-
1.
The impact of Dietary Weight loss, Aerobic Exercise, and Daylong Movement on Social Cognitive Mediators of Long-term Weight loss.
Fanning, J, Nicklas, B, Furlipa, J, Rejeski, WJ
Journal of behavioral medicine. 2023;46(3):499-508
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity in older adults predisposes individuals to physical disability, a host of chronic diseases, and premature mortality. A strong body of evidence indicates that well-designed structured exercise interventions increase older adults’ self-efficacy and satisfaction with their physical functioning, and these are important social cognitive outcomes closely linked with quality of life and health behaviour change. The main aim of this study was to investigate changes in walking self-efficacy and satisfaction after the 6-month intensive phase of the intervention. This study was a secondary analysis of the Empowered with Movement to Prevent Obesity and Weight Regain (EMPOWER) study, which was an 18-month, three-group, single-blind randomised trial. A total of 183 participants were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment arms: weight loss + structured exercise (WL+EX), WL+ sitting less and moving more across the day (SL), or WL+EX+SL. Results showed that: - participants demonstrated improvements in self-efficacy and satisfaction following the 6-month intervention weight loss and physical activity intervention. - participants who received an exercise intervention focused on sustained walking demonstrated significantly better self-efficacy for walking relative to those who did not (WL+SL). - both WL+EX and WL+EX+SL regressed to baseline levels of self-efficacy for walking by month 18, only WL+SL did not significantly decrease self-efficacy scores, sustaining a significant increase over baseline. Authors conclude that programs focused on daylong movement may contribute to improved self-efficacy and satisfaction. Thus, health promotion professionals should demonstrate flexibility in the ways in which physical activity is prescribed for older adults since not everyone resonates with traditional structured exercise.
Abstract
This report contrasts the impact of a dietary weight loss intervention (WL) paired with aerobic exercise (EX) and/or sitting less and moving throughout the day (SL) on self-efficacy for walking (hereafter walking self-efficacy) and satisfaction with physical functioning (hereafter satisfaction). Additional analyses examined dose-response associations between change in weight and changes in these key outcomes. Older adults (N = 112; age = 70.21[Formula: see text]4.43) were randomized to 6 months of WL+EX, WL+SL, or WL+EX+SL followed by a 12-month maintenance period. All groups reported increases in walking self-efficacy at month 6 with greater improvements in WL+EX and WL + EX+SL. Only WL+SL demonstrated improved walking self-efficacy at month 18. All conditions demonstrated improved satisfaction scores at both time points. Changes in walking self-efficacy and satisfaction were negatively associated with change in weight over the 6-month intervention and after the maintenance period. These results support the utility of WL + SL for improving key social cognitive outcomes in aging.
-
2.
Effect of a Personalized Diet to Reduce Postprandial Glycemic Response vs a Low-fat Diet on Weight Loss in Adults With Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Popp, CJ, Hu, L, Kharmats, AY, Curran, M, Berube, L, Wang, C, Pompeii, ML, Illiano, P, St-Jules, DE, Mottern, M, et al
JAMA network open. 2022;5(9):e2233760
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Postprandial glycaemic response (PPGR) to foods can be different from person to person. This could be the reason why people experience different weight loss outcomes with standardised diets such as a low glycaemic index diet, low-fat diet or a low carbohydrate diet. In this single-centre, population-based, randomised, blinded clinical trial, 204 participants with irregular glucose metabolism and obesity were randomised to consume either a low-fat or personalised diet for six months in combination with fourteen behavioural change counselling sessions. The participants in the personalised diet group received a colour-coded meal score to indicate their estimated PPGR for different foods. The results of this study showed no significant weight reduction in the personalised diet group compared to the low-fat diet. Further robust studies are required to develop appropriate precision nutrition interventions for weight loss and energy balance. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand that both a low-fat diet and a personalised diet, coupled with behavioural counselling, may be effective in promoting weight loss in obese populations with irregular glucose metabolism.