-
1.
Vegetarian and vegan diets and the risk of cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Dybvik, JS, Svendsen, M, Aune, D
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(1):51-69
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is mainly due to ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke. Plant-based diets are effective for improving CVD risk factors. This is further supported by the favourable cardiometabolic profile seen among vegetarians who predominantly exclude meat, fish and poultry from their diet, when compared to people consuming meat. The aim of this study was to analyse the association between vegetarian or vegan diets and risk of incidence and mortality from CVD, IHD and stroke, both overall and subtypes. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirteen prospective cohort studies. Results show a 15% and a 21% reduction in the relative risk of CVD and IHD, respectively, for vegetarians compared to nonvegetarians, but there wasn’t a clear association for total stroke or subtypes of stroke. Furthermore, an 18% reduction in the relative risk of IHD was observed among vegans when compared to nonvegetarians but the association lacked precision and no clear association was observed for CVD or stroke; however, there were few studies in the analyses of vegans. Authors conclude that their findings are consistent with existing guidelines recommending plant-based dietary patterns for CVD prevention. However, further studies are required to clarify the association between vegetarian diets and stroke risk, as well as the association between vegan diets and IHD.
Abstract
PURPOSE Vegetarian diets have been associated with reduced risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, results regarding cardiovascular disease (CVD) overall and stroke are less clear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies on CVD, IHD and stroke risk among vegetarians or vegans versus nonvegetarians to clarify these associations. METHODS PubMed and Ovid Embase databases were searched through August 12, 2021. Prospective cohort studies reporting adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incidence or mortality from CVD, IHD and stroke, comparing vegetarians and vegans to nonvegetarians were included. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using ROBINS-I and the strength of evidence was assessed using World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) criteria. Summary RRs (95% CIs) were estimated using a random effects model. RESULTS Thirteen cohort studies (844,175 participants, 115,392 CVD, 30,377 IHD, and 14,419 stroke cases) were included. The summary RR for vegetarians vs. nonvegetarians was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92, I2 = 68%, n = 8) for CVD, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88, I2 = 67%, n = 8) for IHD, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-1.05, I2 = 61%, n = 12) for total stroke, and for vegans vs. nonvegetarians was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-1.00, I2 = 0%, n = 6) for IHD. RoB was moderate (n = 8) to serious (n = 5). The associations between vegetarian diets and CVD and IHD were considered probably causal using WCRF criteria. CONCLUSIONS Vegetarian diets are associated with reduced risk of CVD and IHD, but not stroke, but further studies are needed on stroke. These findings should be considered in dietary guidelines. REVIEW REGISTRATION No review protocol registered.
-
2.
Olive pomace oil can improve blood lipid profile: a randomized, blind, crossover, controlled clinical trial in healthy and at-risk volunteers.
González-Rámila, S, Sarriá, B, Seguido, MA, García-Cordero, J, Mateos, R, Bravo, L
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):589-603
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are increasing. It is known that a healthy diet and physical exercise can modulate the risk of CVD. In this regard, the Mediterranean Diet (MD) is considered a model of healthy eating and olive oil is an essential component of this diet, as its primary fat source. The aims of this study were to assess the possible beneficial role of consuming olive pomace oil (OPO) as the main source of fat in the diet on serum lipid concentrations (primary outcome) and other biomarkers of cardiovascular health such as blood pressure, endothelial function and inflammation (secondary outcomes) in at-risk (hypercholesterolaemic) subjects. This study was a randomised, blind, crossover, controlled clinical trial in free-living subjects. Participants, men and women aged 18–55 years, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups; normocholesterolaemic or hypercholesterolaemic group. Results showed that consumption of OPO for four weeks resulted in an improved blood lipid profile, decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Apo B and low-density lipoprotein/ high-density lipoprotein ratio both in healthy and at-risk volunteers, in contrast to the opposite effect observed with high-oleic acid sunflower oil (HOSO), with no significant changes in other CVD risk factors. Furthermore, no changes were observed in relation to blood pressure, and biomarkers linked to inflammation and endothelial function. Authors conclude that OPO could have hypolipidemic actions in healthy consumers and in subjects with high blood cholesterol, contributing to cardiovascular disease prevention.
