-
1.
Effects of Sodium Valproate Monotherapy on Blood Liver Enzyme Levels in Patients with Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis.
Fu, J, Tao, T, Li, Z, Chen, Y, Chen, X, Li, J, Peng, L
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2021;(7):425-434
Abstract
We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effects of sodium valproate (VPA) monotherapy on blood liver enzymes in patients with epilepsy. PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China national knowledge infrastructure databases were searched. Nine studies were included. Results showed: (1) The overall SMD for blood AST, ALT, and GGT levels of VPA monotherapy group versus control group were 0.70 (95% CI=0.31 to 1.09, Z=3.52, p=0.0004), 0.47 (95% CI=- 0.01 to 0.95, Z=1.91, p=0.06), 0.44 (95% CI=0.29 to 0.60, Z=5.55, p<0.00001), respectively. (2) In subgroup meta-analysis, increased blood AST and GGT levels were observed in epileptic minors (AST: total SMD=0.85, 95% CI=0.40 to 1.30, Z=3.69, p=0.0002; GGT: total SMD=0.46, 95% CI=0.29 to 0.63, Z=5.25, p<0.00001). Elevated blood ALT level was observed in Asian patients receiving VPA monotherapy (total SMD=0.70, 95% CI=0.51 to 0.90, Z=7.01, p<0.00001), and the early stage of VPA monotherapy (total SMD=0.93, 95% CI=0.57 to 1.29, Z=5.09, p<0.00001). Overall, our results indicated that blood AST and GGT were significantly increased in epileptic minors receiving VPA monotherapy. The elevation of blood ALT was observed in Asian patients and the early stage of VPA monotherapy. However, due to the small number of included studies, our results should be considered with caution.
-
2.
Intravenous sodium valproate in status epilepticus: review and Meta-analysis.
Liampas, I, Siokas, V, Brotis, A, Zintzaras, E, Stefanidis, I, Dardiotis, E
The International journal of neuroscience. 2021;(1):70-84
Abstract
Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurologic emergency. The present study constitutes a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of intravenous sodium valproate (VPA) in SE.Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched, while retrieved RCTs and meta-analyses were manually screened. Prespecified outcome measures included seizure-cessation, 24 h-efficacy, constitute (liver enzyme increase, arrhythmias, bone-marrow suppression, hypotension and respiratory depression) and severe (life-threatening) adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis was performed when appropriate, using Random-Effects (RE) or Fixed-Effects (FE) model based on heterogeneity between trials (homogeneity assumed when PQ > 0.1 and I2 < 50%). Outcomes were assessed using Odds-Ratios (ORs) and 95%Confidence-Intervals (95% CIs). Every available comparison was investigated in terms of efficacy and tolerability.Results:Thirteen studies were retrieved and five comparisons were available, four of which involved two or more studies. Results were compatible with no significant difference between VPA and Phenytoin both in terms of efficacy and tolerability [seizure-cessation: FE-OR = 1.99, 95% CI = (0.83-4.75), 24 h-efficacy: FE-OR = 1.32, 95% CI = (0.60-2.89), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.45, 95% CI = (0.17-1.21)]. Phenobarbital proved more commonly associated with composite AEs than VPA [seizure-cessation: RE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.05-9.44), 24 h-efficacy: RE-OR = 0.88, 95% CI = (0.02-33.9), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.09-0.82), severe AEs: FE-OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.04-2.28)]. Diazepam was determined inferior to VPA concerning safety issues [seizure-termination: FE-OR = 0.77, 95% CI = (0.34-1.79), severe respiratory depression: FE-OR = 0.06, 95% CI = (0.01-0.48), severe hypotension: FE-OR = 0.09, 95% CI = (0.01-0.72)]. The combination of Lorazepam (LZP) with VPA and the combination of LZP with Levetiracetam presented no difference in efficacy [24h-efficacy: FE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.37-1.24)].Conclusions: Although, additional high-quality RCTs are warranted, according to our results, VPA can be considered a safe and effective option in the management of SE.
-
3.
Intravenous sodium valproate for acute migraine in the emergency department: A meta-analysis.
