-
1.
Digital Intervention Strategies for Increasing Physical Activity Among Preschoolers: Systematic Review.
Swindle, T, Poosala, AB, Zeng, N, Børsheim, E, Andres, A, Bellows, LL
Journal of medical Internet research. 2022;24(1):e28230
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Digital strategies to improve the diet and activity of pre-schoolers are increasing due to their accessibility and relatively low cost to set up. This systematic review of 8 studies aimed to determine the quality of the studies that have been performed to date, and to determine the effectiveness of the digital strategies used to increase physical activity. The results showed that the studies reviewed had a small sample size. Only 2 studies showed positive changes in physical activity of pre-schoolers and these approaches were child led, but the studies were low quality. Parent focused interventions did not improve the physical activity of pre-schoolers. It was concluded that digital child-centred activities may be of benefit to physical activity in pre-schoolers, however parent-focused digital interventions may be ineffective. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the importance of using digital strategies which engage children to improve their health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital interventions are increasingly used to improve health behaviors. Improved access and lower costs (relative to in-person interventions) make such interventions appealing. Specifically, digital platforms may be a promising approach for increasing physical activity (PA) in young children. OBJECTIVE The goal of this systematic review was three-pronged: (1) to determine the quality of studies using digital PA intervention strategies with preschool-aged children (ie, 3 to 5 years old); (2) to assess the efficacy of digital interventions and approaches designed to improve PA in preschool-aged children; and (3) to examine theoretical application and implementation outcomes with current approaches to digital PA interventions. METHODS This review identified and summarized studies on digitally supported interventions for promoting PA in preschool-aged children. We generated 3 lists of relevant search terms that included technology-related terms, PA-related terms, and weight-related terms. The search included Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Study selection was led by a single author and verified by a second; the same 2 authors assessed study quality using a standardized tool, and 3 authors completed data extraction on PA outcomes, theory application, and implementation outcomes. RESULTS In total, 601 studies were identified; 8 met the inclusion criteria. For study quality, only 2 studies received an overall rating of strong quality and low risk of bias. All but 1 study had a small sample size (<100). Positive and significant changes in child PA outcomes were reported in only 2 studies with weak overall quality, both of which used child-directed approaches. In total, 5 studies applied a behavioral theory for designing the intervention; no patterns of effectiveness were identified based on the application of theory. Finally, no studies reported on the implementation outcomes of adoption, cost, penetration, or sustainability; 1 study did not assess any implementation outcomes, and no single study reported on more than 2 implementation outcomes. Studies measured the implementation outcome of acceptability most frequently (n=4), and researchers assessed fidelity in 3 studies. CONCLUSIONS The interventions with a significant effect on PA used child-centered activities; parent-directed digital interventions alone were ineffective for improving PA. Future research with rigorous designs, monitoring of implementation outcomes, and testing of the contributions of digital components will advance understanding of the effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing PA in children.
-
2.
Effect of a family and interdisciplinary intervention to prevent T2D: randomized clinical trial.
Vargas-Ortiz, K, Lira-Mendiola, G, Gómez-Navarro, CM, Padilla-Estrada, K, Angulo-Romero, F, Hernández-Márquez, JM, Villa-Martínez, AK, González-Mena, JN, Macías-Cervantes, MH, Reyes-Escogido, ML, et al
BMC public health. 2020;20(1):97
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes, lifestyle interventions rather than medication have been more successful in preventing development of the disease, however the benefits of lifestyle strategies diminishes over time due to possible adherence issues. Prolonged lifestyle changes may be affected by lack of family support, but research on family support during lifestyle changes in individuals prior to diabetes is lacking. This parallel randomised control trial of 122 patients with prediabetes and 101 of their family members aimed to assess the impact of family supported diet and exercise changes compared to self-motivation on individuals with prediabetes. At 6 months, body measurements and markers of prediabetes improved in both groups. Lipids were significantly improved in the group with family support compared to having no support. At 12 months there were a high number of dropouts due to lack of patient interest. Benefits shown at 6 months in both groups were only maintained or improved upon with family support and the lipid profile of the individual intervention group actually worsened in comparison to when participants entered the trial. After 12 months the incidence rate of type 2 diabetes was similar in both groups. Individuals with prediabetes who had family support whilst undergoing a diet and exercise regime were more successful at maintaining improvements of factors contributing to diabetes, compared to individuals without support. However this did not affect the occurrence of type 2 diabetes. Clinicians could use this paper to communicate the importance of family support during lifestyle changes in patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, although close monitoring may be required to ensure compliance.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle changes can reduce the risk of T2D; however, no study has evaluated the effect of a lifestyle intervention involving patients´ family. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of an interdisciplinary family (FI) Vs individual intervention (II) on glucose metabolism, insulin resistance (IR), pancreatic β-cell function and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with prediabetes, as well as to measure the impact on their families' metabolic risk. METHODS Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to compare the impact of FI and II on IR and pancreatic β-cell function in subjects with prediabetes. There were 122 subjects with prediabetes (and 101 family members) randomized to FI or II. Data were collected in 2015-2016 and analyzed in 2017-2018. FI group had the support of their family members, who also received personalized diet and exercise recommendations; patients and their family members attended monthly a lifestyle enhancement program. II group received personalized diet and exercise recommendations. The follow-up was for 12 months. Glucose, IR, pancreatic β-cell function and secondary outcomes (body composition and lipid profile) were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS FI group improved area under the glucose curve (AUC) (from 18,597 ± 2611 to 17,237 ± 2792, p = 0.004) and the Matsuda index (from 3.5 ± 2.3 to 4.7 ± 3.5, p = 0.05) at 12 months. II group improved Disposition Index (from 1.5 ± 0.4 to 1.9 ± 0.73, p < .0001) at 12 months. The improvements achieved in weight and lipids at 6 months, were lost in II group at 12 moths, whereas in FI persisted. Adherence up to 12 months was not different between the study groups (FI 56% Vs II 60%). CONCLUSIONS FI intervention was more effective by improving glucose AUC, insulin sensitivity and lipid profile, besides that, metabolic risk in family members of the FI group was maintained, while the risk of II group was increased. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on December 15, 2015 (NTC026365646).
-
3.
The potential long-term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on patients with non-communicable diseases in Europe: consequences for healthy ageing.
Palmer, K, Monaco, A, Kivipelto, M, Onder, G, Maggi, S, Michel, JP, Prieto, R, Sykara, G, Donde, S
Aging clinical and experimental research. 2020;32(7):1189-1194
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Individuals with non-communicable diseases (NCD's), i.e. diseases that are not transmitted from person to person, such as diabetes and heart disease, are at a much higher risk of death from Covid-19. But for individuals who contract Covid-19 and survive, there could be considerable implications on the progression of their pre-existing condition. This review study aimed to discuss how the Covid-19 pandemic might impact management and outcomes in individuals with NCD's. The paper outlined that higher Covid-19 death rates in individuals with NCD's, will cause a decline of these diseases within populations. Although there is little peer reviewed research to support this, circumstantial reports are already suggesting lower hospital admissions for stroke and heart attacks. However it should be noted that it is obvious that this paper was written at the start of the pandemic. The paper went on to discuss that the pandemic and subsequent government actions to control the infection will affect individuals with NCD's through reductions in physical activity, social interaction, and vitamin D intake. Changes to medical management, the subsequent possibility of decreased adherence to medications and the halting of much needed research on NCD's in favour of Covid-19 research, will further exacerbate the impact on individuals with pre-existing conditions. Finally, areas upon which the healthcare system and government should be focusing in order to help individuals with NCD's were discussed. Amongst these was the acknowledgement that the public and private healthcare systems have collaborated with success and this should continue and that on-going support through technology such as Telehealth services and patient advocacy associations is a necessity. Clinicians could use this paper to understand how Covid-19 could accelerate disease progression in individuals with NCD’s and that close monitoring is essential. For individuals with NCD’s who do not have Covid-19, close monitoring would still be required to ensure that government strategies to contain the virus do not exacerbate their condition.
Abstract
The early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic have focused on containing SARS-CoV-2 infection and identifying treatment strategies. While controlling this communicable disease is of utmost importance, the long-term effect on individuals with non-communicable diseases (NCD) is significant. Although certain NCDs appear to increase the severity of COVID-19 and mortality risk, SARS-CoV-2 infection in survivors with NCDs may also affect the progression of their pre-existing clinical conditions. Infection containment measures will have substantial short- and long-term consequences; social distancing and quarantine restrictions will reduce physical activity and increase other unhealthy lifestyles, thus increasing NCD risk factors and worsening clinical symptoms. Vitamin D levels might decrease and there might be a rise in mental health disorders. Many countries have made changes to routine management of NCD patients, e.g., cancelling non-urgent outpatient visits, which will have important implications for NCD management, diagnosis of new-onset NCDs, medication adherence, and NCD progression. We may have opportunities to learn from this unprecedented crisis on how to leverage healthcare technologies and improve procedures to optimize healthcare service provision. This article discusses how the COVID-19 outbreak and related infection control measures could hit the most frail individuals, worsening the condition of NCD patients, while further jeopardizing the sustainability of the healthcare systems. We suggest ways to define an integrated strategy that could involve both public institutional entities and the private sector to safeguard frail individuals and mitigate the impact of the outbreak.