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the effect of dietary consumption of olive pomace oil (OPO) on blood lipids (primary outcome) and other cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (blood pressure, inflammation and endothelial function as secondary outcomes). METHODS A randomized, controlled, blind, crossover intervention was carried out in healthy and at-risk (hypercholesterolemic) subjects. Participants consumed daily 45 g of OPO or high-oleic acid sunflower oil (HOSO) as control oil during 4 weeks. RESULTS OPO significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; P = 0.003) and apolipoprotein B (Apo B; P = 0.022) serum concentrations, and LDL/HDL ratio (P = 0.027) in healthy and at-risk volunteers. These effects were not observed with HOSO. Blood pressure, peripheral artery tonometry (PAT), endothelial function and inflammation biomarkers were not affected. CONCLUSIONS Regular consumption of OPO in the diet could have hypolipidemic actions in subjects at cardiovascular risk as well as in healthy consumers, contributing to CVD prevention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NCT04997122, August 8, 2021, retrospectively registered.
-
3.
No Effect of Isolated Anthocyanins from Bilberry Fruit and Black Rice on LDL Cholesterol or other Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults with Elevated Cholesterol: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.
Aboufarrag, H, Hollands, WJ, Percival, J, Philo, M, Savva, GM, Kroon, PA
Molecular nutrition & food research. 2022;66(21):e2101157
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides contribute significantly to the development of atherosclerosis, an underlying pathophysiological cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Conversely, elevated levels of circulating high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) provide protection against the development of atherosclerosis and is inversely correlated with the incidence of CVD. The main aim of this study was to determine the effects of two major types of anthocyanins on LDL-C and other cardiometabolic markers for CVD risk in hyperlipidaemic individuals. This study is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three arm crossover design. The three treatments were: (i) a bilberry extract delivering 320mg of mostly delphinidin/trihydroxy type anthocyanins, (ii) a black rice extract delivering 320mg of mostly cyanidin/dihydroxy type anthocyanins, and (iii) a placebo control. A total of fifty-five participants were randomly assigned to one of the three treatments. Results show that ingestion of 320mg day of delphinidin or cyanidin type anthocyanins for 28-day did not reduce LDL-C in a study population with elevated cholesterol levels. Additionally, neither did consumption of delphinidin or cyanidin type anthocyanins beneficially alter other biomarkers related to vascular function, glycaemic control or biomarkers of HDL function. Authors conclude that the lack of positive effects in their study may be due to the short duration of the treatments. Thus, future research should conduct studies based on longer time periods (≥12 weeks duration).
Abstract
SCOPE Some dietary interventions with berry fruits, berry fruit extracts, and purified anthocyanins have been reported to beneficially alter lipoprotein profiles in hyperlipidemic participants. The major anthocyanins in human diets are glycosides of cyanidin and delphinidin, and structure can influence both absorption and bioactivity. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of two major types of anthocyanins on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other cardiometabolic markers for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in hyperlipidemic individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-two hyperlipidemic participants complete this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three arm crossover trial. Participants ingest capsules containing 320 mg of anthocyanins (bilberry trihydroxy-type or black rice dihydroxy-type) or placebo once daily for 28 days. Biomarkers of CVD risk are measured before and after the intervention period. Compared to the placebo, neither anthocyanin treatment significantly (p < 0.05) changes circulating levels of lipoproteins (total-/high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-/low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, Apolipoprotein B (ApoB)), biomarkers of glycemic control (fasting glucose, fructosamine), biomarkers of HDL function (ApoA1, HDL3, paraoxonase-1 (PON1) arylesterase, and lactonase activities), or plasma bile acids. CONCLUSIONS These data do not support the notion that regular consumption of anthocyanins beneficially affects glycemic control or lipoprotein profiles or functions. It is possible the no effect observation is due to the relatively short duration of treatments.
-
4.