Wang, F, Zhang, H, Wang, L, Cao, Y, He, Q
Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 2020;(6):521-530
Abstract
The role of intravenous sodium valproate (iVPA) in acute migraine attack has not been completely established. The aim of this updated review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iVPA in patients with acute migraine in the emergency department. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was improvement of headache intensity and headache relief. The need for rescue therapy, recurrence of headache, and number of adverse events was also assessed. Seven double-blinded RCTs involving 682 patients were analyzed. Overall, patients receiving iVPA had less improvement of headache intensity (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.06, P = .02) and lower rate of headache relief (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.77, P = .002) than those receiving other active comparators. In addition, iVPA increased the odds of rescue therapy compared with other active drugs (OR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.96 to 7.20, P < .0001). Subgroup analysis showed that iVPA was comparable to dexamethasone, with similar improvement of headache intensity, and recurrence of headache. For migraine without aura, we found no significant difference in headache intensity improvement when iVPA was compared with active comparators (SMD: -0.00, 95% CI: -0.54 to 0.54, P = 1.00). iVPA was inferior to the studied comparators and was comparable to dexamethasone for aborting migraine attack. Based on the available evidence, iVPA may be a reasonable alternative or salvage therapy. In particular, iVPA might be a promising agent for migraine with aura and migraine status.
-
4.
Valproate decreases vitamin D levels in pediatric patients with epilepsy.
Xu, Z, Jing, X, Li, G, Sun, J, Guo, H, Hu, Y, Sun, F, Wen, X, Chen, F, Wang, T, et al
Seizure. 2019;:60-65
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare Vitamin D (Vit D) levels in children with epilepsy on valproate monotherapy with healthy controls. METHODS A meta-analysis performed on articles identified from PubMed and Web of Science online databases evaluated using National Institute of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools. Subgroup analyses and publication bias assessments were also performed. RESULTS Eleven publications were eligible based on inclusion/exclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Results noted a decrease in the mean Vit D level in children with epilepsy on valproate monotherapy compared with healthy children with a Standard Mean Difference = -0.313 [-0.457, -0.169]. Cumulative meta-analysis showed progressive negative effect of valproate therapy on Vit D levels across time. Other antiepileptic medications caused a similar effect on Vit D status. There was no evidence of publication bias in the analyses. Type of study design and country of origin introduced heterogeneities into the meta-analyses. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis provides evidence that long-term therapy with valproate causes a decrease in Vit D levels in children. Therefore, in children with a seizure disorder on long-term valproate therapy, 25-OH-Vit D levels should be monitored and appropriate supplementation implemented if levels are deficient.
-
5.
Effects of Second-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs Compared to First-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs on Bone Metabolism in Patients with Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis.
Fu, J, Peng, L, Li, J, Tao, T, Chen, Y
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2019;(8):511-521
Abstract
We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate effects of second-generation anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs; levetiracetam, lamotrigine) compared to first-generation AEDs (valproic acid, carbamazepine) on bone metabolism in epilepsy patients. PubMed, Web of Science, Clinical trials.gov, Wanfang, and China national knowledge infrastructure databases were searched. Ten trials were included. Results showed: (1) The overall SMD for changes of serum calcium, phosphorus, ALP, and PTH levels from baseline of LEV versus first-generation AEDs were 1.00 (95% CI=0.23-1.77, Z=2.56, p=0.01), 0.98 (95% CI=- 0.05 to 2.01, Z=1.86, p=0.06), - 1.17 (95% CI=- 2.08 to - 0.25, Z=2.50, p=0.01), 0.07 (95% CI=- 0.14 to 0.27, Z=0.63, p=0.53), respectively. (2) The overall SMD for changes of serum calcium, phosphorus, ALP, and PTH levels from baseline of LTG versus first-generation AEDs were -0.16 (95% CI=- 0.47 to 0.16, Z=0.99, p=0.32), -0.05 (95% CI=- 0.55 to 0.44, Z=0.22, p=0.83), 0.10 (95% CI=- 0.53 to 0.73, Z=0.31, p=0.75), -0.05 (95% CI=- 0.52 to 0.42, Z=0.22, p=0.83), respectively. Overall, our results indicate that compared to first-generation AEDs, LEV has less adverse effects on blood bone metabolism markers in epilepsy patients, while LTG does not. However, due to small number of included studies, our results warrant additional research.
-
6.
Effects of valproic acid on bone mineral density and bone metabolism: A meta-analysis.
Fan, D, Miao, J, Fan, X, Wang, Q, Sun, M
Seizure. 2019;:56-63
Abstract
PURPOSE Numerous studies have shown that the risk of fracture is increased by long-term antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Valproic acid (VPA) is one of the most commonly used AEDs. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effects of VPA on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to January 2019 for articles focusing on the effects of VPA on BMD and bone metabolism in adults or children. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5. 3 software. RESULTS 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The BMD of lumber spine (MD= -0.06, 95%CI: -0.09 to -0.03, P < 0.0001) and femoral neck (MD= -0.05, 95% CI= -0.08 to -0.01, P = 0.02) was markedly decreased in the VPA group compared to healthy controls. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) level (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.30-1.40, P = 0.002) was notably increased in the VPA group compared to healthy groups. In the child group, the serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level was higher than in healthy groups (SMD= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.04, P = 0.02); besides, the serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) level was decreased (SMD= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.04, P = 0.02), while no significant alteration of these parameters was noted in the adult VPA group (P ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS VPA may reduce the BMD of lumbar spine and femoral neck in patients with epilepsy while increasing the serum BALP level. Serum PTH level are increased and serum 25(OH)D3 level decreased in children with epilepsy treated with VPA. These parameters were unaltered in adults.
-
7.
CPS1 T1405N polymorphism, HDL cholesterol, homocysteine and renal function are risk factors of VPA induced hyperammonemia among epilepsy patients.
Chen, L, Tian, Q, Zhang, M, Chen, D, Gao, X, Yang, H, Li, H, Li, C, Wen, J, Li, Y, et al
Epilepsy research. 2019;:139-143
Abstract
PURPOSE Valproic acid (VPA) is frequently used in the treatment of epilepsy. The adverse effects of VPA include hyperammonemia (HA) which is characterized by abnormally elevated blood ammonia level. Carbamoyl-Phosphate Synthase 1 (CPS1) is an enzyme catalyzing the initial step of removing ammonia from blood. Studies have demonstrated that the CPS1 polymorphism rs1047891-A allele carriers were susceptible to VPA-induced HA. However, the evidences remained controversial. In this study, we sought to validate the association between rs1047891 and VPA-induced HA by combining the association results from previous studies together. METHODS We first conducted a systematic meta-analysis to determine whether rs1047891 was statistically significant. Then, we further evaluated the pleiotropic effects of rs1047891 using published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and UKBB results. A conditional analysis was conducted to investigate whether the association between rs1047891 and VPA-induced HA was mediated by cardiovascular or renal disease risk factors or vice versa. RESULTS The allelic, dominant and recessive ORs of rs1047891-A were all significant in our fixed-effect meta-analysis. In GWAS catalog and UKBB data, rs1047891 was associated with basal metabolic rate, adiposity and hematology traits, cardiovascular and renal disease risk factors. We further proved that plasma HDL cholesterol and homocysteine level, in addition to eGFR by serum creatinine, were associated with VPA-induced HA risk independently from rs1047891 polymorphism. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the SNP rs1047891 was associated with VPA-induce HA among epilepsy patients. Meanwhile, plasma HDL cholesterol and homocysteine level had independent effects from it.
-
8.
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.
Nevitt, SJ, Marson, AG, Weston, J, Tudur Smith, C
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;(8):CD001769
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy is a common neurological condition in which abnormal electrical discharges from the brain cause recurrent unprovoked seizures. It is believed that with effective drug treatment up to 70% of individuals with active epilepsy have the potential to become seizure-free, and to go into long-term remission shortly after starting drug therapy with a single antiepileptic drug in monotherapy.Worldwide, sodium valproate and phenytoin are commonly used antiepileptic drugs for monotherapy treatment. It is generally believed that phenytoin is more effective for focal onset seizures, and that sodium pvalproate is more effective for generalised onset tonic-clonic seizures (with or without other generalised seizure types). This review is one in a series of Cochrane Reviews investigating pair-wise monotherapy comparisons. This is the latest updated version of the review first published in 2001, and updated in 2013 and 2016. OBJECTIVES To review the time to treatment failure, remission and first seizure of sodium valproate compared to phenytoin when used as monotherapy in people with focal onset seizures or generalised tonic-clonic seizures (with or without other generalised seizure types). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP on 19 February 2018. We handsearched relevant journals, contacted pharmaceutical companies, original trial investigators and experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing monotherapy with either sodium valproate or phenytoin in children or adults with focal onset seizures or generalised onset tonic-clonic seizures DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS This was an individual participant data (IPD) review. Our primary outcome was time to treatment failure and our secondary outcomes were time to first seizure post-randomisation, time to six-month, and 12-month remission, and incidence of adverse events. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to obtain trial-specific estimates of hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using the generic inverse variance method to obtain the overall pooled HR and 95% CI. MAIN RESULTS We included 11 trials in this review and IPD were available for 669 individuals out of 1119 eligible individuals from five out of 11 trials, 60% of the potential data. Results apply to focal onset seizures (simple, complex and secondary generalised tonic-clonic seizures), and generalised tonic-clonic seizures, but not other generalised seizure types (absence or myoclonus seizure types). For remission outcomes, a HR of less than 1 indicates an advantage for phenytoin, and for first seizure and treatment failure outcomes a HR of less than 1 indicates an advantage for sodium valproate.The main overall results were: time to treatment failure for any reason related to treatment (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type 0.88, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.27; 5 studies; 528 participants; moderate-quality evidence), time to treatment failure due to adverse events (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type 0.77, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.37; 4 studies; 418 participants; moderate-quality evidence), time to treatment failure due to lack of efficacy (pooled HR for all participants 1.16 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.89; 5 studies; 451 participants; moderate-quality evidence). These