-
4.
Effects of the Healthy Children, Healthy Families, Healthy Communities Program for Obesity Prevention among Vulnerable Children: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Choo, J, Yang, HM, Jae, SY, Kim, HJ, You, J, Lee, J
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Childhood obesity is especially pronounced in those from lower socioeconomical backgrounds. The Three-Healthy Programme is a multilevel initiative designed to target obesity in these children. This randomised control trial of 104 socioeconomically vulnerable children and 59 of their parents over 12 weeks aimed to determine the effects of the Three-Healthy Programme on healthy lifestyle behaviours and obesity in children in the public welfare system. The results showed that the Three-Healthy Programme, which targeted child behavioural strategies, parenting strategies and organisational strategies helped to increase a child’s knowledge of healthy lifestyle behaviours, vegetable intake and physical activity. However, there were no improvements in breakfast, fruit, milk, no-sugar beverage and fast-food consumption. This did not translate to improved obesity status. It was concluded that the Three-Healthy Programme may be effective at promoting healthy lifestyles in socioeconomically vulnerable children. The short study duration may be the reason why obesity did not improve, at least one year of intervention may be needed. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the importance of targeting all influencers for weight loss in children from socioeconomically vulnerable backgrounds.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to examine whether the Healthy Children, Healthy Families, and Healthy Communities Program, consisting of multi-level strategies for obesity prevention tailoring the context of socioeconomically vulnerable children based on an ecological perspective, would be effective on improving their healthy lifestyle behaviors and obesity status. Methods: Participants were 104 children (and 59 parents) enrolled in public welfare systems in Seoul, South Korea. Based on a cluster-randomized controlled trial (no. ISRCTN11347525), eight centers were randomly assigned to intervention (four centers, 49 children, 27 parents) versus control groups (four centers, 55 children, 32 parents). Multi-level interventions of child-, parent-, and center-level strategies were conducted for 12 weeks. Children's healthy lifestyle behaviors and obesity status were assessed as daily recommended levels and body mass index ≥85th percentile, respectively. Parents' parenting behaviors were measured by the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity scale. Results: Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed significant improvements in total composite scores of healthy-lifestyle behaviors-including 60-min of moderate physical activity-but not in obesity status among children. Moreover, the intervention group showed significant improvements in parenting behaviors among parents. Conclusion: The multi-level strategies for obesity prevention based on an ecological perspective may be effective for promoting healthy lifestyles among socioeconomically vulnerable children.
-
5.
Predictors of completing a primary health care diabetes prevention intervention programme in people at high risk of type 2 diabetes: Experiences of the DE-PLAN project.
Gilis-Januszewska, A, Lindström, J, Barengo, NC, Tuomilehto, J, Schwarz, PE, Wójtowicz, E, Piwońska-Solska, B, Szybiński, Z, Windak, A, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, A
Medicine. 2018;97(5):e9790
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
As the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) begins to grow, the spotlight is on successful, cost-effective lifestyle interventions to help prevent it. Real-life implementation studies in various settings and with various people have shown than lower cost, less intensive interventions can help prevent T2D. The DE-PLAN (Diabetes in Europe: Prevention Using Lifestyle, Physical Activity and Nutritional Intervention) was implemented across 17 European countries, where it aimed to assess its application but also to create a network of trained professionals to deliver T2D prevention. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with completing the programme in primary healthcare in Poland. The study included nine GP practices in Krakow with 262 people at high risk of T2D (according to the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score). The prevention programme included 11 lifestyle counselling sessions, physical activity sessions and motivational phone calls/letters. Measurements including fasting glucose, body mass index and blood pressure were taken at baseline and 1 year after the programme. People who completed the whole programme were less likely to be employed, less likely to have high blood pressure and ate more fruits and vegetables each day. The authors concluded that people who healthier behaviours were more likely to complete the programme, whereas men and people who work were less likely to complete the programme. More strategies are needed to increase completion with these individuals.