Effect of oat supplementation interventions on cardiovascular disease risk markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Llanaj, E, Dejanovic, GM, Valido, E, Bano, A, Gamba, M, Kastrati, L, Minder, B, Stojic, S, Voortman, T, Marques-Vidal, P, et al
European journal of nutrition. 2022;61(4):1749-1778
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of mortality among adults. Changes in diet can have a beneficial effect on the prevention and management of CVD. Studies have shown that increasing intake of wholegrains, particularly those containing oat components, reduces CVD risk markers including blood cholesterol, blood glucose and body mass index (BMI). The purpose of this systematic review was to look at the effects of oat supplementation interventions (OSI) on CVD risk markers among adults, accounting for different dietary backgrounds or control arms. 74 RCTs were included (4937 subjects). Supplementing the diet with oat cereals improves CVD risk markers in healthy adults and those with mild metabolic disturbances. In particular serum total and LDL cholesterol, BMI and waist circumference. The beneficial effects on total cholesterol and LDL-Cholesterol were independent of the dietary background. The role of OSIs on blood pressure, glucose homeostasis or other markers, could not be established.
Abstract
PURPOSE Oat supplementation interventions (OSIs) may have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, dietary background can modulate such effect. This systematic review assesses the effects of OSIs on CVD risk markers among adults, accounting for different dietary backgrounds or control arms. METHODS We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed the effect of oat, oat beta-glucan-rich extracts or avenanthramides on CVD risk markers. RESULTS Seventy-four RCTs, including 4937 predominantly hypercholesterolemic, obese subjects, with mild metabolic disturbances, were included in the systematic review. Of these, 59 RCTs contributed to the meta-analyses. Subjects receiving an OSI, compared to control arms without oats, had improved levels of total cholesterol (TC) [weighted mean difference and (95% CI) - 0.42 mmol/L, (- 0.61; - 0.22)], LDL cholesterol [- 0.29 mmol/L, (- 0.37; - 0.20)], glucose [- 0.25 nmol/L, (- 0.36; - 0.14)], body mass index [- 0.13 kg/m2, (- 0.26; - 0.01)], weight [- 0.94 kg, (- 1.84: - 0.05)], and waist circumference [- 1.06 cm, (- 1.85; - 0.27)]. RCTs on inflammation and/or oxidative stress markers were scarce and with inconsistent findings. RCTs comparing an OSI to heterogeneous interventions (e.g., wheat, eggs, rice, etc.), showed lowered levels of glycated haemoglobin, diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B. The majority of included RCTs (81.1%) had some concerns for risk of bias. CONCLUSION Dietary OSIs resulted in lowered levels of blood lipids and improvements in anthropometric parameters among participants with predominantly mild metabolic disturbances, regardless of dietary background or control. Further high-quality trials are warranted to establish the role of OSIs on blood pressure, glucose homeostasis and inflammation markers.
-
5.
Effect of Casein Hydrolysate on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Zhou, S, Xu, T, Zhang, X, Luo, J, An, P, Luo, Y
Nutrients. 2022;14(19)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Casein makes up around 80% of the protein in cow’s milk. Hydrolysed casein has been partially broken down, making it easier to digest. It has various biological functions including, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antihypertensive activities which could be beneficial for cardiovascular health. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarise the effects of casein hydrolysate supplementation on cardiovascular risk factors. 26 randomised control trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis. Casein hydrolysate significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared with control diets, but had no effect on total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides or fasting blood glucose. The authors concluded that their findings support the consumption of casein hydrolysate in the population at risk for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Abstract
Casein hydrolysate has various biological functional activities, especially prominent are angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activities. Increasing evidence has reported the prominent hypotensive effect of casein hydrolysate. However, the effects of casein hydrolysate on cardiovascular risk factors remain unclear and require more comprehensive and detailed studies. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to summarize the effects of casein hydrolysate supplementation on blood pressure, blood lipids, and blood glucose. In the pooled analyses, casein hydrolysate significantly reduced systolic blood pressure by 3.20 mmHg (-4.53 to -1.87 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure by 1.50 mmHg (-2.31 to -0.69 mmHg). Supplementation of casein hydrolysate displayed no effect on total cholesterol (-0.07 mmol/L; -0.17 to 0.03 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.04 mmol/L; -0.15 to 0.08 mmol/L), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.01 mmol/L; -0.06 to 0.03 mmol/L), triglycerides (-0.05 mmol/L, -0.14 to 0.05 mmol/L), or fasting blood glucose (-0.01 mmol/L; -0.10 to 0.09 mmol/L) compared with the placebo diets. Collectively, this study indicated that supplementation of casein hydrolysate displayed decreasing effect on blood pressure without affecting blood lipids or glycemic status.
