1.
Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with conventional and CZT single-photon emission computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.
Cantoni, V, Green, R, Acampa, W, Zampella, E, Assante, R, Nappi, C, Gaudieri, V, Mannarino, T, Cuocolo, R, Di Vaia, E, et al
Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2021;(2):698-715
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of conventional SPECT (C-SPECT) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-SPECT systems in detecting angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS Studies published between January 2000 and February 2018 were identified by database search. We included studies assessing C-SPECT or CZT-SPECT as a diagnostic test to evaluate patients for the presence of CAD, defined as at least 50% diameter stenosis on invasive coronary angiography. A study was eligible regardless of whether patients were referred for suspected or known CAD. RESULTS We identified 40 eligible articles (25 C-SPECT and 15 CZT-SPECT studies) including 7334 patients (4997 in C-SPECT and 2337 in CZT-SPECT studies). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 66% for C-SPECT and 89% and 69% for CZT-SPECT imaging studies. The area under the curve was slightly higher for CZT-SPECT (0.89) compared to C-SPECT (0.83); accordingly, the summary diagnostic OR was 17 for CZT-SPECT and 11 for C-SPECT. The accuracy of the two tests slightly differs between C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT (chi-square 11.28, P < .05). At meta-regression analysis, no significant association between both sensitivity and specificity and demographical and clinical variables considered was found for C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT studies. CONCLUSIONS C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT have good diagnostic performance in detecting angiographic proven CAD, with a slightly higher accuracy for CZT-SPECT. This result supports the use of the novel gamma cameras in clinical routine practices also considering the improvements in acquisition time and radiation exposure reduction.
2.
The value of four imaging modalities to distinguish malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules: a study based on 73 cohorts incorporating 7956 individuals.
Wu, Q, Zhong, L, Xie, X
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico. 2021;(2):296-310
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) frequently bother oncologists. The differentiation of malignant from benign nodules with non-invasive approach remains a tough challenge. This study was designed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomography (CT), dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and technetium 99 m (99mTc) depreotide single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for SPNs. METHODS Electronic databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant trials. The primary evaluation index of diagnostic accuracy was areas under the summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curve. The results were analyzed utilizing Stata 12.0 statistical software. RESULTS Seventy-three trials incorporating 7956 individuals were recruited. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic score, diagnostic odds ratios, and areas under the SROC curve with 95% confidence intervals were, respectively, 0.92 (0.89-0.95), 0.64 (0.54-0.74), 2.60 (1.98-3.42), 0.12 (0.08-0.17), 3.10 (2.62-3.59), 22.24 (13.67-36.17), and 0.91 (0.88-0.93) for CT; 0.92 (0.86-0.95), 0.85 (0.77-0.90), 6.01 (3.90-9.24), 0.10 (0.06-0.17), 4.12 (3.41-4.82), 61.39 (30.41-123.93), and 0.94 (0.92-0.96) for MRI; 0.90 (0.86-0.93), 0.73 (0.65-0.79), 3.28 (2.56-4.20), 0.14 (0.10-0.19), 3.16 (2.69-3.64), 23.68 (14.74-38.05), and 0.90 (0.87-0.92) for 18F-FDG PET; and 0.93 (0.88-0.96), 0.70 (0.56-0.81), 3.12 (2.03-4.81), 0.10 (0.06-0.17), 3.43 (2.63-4.22), 30.74 (13.84-68.27), and 0.93 (0.91-0.95) for 99mTc-depreotide SPECT. CONCLUSION The dynamic MRI, dynamic CT, 18F-FDG PET, and 99mTc-depreotide SPECT were favorable non-invasive approaches to distinguish malignant SPNs from benign. Moreover, from the viewpoint of cost-effectiveness and avoiding radiation, the dynamic MRI was recommendable for SPNs.
3.
Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.
Gonzalez, JA, Lipinski, MJ, Flors, L, Shaw, PW, Kramer, CM, Salerno, M
The American journal of cardiology. 2015;(9):1469-78
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
We sought to compare the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), computed tomography perfusion (CTP), and computed tomography (CT)-fractional flow reserve (FFR) for assessing the functional significance of coronary stenosis as defined by invasive FFR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). CCTA has proved clinically useful for excluding obstructive CAD because of its high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV); however, the ability of CTA to identify functionally significant CAD has remained challenging. We searched PubMed/Medline for studies evaluating CCTA, CTP, or CT-FFR for the noninvasive detection of obstructive CAD compared with catheter-derived FFR as the reference standard. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, likelihood ratios, and odds ratio of all diagnostic tests were assessed. Eighteen studies involving a total of 1,535 patients were included. CTA demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.92, specificity 0.43, PPV of 0.56, and NPV of 0.87 on a per-patient level. CT-FFR and CTP increased the specificity to 0.72 and 0.77, respectively (p = 0.004 and p = 0.0009) resulting in higher point estimates for PPV 0.70 and 0.83, respectively. There was no improvement in the sensitivity. The CTP protocol involved more radiation (3.5 mSv CCTA vs 9.6 mSv CTP) and a higher volume of iodinated contrast (145 ml). In conclusion, CTP and CT-FFR improve the specificity of CCTA for detecting functionally significant stenosis as defined by invasive FFR on a per-patient level; both techniques could advance the ability to noninvasively detect the functional significance of coronary lesions.