1.
Multispecies probiotic administration reduces emotional salience and improves mood in subjects with moderate depression: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Baião, R, Capitão, LP, Higgins, C, Browning, M, Harmer, CJ, Burnet, PWJ
Psychological medicine. 2023;53(8):3437-3447
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Gut microbiota may be able to augment an individual’s mood, brain processing and cognition. Supplements containing live bacteria or a diet high in fibre which act as a substrate for beneficial gut bacteria may be of benefit to individuals with depression or mental illness. This 4-week randomised control trial aimed to determine the effect of a probiotic containing several different gut bacteria species on emotional processing and cognition in people with mild to moderate depression. The results showed that compared to placebo, probiotic intake increased empathy with others and improved some but not all aspects of cognition. Probiotic intake did not affect biological measures of stress but did improve feelings of depression. It was concluded that multispecies probiotics may change the emotional processing of people with depression. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the use of probiotics may be a good option to reduce the risk of people with mild to moderate depression developing a major depressive disorder.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential antidepressant properties of probiotics have been suggested, but their influence on the emotional processes that may underlie this effect is unclear. METHODS Depressed volunteers (n = 71) were recruited into a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled study to explore the effects of a daily, 4-week intake of a multispecies probiotic or placebo on emotional processing and cognition. Mood, anxiety, positive and negative affect, sleep, salivary cortisol and serum C-reactive peptide (CRP) were assessed before and after supplementation. RESULTS Compared with placebo, probiotic intake increased accuracy at identifying faces expressing all emotions (+12%, p < 0.05, total n = 51) and vigilance to neutral faces (mean difference between groups = 12.28 ms ± 6.1, p < 0.05, total n = 51). Probiotic supplementation also reduced reward learning (-9%, p < 0.05, total n = 51), and interference word recall on the auditory verbal learning task (-18%, p < 0.05, total n = 50), but did not affect other aspects of cognitive performance. Although actigraphy revealed a significant group × night-time activity interaction, follow up analysis was not significant (p = 0.094). Supplementation did not alter salivary cortisol or circulating CRP concentrations. Probiotic intake significantly reduced (-50% from baseline, p < 0.05, n = 35) depression scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, but these did not correlate with the changes in emotional processing. CONCLUSIONS The impartiality to positive and negative emotional stimuli or reward after probiotic supplementation have not been observed with conventional antidepressant therapies. Further studies are required to elucidate the significance of these changes with regard to the mood-improving action of the current probiotic.
2.
Acceptability, Tolerability, and Estimates of Putative Treatment Effects of Probiotics as Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nikolova, VL, Cleare, AJ, Young, AH, Stone, JM
JAMA psychiatry. 2023;80(8):842-847
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
About 60% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not fully respond to anti-depressant treatments. The microbiota-gut-brain axis is thought to be involved in the development of MDD, making the microbiome a promising target for new treatments. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, including 50 adult patients with major depressive disorder, was to evaluate the tolerability, acceptability and efficacy of a multi-strain probiotic supplement for 8 weeks as an adjunctive to antidepressant drugs. There were no serious adverse events; all reported non-serious events were of gastrointestinal nature and more common in the probiotic group (it was not reported whether the difference was statistically significant). A high adherence rate of 97.2% suggests a high level of acceptability. Depressive mood symptoms improved significantly more in the probiotic group. Greater improvements in anxiety in the probiotic were also seen in some, but not all anxiety scales. The authors concluded that a multi-strain probiotic supplement is a promising adjunct to anti-depressant treatment in patients with MDD, with high tolerability and acceptability.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The microbiota-gut-brain axis is a promising target for novel treatments for mood disorders, such as probiotics. However, few clinical trials have been conducted, and further safety and efficacy data are needed to support this treatment approach. OBJECTIVE To provide acceptability and tolerability data and estimates of intervention effect size for probiotics as adjunctive treatment for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot randomized clinical trial, adults aged 18 to 55 years with MDD taking antidepressant medication but having an incomplete response were studied. A random sample was recruited from primary and secondary care services and general advertising in London, United Kingdom. Data were collected between September 2019 and May 2022 and analyzed between July and September 2022. INTERVENTION Multistrain probiotic (8 billion colony-forming units per day) or placebo daily for 8 weeks added to ongoing antidepressant medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The pilot outcomes of the trial were retention, acceptability, tolerability, and estimates of putative treatment effect on clinical symptoms (depression: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD-17] and Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology [IDS] scores; anxiety: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAMA] and General Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7] scores) to be used as indicators for a definitive trial. RESULTS Of 50 included participants, 49 received the intervention and were included in intent-to-treat analyses; of these, 39 (80%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 31.7 (9.8) years. A total of 24 were randomized to probiotic and 25 to placebo. Attrition was 8% (1 in the probiotic group and 3 in the placebo group), adherence was 97.2%, and there were no serious adverse reactions. For the probiotic group, mean (SD) HAMD-17 scores at weeks 4 and 8 were 11.00 (5.13) and 8.83 (4.28), respectively; IDS, 30.17 (11.98) and 25.04 (11.68); HAMA, 11.71 (5.86) and 8.17 (4.68); and GAD-7, 7.78 (4.12) and 7.63 (4.77). For the placebo group, mean (SD) HAMD-17 scores at weeks 4 and 8 were 14.04 (3.70) and 11.09 (3.22), respectively; IDS, 33.82 (9.26) and 29.64 (9.31); HAMA, 14.70 (5.47) and 10.95 (4.48); and GAD-7, 10.91 (5.32) and 9.48 (5.18). Standardized effect sizes (SES) from linear mixed models demonstrated that the probiotic group attained greater improvements in depressive symptoms according to HAMD-17 scores (week 4: SES, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.01-0.98) and IDS Self Report scores (week 8: SES, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87) as well as greater improvements in anxiety symptoms according to HAMA scores (week 4: SES, 0.67; 95% CI, 0-0.95; week 8: SES, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.06-1.05), but not GAD-7 scores (week 4: SES, 0.57; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.82; week 8: SES, 0.32; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.65), compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The acceptability, tolerability, and estimated effect sizes on key clinical outcomes are promising and encourage further investigation of probiotics as add-on treatment for people with MDD in a definitive efficacy trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03893162.