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Interindividual variability in postprandial glycemic response (PPGR) to the same foods may explain why low glycemic index or load and low-carbohydrate diet interventions have mixed weight loss outcomes. A precision nutrition approach that estimates personalized PPGR to specific foods may be more efficacious for weight loss. OBJECTIVE To compare a standardized low-fat vs a personalized diet regarding percentage of weight loss in adults with abnormal glucose metabolism and obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Personal Diet Study was a single-center, population-based, 6-month randomized clinical trial with measurements at baseline (0 months) and 3 and 6 months conducted from February 12, 2018, to October 28, 2021. A total of 269 adults aged 18 to 80 years with a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) ranging from 27 to 50 and a hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 5.7% to 8.0% were recruited. Individuals were excluded if receiving medications other than metformin or with evidence of kidney disease, assessed as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation, to avoid recruiting patients with advanced type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to either a low-fat diet (<25% of energy intake; standardized group) or a personalized diet that estimates PPGR to foods using a machine learning algorithm (personalized group). Participants in both groups received a total of 14 behavioral counseling sessions and self-monitored dietary intake. In addition, the participants in the personalized group received color-coded meal scores on estimated PPGR delivered via a mobile app. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the percentage of weight loss from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in body composition (fat mass, fat-free mass, and percentage of body weight), resting energy expenditure, and adaptive thermogenesis. Data were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Analysis was based on intention to treat using linear mixed modeling. RESULTS Of a total of 204 adults randomized, 199 (102 in the personalized group vs 97 in the standardized group) contributed data (mean [SD] age, 58 [11] years; 133 women [66.8%]; mean [SD] body mass index, 33.9 [4.8]). Weight change at 6 months was -4.31% (95% CI, -5.37% to -3.24%) for the standardized group and -3.26% (95% CI, -4.25% to -2.26%) for the personalized group, which was not significantly different (difference between groups, 1.05% [95% CI, -0.40% to 2.50%]; P = .16). There were no between-group differences in body composition and adaptive thermogenesis; however, the change in resting energy expenditure was significantly greater in the standardized group from 0 to 6 months (difference between groups, 92.3 [95% CI, 0.9-183.8] kcal/d; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A personalized diet targeting a reduction in PPGR did not result in greater weight loss compared with a low-fat diet at 6 months. Future studies should assess methods of increasing dietary self-monitoring adherence and intervention exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03336411.
-
3.
Effect of a Comprehensive Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Intervention in Persons With Serious Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Daumit, GL, Dalcin, AT, Dickerson, FB, Miller, ER, Evins, AE, Cather, C, Jerome, GJ, Young, DR, Charleston, JB, Gennusa, JV, et al
JAMA network open. 2020;3(6):e207247
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Heart disease death rates in individuals with serious mental illness are double that of the general population, indicating a concerted effort is needed to help this group of people. However, previous studies on interventions have failed to show improvements indicating a requirement to identify effective solutions. This randomised control trial of 269 individuals with mental illness aimed to determine the effectiveness of an 18-month management plan to reduce heart disease risk. The results showed that heart disease risk was significantly decreased when individuals with mental illness were in a closely monitored management programme. This programme consisted of behavioural counselling and care coordination. It was concluded that a multi-faceted care management plan can significantly reduce the risk of heart disease in individuals with serious mental illness. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand that individuals with mental illness are at a higher risk of death from heart disease and that they need to consider enrolling them into a closely monitored management plan.
Abstract
Importance: Persons with serious mental illness have a cardiovascular disease mortality rate more than twice that of the overall population. Meaningful cardiovascular risk reduction requires targeted efforts in this population, who often have psychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of an 18-month multifaceted intervention incorporating behavioral counseling, care coordination, and care management for overall cardiovascular risk reduction in adults with serious mental illness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2013 to November 2018 at 4 community mental health outpatient programs in Maryland. The study recruited adults with at least 1 cardiovascular disease risk factor (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, current tobacco smoking, and/or overweight or obesity) attending the mental health programs. Of 398 participants screened, 269 were randomized to intervention (132 participants) or control (137 participants). Data collection staff were blinded to group assignment. Data were analyzed on the principle of intention to treat, and data analysis was performed from November 2018 to March 2019. Interventions: A health coach and nurse provided individually tailored cardiovascular disease risk reduction behavioral counseling, collaborated with physicians to implement appropriate risk factor management, and coordinated with mental health staff to encourage attainment of health goals. Programs offered physical activity classes and received consultation on serving healthier meals; intervention and control participants were exposed to these environmental changes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in the risk of cardiovascular disease from the global Framingham Risk Score (FRS), which estimates the 10-year probability of a cardiovascular disease event, from baseline to 18 months, expressed as percentage change for intervention compared with control. Results: Of 269 participants randomized (mean [SD] age, 48.8 [11.9] years; 128 men [47.6%]), 159 (59.1%) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, 67 (24.9%) had bipolar disorder, and 38 (14.1%) had major depressive disorder. At 18 months, the primary outcome, FRS, was obtained for 256 participants (95.2%). The mean (SD) baseline FRS was 11.5% (11.5%) (median, 8.6%; interquartile range, 3.9%-16.0%) in the intervention group and 12.7% (12.7%) (median, 9.1%; interquartile range, 4.0%-16.7%) in the control group. At 18 months, the mean (SD) FRS was 9.9% (10.2%) (median, 7.7%; interquartile range, 3.1%-12.0%) in the intervention group and 12.3% (12.0%) (median, 9.7%; interquartile range, 4.0%-15.9%) in the control group. Compared with the control group, the intervention group experienced a 12.7% (95% CI, 2.5%-22.9%; P = .02) relative reduction in FRS at 18 months. Conclusions and Relevance: An 18-month behavioral counseling, care coordination, and care management intervention statistically significantly reduced overall cardiovascular disease risk in adults with serious mental illness. This intervention provides the means to substantially reduce health disparities in this high-risk population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02127671.
-
4.
Predicting Weight Loss Using Psychological and Behavioral Factors: The POUNDS LOST Trial.
Liu, X, Hanseman, DJ, Champagne, CM, Bray, GA, Qi, L, Williamson, DA, Anton, SD, Sacks, FM, Tong, J
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2020;105(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Food cravings are a psychological state associated with increased food intake and body weight. Understanding food cravings and psychological behaviour may help weight management. This randomised control trial of 811 individuals on a weight loss regime aimed to determine relationships between behavioural factors and weight changes over two years. The results showed that individuals who reported the strongest food cravings, lost less weight and those who had weaker cravings lost the most weight. Craving fatty foods was associated with greater weight loss, less calories consumed and reduced fat intake. Craving carbohydrates was associated with less weight loss and greater weight regain after 2 years. Interestingly, participants lost the most weight in the first six months and then regained weight in years one and two. It was concluded that cravings were most likely to influence weight loss and regain. Individuals who craved fatty foods, were more likely to lose weight through decreased calorie and fat intake. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand that helping their obese and overweight patients to manage their food cravings may aid weight loss and prevent weight gain.
Abstract
CONTEXT Eating habits and food craving are strongly correlated with weight status. It is currently not well understood how psychological and behavioral factors influence both weight loss and weight regain. OBJECTIVE To examine the associations between psychological and behavioral predictors with weight changes and energy intake in a randomized controlled trial on weight loss. DESIGN AND SETTING The Prevention of Obesity Using Novel Dietary Strategies is a dietary intervention trial that examined the efficacy of 4 diets on weight loss over 2 years. Participants were 811 overweight (body mass index, 25-40.9 kg/m2; age, 30-70 years) otherwise healthy adults. RESULTS Every 1-point increase in craving score for high-fat foods at baseline was associated with greater weight loss (-1.62 kg, P = .0004) and a decrease in energy intake (r = -0.10, P = .01) and fat intake (r = -0.16, P < .0001) during the weight loss period. In contrast, craving for carbohydrates/starches was associated with both less weight loss (P < .0001) and more weight regain (P = .04). Greater cognitive restraint of eating at baseline was associated with both less weight loss (0.23 kg, P < .0001) and more weight regain (0.14 kg, P = .0027), whereas greater disinhibition of eating was only associated with more weight regain (0.12 kg, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Craving for high-fat foods is predictive of greater weight loss, whereas craving for carbohydrates is predictive of less weight loss. Cognitive restraint is predictive of less weight loss and more weight regain. Interventions targeting different psychological and behavioral factors can lead to greater success in weight loss.
-
5.
The COVID-19 Pandemic: a Call to Action to Identify and Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities.
