JR, Finck, C, Khalife, M, Huet, K, Delvaux, V, Picalugga, M, Harmegnies, B, Saussez, S
Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery. 2018;(5):1273-1282
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the usefulness of voice quality measurements as a treatment outcome in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)-related symptoms. DESIGN Prospective uncontrolled multi-centre study. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 80 clinically diagnosed LPR patients with a reflux finding score (RFS)>7 and a reflux symptom index (RSI)>13 were treated with pantoprazole and diet recommendations during 3 or 6 months, according to their evolution. RSI; RFS; blinded Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain and Instability (GRBASI) and aerodynamic and acoustic measurements were evaluated at baseline, 3 months (n = 80), and 6 months (n = 41) post-treatment. We conducted a correlation analysis between the adherence to the diet, and the evolution of both signs and symptoms and between videolaryngostroboscopic signs and acoustic measurements. RESULTS Reflux symptom index, RFS, perceptual voice quality evaluations (dysphonia, roughness, strain and instability), and aerodynamic and acoustic measurements (ie, percent jitter and percent shimmer) were significantly improved at 3 months post-treatment but not at 6 months. Percent jitter was the most useful outcome for evaluating the clinical evolution of patients throughout the treatment course. A significant relationship between globus sensation and posterior commissure hypertrophy was documented; both seemed to significantly improve from 3 to 6 months. The correlation analysis revealed correlations between adherence to diet recommendations and the improvement of symptoms and between posterior commissure granulation severity and acoustic measurement impairments. CONCLUSION Voice quality improved in a manner similar to both signs and symptoms throughout a 6-month empirical treatment with better improvement the 3 first months. Voice quality assessments can be used as indicators of treatment effectiveness in patients with LPR-related symptoms.
-
6.
The Effect of Food or Omeprazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Osimertinib in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and in Healthy Volunteers.
Vishwanathan, K, Dickinson, PA, Bui, K, Cassier, PA, Greystoke, A, Lisbon, E, Moreno, V, So, K, Thomas, K, Weilert, D, et al
Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2018;(4):474-484
Abstract
Two phase 1, open-label studies assessed the impact of food or gastric pH modification (omeprazole) on the exposure and safety/tolerability of osimertinib and its metabolites. The food effect study was an open-label, 2-period crossover study in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, randomized into 2 treatment sequences: single-dose osimertinib 80 mg in a fed then fasted state or fasted then fed. The gastric pH study was an open-label, 2-period fixed sequence study assessing the effect of omeprazole on osimertinib exposure in healthy male volunteers. In period 1, volunteers received omeprazole 40 mg (days 1-4), then omeprazole 40 mg plus osimertinib 80 mg (day 5). In period 2, volunteers received osimertinib 80 mg alone (single dose). Blood samples were collected at prespecified time points for pharmacokinetic analyses. Safety/tolerability was also assessed. In the food effect study 38 patients were randomized to fed/fasted (n = 18) or fasted/fed (n = 20) sequences with all patients completing treatment. Coadministration with food did not affect osimertinib exposure (geometric least-squares mean ratios [90% confidence intervals]: 106.05% [94.82%, 118.60%] [area under the plasma concentration time curve from zero to 72 hours] and 92.75% [81.40%, 105.68%] [maximum plasma concentration]). In the gastric pH study (n = 68 received treatment, n = 47 completed the study), coadministration with omeprazole did not affect osimertinib exposure (geometric least-squares mean ratios 106.66% [100.26%, 113.46%] [area under the concentration-time curve], 101.65% [94.65%, 109.16%] [peak concentration]). Osimertinib was well tolerated in both studies. Osimertinib may be administered without regard to food. Dose restriction is not required in patients whose gastric pH may be altered by concomitant agents or medical conditions. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02224053, NCT02163733.
-
7.
Maintenance for healed erosive esophagitis: Phase III comparison of vonoprazan with lansoprazole.
Ashida, K, Iwakiri, K, Hiramatsu, N, Sakurai, Y, Hori, T, Kudou, K, Nishimura, A, Umegaki, E
World journal of gastroenterology. 2018;(14):1550-1561
Abstract
AIM: To compare vonoprazan 10 and 20 mg vs lansoprazole 15 mg as maintenance therapy in healed erosive esophagitis (EE). METHODS A total of 607 patients aged ≥ 20 years, with endoscopically-confirmed healed EE following 8 wk of treatment with vonoprazan 20 mg once daily, were randomized 1:1:1 to receive lansoprazole 15 mg (n = 201), vonoprazan 10 mg (n = 202), or vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 204), once daily. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of endoscopically-confirmed EE recurrence during a 24-wk maintenance period. The secondary endpoint was the EE recurrence rate at Week 12 during maintenance treatment. Additional efficacy endpoints included the incidence of heartburn and acid reflux, and the EE healing rate 4 wk after the initiation of maintenance treatment. Safety endpoints comprised adverse events (AEs), vital signs, electrocardiogram findings, clinical laboratory results, serum gastrin and pepsinogen I/II levels, and gastric mucosa histopathology results. RESULTS Rates of EE recurrence during the 24-wk maintenance period were 16.8%, 5.1%, and 2.0% with lansoprazole 15 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg, respectively. Vonoprazan was shown to be non-inferior to lansoprazole 15 mg (P < 0.0001 for both doses). In a post-hoc analysis, EE recurrence at Week 24 was significantly reduced with vonoprazan at both the 10 mg and the 20 mg dose vs lansoprazole 15 mg (5.1% vs 16.8%, P = 0.0002, and 2.0% vs 16.8%, P < 0.0001, respectively); by contrast, the EE recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two doses of vonoprazan (P = 0.1090). The safety profiles of vonoprazan 10 and 20 mg were similar to that of lansoprazole 15 mg in patients with healed EE. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 11.4%, 10.4%, and 10.3% of patients in the lansoprazole 15 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg arms, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings confirm the non-inferiority of vonoprazan 10 and 20 mg to lansoprazole 15 mg as maintenance therapy for patients with healed EE.
