-
1.
Effect of Lisinopril and Verapamil on Angiopoietin 2 and Endostatin in Hypertensive Diabetic Patients with Nephropathy: A Randomized Trial.
Salem, M, Sallam, AM, Abdel-Aleem, E, El-Mesallamy, HO
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2021;(7):470-477
Abstract
Angiogenesis is a multistep process implicated in the pathophysiology and progression of diabetic nephropathy (DN). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and calcium channel blockers (CCB) have an important role in DN. We performed a randomized-controlled trial of lisinopril alone (an ACEI) or in combination with verapamil (a CCB) as a therapy for DN in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with hypertension (HTN) and urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) (30-300 mg/g) also to evaluate their effect on UACR, the angiogenic proteins: Angiopoietin 2 (Ang-2) and Endostatin (EST). Forty T2DM patients with microalbuminuria, aged 45-65 years were included. Patients were randomly assigned into group 1 receiving oral lisinopril and group 2 receiving oral lisinopril and verapamil once daily. After 3 months follow-up fasting blood glucose (FPG), HbA1c, lipid profile, UACR, serum urea and creatinine levels were assessed. EST and Ang-2 were measured using ELISA technique. Baseline Ang-2 and EST levels were elevated in both groups compared with controls (p<0.001). After follow-up, group 2 had significantly decreased FPG, HbA1c, UACR, EST and Ang-2 compared with their baseline levels (p<0.001 for all comparisons) and with group 1 (p<0.001). No adverse reactions were reported. Baseline EST and Ang-2 were positively correlated to UACR (r=0.753, p<0.001) (r=0.685, p<0.001). Lisinopril/verapamil combination enhanced glycemic control and kidney function via diminishing EST and Ang-2. This combination can be considered as a safe and effective approach for early stage nephropathy therapy in T2DM.
-
2.
Therapeutic effects of nebulized verapamil on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized and double-blind clinical trial.
Bozorgmehr, R, Edalatifard, M, Safavi, E, Rahimi, B, Ghorbani, F, Abtahi, H, Amini, S, Pourdowlat, G
The clinical respiratory journal. 2020;(4):370-381
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this study, we assessed the clinical effect of inhaled verapamil on hospitalized COPD patients in a randomized and double-blind study. METHOD COPD patients randomly received 10 mg of inhaled verapamil or 4 cc nebulized distilled water (DW) as placebo. RESULTS Twenty patients enrolled in each group with no difference in baseline characteristics. Mean age was 64.95 ± 8.9 and 66.9 ± 10.74 years in verapamil and control group; respectively, (P > 0.05). The mean dyspnea score was 6.4 ± 1.2 and 6.2 ± 1.8 in the verapamil and control group, respectively and decreased to 4.9 ± 1.3 and 5.7 ± 1.8 after the intervention. The mean change in the verapamil group was significantly higher, (22.43% ± 10.6% vs 8.7% ± 12.1%), P = 0.00. Unlike the control group, the FEV1 value in the verapamil group significantly increased and reached to 1.17 ± 0.4 L from 1.03 ± 0.4. There was a significant decrease in airway resistance in both groups after intervention. However, neither total lung capacity and residual volume nor forced vital capacity changed significantly. Moreover, oxygen saturation in the verapamil group changed 4.8% ± 2.5% and this improvement in the control group was 1.8 ± 1 (P = 0.00). Smoker subjects, ones with PAP more than 35 mm Hg and obese patients benefit from verapamil. CONCLUSION The beneficial impact of inhaled verapamil on the diminishing of dyspnea score along with its bronchodilatory effect would make this selective calcium blocker agent a therapeutic option in COPD.
-
3.
Preventing spasm of the radial artery conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting: Nicardipine versus verapamil.
