1.
Updated Review and Meta-Analysis of Probiotics for the Treatment of Clinical Depression: Adjunctive vs. Stand-Alone Treatment.
Nikolova, VL, Cleare, AJ, Young, AH, Stone, JM
Journal of clinical medicine. 2021;10(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder is a common, complex, and heterogeneous illness that is characterized by persistent low mood and anhedonia, and a combination of sleep disturbances, changes in appetite, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, poor concentration, and suicidal ideation. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate all current evidence from randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of probiotics in reducing depressive symptoms among people with clinical depression. This study is a review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials which included seven studies for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Results demonstrate that probiotics significantly reduce depressive symptoms after eight weeks of use, but only when used in addition to an approved antidepressant. Authors conclude that their findings support the clinical use of probiotics in depressed populations and provides an insight into the mode of administration more likely to yield antidepressant effects.
Abstract
Recent years have seen a rapid increase in the use of gut microbiota-targeting interventions, such as probiotics, for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The objective of this update review was to evaluate all randomised controlled clinical trial evidence on the efficacy of probiotics for clinical depression. Cochrane guidelines for updated reviews were followed. By searching PubMed and Web of Science databases, we identified 546 new records since our previous review. A total of seven studies met selection criteria, capturing 404 people with depression. A random effects meta-analysis using treatment type (stand-alone vs. adjunctive) as subgroup was performed. The results demonstrated that probiotics are effective in reducing depressive symptoms when administered in addition to antidepressants (SMD = 0.83, 95%CI 0.49-1.17), however, they do not seem to offer significant benefits when used as stand-alone treatment (SMD = -0.02, 95%CI -0.34-0.30). Potential mechanisms of action may be via increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and decreases in C-reactive protein (CRP), although limited evidence is available at present. This review offers stronger evidence to support the clinical use of probiotics in depressed populations and provides an insight into the mode of administration more likely to yield antidepressant effects.
2.
Augmenting Clinical Interventions in Psychiatric Disorders: Systematic Review and Update on Nutrition.
Offor, SJ, Orish, CN, Frazzoli, C, Orisakwe, OE
Frontiers in psychiatry. 2021;12:565583
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Mental disorders are widespread and impact significantly on health. “Nutritional psychiatry” pivots on the impact of nutrition (food) on the state of mind and mood. The aim of this study was to justify the inclusion and recognition of nutrition in the management of psychiatric illnesses. This study is a systemic review which included 97 studies. The literature shows that several foods and food compounds modulate biomarkers and molecular mechanisms involved in the aetiogenesis [the origin and development of a pathological condition] of several mental disorders. Furthermore, the evidence-based approach warrants the inclusion and co-recognition of nutrition in the management of psychiatric illnesses. Authors conclude that there is a need to advocate for policies aimed at bridging the knowledge gap and encourage the utilization and integration of nutrition in addition to contemporary therapies in clinical settings.
Abstract
There is a strong relationship between a healthy diet and mental well-being. Several foods and food compounds are known to modulate biomarkers and molecular mechanisms involved in the aetiogenesis of several mental disorders, and this can be useful in containing the disease progression, including its prophylaxis. This is an updated systematic review of the literature to justify the inclusion and recognition of nutrition in the management of psychiatric illnesses. Such foods and their compounds include dietary flavanols from fruits and vegetables, notable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents, probiotics (fermented foods) known to protect good gut bacteria, foods rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g., Omega-3), and avoiding diets high in saturated fats and refined sugars among others. While the exact mechanism(s) of mitigation of many nutritional interventions are yet to be fully understood, the evidence-based approach warrants the inclusion and co-recognition of nutrition in the management of psychiatric illnesses. For the greater public health benefit, there is a need for policy advocacy aimed at bridging the knowledge gap and encouraging the integration of nutritional intervention with contemporary therapies in clinical settings, as deficiencies of certain nutrients make therapy difficult even with appropriate medication.
3.
Zinc, Magnesium, Selenium and Depression: A Review of the Evidence, Potential Mechanisms and Implications.
Wang, J, Um, P, Dickerman, BA, Liu, J
Nutrients. 2018;10(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Adequate micronutrient consumption and mental health are of major public health importance. Recent findings suggest micronutrient deficiencies may play a role in the development and progression of depression, yet the findings remain unclear. The aim of this review is to present the recent evidence on the association between several micronutrients and depression and discuss the potential mechanisms and clinical implications. Based on the current literature, evidence shows an association between both zinc and magnesium deficiency and the risk of depression, with stronger evidence supporting zinc. Studies on selenium are limited or inconclusive. According to these findings, the authors support the importance of adequate micronutrient consumption for promoting mental health. They suggest future research should investigate the safety and efficacy of micronutrient supplementation as an adjunct treatment for depression to better inform current prevention and treatment strategies.
Abstract
Micronutrient deficiency and depression are major global health problems. Here, we first review recent empirical evidence of the association between several micronutrients—zinc, magnesium, selenium—and depression. We then present potential mechanisms of action and discuss the clinical implications for each micronutrient. Collectively, empirical evidence most strongly supports a positive association between zinc deficiency and the risk of depression and an inverse association between zinc supplementation and depressive symptoms. Less evidence is available regarding the relationship between magnesium and selenium deficiency and depression, and studies have been inconclusive. Potential mechanisms of action involve the HPA axis, glutamate homeostasis and inflammatory pathways. Findings support the importance of adequate consumption of micronutrients in the promotion of mental health, and the most common dietary sources for zinc and other micronutrients are provided. Future research is needed to prospectively investigate the association between micronutrient levels and depression as well as the safety and efficacy of micronutrient supplementation as an adjunct treatment for depression.