-
6.
The effects of olive leaf extract on cardiovascular risk factors in the general adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Razmpoosh, E, Abdollahi, S, Mousavirad, M, Clark, CCT, Soltani, S
Diabetology & metabolic syndrome. 2022;14(1):151
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Modifiable unhealthy behaviours, such as sedentary lifestyle, smoking, and unhealthy food habits, are regarded as important contributors to the widespread prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which occur concurrently in overweight/obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, hyperglycaemia, and inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether olive leaf extract (OLE) could improve the major cardiovascular-related variables, including lipid profile, glucose haemostasis, blood pressure, as well as liver/kidney and inflammatory markers in the general adult population. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of twelve randomised controlled studies. Results show that OLE supplementation: - significantly decreased triglycerides and systolic blood pressure levels. - only had short-term positive effects on blood pressure and lipid profiles, which may be attributed to the active constituents in OLE. - had more profitable effects on the improvement of triglycerides, blood pressure, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measures among participants with hypertension and individuals with normal body weight. Authors conclude that stronger randomised controlled trial investigations, assessing different doses and durations of OLE, are required to better elucidate the effects of OLE supplementation.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of olive leaf extract (OLE) supplementation on cardiovascular-related variables, including lipid, glycemic, inflammatory, liver and renal-related factors, as well as blood pressure. METHODS PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane library were searched, up to October 2021, for relevant controlled trials. Mean differences and standard deviations were pooled for all outcomes, using a random-effects model. The methodological quality, as well as quality of evidence were assessed using standard tools. RESULTS Twelve studies (n = 819 participants) were included in our analyses. Overall analyses showed that OLE supplementation significantly decreased triglyceride (TG) levels (WMD = - 9.51 mg/dl, 95% CI - 17.83, - 1.18; P = 0.025; I2 = 68.7%; P-heterogeneity = 0.004), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD = - 3.86 mmHg, 95% CI - 6.44, - 1.28 mmHg; P = 0.003; I2 = 19.9%; P-heterogeneity = 0.28). Subgroup analyses also revealed a significant improvement in SBP (- 4.81 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (- 2.45 mmHg), TG (- 14.42 mg/dl), total cholesterol (TC) (- 9.14 mg/dl), and low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) (- 4.6 mg/dl) measurements, in patients with hypertension. Significant reductions were also observed in TC (- 6.69 mg/dl), TG (- 9.21 mg/dl), and SBP (- 7.05 mmHg) in normal-weight individuals. However, no meaningful changes were seen in glucose hemostasis, liver and kidney, or inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION The present study revealed that supplementation with OLE yielded beneficial effects for blood pressure and lipid profile in adults, especially in patients with hypertension. As the quality of evidence for glucose hemostasis variables, liver, kidney, and inflammatory markers, were low-to-very low, higher quality RCTs may impact the overarching results. This study was registered at PROSPERO with the code CRD42022302395.
-
7.
Do B Vitamins Enhance the Effect of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Diseases? A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.
Zhu, J, Xun, PC, Kolencik, M, Yang, KF, Fly, AD, Kahe, K
Nutrients. 2022;14(8)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dietary intake of B-vitamins or omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) has been found to be inversely related to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to examine whether the combined supplementation of B-vitamins and omega-3 PUFAs could provide additional beneficial effects on improving risk factors to prevent CVD beyond the effects of either of them alone. This study is a systematic review of fifteen studies. The sample sizes ranged from 12 to 2501 participants with study duration ranging from 4 weeks to 4.7 years. Results show that the combined supplementation with B-vitamins and omega-3 PUFAs may be promising and more effective at reducing plasma homocysteine, triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol than each supplementation alone. Authors conclude that: - there is no solid evidence that the joint supplementation of B-vitamins and omega-3 PUFAs can offer a synergistic effect on preventing CVD and decreasing the relevant morbidity and/or mortality in susceptible populations. - dietetic strategies for preventing CVD need to focus more on the importance of considering effects at the whole food and dietary patterns level. - further well-designed high-quality trials that will use the combined supplementation of B vitamins and omega-3 PUFAs or dietary patterns rich in these two types of nutrients are required.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Combined vitamin B and n3 PUFA supplementation might have favourable health effects
- Combined vitamin B and n3 PUFA supplementation could help in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
- The suggested favourable dose ranges are vitamin B6: 2.5–80 mg/day, vitamin B12: 20–1000 μg/day, folic acid: 150–10000 μg/day, and n3 PUFA 0.2–2) g/day.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- The paper reviews whether combined supplementation of vitamin B (B2, B6, B9, and B12) and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n3 PUFA) outweighs the individual cardiovascular benefits of each supplement. Registered in PROSPERO under CRD42018085993
- A total of 15 clinical studies including 8,263 individuals published from December 2021, that investigated the combined effects of the supplements met inclusion criteria and were included in the review
- Although the results indicate the beneficial effects of combined supplementation in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention, firm conclusions cannot be drawn from the existing data, and more studies are needed in this area.