-
8.
Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions Between Vonoprazan and Low-Dose Aspirin or Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: A Phase 2, Open-Label, Study in Healthy Japanese Men.
Sakurai, Y, Shiino, M, Horii, S, Okamoto, H, Nakamura, K, Nishimura, A, Sakata, Y
Clinical drug investigation. 2017;(1):39-49
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroprotective agents are recommended for patients receiving low-dose aspirin (LDA) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Vonoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker recently approved for the prevention of peptic ulcer recurrence in patients receiving LDA or NSAIDs. METHODS This phase 2, open-label, single-center study in healthy Japanese males evaluated drug-drug interactions between vonoprazan 40 mg and LDA (100 mg) or NSAIDs [loxoprofen sodium (60 mg), diclofenac sodium (25 mg), or meloxicam (10 mg)] and vice versa. Subjects were allocated to one of eight cohorts and received their orally administered treatment regimen (to assess the effect of vonoprazan vs. NSAID or LDA, or vice versa) once daily. Endpoints were the pharmacokinetics of plasma concentrations of the study drugs alone and in combination (primary), safety (secondary), and vonoprazan effects on aspirin-mediated inhibition of platelet-aggregation. RESULTS Of 109 subjects screened, 64 were assigned to one of eight cohorts (n = 8 per cohort) and received treatment, one subject discontinued due to a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), and 63 completed the study. There were few differences in the pharmacokinetics of vonoprazan when administered with LDA or NSAIDs, and few differences in the pharmacokinetics of LDA or NSAIDs when administered with vonoprazan. The differences were small and not clinically meaningful. Inhibition of arachidonic-induced platelet aggregation by LDA was not influenced by vonoprazan. Six patients experienced a TEAE, all were mild and were deemed unrelated to study drugs. One subject withdrew due to infection (tonsillitis). CONCLUSIONS No clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions were observed and vonoprazan was well tolerated when administered with LDA or NSAIDs. STUDY REGISTRATION JapicCTI-153100.
-
9.
Proton pump inhibitors use suppresses iron absorption in congenital dyserythropoietic anemia.
Shalev, H, Quider, AA, Harosh, MB, Kapelushnik, J
Pediatric hematology and oncology. 2016;(7-8):457-461
Abstract
Congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type I (CDA I) is associated, as other anemic noninflammatory states, with ineffective erythropoiesis and increased iron absorption, which may lead to complication of iron overload. The latter complication requires iron-chelating therapy, which may be associated with adverse effects and toxicity. Gastric acid production is known to be an important factor that facilitates non-heme iron absorption. The purpose of this study was to examine whether treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can decrease iron absorption in patients with CDA I. Eight CDA I patients (4 boys) aged 12-18 years with mild iron overload (not yet requiring chelating therapy) received 20 mg/d omeprazole for 6 months. Blood samples were obtained for ferritin, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, calcium, and magnesium at baseline, at the end of months intervention and 6 months after its cessation. The mean ferritin level decreased from 585 ± 180 ng/ml at baseline to 522 ± 172 ng/ml at the end of 6-month treatment and 660 ± 256 ng/ml 6 months after cessation of omeprazole treatment (p = 0.009). Omeprazole treatment caused a nonsignificant reduction in the mean iron level (iron 159 ± 42, 136 ± 54,167 ± 34 µg/dl, p = 0.302). However, mean hemoglobin level was mildly but significantly reduced (Hg 10.0 ± 0.8, 9.55 ± 1.0, 10.4 ± 10.7 g/dl, p = 0.002). No adverse effects were reported. Our investigation suggests that administration of PPI to patients with CDA I may reduce iron absorption and may lower iron overload and the need for chelation therapy.
-
10.
Routine prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors and post-transplant complications in kidney transplant recipients undergoing early corticosteroid withdrawal.
Courson, AY, Lee, JR, Aull, MJ, Lee, JH, Kapur, S, McDermott, JK
Clinical transplantation. 2016;(6):694-702
Abstract
Surgical stress, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate may contribute to gastrointestinal ulcers/bleeding after kidney transplantation. Prophylactic acid suppression with H2RAs or PPIs is often utilized after transplantation, although unclear if truly indicated after early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD). PPIs have been associated with increased risks of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), pneumonia, and acute rejection. This retrospective cohort study investigated benefits and risks of prolonged PPI use following kidney transplantation and included 286 kidney recipients undergoing CSWD within five d of transplant who were maintained on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil/sodium. Patients on PPI before transplant, H2RA before/after transplant, and/or those with pre-transplant GI complications were excluded. A total of 171 patients received PPI>30 d, mean duration 287 ± 120 d (PPI group); 115 patients were not maintained on acid suppression (No-PPI group). GI ulceration and bleeding events were rare in PPI group (1.2% and 2.3%, respectively) and not observed in No-PPI group (p = NS). The incidence of infectious or hematological complications was not significantly different between groups. The PPI group experienced more biopsy-proven acute rejection (9.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.03). No direct benefit was observed with PPI in reducing the incidence of GI ulcers and bleeding events in kidney transplant recipients undergoing early CSWD. Further studies are needed to investigate the association of PPI and acute rejection.