Abstract
It has been shown that real-life implementation studies for the prevention of type 2 diabetes (DM2) performed in different settings and populations can be effective. However, not enough information is available on factors influencing the reach of DM2 prevention programmes. This study examines the predictors of completing an intervention programme targeted at people at high risk of DM2 in Krakow, Poland as part of the DE-PLAN project.A total of 262 middle-aged people, everyday patients of 9 general practitioners' (GP) practices, at high risk of DM2 (Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISK) >14) agreed to participate in the lifestyle intervention to prevent DM2. Intervention consisted of 11 lifestyle counseling sessions, organized physical activity sessions followed by motivational phone calls and letters. Measurements were performed at baseline and 1 year after the initiation of the intervention.Seventy percent of the study participants enrolled completed the core curriculum (n = 184), 22% were men. When compared to noncompleters, completers had a healthier baseline diabetes risk profile (P <.05). People who completed the intervention were less frequently employed versus noncompleters (P = .037), less often had hypertension (P = .043), and more frequently consumed vegetables and fruit daily (P = .055).In multiple logistic regression model, employment reduced the likelihood of completing the intervention 2 times (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.81). Higher glucose 2 hours after glucose load and hypertension were the independent factors decreasing the chance to participate in the intervention (OR 0.79, 95% 0.69-0.92 and OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.99, respectively). Daily consumption of vegetables and fruits increased the likelihood of completing the intervention (OR 1.86, 95% 1.01-3.41).In conclusion, people with healthier behavior and risk profile are more predisposed to complete diabetes prevention interventions. Male, those who work and those with a worse health profile, are less likely to participate and complete interventions. Targeted strategies are needed in real-life diabetes prevention interventions to improve male participation and to reach those who are working as well as people with a higher risk profile.
-
6.
Exercise as adjunctive treatment for alcohol use disorder: A randomized controlled trial.
Roessler, KK, Bilberg, R, Søgaard Nielsen, A, Jensen, K, Ekstrøm, CT, Sari, S
PloS one. 2017;12(10):e0186076
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Treating alcohol-use disorder (AUD) is challenging and multi-faceted thus many analyses suggest the effectiveness of interventions be low. Recent evidence suggests exercise may be a promising addition to intervention in both reducing consumption as well as the co-morbidities linked with AUD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of physical activity as an adjunct to outpatient alcohol treatment on alcohol consumption in 100 patients. Participants were allocated to one of three arms: treatment, treatment with group exercise or treatment with individual exercise, and alcohol intake was measured at six and 12 months after treatment initiation. This study demonstrated that there is no significant effect of physical activity on alcohol consumption, however moderate physical activity was seen to be protective against excessive drinking following treatment. Based on this study as well as the Health Lifestyle Study, the authors support the need for implementing physically active lifestyles for patients in treatment.
Abstract
AIMS: To examine whether physical activity as an adjunct to outpatient alcohol treatment has an effect on alcohol consumption following participation in an exercise intervention of six months' duration, and at 12 months after treatment initiation. METHODS The study is a randomized controlled study with three arms: Patients allocated to (A) treatment as usual, (B) treatment as usual and supervised group exercise, (C) treatment as usual and individual physical exercise. The primary outcome measure was excessive drinking six months after treatment start and completion of the intervention. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the odds of excessive drinking among the three groups, based on intention-to-treat. Changes in level of physical activity in all three groups were tested by using a generalized linear mixed model. A multiple linear model was used to test if there was an association between amount of performed physical activity and alcohol consumption. RESULTS A total of 175 patients (68.6% male) participated. Response rates were 77.7% at six months and 57.1% at 12 months follow-up. OR 0.99 [95% CI: 0.46; 2.14], p = 0.976 for excessive drinking in the group exercise condition, and 1.02 [95% CI: 0.47; 2.18], p = 0.968 in the individual exercise condition, which, when compared to the control group as reference, did not differ statistically significantly. Participants with moderate level physical activity had lower odds for excessive drinking OR = 0.12 [0.05; 0.31], p<0.001 than participants with low level physical activity. Amount of alcohol consumption in the intervention groups decreased by 4% [95% CI: 0.03; 6.8], p = 0.015 for each increased exercising day. CONCLUSIONS No direct effect of physical exercise on drinking outcome was found. Moderate level physical activity was protective against excessive drinking following treatment. A dose-response effect of exercise on drinking outcome supports the need for implementing physically active lifestyles for patients in treatment for alcohol use disorder.