Clinical practice applications:
In comparison with a single supplement alone, the combined administration of vitamin B and n3 PUFA might have:
- Hypolipidemic effects, by reducing triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol. Some of the studies indicate a lowering of LDL-c up to 13% and triglycerides up to 24%
- Anti-inflammatory effects, by reducing homocysteine. Based on some of the studies, the lowering effects might go up to 39%.
Dietary practice might benefit from the following:
- The authors highlighted food-based and healthy dietary pattern-based strategies should include food sources rich in these nutrients such as fish, vegetables, fruit, legumes, nuts, and eggs
- The authors conclude that intake of whole foods and whole diets rich in desirable foods (such as MedDiet) should be encouraged
- The supplementation dose ranges in the studies covered by the review were the following: vitamin B6: 2.5–80 mg/day, vitamin B12: 20–1000 μg/day, folic acid: 150–10000 μg/day and n3 PUFA 0.2–2) g/day
- Limitations of the systematic review include different supplementation regimens, variability of study designs in terms of duration of the intervention, existence of placebo group, dosages and the inability to monitor study subjects’ habitual diet.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies should be designed regarding the need for a uniform methodological approach in testing the combined effects of vitamin B complex and n3 PUFA supplements
- The studies should investigate supplementation strategies and dietary patterns rich in both nutrients.
Abstract
Studies have suggested that B vitamins or omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may deter the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This systematic review aims to examine whether the combined supplementation of both B vitamins and omega-3 PUFAs could provide additional beneficial effects to prevent CVD beyond the effect of each supplement based on clinical trials published up to December 2021. The overall findings are inconsistent and inconclusive, yet the combined supplementation of these two nutrients may be more effective at reducing plasma homocysteine, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol than the individual components. The underlying mechanisms mainly include alleviating endothelial dysfunction, inhibiting atherosclerosis and lesion initiation, reducing oxidative stress, suppressing activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, regulating endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and interfering with methylation of genes that promote atherogenesis. Although biologically plausible, the existing literature is insufficient to draw any firm conclusion regarding whether B vitamins can further enhance the potential beneficial effects of omega-3 PUFA intake on either primary or secondary prevention of CVD. The inconsistent findings may be largely explained by the methodological challenges. Therefore, well-designed high-quality trials that will use the combined supplementation of B vitamins and omega-3 PUFAs or dietary patterns rich in these two types of nutrients are warranted.
-
8.
Effect of cocoa flavanol supplementation for the prevention of cardiovascular disease events: the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial.