Laurencin, CT, McClinton, A
Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities. 2020;7(3):398-402
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus was first identified in late 2019 in Wuhan, China. Various unsubstantiated reports emerged declaring that the genetic constitution of Blacks or even the presence of melanin rendered Blacks immune to the virus. This study is a call of action which reviews preliminary data on race and ethnicity in the peer-reviewed literature for citizens in America affected by COVID-19. Findings demonstrate that communities of colour (Blacks) have a higher rate of infection and death in comparison to their population percentage in the state of Connecticut. However, authors are unable to draw conclusions since race and ethnicity data is missing and the data in this paper is the earliest data available. Therefore, the authors call for action to identify and address racial and ethnic health disparities in the COVID-19 crisis.
Abstract
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted and devastated the world. As the infection spreads, the projected mortality and economic devastation are unprecedented. In particular, racial and ethnic minorities may be at a particular disadvantage as many already assume the status of a marginalized group. Black Americans have a long-standing history of disadvantage and are in a vulnerable position to experience the impact of this crisis and the myth of Black immunity to COVID-19 is detrimental to promoting and maintaining preventative measures. We are the first to present the earliest available data in the peer-reviewed literature on the racial and ethnic distribution of COVID-19-confirmed cases and fatalities in the state of Connecticut. We also seek to explode the myth of Black immunity to the virus. Finally, we call for a National Commission on COVID-19 Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities to further explore and respond to the unique challenges that the crisis presents for Black and Brown communities.
-
6.
Prevalence of Depression Symptoms in US Adults Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Ettman, CK, Abdalla, SM, Cohen, GH, Sampson, L, Vivier, PM, Galea, S
JAMA network open. 2020;3(9):e2019686
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an event that can cause physical, emotional, and psychological harm. Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic can itself be considered a traumatic event. The aim of this study was to (a) assess the burden of depression symptoms in the US during COVID-19 using the same measures deployed in representative national surveys before COVID-19 began, and (b) understand the factors associated with depression symptoms during and before COVID-19. This study is a population-representative survey study of US adults. A total of 1441 participants were included in the final sample out of which 619 participants were aged between 18 and 39 years, 723 were men, and 933 were non-Hispanic White. Results showed that: - prevalence of depression symptoms in the US increased more than 3-fold during the COVID-19 pandemic, from 8.5% before COVID-19 to 27.8% during COVID-19. - there was a shift in depression symptoms, with fewer people with no symptoms and more people with more symptoms during COVID-19 than before COVID-19. - lower income groups were at greater risk of depression symptoms than higher income groups. Authors conclude that the potential for the mental health consequences of COVID-19 to be large in scale, to recognize that these effects can be long-lasting, and to consider preventative action to help mitigate its effects.
Abstract
Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the policies to contain it have been a near ubiquitous exposure in the US with unknown effects on depression symptoms. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of and risk factors associated with depression symptoms among US adults during vs before the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationally representative survey study used 2 population-based surveys of US adults aged 18 or older. During COVID-19, estimates were derived from the COVID-19 and Life Stressors Impact on Mental Health and Well-being study, conducted from March 31, 2020, to April 13, 2020. Before COVID-19 estimates were derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, conducted from 2017 to 2018. Data were analyzed from April 15 to 20, 2020. Exposures: The COVID-19 pandemic and outcomes associated with the measures to mitigate it. Main Outcomes and Measures: Depression symptoms, defined using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 cutoff of 10 or higher. Categories of depression symptoms were defined as none (score, 0-4), mild (score, 5-9), moderate (score, 10-14), moderately severe (score, 15-19), and severe (score, ≥20). Results: A total of 1470 participants completed the COVID-19 and Life Stressors Impact on Mental Health and Well-being survey (completion rate, 64.3%), and after removing those with missing data, the final during-COVID-19 sample included 1441 participants (619 participants [43.0%] aged 18-39 years; 723 [50.2%] men; 933 [64.7%] non-Hispanic White). The pre-COVID-19 sample included 5065 participants (1704 participants [37.8%] aged 18-39 years; 2588 [51.4%] women; 1790 [62.9%] non-Hispanic White). Depression symptom prevalence was higher in every category during COVID-19 compared with before (mild: 24.6% [95% CI, 21.8%-27.7%] vs 16.2% [95% CI, 15.1%-17.4%]; moderate: 14.8% [95% CI, 12.6%-17.4%] vs 5.7% [95% CI, 4.8%-6.9%]; moderately severe: 7.9% [95% CI, 6.3%-9.8%] vs 2.1% [95% CI, 1.6%-2.8%]; severe: 5.1% [95% CI, 3.8%-6.9%] vs 0.7% [95% CI, 0.5%-0.9%]). Higher risk of depression symptoms during COVID-19 was associated with having lower income (odds ratio, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.26-4.43]), having less than $5000 in savings (odds ratio, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.02-2.26]), and exposure to more stressors (odds ratio, 3.05 [95% CI, 1.95-4.77]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that prevalence of depression symptoms in the US was more than 3-fold higher during COVID-19 compared with before the COVID-19 pandemic. Individuals with lower social resources, lower economic resources, and greater exposure to stressors (eg, job loss) reported a greater burden of depression symptoms. Post-COVID-19 plans should account for the probable increase in mental illness to come, particularly among at-risk populations.
-
7.
Lifestyle and vascular risk effects on MRI-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study of middle-aged adults from the broader New York City area.
Mosconi, L, Walters, M, Sterling, J, Quinn, C, McHugh, P, Andrews, RE, Matthews, DC, Ganzer, C, Osorio, RS, Isaacson, RS, et al
BMJ open. 2018;8(3):e019362
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, affecting nearly 34 million people worldwide. It has been estimated that one in every three cases of AD may be attributable to diet and lifestyle factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of lifestyle and vascular-related risk factors for AD. Researchers studied the brain scans of 116 healthy adults aged 30-60 years. They collected information on factors related to lifestyle, such as diet, physical activity and intellectual enrichment. They also looked at markers for vascular risk such as body mass index (BMI), cholesterol and homocysteine, as well as cognitive function. The researchers found that a Mediterranean-style diet and good insulin sensitivity were both associated with a healthier brain structure. A better score for intellectual enrichment and lower BMI were both associated with better cognition. They concluded that adopting a Mediterranean-style diet and maintaining a healthy weight might reduce the risk of developing AD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of lifestyle and vascular-related risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD) on in vivo MRI-based brain atrophy in asymptomatic young to middle-aged adults. DESIGN Cross-sectional, observational. SETTING Broader New York City area. Two research centres affiliated with the Alzheimer's disease Core Center at New York University School of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS We studied 116 cognitively normal healthy research participants aged 30-60 years, who completed a three-dimensional T1-weighted volumetric MRI and had lifestyle (diet, physical activity and intellectual enrichment), vascular risk (overweight, hypertension, insulin resistance, elevated cholesterol and homocysteine) and cognition (memory, executive function, language) data. Estimates of cortical thickness for entorhinal (EC), posterior cingulate, orbitofrontal, inferior and middle temporal cortex were obtained by use of automated segmentation tools. We applied confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling to evaluate the associations between lifestyle, vascular risk, brain and cognition. RESULTS Adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet (MeDi) and insulin sensitivity were both positively associated with MRI-based cortical thickness (diet: βs≥0.26, insulin sensitivity βs≥0.58, P≤0.008). After accounting for vascular risk, EC in turn explained variance in memory (P≤0.001). None of the other lifestyle and vascular risk variables were associated with brain thickness. In addition, the path associations between intellectual enrichment and better cognition were significant (βs≥0.25 P≤0.001), as were those between overweight and lower cognition (βs≥-0.22, P≤0.01). CONCLUSIONS In cognitively normal middle-aged adults, MeDi and insulin sensitivity explained cortical thickness in key brain regions for AD, and EC thickness predicted memory performance in turn. Intellectual activity and overweight were associated with cognitive performance through different pathways. Our findings support further investigation of lifestyle and vascular risk factor modification against brain ageing and AD. More studies with larger samples are needed to replicate these research findings in more diverse, community-based settings.
-
8.
Effect of tai chi versus aerobic exercise for fibromyalgia: comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial.