Özdemir, HI, van Dijk, CHB, Özdemir, AB, van Straten, BHM, Haanschoten, M, Soliman-Hamad, MA
Journal of cardiac surgery. 2019;(12):1505-1510
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY In vitro studies have shown a reduction in radial artery spasm with the use of calcium antagonists. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of topical treatment of the radial artery conduit using either verapamil or nicardipine before the anastomoses. METHODS This prospective randomized study included 131 patients, who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with the use of the radial artery as a conduit. In 65 patients, the harvested radial artery was topically treated with verapamil and in 66 patients with nicardipine. After harvesting the radial artery, the direct flow through the conduit was measured in vitro before 5-minute incubation in nicardipine or verapamil and measured again after incubation. The flow before and after incubation was compared. Postincubation flow was also compared in the two groups. After performing the anastomosis, the flow through the radial artery was measured in vivo. RESULTS The mean flow after NaCl incubation was 19.93 ± 12.66 mL/min and after incubation in the Ca+ channel blocker 47.16 ± 14.58 mL/min (P < .001). No significant difference in postincubation free flow was found between verapamil (46.29 ± 15.43 mL/min) and nicardipine (48.01 ± 13.77 mL/min; P = .503). CONCLUSION Topical treatment with Ca+ channel blockers reduces radial artery spasm and significantly increases the free flow through the radial artery conduit. Nicardipine is a safe and effective alternative of verapamil in preventing spasm of radial artery conduit.
-
4.
Comparison of intralesional verapamil versus intralesional corticosteroids in treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars: A randomized controlled trial.
Abedini, R, Sasani, P, Mahmoudi, HR, Nasimi, M, Teymourpour, A, Shadlou, Z
Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2018;(6):1482-1488
Abstract
BACKGROUND Keloids and hypertrophic scars are due to overgrowth of dermal collagen following trauma to the skin that usually cause major physical, psychological and cosmetic problems. METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, with a paired design, 50 patients with 2 or more keloids were included. In the control group (50 lesions), intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (40mg/mL) was injected at three-week intervals for a total of 18weeks. In the other group (50 lesions), lesions were treated by verapamil (2.5mg/mL) with the same therapeutic sessions. Scar evaluation at each stage and at the end of 3months follow up was done by serial photographic records as well as by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). RESULTS Mean zero VSS scores were achieved with only triamcinolone in respect of scar height (week 15th) and pliability (week 15th). No therapeutic event (parameter=0) or significant improvement was seen in verapamil group. CONCLUSION Our results did not support verapamil's capability in treatment of keloid nor hypertrophic scars.
-
5.
A randomised controlled trial evaluating renal protective effects of selenium with vitamins A, C, E, verapamil, and losartan against extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy-induced renal injury.
El-Nahas, AR, Elsaadany, MM, Taha, DE, Elshal, AM, El-Ghar, MA, Ismail, AM, Elsawy, EA, Saleh, HH, Wafa, EW, Awadalla, A, et al
BJU international. 2017;(1):142-147
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the protective effects of selenium with vitamins A, C and E (selenium ACE, i.e. antioxidants), verapamil (calcium channel blocker), and losartan (angiotensin receptor blocker) against extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL)-induced renal injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS A randomised controlled trial was conducted between August 2012 and February 2015. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with a single renal stone (<2 cm) suitable for ESWL. Patients with diabetes, hypertension, congenital renal anomalies, moderate or marked hydronephrosis, or preoperative albuminuria (>300 mg/L) were excluded. ESWL was performed using the electromagnetic DoLiS lithotripter. Eligible patients were randomised into one of four groups using sealed closed envelopes: Group1, control; Group 2, selenium ACE; Group 3, losartan; and Group 4, verapamil. Albuminuria and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) were estimated after 2-4 h and 1 week after ESWL. The primary outcome was differences between albuminuria and uNGAL. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed before ESWL, and at 2-4 h and 1 week after ESWL to compare changes in renal perfusion. RESULTS Of 329 patients assessed for eligibility, the final analysis comprised 160 patients (40 in each group). Losartan was the only medication that showed significantly lower levels of albuminuria after 1 week (P < 0.001). For perfusion changes, there was a statistically significant decrease in the renal perfusion in patients with obstructed kidneys in comparison to before ESWL (P = 0.003). These significant changes were present in the control or antioxidant group, whilst in the losartan and verapamil groups renal perfusion was not significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS Losartan was found to protect the kidney against ESWL-induced renal injury by significantly decreasing post-ESWL albuminuria. Verapamil and losartan maintained renal perfusion in patients with post-ESWL renal obstruction.
-
6.
Effects of CYP3A4 Inhibitors Ketoconazole and Verapamil and the CYP3A4 Inducer Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Fostamatinib: Results from In Vitro and Phase I Clinical Studies.