Sesso, HD, Manson, JE, Aragaki, AK, Rist, PM, Johnson, LG, Friedenberg, G, Copeland, T, Clar, A, Mora, S, Moorthy, MV, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;115(6):1490-1500
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cocoa is made from the bean of the cacao tree and has a long history of potential health benefits based upon its flavanol and procyanidin content. Cocoa extract also contains methylxanthines [alkaloids] such as theobromine and caffeine, which may enhance the vascular and central nervous system effects of cocoa flavanols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the flavanol-rich cocoa extract containing all potential bioactive components of the cocoa bean on clinical cardiovascular outcomes. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial testing a cocoa extract supplement and a multivitamin supplement (COSMOS). This study focuses on the cocoa extract component of the trial. A total of 21,442 participants underwent randomisation to one of the four groups. Results show that after a median of 3.6 years of treatment there was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of total cardiovascular events. However, cocoa flavanol supplementation significantly reduced cardiovascular disease death by 27%, whereas other individual cardiovascular outcomes had no significant reductions in risk. Authors conclude that longer-term follow-up of the trial cohort and ongoing ancillary mechanistic studies in COSMOS may further elucidate the relation between cocoa extract supplementation and clinical cardiovascular events.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cocoa extract is a source of flavanols that favorably influence vascular risk factors in small and short-term trials, yet effects on clinical cardiovascular events are untested. OBJECTIVES We examined whether cocoa extract supplementation decreases total cardiovascular disease (CVD) among older adults. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-by-2 factorial trial of cocoa extract supplementation and multivitamins for prevention of CVD and cancer among 21,442 US adults (12,666 women aged ≥65 y and 8776 men aged ≥60 y), free of major CVD and recently diagnosed cancer. The intervention phase was June 2015 through December 2020. This article reports on the cocoa extract intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to a cocoa extract supplement [500 mg flavanols/d, including 80 mg (-)-epicatechin] or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of confirmed incident total cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, carotid artery disease, peripheral artery surgery, and unstable angina. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 3.6 y, 410 participants taking cocoa extract and 456 taking placebo had confirmed total cardiovascular events (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.02; P = 0.11). For secondary endpoints, HRs were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.98) for CVD death, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.16) for MI, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.70, 1.17) for stroke, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.17) for coronary revascularization, neutral for other individual cardiovascular endpoints, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.03) for all-cause mortality. Per-protocol analyses censoring follow-up at nonadherence supported a lower risk of total cardiovascular events (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.99). There were no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Cocoa extract supplementation did not significantly reduce total cardiovascular events among older adults but reduced CVD death by 27%. Potential reductions in total cardiovascular events were supported in per-protocol analyses. Additional research is warranted to clarify whether cocoa extract may reduce clinical cardiovascular events. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02422745.
-
9.
Anti-inflammatory effects of resveratrol in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Teimouri, M, Homayouni-Tabrizi, M, Rajabian, A, Amiri, H, Hosseini, H
Complementary therapies in medicine. 2022;70:102863
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) include various heart or/and blood vessel disorders, such as cerebrovascular disease, congenital heart disease, and coronary artery disease. It is well shown that prolonged or chronic inflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of several disorders, especially CVDs. Resveratrol has recently been considered a choice for preventing and treating inflammatory conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of resveratrol on serum/plasma concentration of specific inflammatory markers - tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and c-reactive protein (CRP) - in patients with CVDs. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomised controlled studies with a total of 415 participants. Results show that resveratrol significantly decreases CRP and TNF-α concentration; however, it did not significantly affect the serum concentration of IL-6 in patients with CVDs. Authors conclude that there is a potential preventive effect of resveratrol supplementation on inflammatory conditions in CVD patients. However, larger randomised clinical trials are needed to further investigate and explore the effects of resveratrol supplementations.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic inflammation is one of the most important factors involved in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVDs). Accumulating evidence has described the effect of resveratrol, a natural polyphenolic compound, on biomarkers of inflammation among patients with CVDs; however, findings are controversial. Here we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of resveratrol supplements on TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP levels in CVDs patients. METHODS Online research was conducted in the following database: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases, and Scopus. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the effects of resveratrol supplements on inflammatory biomarkers among patients with CVDs. The meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) V3 software. RESULTS Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the current meta-analysis. Our results demonstrated that resveratrol significantly decreases serum levels of CRP (MD = -0.63, 95 % CI: -0.1.13, -0.12; p = 0.01), and TNF-α (MD = -0.55, 95 % CI: -1.04, -0.06; p = 0.02), however, resveratrol had not significant effect on serum concentration of IL-6 (MD = -0.12, 95 % CI: -0.52, 0.27; p = 0.53), in patients with CVDs. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that resveratrol can be used as a potential treatment in patients with CVD by reducing inflammatory conditions.
-
10.
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events in Women vs Men With Type 1 Diabetes.
