1.
Retinoids for preventing the progression of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia.
Helm, CW, Lorenz, DJ, Meyer, NJ, Rising, WW, Wulff, JL
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013;(6):CD003296
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive cervical carcinoma is preceded by a precancerous phase, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN), which can be detected on cervical smears and confirmed by colposcopy and biopsy. Moderate and severe cases of intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN2 and CIN3) are treated mainly with surgery to prevent progression to invasive carcinoma. Medical methods of preventing the progression or inducing the regression of CIN are needed. Retinoids are potent modulators of epithelial cell growth and differentiation that may have potential for the treatment of CIN. OBJECTIVES To ascertain whether retinoids can cause regression or prevent progression of CIN. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group's Specialised Register and Non-Trials Database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 3, 2010), and MEDLINE and EMBASE (July 2010).For the 2013 update, the searches were re-run as follows: CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2013; MEDLINE, April, Week 2, 2013; and EMBASE, Week 16, 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs of retinoids for treating CIN in women. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data from the trials. Adverse effects information was also collected from the trials. MAIN RESULTS Five RCTs comparing the efficacy of four different retinoids were identified. Two studies examined the effects on CIN2 and CIN3 of the retinoids N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (fenretinide) and 9-cis-retinoic acid (aliretinoin) given orally. Two examined the effect of all-trans-retinoic acid administered topically to the cervix. The fifth study investigated the use of 13-cis-retinoic acid (isotretinoin) given orally to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive participants with CIN1 and condyloma.Four studies reported no significant effect of retinoids on the progression to higher grades of CIN, and the fifth did not report data on progression. In all studies retinoids had no significant effect on regression of CIN3. Two studies reported that retinoids were associated with regression of CIN2. One reported a greater complete regression of CIN2 over that seen with placebo, which was of borderline statistical significance (odds ratio (OR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 1.02). The other study reported a nonsignificant dose-related trend toward increased rates of complete and partial regression compared with placebo. One study reported significantly worse outcomes in women receiving retinoid (OR for regression 6.00, 95% CI 1.00 to 35.91). In general, the retinoid medications were well tolerated.In the 2010 review and in this update, no new studies were identified for inclusion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The retinoids studied are not effective in causing regression of CIN3 but may have some effect on CIN2. The data on CIN1 are inadequate. Retinoids are not effective in preventing progression of CIN of any grade. At the doses given for the duration of treatment studied, the retinoids were reasonably well tolerated.
2.
A systematic review of clinical trials of treatments for the congenital ichthyoses, excluding ichthyosis vulgaris.
Hernández-Martin, A, Aranegui, B, Martin-Santiago, A, Garcia-Doval, I
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2013;(4):544-549.e8
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ichthyoses comprise a group of inherited disorders of keratinization. Because of the need for lifelong treatment, it is important that therapies are beneficial, safe, and well tolerated. OBJECTIVES We sought to review the evidence on existing treatments for the congenital ichthyoses, excluding ichthyosis vulgaris. METHOD We undertook a systematic review using the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. Articles published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL and registered clinical trials were screened. Randomized controlled trials involving patients with the inherited ichthyoses, either syndromic or nonsyndromic but excluding ichthyosis vulgaris, were considered. RESULTS Six trials met the inclusion criteria. Topical treatments including 5% urea, 20% propylene glycol alone or in combination with 5% lactic acid, calcipotriol ointment, and liarozole 5% cream showed therapeutic benefit. Oral liarozole, a retinoic acid metabolism blocking agent, showed no advantage over oral acitretin. LIMITATIONS Most studies were performed on a small sample of patients and lacked methodological and reporting quality. The small number of trials and the nearly constant positive results make publication bias likely. The absence of standardization of outcome measures precluded the comparison of studies. CONCLUSIONS Topical treatments including emollients, calcipotriol ointment, and liarozole cream seem to have therapeutic benefit and a good safety profile, although the use of topical calcipotriol is limited by a maximum weekly dose of 100 g. The advantage of oral liarozole over acitretin is uncertain. Multicenter trials comparing oral and topical interventions and evaluation of long-term outcomes are needed.