Martin, P, Gillen, M, Millson, D, Oliver, S, Brealey, C, Grossbard, EB, Baluom, M, Lau, D, Sweeny, D, Mant, T, et al
Drugs in R&D. 2016;(1):81-92
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fostamatinib (R788) is a spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor. The active metabolite of fostamatinib, R406, is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to characterize hepatic microsomal metabolism of R406 and confirm the role of CYP3A4 in R406 metabolism, determining whether co-administration of CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole, verapamil) or inducers (rifampicin) affects R406 pharmacokinetics. METHODS R406 stability was determined using human hepatic microsomes. The CYP450 isoforms responsible for R406 metabolism in humans were identified using expressed CYP450 isoforms and specific chemical inhibitors. The ketoconazole interaction study (double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover) involved fostamatinib administration (single 80-mg dose), alone and with ketoconazole (200 mg twice daily). The verapamil and rifampicin interaction studies (open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence) involved fostamatinib administration (single 150-mg dose), alone and with immediate-release verapamil (80 mg three times daily) or rifampicin (600 mg once daily). Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in all studies. RESULTS/DISCUSSION Hepatic microsomes showed time-dependent loss of R406 and formation of para-O-demethylated R406. Microsomal metabolism of R406 was markedly inhibited by CYP3A4 inhibitors and, in the expressed CYP450 studies, the rate of R406 disappearance was greatest with CYP3A4. In the clinical studies, co-administration of ketoconazole caused a 2-fold (CI 1.77-2.30) increase in R406 exposure. Verapamil increased R406 exposure (39% increase, CI 8-80), whereas rifampicin co-administration decreased exposure by 75% (CI 68-81). Fostamatinib was well tolerated. CONCLUSION The oxidative metabolism of R406 is predominantly catalyzed by CYP3A4. In clinical studies, exposure to R406 is affected by concomitant administration of CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors. These findings should be taken into account when considering co-prescription of fostamatinib with such agents.
-
7.
Comprehensive T wave morphology assessment in a randomized clinical study of dofetilide, quinidine, ranolazine, and verapamil.
Vicente, J, Johannesen, L, Mason, JW, Crumb, WJ, Pueyo, E, Stockbridge, N, Strauss, DG
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2015;(4)
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congenital long QT syndrome type 2 (abnormal hERG potassium channel) patients can develop flat, asymmetric, and notched T waves. Similar observations have been made with a limited number of hERG-blocking drugs. However, it is not known how additional calcium or late sodium block, that can decrease torsade risk, affects T wave morphology. METHODS AND RESULTS Twenty-two healthy subjects received a single dose of a pure hERG blocker (dofetilide) and 3 drugs that also block calcium or sodium (quinidine, ranolazine, and verapamil) as part of a 5-period, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. At pre-dose and 15 time-points post-dose, ECGs and plasma drug concentration were assessed. Patch clamp experiments were performed to assess block of hERG, calcium (L-type) and late sodium currents for each drug. Pure hERG block (dofetilide) and strong hERG block with lesser calcium and late sodium block (quinidine) caused substantial T wave morphology changes (P<0.001). Strong late sodium current and hERG block (ranolazine) still caused T wave morphology changes (P<0.01). Strong calcium and hERG block (verapamil) did not cause T wave morphology changes. At equivalent QTc prolongation, multichannel blockers (quinidine and ranolazine) caused equal or greater T wave morphology changes compared with pure hERG block (dofetilide). CONCLUSIONS T wave morphology changes are directly related to amount of hERG block; however, with quinidine and ranolazine, multichannel block did not prevent T wave morphology changes. A combined approach of assessing multiple ion channels, along with ECG intervals and T wave morphology may provide the greatest insight into drug-ion channel interactions and torsade de pointes risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Unique identifier: NCT01873950.
-
8.
Comparative efficacy of intralesional verapamil hydrochloride and triamcinolone acetonide in hypertrophic scars and keloids.