Wang, C, Schmid, CH, Fielding, RA, Harvey, WF, Reid, KF, Price, LL, Driban, JB, Kalish, R, Rones, R, McAlindon, T
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2018;360:k851
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fibromyalgia is a complex disorder, characterised by chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep problems and depression. Conventional treatment is multidisciplinary, including medication, exercise and CBT. This randomised, single-blinded trial aimed to determine the effectiveness of regular Tai Chi practice when compared to the standard recommended exercise, aerobic training. 226 adults diagnosed with fibromyalgia were randomly assigned to either 24 weeks of supervised aerobic exercise or 12 or 24 weeks of Tai Chi classes. A standard fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was used to assess changes in pain and quality of life measures, along with patient perception of various aspects of their condition. The study found that Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire scores improved across all treatment groups, however the 24-week Tai Chi group saw a statistically significant greater improvement than the aerobic group. In addition, those patients on the 24-week Tai Chi programme experienced greater improvement than those on the 12-week Tai Chi programme. There was also higher attendance and fewer drop-outs in the Tai Chi groups in comparison to the aerobic exercise group. Tai Chi could therefore be considered as an alternative to aerobic exercise in a multi-disciplinary approach to fibromyalgia treatment.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of tai chi interventions compared with aerobic exercise, a current core standard treatment in patients with fibromyalgia, and to test whether the effectiveness of tai chi depends on its dosage or duration. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, 52 week, single blind comparative effectiveness trial. SETTING Urban tertiary care academic hospital in the United States between March 2012 and September 2016. PARTICIPANTS 226 adults with fibromyalgia (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology 1990 and 2010 criteria) were included in the intention to treat analyses: 151 were assigned to one of four tai chi groups and 75 to an aerobic exercise group. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned to either supervised aerobic exercise (24 weeks, twice weekly) or one of four classic Yang style supervised tai chi interventions (12 or 24 weeks, once or twice weekly). Participants were followed for 52 weeks. Adherence was rigorously encouraged in person and by telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was change in the revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQR) scores at 24 weeks compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes of scores in patient's global assessment, anxiety, depression, self efficacy, coping strategies, physical functional performance, functional limitation, sleep, and health related quality of life. RESULTS FIQR scores improved in all five treatment groups, but the combined tai chi groups improved statistically significantly more than the aerobic exercise group in FIQR scores at 24 weeks (difference between groups=5.5 points, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 10.4, P=0.03) and several secondary outcomes (patient's global assessment=0.9 points, 0.3 to 1.4, P=0.005; anxiety=1.2 points, 0.3 to 2.1, P=0.006; self efficacy=1.0 points, 0.5 to 1.6, P=0.0004; and coping strategies, 2.6 points, 0.8 to 4.3, P=0.005). Tai chi treatment compared with aerobic exercise administered with the same intensity and duration (24 weeks, twice weekly) had greater benefit (between group difference in FIQR scores=16.2 points, 8.7 to 23.6, P<0.001). The groups who received tai chi for 24 weeks showed greater improvements than those who received it for 12 weeks (difference in FIQR scores=9.6 points, 2.6 to 16.6, P=0.007). There was no significant increase in benefit for groups who received tai chi twice weekly compared with once weekly. Participants attended the tai chi training sessions more often than participants attended aerobic exercise. The effects of tai chi were consistent across all instructors. No serious adverse events related to the interventions were reported. CONCLUSION Tai chi mind-body treatment results in similar or greater improvement in symptoms than aerobic exercise, the current most commonly prescribed non-drug treatment, for a variety of outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia. Longer duration of tai chi showed greater improvement. This mind-body approach may be considered a therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary management of fibromyalgia. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01420640.
-
9.
Meditation or exercise for preventing acute respiratory infection (MEPARI-2): A randomized controlled trial.
