0
selected
-
1.
Selenium levels and skin diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lv, J, Ai, P, Lei, S, Zhou, F, Chen, S, Zhang, Y
Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS). 2020;:126548
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have investigated the association between selenium levels and skin diseases, but reached inconsistent results. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between selenium levels and skin diseases. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in public databases to identify all relevant studies, and study-specific standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled to compare the selenium levels between different groups. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies were identified with a total of 1315 patient and 7181 healthy controls. Compared with controls, no significant difference in selenium was found in patients with vitiligo (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI: -0.40 to 1.45), alopecia areata (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI: -2.72 and 3.65), or eczema (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.48). A lower selenium level was found in patients with psoriasis (SMD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.15 to -0.10), acne vulgaris (SMD = -1.02, 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.60), chloric acne (SMD = -2.35, 95% CI: -3.15 to -1.55), and atopic dermatitis (SMD = -2.62, 95% CI: -3.00 to -2.24). As for disease severity, severe patients had a higher selenium level than mild patients in psoriasis (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.07-1.38), but no difference was found in vitiligo (SMD = -0.26, 95% CI: -2.38 to 1.85) and alopecia areata (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: -0.34 to 1.26). CONCLUSION Selenium levels were associated with several skin diseases and the disease severity, and high selenium levels tended to be a protective factor in certain skin diseases.
-
2.
Meta-analysis of dermatological toxicities associated with sorafenib.
Zhang, L, Zhou, Q, Ma, L, Wu, Z, Wang, Y
Clinical and experimental dermatology. 2011;(4):344-50
Abstract
A meta-analysis was performed to determine the type, incidence and risks of dermatological toxicities associated with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. A literature search was performed using the electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE, and conference abstracts published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Eligible studies included prospective phase II or III clinical trials, and expanded-access programmes (i.e. outside a clinical trial) of patients with solid tumours assigned sorafenib at a starting dose of 400 mg twice daily. The overall incidences and risk ratios of dermatological toxicities associated with sorafenib were analysed. For patients assigned sorafenib, the overall incidence of all-grade rash/desquamation was 35.4% (95% CI 0.29-0.43), hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) 39.0% (95% CI 0.32-0.47), alopecia 25.5% (95% CI 0.18-0.35), pruritus 14.0% (95% CI 0.10-0.20) and dry skin 14.1% (95% CI 0.10-0.20). High-grade rash/desquamation events occurred in 5.0% (95% CI 0.04-0.07), HFSR in 9.0% (95% CI 0.082-0.098), alopecia in 4/1793, pruritus in 2/1265 and dry skin in 0/1689 of patients assigned sorafenib. Meta-analysis of risk ratio showed that sorafenib was associated with a significantly increased risk of rash/desquamation [risk ratio (RR) 2.73; 95% CI 1.66-4.49)], HFSR (RR 7.50; 95% CI 3.90-14.40) and alopecia (RR 7.55; 95% CI 5.26-10.84) in patients with solid tumours, but risk of pruritus (RR 1.80; 95% CI 0.77-4.22) or dry skin (RR 2.18; 95% CI 0.88-5.40) was not increased. In conclusion, the most frequent dermatological toxicities associated with sorafenib were HFSR, rash/desquamation, alopecia, pruritus and dry skin. There was a significantly increased risk of HFSR, rash/desquamation and alopecia with sorafenib compared with placebo. Skin toxicities were mainly mild or moderate in severity. Appropriate prevention and management are recommended.
-
3.
Risk of hand-foot skin reaction with sorafenib: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chu, D, Lacouture, ME, Fillos, T, Wu, S
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2008;(2):176-86
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a dose-limiting toxicity associated with sorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor with clinical activity against solid tumors. This study was conducted to determine the risk of developing HFSR among patients receiving sorafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS Databases from Pubmed, Web of Science, and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings from 2004 through July, 2007 were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were prospective clinical trials using single agent sorafenib. The summary incidence rate and the relative risk (RR) were calculated using random-effects model. RESULTS A total of 4 883 patients in 11 trials with metastatic tumors were included for analysis. Among patients receiving sorafenib, the summary incidence of all-grade HFSR was 33.8% (95% CI: 24.5-44.7%) with significant difference between patients with RCC and non-RCC malignancy (RR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.32-1.75%, p<0.001). The incidence of high-grade HFSR was 8.9% (95% CI: 7.3-10.7%). In addition, sorafenib was associated with a significant increased risk of HFSR with RR of 6.6 (95% CI: 3.7 to 11.7, p<0.001) in comparison with controls. CONCLUSION There is a significant risk of HFSR associated with sorafenib. Proper management and further study are recommended to reduce the risk.
-
4.
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: center case review.
Lauenstein, TC, Salman, K, Morreira, R, Tata, S, Tudorascu, D, Baramidze, G, Singh-Parker, S, Martin, DR
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2007;(5):1198-203
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively analyze nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) cases at our center, to determine prior gadolinium based contrast agent (GBCA) administration and to evaluate possible common risk factors for the development of NSF by reviewing laboratory data and concurrent medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of four data bases (pathology, MRI, dialysis, and medical records) were cross-referenced for identification and evaluation of NSF patients. Medical history of NSF patients was assessed as for previous deep venous thrombosis (DVT), surgery, or infections. Laboratory data (creatinine, anion gap, calcium, phosphorus, and albumin) as well as concurrent medication were evaluated. Findings were compared to those of a control group of non-NSF dialysis patients. RESULTS Between October 2003 and February 2007 a total of nine NSF cases were identified. All patients had undergone contrast-enhanced MRI prior to the diagnosis of NSF. Only one gadolinium chelate had been used at our MRI center (Omniscan, gadodiamide; GE Healthcare). Of nine patients, eight were receiving dialysis at the time of the MRI scan. During the same time 312 dialysis patients received gadodiamide. Thus, the prevalence of NSF within dialysis patients exposed to gadodiamide was 2.6%. NSF patients presented with a higher creatinine and anion gap than the control patients. Other laboratory values as well as medication did not show a significant difference. There were no patterns regarding previous history of DVT, surgery, or infection in the NSF group. CONCLUSION Our findings are consistent with the previously reported association between gadodiamide exposure and NSF. All NSF patients had severe renal insufficiency with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 (highest GFR = 25 mL/minute) at the time of last gadodiamide administration, and on average had received 71 mL of gadodiamide over an average of 2.9 administrations.
-
5.
The therapeutic potential of calcipotriol in diseases other than psoriasis.
Holm, EA, Jemec, GB
International journal of dermatology. 2002;(1):38-43
Abstract
BACKGROUND Calcipotriol is a vitamin D analog, which has antiproliferative and anti- inflammatory effects, and stimulates terminal differentiation. It has been an established treatment for psoriasis since 1991 in Europe and 1994 in the USA. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical efficacy of topical calcipotriol in diseases other than psoriasis. RESULTS A total of 36 original papers were found describing 21 different diseases in which the clinical use of calcipotriol ointment was described as having an effect. These papers were predominantly case reports (n = 22) and observational studies (n = 5), but nine papers described small randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS Calcipotriol may generally be effective in diseases characterized by pathogenic elements, such as impaired differentiation or increased keratinocyte proliferation, and activated T lymphocytes. This study of the existing literature suggests that randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of calcipotriol therapy may be worthwhile in a number of diseases.