3.
Regulation of Neurotransmitters by the Gut Microbiota and Effects on Cognition in Neurological Disorders.
Chen, Y, Xu, J, Chen, Y
Nutrients. 2021;13(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Imbalances in the gut microbiota occur in various neurological disorders including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), autism spectrum disorder and depression. Imbalances in key neurotransmitters are associated with the same disorders. This review focuses on the regulatory mechanisms of the intestinal microbiome and its metabolites on cognitive functions and the pathogeneses of these neurodegenerative diseases. The gut microbiota produce neurotransmitters such as glutamate, GABA, serotonin and dopamine or their precursors. These neurotransmitters are not able to cross the blood brain barrier but the precursors are, therefore the gut microbiota is indirectly involved in the regulation of the production of these key neurotransmitters and therefore neuronal activity and cognitive functions of the brain. The findings demonstrate an association between a healthy gut microbiome structure and balanced neurotransmitter levels in the host. Microbial therapy holds huge promise for the treatment of brain disorders. The development of drugs for neurological disorders must also consider effects on the physiology of the gut microbiome.
Abstract
Emerging evidence indicates that gut microbiota is important in the regulation of brain activity and cognitive functions. Microbes mediate communication among the metabolic, peripheral immune, and central nervous systems via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. However, it is not well understood how the gut microbiome and neurons in the brain mutually interact or how these interactions affect normal brain functioning and cognition. We summarize the mechanisms whereby the gut microbiota regulate the production, transportation, and functioning of neurotransmitters. We also discuss how microbiome dysbiosis affects cognitive function, especially in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.
4.
Testosterone Deficiency, Weakness, and Multimorbidity in Men.
Peterson, MD, Belakovskiy, A, McGrath, R, Yarrow, JF
Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):5897
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
With age, the occurrence of total testosterone (TT) deficiency in men also increases. Such deficiency can have a detrimental impact on the musculoskeletal system leading to bone and muscle loss, increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Hence muscle weakness is a known a predicitve factor for chronic disease. Whereby reference ranges have been set for testosterone levels in young healthy men, uncertainty exists about optimal levels throughout different age ranges, ethnicities and in concurrence with diseases. This observational study evaluated how TT deficiency and muscle weakness assessed via grip strength, relates to chronic health conditions in men. The study included 2399 young, middle-aged, and older men in the US, with a diverse ethnic backgrounds, who presented with and without testosterone deficiency. The findings indicated that TT levels were highest amongst young men, yet no particular difference was seen in levels between middle-aged and older men. Grip strength decreased in the higher age categories. Chronic health conditions were more common in young and older men who displayed testosterone deficiencies, whilst low testosterone and reduced grip strength were linked to the presence of chronic disease in all age groups. Overall the study confirmed previous research, that in men with testosterone deficiency chronic disease was much more prevalent, even after accounting for other variables. The study also observed a much lower average of TT levels in young men compared to previous research, in mostly white males. Thus testosterone deficiency appears much more common in men of all ages when including a variety of ethnic groups. As low testosterone may play an early, causal role in the chronic disease process, continuous monitoring of testosterone levels through the life span may aid the early identification of chronic disease development or disease progression. Further research is needed on the independent and joint effects of low TT and muscular weakness. From a clinical perspective, this study affirms that low testosterone in men is a presenting risk factor for chronic disease and that chronic disease is commonly accompanied by low testosterone. It also highlights some unsettled aspects around reference ranges of testosterone
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to evaluate the association between total testosterone (TT) deficiency and weakness on multimorbidity in men. Analyses were performed to examine the prevalence of multimobidity among young, middle-aged, and older men, with and without testosterone deficiency. Multivariate logistic models were also used to determine the association between age-specific TT tertiles and multimorbidity, adjusting for key sociodemographic variables, as well as a secondary analysis adjusted for grip strength. Multimorbidity was more prevalent among men with testosterone deficiency, compared to normal TT in the entire group (36.6% vs 55.2%; p < 0.001); however, differences were only seen within young (testosterone deficiency: 36.4%; normal TT: 13.5%; p < 0.001) and older men (testosterone deficiency: 75.0%; normal TT: 61.5%; p < 0.001). Robust associations were found between the age-specific low-TT (OR: 2.87; 95%CI: 2.14-3.83) and moderate-TT (OR: 1.67; 95%CI: 1.27-2.20) tertiles (reference high-TT) and multimorbidity. Secondary analysis demonstrated that both low TT (OR: 1.82; 95%CI: 1.29-2.55) and moderate-TT (OR: 1.31; 95%CI: 1.01-1.69) were associated with multimorbidity, even after adjusting for obesity (OR: 1.75; 95%CI: 1.07-2.87) and NGS (OR: 1.21 per 0.05 unit lower NGS). Low TT and weakness in men were independently associated with multimorbidity at all ages; however, multimorbidity was more prevalent among young and older men with testosterone deficiency.