Barrett, B, Hayney, MS, Muller, D, Rakel, D, Brown, R, Zgierska, AE, Barlow, S, Hayer, S, Barnet, JH, Torres, ER, et al
PloS one. 2018;13(6):e0197778
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Susceptibility to acute respiratory infection (ARI), including the common cold and flu, have been shown to be influenced by psychological, social and behavioural factors. Given these previous associations, the aim of this study was to determine the preventive effects of meditation and exercise on ARI illness. This randomised controlled trial allocated 390 participants to one of three parallel groups either receiving 8-week training in mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), 8-week training in moderate intensity exercise or observational control. ARI symptoms were assessed daily and various psychosocial factors were assessed at baseline and 4 times after the intervention. Blood and nasal wash samples were assessed with each ARI episode as well as at baseline, 1-month and 4-month post-intervention. This study found significant reductions in ARI illness incidence, duration and severity for participants in the MBSR group compared with controls. While this was also true for the exercise group, results were not as significant suggesting a slight advantage of mindfulness over exercise. Based on these results, the authors conclude both mindfulness and exercise should be encouraged and further research be conducted to better understand the benefits of these activities in sick populations.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practice of meditation or exercise may enhance health to protect against acute infectious illness. OBJECTIVE To assess preventive effects of meditation and exercise on acute respiratory infection (ARI) illness. DESIGN Randomized controlled prevention trial with three parallel groups. SETTING Madison, Wisconsin, USA. PARTICIPANTS Community-recruited adults who did not regularly exercise or meditate. METHODS 1) 8-week behavioral training in mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR); 2) matched 8-week training in moderate intensity sustained exercise (EX); or 3) observational waitlist control. Training classes occurred in September and October, with weekly ARI surveillance through May. Incidence, duration, and area-under-curve ARI global severity were measured using daily reports on the WURSS-24 during ARI illness. Viruses were identified multiplex PCR. Absenteeism, health care utilization, and psychosocial health self-report assessments were also employed. RESULTS Of 413 participants randomized, 390 completed the trial. In the MBSR group, 74 experienced 112 ARI episodes with 1045 days of ARI illness. Among exercisers, 84 had 120 episodes totaling 1010 illness days. Eighty-two of the controls had 134 episodes with 1210 days of ARI illness. Mean global severity was 315 for MBSR (95% confidence interval 244, 386), 256 (193, 318) for EX, and 336 (268, 403) for controls. A prespecified multivariate zero-inflated regression model suggested reduced incidence for MBSR (p = 0.036) and lower global severity for EX (p = 0.042), compared to control, not quite attaining the p<0.025 prespecified cut-off for null hypothesis rejection. There were 73 ARI-related missed-work days and 22 ARI-related health care visits in the MBSR group, 82 days and 21 visits for exercisers, and 105 days and 24 visits among controls. Viruses were identified in 63 ARI episodes in the MBSR group, compared to 64 for EX and 72 for control. Statistically significant (p<0.05) improvements in general mental health, self-efficacy, mindful attention, sleep quality, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms were observed in the MBSR and/or EX groups, compared to control. CONCLUSIONS Training in mindfulness meditation or exercise may help protect against ARI illness. LIMITATIONS This trial was likely underpowered. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01654289.
-
10.
How Does the Brain Implement Adaptive Decision Making to Eat?
Compan, V, Walsh, BT, Kaye, W, Geliebter, A
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2015;35(41):13868-78
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
While food intake is critical for survival, adaptive decision-making can be altered through various mechanisms and eventually lead to disordered eating patterns. Feeding behaviour is dependent on homeostatic rules, motivational drives, biological predispositions and external stressors. This complex web elucidates how humans can decide to satisfy or abstain from hunger cues, and the underlying mechanisms of this behaviour have been increasingly explored. This review summarises the overall neural circuitry in restrictive food choice and binge eating. Serotonergic systems play a key role in eating disorders because they are involved in responses to stress, emotions and feeding behaviour. The decision to overeat or abstain from eating is a reward, and this goal-directed and persistent behaviour mirror some aspects of drug dependence. This review found that voluntary processes in the nervous system could be modified to predominate over homeostatic control of hunger. Eating disorders may emerge when serotonin neurons reach their limit of adaptive capacities, potentially to the extent of compromised survival. This study provides a basis for developing more effective interventions for this population.
Abstract
Adaptive decision making to eat is crucial for survival, but in anorexia nervosa, the brain persistently supports reduced food intake despite a growing need for energy. How the brain persists in reducing food intake, sometimes even to the point of death and despite the evolution of multiple mechanisms to ensure survival by governing adaptive eating behaviors, remains mysterious. Neural substrates belong to the reward-habit system, which could differ among the eating disorders. The present review provides an overview of neural circuitry of restrictive food choice, binge eating, and the contribution of specific serotonin receptors. One possibility is that restrictive food intake critically engages goal-directed (decision making) systems and "habit," supporting the view that persistent caloric restriction mimics some aspects of addiction to drugs of abuse. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT An improved understanding of the neural basis of eating disorders is a timely challenge because these disorders can be deadly. Up to 70 million of people in the world suffer from eating disorders. Anorexia nervosa affects 1-4% of women in United States and is the first cause of death among adolescents in Europe. Studies relying on animal models suggest that decision making to eat (or not) can prevail over actual energy requirements due to emotional disturbances resulting in abnormal habitual behavior, mimicking dependence. These recent studies provide a foundation for developing more specific and effective interventions for these disorders.