results suggest that treatment failure for any reason related to treatment and treatment failure due to adverse events may occur earlier on phenytoin compared to sodium valproate, while treatment failure due to lack of efficacy may occur earlier on sodium valproate than phenytoin; however none of these results were statistically significant.Results for time to first seizure (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type 1.08, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.33; 5 studies; 639 participants; low-quality evidence) suggest that first seizure recurrence may occur slightly earlier on sodium valproate compared to phenytoin. There were no clear differences between drugs in terms of time to 12-month remission (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type 1.02, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.28; 4 studies; 514 participants; moderate-quality evidence) and time to six-month remission (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type 1.05, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.27; 5 studies; 639 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Limited information was available regarding adverse events in the trials and we could not make comparisons between the rates of adverse events on sodium valproate and phenytoin. Some adverse events reported with both drugs were drowsiness, rash, dizziness, nausea and gastrointestinal problems. Weight gain was also reported with sodium valproate and gingival hypertrophy/hyperplasia was reported on phenytoin.The methodological quality of the included trials was generally good, however four out of the five trials providing IPD for analysis were of an open-label design, therefore all results were at risk of detection bias. There was also evidence that misclassification of seizure type may have confounded the results of this review, particularly for the outcome 'time to first seizure' and heterogeneity was present in analysis of treatment failure outcomes which could not be explained by subgroup analysis by epilepsy type or by sensitivity analysis for misclassification of seizure type. Therefore, for treatment failure outcomes we judged the quality of the evidence to be moderate to low, for 'time to first seizure' we judged the quality of the evidence to be low, and for remission outcomes we judged the quality of the evidence to be moderate. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We have not found evidence that a significant difference exists between valproate and phenytoin for any of the outcomes examined in this review. However detection bias, classification bias and heterogeneity may have impacted on the results of this review. We did not find any outright evidence to support or refute current treatment policies. We recommend that future trials be designed to the highest quality possible with consideration of masking, choice of population, classification of seizure type, duration of follow-up, choice of outcomes and analysis, and presentation of results.
-
9.
SCN1A IVS5N+5 polymorphism and response to sodium valproate: a multicenter study.
Haerian, BS, Baum, L, Tan, HJ, Kwan, P, Raymond, AA, Saruwatari, J, Nakagawa, K, Mohamed, Z
Pharmacogenomics. 2012;(13):1477-85
Abstract
AIM: Approximately 30% of epilepsy patients do not response to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The functional SCN1A IVS5N+5 polymorphism may play a role in response to some AEDs. The purpose of this study was to examine this hypothesis in a cohort study of Malaysian and Hong Kong Chinese epilepsy patients on sodium valproate (VPA) monotherapy and in a meta-analysis. PATIENTS & METHODS The SCN1A IVS5N+5 polymorphism was genotyped in 583 Malaysian (84%) and Hong Kong Chinese (16%) epilepsy patients receiving VPA monotherapy. The related association studies, including the current study, were meta-analyzed by using fixed- and random-effects models under various genetic models. RESULTS A total of 277 (47.5%) and 306 (52.5%) patients were VPA nonresponsive and responsive, respectively. Unlike Chinese and Indian patients, Malay nonresponsive patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy showed significant association, probably caused by the small sample size. CONCLUSION The cohort study and meta-analysis did not demonstrate an association between AED responsiveness and this polymorphism. Future studies with a larger sample size of Malays with idiopathic generalized epilepsy are suggested.
-
10.
Valproic acid and all-trans retinoic acid: meta-analysis of a palliative treatment regimen in AML and MDS patients.
Bellos, F, Mahlknecht, U
Onkologie. 2008;(11):629-33
Abstract
Currently, no standard treatment is available for elderly patients with de novo/secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. New, less aggressive therapies are therefore needed. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are known to reduce proliferation and induce differentiation in hematological malignancies. With all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) these effects have been reported to be even enhanced. Valproic acid (VPA) is an HDACi and has been known as anti-epileptic agent for many years. We treated 21 patients with de novo/secondary AML and 1 patient with myelodysplastic syndrome with ATRA (45 mg/m(2)/day in 2 doses, 14 days, q29 days) and VPA (150 mg/day 1 week, then 300 mg/day, continuously). Treatment was tolerated well with moderate side effects. 4 patients revealed hematological improvement and another 4 patients experienced a reduction in transfusion dependency. The overall response rate was 27%. Our study is presented together with an overview of the literature on the topic.