1.
S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) monotherapy for depression: an 8-week double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
Sarris, J, Murphy, J, Stough, C, Mischoulon, D, Bousman, C, MacDonald, P, Adams, L, Nazareth, S, Oliver, G, Cribb, L, et al
Psychopharmacology. 2020;(1):209-218
Abstract
RATIONALE Dysregulation of the one carbon cycle is documented in depression. Thereby, S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), a one-carbon cycle nutraceutical compound with a favourable side effect profile, has a theoretical rationale for efficacy. However, further controlled studies are required to confirm SAMe's efficacy. OBJECTIVES To test the efficacy of SAMe versus placebo in unmedicated DSM-5 diagnosed (major depressive disorder) (MDD) patients with mild-to-moderate levels of depressive symptoms. METHODS We conducted an 8-week, double-blind, randomised controlled trial testing 800 mg/day of SAMe monotherapy versus placebo in 49 patients with MDD (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score 14-25) who were not currently taking antidepressants. One-carbon cycle biomarkers, brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), and relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analysed as potential treatment moderators. RESULTS A clinically relevant differential reduction from baseline to week 8 of 3.76 points occurred on the primary outcome (MADRS) in favour of SAMe. This however was not significant (p = 0.13) on an adjusted linear mixed model, notwithstanding a medium to large effect size of 0.72. A high placebo response rate of 53% occurred (> 50% reduction on MADRS). Exploratory analyses showed that SAMe was however effective in reducing depression amongst participants with milder depression severity (MADRS ≤ 22, p = 0.045). Response was not moderated by BDNF, SNPs, or one-carbon cycle biomarkers, although increased folate concentrations were correlated with improved symptoms in the SAMe group (r = - 0.57, p = 0.026). The treatment was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Although a differential reduction in depression symptoms between groups was observed in favour of SAMe, the results of this pilot study were not statistically significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR-Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; No.: ACTRN12613001299796; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364900.
2.
Ursodeoxycholic acid and S-adenosylmethionine in the treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a multi-centered randomized controlled trial.
Zhang, L, Liu, XH, Qi, HB, Li, Z, Fu, XD, Chen, L, Shao, Y
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2015;(19):3770-6
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a special complication of pregnancy characterized by skin pruritus, abnormal liver function tests and bile acids. To compare the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) monotherapy with their combined effect on intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Singleton pregnancies with ICP in five tertiary medical centers were randomly divided into three treatment groups: oral UDCA 4×250 mg daily (Group 1, n = 41), intravenous SAMe 1000 mg daily (Group 2, n = 38), and a combination of both drugs (Group 3, n = 41) until delivery. Paired t test, analysis of covariance and non-parametric test were used. RESULTS All therapies significantly and equally improved pruritus. The serum levels of total bile acids (TBA), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin (TB) in each group significantly decreased after treatment (p < 0.05). Group 1 was more effective than Group 2 in reducing TBA concentration (p < 0.05), Group 1 and Group 3 showed more effective than Group 2 in reducing AST and TB concentrations (p < 0.05), and Group 1 facilitated deliveries at term. No perinatal death or adverse drug reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS UDCA and SAMe are both effective and safe in the treatment of ICP. UDCA monotherapy should be used as the first line therapy for ICP because it is more efficacious, cost-effective and convenient.
3.
Effect of adjunctive L-methylfolate 15 mg among inadequate responders to SSRIs in depressed patients who were stratified by biomarker levels and genotype: results from a randomized clinical trial.
Papakostas, GI, Shelton, RC, Zajecka, JM, Bottiglieri, T, Roffman, J, Cassiello, C, Stahl, SM, Fava, M
The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2014;(8):855-63
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Specific genetic or biological markers may predict inadequate response to therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of the current post hoc analysis was to evaluate the effect of specific biological and genetic markers on the antidepressant efficacy of adjunctive L-methylfolate 15 mg versus placebo from a trial of inadequate responders to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). METHOD The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial used the sequential parallel comparison design. Outpatients with SSRI-resistant MDD (DSM-IV criteria) received L-methylfolate 15 mg/d for 60 days, placebo for 30 days followed by L-methylfolate 15 mg/d for 30 days, or placebo for 60 days. The effects of baseline levels of select biological and genetic markers individually and combined on treatment response to L-methylfolate versus placebo were evaluated; the primary response measure was the 28-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-28). The first patient was enrolled July 14, 2009, and the last patient completed April 28, 2011. RESULTS Seventy-five patients were enrolled. Patients with specific biological (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m², elevated plasma levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, low S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteine ratio) and genetic markers at baseline had significantly (P ≤ .05) greater pooled mean change from baseline on the HDRS-28 with L-methylfolate versus placebo. Pooled mean change from baseline on the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale was significantly (P < .05) greater with L-methylfolate versus placebo for most genetic markers. Most combinations of baseline biological and genetic markers predicted significantly (P ≤ .05) greater reductions in pooled mean change from baseline in HDRS-28 scores with L-methylfolate versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS Biomarkers associated with inflammation or metabolism and genomic markers associated with L-methylfolate synthesis and metabolism may identify patients with SSRI-resistant depression who are responsive to adjunctive therapy with L-methylfolate 15 mg. Confirmatory studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00955955.