Braffett, BH, Bebu, I, El Ghormli, L, Cowie, CC, Sivitz, WI, Pop-Busui, R, Larkin, ME, Gubitosi-Klug, RA, Nathan, DM, Lachin, JM, et al
JAMA network open. 2022;5(9):e2230710
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
In the general population, women have a lower absolute risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with men. However, among individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, the relative risk of CVD is similar or higher in women compared with men. The aim of this study was to assess sex differences in achieving recommended CVD risk management targets and associations with CVD events. This is a cohort study which included a total of 1441 (men n= 736) participants with type 1 diabetes. Results show that the prevalence and mean levels of most cardiometabolic risk factors (except for pulse rate and haemoglobin A1c) were consistent with a less atherogenic profile among women compared with men. Furthermore, achieving treatment targets for blood pressure, lipids, and glucose was associated with significantly decreased risk of CVD in both women and men. Authors conclude that their findings argue for a recalibration of CVD risk factor stratification in revised clinical care guidelines and therapeutic recommendations by sex for individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among women compared with men in the general population may be diminished among those with diabetes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate cardiometabolic risk factors and their management in association with CVD events in women vs men with type 1 diabetes enrolled in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used data obtained during the combined DCCT (randomized clinical trial, conducted 1983-1993) and EDIC (observational study, conducted 1994 to present) studies through April 30, 2018 (mean [SD] follow-up, 28.8 [5.8] years), at 27 clinical centers in the US and Canada. Data analyses were performed between July 2021 and April 2022. EXPOSURE During the DCCT phase, patients were randomized to intensive vs conventional diabetes therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD events were assessed via detailed medical history and focused physical examinations. Blood and urine samples were assayed centrally. CVD events were adjudicated by a review committee. Linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated sex differences in cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD risk over follow-up. RESULTS A total of 1441 participants with type 1 diabetes (mean [SD] age at DCCT baseline, 26.8 [7.1] years; 761 [52.8%] men; 1390 [96.5%] non-Hispanic White) were included. Over the duration of the study, compared with men, women had significantly lower body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; β = -0.43 [SE, 0.16]; P = .006), waist circumference (β = -10.56 cm [SE, 0.52 cm]; P < .001), blood pressure (systolic: β = -5.77 mm Hg [SE, 0.35 mm Hg]; P < .001; diastolic: β = -3.23 mm Hg [SE, 0.26 mm Hg]; P < .001), and triglyceride levels (β = -10.10 mg/dL [SE, 1.98 mg/dL]; P < .001); higher HDL cholesterol levels (β = 9.36 mg/dL [SE, 0.57 mg/dL]; P < .001); and similar LDL cholesterol levels (β = -0.76 mg/dL [SE, 1.22 mg/dL]; P = .53). Women, compared with men, achieved recommended targets more frequently for blood pressure (ie, <130/80 mm Hg: 90.0% vs 77.4%; P < .001) and triglycerides (ie, <150 mg/dL: 97.3% vs 90.5%; P < .001). However, sex-specific HDL cholesterol targets (ie, ≥50 mg/dL for women, ≥40 mg/dL for men) were achieved less often (74.3% vs 86.6%; P < .001) and cardioprotective medications were used less frequently in women than men (ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker: 29.6% [95% CI, 25.7%-33.9%] vs 40.0% [95% CI, 36.1%-44.0%]; P = .001; lipid-lowering medication: 25.3% [95% CI, 22.1%-28.7%] vs 39.6% [95% CI, 36.1%-43.2%]; P < .001). Women also had significantly higher pulse rates (mean [SD], 75.2 [6.8] beats per minute vs 71.8 [6.9] beats per minute; P < .001) and hemoglobin A1c levels (mean [SD], 8.3% [1.0%] vs 8.1% [1.0%]; P = .01) and achieved targets for tighter glycemic control less often than men (ie, hemoglobin A1c <7%: 11.2% [95% CI, 9.3%-13.3%] vs 14.0% [95% CI, 12.0%-16.3%]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that despite a more favorable cardiometabolic risk factor profile, women with type 1 diabetes did not have a significantly lower CVD event burden than men, suggesting a greater clinical impact of cardiometabolic risk factors in women vs men with diabetes. These findings call for conscientious optimization of the control of CVD risk factors in women with type 1 diabetes.