Ahuja, RB, Chatterjee, P
Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2014;(4):583-8
Abstract
There is not much level 1 evidence based literature to guide management of hypertrophic scars and keloids despite an array of therapeutic modalities at disposal. Intralesional (i/l) triamcinolone injections have remained a gold standard in non surgical management. Sporadic reports on use of i/l verapamil suggest its efficacy. Since verapamil has not found sufficient mention as an effective alternative modality, it was decided to undertake a randomized study which could also address some additional clinical parameters. A randomized, parallel group and observer blinded comparison with 40 patients (48 scars) was carried out to compare the effects of i/l triamcinolone (T) (22 scars) and verapamil injections (V) (26 scars). 1.5 ml was the maximum indicative volume decided in the study protocol for both the drugs (triamcinolone @40 mg/ml and verapamil @ 2.5 mg/ml). Patients included were aged between 15-60 years with scars ranging between 0.5-5 cm (but total area roughly <6 cm(2)), and scars under 2 years duration. Patients with keloidal diathesis were excluded. Injections were scheduled every three weeks until complete flattening of the scar or eight sessions, which ever came earlier. No concomitant therapies like massage, silicone gel or pressure garments were used. Scar evaluation at each stage was done by serial photographic records as well as by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Comparative survival analysis between the two drugs was done using Kaplan Meier curves, and VSS scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon test and log rank test. Mean zero VSS scores were achieved with treatments in respect of scar height (T-12 weeks, V-21 weeks), vascularity (T-15 weeks, V-18 weeks) and pliability (T-15 weeks, V-21 weeks). The improvement in scar vascularity and pliability kept pace with decrease in scar height, in both the groups. There was not much difference in the rate of change of scar pigmentation with either drug but almost 60% patients in both the groups regained normal pigmentation. Our study adds to evidence of verapamil's capability in flattening the raised scars. With an extremely low cost and fewer adverse effects it deserves better positioning in the wide armamentarium against hypertrophic scars. It also offers several therapeutic possibilities to alternate with triamcinolone or be used simultaneously in larger (or multiple) scars.
-
9.
A pilot double-blind trial using verapamil as adjuvant therapy for refractory seizures.
Borlot, F, Wither, RG, Ali, A, Wu, N, Verocai, F, Andrade, DM
Epilepsy research. 2014;(9):1642-51
Abstract
RATIONALE Given verapamil's property as a glycoprotein inhibitor, this drug could increase the effective concentration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the epileptic foci, reducing the number of seizures. This pilot study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of verapamil as adjunct therapy in pharmacoresistant patients with focal onset seizures. METHODS This was a single-centered, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial evaluating verapamil as an add-on therapy for adult patients with refractory epilepsy. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were randomized, but five of them withdrew and one patient passed away after consent, having no exposure to either verapamil or placebo; four patients withdrew during or after the double-blind phase due to side effects. From these four patients, only one patient was in the verapamil group. Twelve patients (59%) finished the study. Some patients experienced lower seizure frequencies, but none of them reached 50% reduction. In addition, there was no statistically significant decrease in the seizure frequency of patients receiving verapamil. When comparing the verapamil with the placebo at the double-blind or the open label study phases, the average difference in seizure range also failed to show significance (p=0.41 and p=0.98, respectively). No significant cardiovascular effects were observed, and side effects unique to verapamil were skin rashes and feet edema. Throughout the study, carbamazepine, valproic acid and clobazam levels increased following verapamil intake; minor dosage adjustment was required in one patient on carbamazepine. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study has shown mild benefits of verapamil use in comparison to placebo as an add-on therapy for a group of non-selected patients with refractory epilepsy. A partial response in a subset of patients was seen. No significant safety problems happened, but adjustments on AEDs may be required during verapamil use.
-
10.
Adjunctive use of verapamil in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: a pilot study.
Asadi-Pooya, AA, Razavizadegan, SM, Abdi-Ardekani, A, Sperling, MR
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B. 2013;(1):150-4
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study aimed to determine if adjunctive use of verapamil, as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor, is efficacious in decreasing seizure frequency in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an open-label pilot study. Adult patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy were studied. Baseline seizure type and seizure count were determined. Patients were divided randomly into two groups. Group A received verapamil 120 mg/day (n=13), and group B received 240 mg/day (n=6). All patients were followed for eight weeks. The proportion of responders, which consist of patients with more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline, was tabulated. RESULTS Nineteen patients were studied. Seven patients (36.84%) reached the responder rate. Three patients (50%) in group B were among the responders; two of these patients achieved seizure freedom. Four patients (30.7%) in group A responded favorably to verapamil. CONCLUSION Developing new means of improving the effectiveness of existing antiepileptic drugs is a desirable way of tackling the dilemma of medically refractory epilepsy. Hypothetically, P-gp inhibitors (e.g., verapamil) might be used to counteract the removal of AEDs from the epileptogenic tissue. Such a strategy was adopted in this non-placebo-controlled, open-label, pilot study. We observed a significant achievement in seizure control associated with adjunctive use of verapamil in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy.