-
1.
Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of Beijing Prediabetes Reversion Program: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lifestyle Intervention and/or Pioglitazone in Reversion to Normal Glucose Tolerance in Prediabetes.
Luo, Y, Paul, SK, Zhou, X, Chang, C, Chen, W, Guo, X, Yang, J, Ji, L, Wang, H
Journal of diabetes research. 2017;:7602408
Abstract
Background. Patients with prediabetes are at high risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). No study has explored whether intervention could revert prediabetes to normal glycemic status as the primary outcome. Beijing Prediabetes Reversion Program (BPRP) would evaluate whether intensive lifestyle modification and/or pioglitazone could revert prediabetic state to normoglycemia and improve the risk factors of CVD as well. Methods. BPRP is a randomized, multicenter, 2 × 2 factorial design study. Participants diagnosed as prediabetes were randomized into four groups (conventional/intensive lifestyle intervention and 30 mg pioglitazone/placebo) with a three-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was conversion into normal glucose tolerance. The trial would recruit 2000 participants (500 in each arm). Results. Between March 2007 and March 2011, 1945 participants were randomized. At baseline, the individuals were 53 ± 10 years old, with median BMI 26.0 (23.9, 28.2) kg/m2 and HbA1c 5.8 (5.6, 6.1)%. 85% of the participants had IGT and 15% had IFG. Parameters relevant to glucose, lipids, blood pressure, lifestyle, and other metabolic markers were similar between conventional and intensive lifestyle intervention group at baseline. Conclusion. BPRP was the first study to determine if lifestyle modification and/or pioglitazone could revert prediabetic state to normoglycemia in Chinese population. Major baseline parameters were balanced between two lifestyle intervention groups. This trial is registered with www.chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR-PRC-06000005.
-
2.
Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial.
Vaccaro, O, Masulli, M, Nicolucci, A, Bonora, E, Del Prato, S, Maggioni, AP, Rivellese, AA, Squatrito, S, Giorda, CB, Sesti, G, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2017;(11):887-897
Abstract
BACKGROUND The best treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes in whom treatment with metformin alone fails to achieve adequate glycaemic control is debated. We aimed to compare the long-term effects of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas, given in addition to metformin, on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS TOSCA.IT was a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic clinical trial, in which patients aged 50-75 years with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (2-3 g per day) were recruited from 57 diabetes clinics in Italy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), by permuted blocks randomisation (block size 10), stratified by site and previous cardiovascular events, to add-on pioglitazone (15-45 mg) or a sulfonylurea (5-15 mg glibenclamide, 2-6 mg glimepiride, or 30-120 mg gliclazide, in accordance with local practice). The trial was unblinded, but event adjudicators were unaware of treatment assignment. The primary outcome, assessed with a Cox proportional-hazards model, was a composite of first occurrence of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or urgent coronary revascularisation, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned participants with baseline data available and without any protocol violations in relation to inclusion or exclusion criteria). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00700856. FINDINGS Between Sept 18, 2008, and Jan 15, 2014, 3028 patients were randomly assigned and included in the analyses. 1535 were assigned to pioglitazone and 1493 to sulfonylureas (glibenclamide 24 [2%], glimepiride 723 [48%], gliclazide 745 [50%]). At baseline, 335 (11%) participants had a previous cardiovascular event. The study was stopped early on the basis of a futility analysis after a median follow-up of 57·3 months. The primary outcome occurred in 105 patients (1·5 per 100 person-years) who were given pioglitazone and 108 (1·5 per 100 person-years) who were given sulfonylureas (hazard ratio 0·96, 95% CI 0·74-1·26, p=0·79). Fewer patients had hypoglycaemias in the pioglitazone group than in the sulfonylureas group (148 [10%] vs 508 [34%], p<0·0001). Moderate weight gain (less than 2 kg, on average) occurred in both groups. Rates of heart failure, bladder cancer, and fractures were not significantly different between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION In this long-term, pragmatic trial, incidence of cardiovascular events was similar with sulfonylureas (mostly glimepiride and gliclazide) and pioglitazone as add-on treatments to metformin. Both of these widely available and affordable treatments are suitable options with respect to efficacy and adverse events, although pioglitazone was associated with fewer hypoglycaemia events. FUNDING Italian Medicines Agency, Diabete Ricerca, and Italian Diabetes Society.
-
3.
Lobeglitazone and pioglitazone as add-ons to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase III clinical trial with a 28-week extension.
Jin, SM, Park, CY, Cho, YM, Ku, BJ, Ahn, CW, Cha, BS, Min, KW, Sung, YA, Baik, SH, Lee, KW, et al
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2015;(6):599-602
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone and pioglitazone as add-ons to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients who were inadequately controlled by metformin were randomized and treated once daily with either lobeglitazone (0.5 mg, n = 128) or pioglitazone (15 mg, n = 125) for 24 weeks, with a 28-week extension trial of lobeglitazone treatment in patients who consented. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration from baseline to week 24. At week 24, the mean change from baseline in HbA1c was -0.74% for the lobeglitazone group and -0.74% for the pioglitazone group, with a mean difference of 0.01% [95% confidence interval (CI) of difference, -0.16 to 0.18]. The effects of lobeglitazone on lipid variables and the adverse events associated with lobeglitazone were similar to those observed with pioglitazone. Lobeglitazone was not inferior to pioglitazone as an add-on to metformin in terms of their efficacy and safety.
-
4.
Effect of exenatide, insulin and pioglitazone on bone metabolism in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
Li, R, Xu, W, Luo, S, Xu, H, Tong, G, Zeng, L, Zhu, D, Weng, J
Acta diabetologica. 2015;(6):1083-91
Abstract
AIM: Preclinical studies suggested that insulin, incretin and thiazolidinediones had effect on regulation of bone metabolism. But clinical evidence is limited. We assessed the effects of these antihyperglycemic agents on bone metabolism in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. METHODS The present study was a two-center, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. Sixty-two newly diagnosed and drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to exenatide (EXE, n = 20), mixed protamine zinc recombinant human insulin lispro injection (25R; INS, n = 21) or pioglitazone (PIO, n = 21) group for a 24-week treatment. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, body mineral density (BMD) and fasting serum concentration of bone turnover markers including osteocalcin (OC), C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and tartrate-resistant alkaline phosphatase 5b (TRAcP5b) were assessed at baseline and week 24. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. At week 24, HbA1c improved in all patients (EXE:-2.4 ± 0.3 %, INS:-2.4 ± 0.3 %, PIO:-2.0 ± 0.2 %; p > 0.05 among groups). Patients treated with exenatide lost body weight remarkably (-4.7 ± 0.8 kg). In spite of the amelioration of glucose control, no significant improvement of OC, CTX or TRAcP5b was observed at week 24 (EXE: OC -0.619 ± 0.728 ng/ml, CTX 0.147 ± 0.046 ng/ml, TRAcP5b 0.302 ± 0.149 U/L;INS: OC 0.637 ± 0.787 ng/ml, CTX -0.012 ± 0.074 ng/ml, TRAcP5b 0.124 ± 0.395 U/L; PIO: OC -0.150 ± 0.691 ng/ml, CTX 0.073 ± 0.094 ng/ml, TRAcP5b 0.586 ± 0.183 U/L; p > 0.05), as well as BMD measurement, regardless of the treatments. CONCLUSIONS Twenty-four-week treatment with exenatide, insulin and pioglitazone improved glucose control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, but had no impact on bone turnover markers or BMD.
-
5.
Metformin, but not rosiglitazone, attenuates the increasing plasma levels of a new cardiovascular marker, fibulin-1, in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Skov, V, Cangemi, C, Gram, J, Christensen, MM, Grodum, E, Sørensen, D, Argraves, WS, Henriksen, JE, Rasmussen, LM
Diabetes care. 2014;(3):760-6
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The extracellular matrix protein fibulin-1 is upregulated in the arterial wall in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and circulates in increased concentrations in diabetes. Metformin is an antidiabetic drug with beneficial cardiovascular disease effects in diabetes. We hypothesized that metformin would influence the increased level of plasma fibulin-1 in diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After a 4-week run-in period, 371 eligible patients with T2D were randomized to treatment groups in a factorial design including insulin alone (control), +metformin, +rosiglitazone, or +both metformin and rosiglitazone. Plasma fibulin-1 was analyzed at the beginning of the study and after 18 and 24 months. RESULTS Plasma fibulin-1 increased in all groups throughout the 2-year period; however, the increase was strongly attenuated among patients treated with metformin. A highly significant difference was observed when the mean change in plasma fibulin-1 was compared between metformin- and non-metformin-treated individuals both at 18 and 24 months of treatment, but rosiglitazone had no effect. Metformin and rosiglitazone alone reduced the HbA1c levels to comparable levels and in combination even further. CONCLUSIONS Metformin attenuates the increase in plasma fibulin-1 concentrations in T2D, independently of glycemic effects. Changes in fibulin-1 may reflect an important element in diabetic arteriopathy that can be influenced by metformin.
-
6.
Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add-on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Kovacs, CS, Seshiah, V, Swallow, R, Jones, R, Rattunde, H, Woerle, HJ, Broedl, UC, ,
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2014;(2):147-58
Abstract
AIMS: This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of empagliflozin as add-on to pioglitazone ± metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS Patients with HbA1c ≥7 and ≤10% were randomized and treated with once daily empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 165), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 168) or placebo (n = 165) as add-on to pioglitazone ± metformin for 24 weeks. Endpoints included changes from baseline in HbA1c (primary endpoint), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and body weight at week 24. RESULTS Adjusted mean ± standard error changes in HbA1c were -0.6 ± 0.07% and -0.7 ± 0.07% with empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg, respectively, vs. -0.1 ± 0.07% with placebo (both p < 0.001). More patients with HbA1c ≥7% at baseline achieved HbA1c <7% with empagliflozin 10 mg (23.8%) and 25 mg (30.0%) vs. placebo (7.7%) (both p < 0.001). FPG decreased with empagliflozin (-0.94 mmol/l for 10 mg and -1.22 mmol/l for 25 mg) and increased with placebo (+0.36 mmol/l; both p < 0.001). Adjusted mean ± standard error changes in weight were -1.62 ± 0.21 kg and -1.47 ± 0.21 kg with empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg, respectively, vs. +0.34 ± 0.21 kg with placebo (both p < 0.001). Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events with empagliflozin (67.3-71.4%) and placebo (72.7%). Confirmed hypoglycaemia was reported by 1.2-2.4% of patients on empagliflozin and 1.8% on placebo. CONCLUSION Empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg once daily for 24 weeks as add-on to pioglitazone ± metformin reduced HbA1c, FPG and weight and were well tolerated in patients with T2DM.
-
7.
Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double blind, randomized comparison with pioglitazone.
Pareek, A, Chandurkar, N, Thomas, N, Viswanathan, V, Deshpande, A, Gupta, OP, Shah, A, Kakrani, A, Bhandari, S, Thulasidharan, NK, et al
Current medical research and opinion. 2014;(7):1257-66
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine with pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This double-blind study randomized 267 uncontrolled type 2 diabetes patients (HbA1c ≥7.5% and ≤11.5%), post 3 months' treatment with glimepiride/gliclazide and metformin, to additionally receive hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day (n = 135) or pioglitazone 15 mg/day (n = 132) for 24 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by changes in HbA1c, fasting (FBG) and post-prandial (PPG) blood glucose at Week 12 and Week 24. RESULTS At Week 12 and Week 24, HbA1c, FBG and PPG significantly reduced from baseline in both groups. Mean reduction in glycemic parameters at Week 12 (HbA1c: -0.56% vs -0.72%, p = 0.394; FBG: -0.99 mmol/L vs -1.05 mmol/L, p = 0.878; PPG: -1.93 mmol/L vs -1.52 mmol/L, p = 0.423) and Week 24 (HbA1c: -0.87% vs -0.90%, p = 0.909; FBG: -0.79 mmol/L vs -1.02 mmol/L, p = 0.648; PPG: -1.77 mmol/L vs -1.36 mmol/L, p = 0.415) was not significantly different between the hydroxychloroquine and pioglitazone groups. Change in total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C was significant in favor of hydroxychloroquine (TC: -0.37 mmol/L vs 0.03 mmol/L, p = 0.002; LDL-C: -0.23 mmol/L vs 0.09 mmol/L, p = 0.003). Triglycerides significantly reduced in both groups at Week 24. Mean HDL-C remained unchanged. Study treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION With favorable effects on glycemic parameters and lipids, hydroxychloroquine may emerge as well tolerated therapeutic option for T2DM. LIMITATIONS The sample size for this study was small. However, based on the encouraging results of this proof-of-concept study, longer duration studies in larger population can be conducted to further confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS Clinical Trial Registry-India URL: http://ctri.nic.in, Registration Number: CTRI/2009/091/001036.
-
8.
Effects of pioglitazone on macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk of stroke: the PROFIT-J study.
Yoshii, H, Onuma, T, Yamazaki, T, Watada, H, Matsuhisa, M, Matsumoto, M, Kitagawa, K, Kitakaze, M, Yamasaki, Y, Kawamori, R, et al
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2014;(6):563-73
Abstract
AIM: The present study evaluated the effects of pioglitazone treatment on the incidence of primary cardiovascular events in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk of stroke. METHODS A prospective, multicenter, randomized, open label, comparative study was conducted among diabetic patients recruited from 50 medical institutions nationwide. A total of 522 patients with hypertension and/or dyslipidemia who had one or more silent cerebral infarcts, advanced carotid atherosclerosis or microalbuminuria at baseline were randomly treated with (n=254) or without pioglitazone (n=268) and observed for a medium of 672 days. The hypertension and dyslipidemia were concurrently treated according to the respective treatment guidelines. The primary outcome was the time to the first occurrence of a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal cerebral infarction and nonfatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS Treatment with pioglitazone resulted in significant reductions in the levels of HbA1c, diastolic blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol and a significant increase in the levels of HDL-cholesterol. The pioglitazone non-users exhibited a significant reduction in the LDL-cholesterol levels alone. Primary events were registered during the study period in nine patients in the pioglitazone group and 10 patients in the non-pioglitazone group. The difference in the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was not significant between the two groups(1.8% per year). CONCLUSIONS Pioglitazone therapy produces immediate and effective improvements in glycemic control, diastolic blood pressure and lipid profiles. While this study was too underpowered to determine the effects of pioglitazone on the incidence of cardiovascular events, the results indicated that two years of pioglitazone treatment did not produce any statistically significant reductions in the rate of primary cardiovascular events.
-
9.
Paradoxical reduction in HDL-C with fenofibrate and thiazolidinedione therapy in type 2 diabetes: the ACCORD Lipid Trial.
Linz, PE, Lovato, LC, Byington, RP, O'Connor, PJ, Leiter, LA, Weiss, D, Force, RW, Crouse, JR, Ismail-Beigi, F, Simmons, DL, et al
Diabetes care. 2014;(3):686-93
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the occurrence of extremely low HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) among participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid Trial and to examine the relationship of this finding with treatment with fenofibrate and thiazolidinedione (TZD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The ACCORD Lipid Trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes at 77 clinical centers across the U.S. and Canada in a 5,518-patient subset of the larger 10,251 ACCORD Glycemia Trial. Patients were enrolled from 11 January 2001 to 29 October 2005 and followed until the end of study visits between 1 March and 30 June 2009. Follow-up in the ACCORD Lipid Trial was 4-8 years (mean 4.7 years). Patients were treated with blinded fenofibrate or placebo on a background of simvastatin therapy. The main outcome measures for these descriptive, post hoc analyses was the occurrence of extremely low HDL-C (defined as <25 mg/dL [0.647 mmol/L]) during the trial. RESULTS Among ACCORD Lipid Trial participants, the occurrence of extremely low HDL-C ever during study follow-up was 106% higher among those randomized to fenofibrate (10.1% fenofibrate vs. 4.9% placebo, P < 0.001). The occurrence of low HDL-C was associated with concurrent treatment with fenofibrate and TZD (7.0% for both vs. 2.2% for neither at 48 months postrandomization). CONCLUSIONS Idiosyncratic and marked reduction in HDL-C can occur in some patients treated with both fenofibrate and TZD. Practitioners should recognize this important potential idiosyncratic reaction and take appropriate corrective action.
-
10.
A comparison between sitagliptin or glibenclamide in addition to metformin + pioglitazone on glycaemic control and β-cell function: the triple oral therapy.
Derosa, G, Cicero, AF, Franzetti, IG, Querci, F, Carbone, A, Piccinni, MN, D'Angelo, A, Fogari, E, Maffioli, P
Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2013;(7):846-54
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate which triple oral therapy between metformin + pioglitazone + sitagliptin and metformin + pioglitazone + glibenclamide can be more useful in improving glycaemic control and should be preferred in clinical practice. METHODS During the 2-year run-in period, patients were instructed to take metformin monotherapy for the first year, then a combination of metformin and pioglitazone for the second year, then patients were randomized to add glibenclamide or sitagliptin to the dual combination of metformin and pioglitazone for another year. RESULTS Body weight reached with sitagliptin at 36 months was lower than that reached with glibenclamide. Fasting plasma insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were significantly increased by triple therapy with glibenclamide and decreased by that with sitagliptin. While sitagliptin did not change homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function, this value was significantly increased by glibenclamide. Fasting plasma proinsulin was not influenced by triple oral therapy including glibenclamide, while it was decreased by the therapy including sitagliptin compared to glibenclamide. Triple oral therapy with sitagliptin better improved β-cell function measures compared with the glibenclamide therapy. CONCLUSIONS Sitagliptin should be preferred to glibenclamide as an addition to the metformin + pioglitazone combination for its better protection of β-cell secretion and its neutral effect on body weight.