1.
Normalization of Plus Size and the Danger of Unseen Overweight and Obesity in England.
Muttarak, R
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2018;26(7):1125-1129
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
In the United Kingdom more than 25% of adults are classified as clinically obese, thus leading to a normalisation of overweight and obesity. As being 'plus size' becomes more common, there is an increase in weight status misperception that can potentially undermine the recognition of being overweight and its health consequences. The aim of this study was to explore the trends and socio-demographic factors underlying perceived weight status among the overweight or obese population in England. A cross-sectional study was done to collect data through face-to-face interviews and a self-completion questionnaire. The findings of this study showed that there is an increasing trend in misperceiving weight status between both men and women. The authors’ conclude this is possibly reflective of the normalisation of overweight and obesity and that it is vital for obesity prevention programs to consider socioeconomic inequalities for program effectiveness.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate trends and sociodemographic factors underlying weight misperception in adults with overweight and obesity in England. METHODS This study used descriptive and logistic regression analyses based on a pooled nationally representative cross-sectional survey, Health Survey for England, for the years 1997, 1998, 2002, 2014, and 2015 of individuals with BMI ≥ 25 (n = 23,459). The main outcomes were (1) weight misperception and (2) weight-loss attempts as well as the associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and health status. RESULTS The proportion of individuals with overweight and obesity misperceiving their weight status increased over time between 1997 and 2015 (37% to 40% in men; 17% to 19% in women). There were socioeconomic disparities in the misperception of weight status, with lower-educated individuals from poorer-income households and members of minority ethnic groups being more likely to underestimate their weight. Those underestimating their overweight and obesity status were 85% less likely to try to lose weight compared with people who accurately identified their weight status. CONCLUSIONS The upward trend in underassessment of overweight and obesity status in England is possibly a result of the normalization of overweight and obesity. Obesity prevention programs need to consider differential sociodemographic characteristics associated with underassessment of weight status.
2.
Eating at food outlets and leisure places and "on the go" is associated with less-healthy food choices than eating at home and in school in children: cross-sectional data from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Program (2008-2014).
Ziauddeen, N, Page, P, Penney, TL, Nicholson, S, Kirk, SF, Almiron-Roig, E
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2018;107(6):992-1003
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Poor diet in childhood and adolescence has been recognised as a risk factor for obesity during adulthood. Public health research has found the food environment to be an important determinant of diet, specifically for this age group, and the major environments are home, school, and food outlets/leisure places. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the types of food consumed in each environment based on data from 4636 children and adolescents in the United Kingdom. This study showed the most common eating location across all age groups was at home, and this was associated with less sugar and takeaway food consumption. Based on these results, the authors conclude that home and school are both important areas to target for public health policy, however also highlight the importance of providing healthier food options for adolescents outside of these environments.
Abstract
Background: Where children eat has been linked to variations in diet quality, including the consumption of low-nutrient, energy-dense food, a recognized risk factor for obesity. Objective: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of consumption patterns and nutritional intake by eating location in British children with the use of a nationally representative survey. Design: Cross-sectional data from 4636 children (80,075 eating occasions) aged 1.5-18 y from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Program (2008-2014) were analyzed. Eating locations were categorized as home, school, work, leisure places, food outlets, and "on the go." Foods were classified into core (considered important or acceptable within a healthy diet) and noncore (all other foods). Other variables included the percentage of meals eaten at home, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, income, frequency of eating out, takeaway meal consumption, alcohol consumption, and smoking. Results: The main eating location across all age groups was at home (69-79% of eating occasions), with the highest energy intakes. One-third of children from the least-affluent families consumed ≤25% of meals at home. Eating more at home was associated with less sugar and takeaway food consumption. Eating occasions in leisure places, food outlets, and "on the go" combined increased with age, from 5% (1.5-3 y) to 7% (11-18 y), with higher energy intakes from noncore foods in these locations. The school environment was associated with higher intakes of core foods and reduced intakes of noncore foods in children aged 4-10 y who ate school-sourced foods. Conclusions: Home and school eating are associated with better food choices, whereas other locations are associated with poor food choices. Effective, sustained initiatives targeted at behaviors and improving access to healthy foods in leisure centers and food outlets, including food sold to eat "on the go," may improve food choices. Home remains an important target for intervention through family and nutrition education, outreach, and social marketing campaigns. This trial was registered with the ISRTCN registry (https://www.isrctn.com) as ISRCTN17261407.
3.
Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America.
Puhl, RM, Andreyeva, T, Brownell, KD
International journal of obesity (2005). 2008;32(6):992-1000
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Overweight individuals are frequent targets of weight stigmatisation and prejudice. Negative implications include impairments in psychological well-being and physical health. The aim of this study was to document rates and patterns of weight/height discrimination in comparison to other forms of discrimination (based on gender and race) among adults in the United States. Respondents were drawn from a nationally representative sample of community-based English-speaking adults aged 25–74 years in the United States. A total of 2290 individuals (1104 men and 1186 women) were eligible for the study. Results demonstrate greater vulnerability to weight bias among youth at higher levels of obesity, and that women are more vulnerable to weight/height discrimination than men. Authors conclude that the prevalence of weight/height discrimination is high in the United States and it is comparable to rates of racial discrimination.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited data are available on the prevalence and patterns of body weight discrimination from representative samples. This study examined experiences of weight/height discrimination in a nationally representative sample of US adults and compared their prevalence and patterns with discrimination experiences based on race and gender. METHOD AND PROCEDURES Data were from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, a 1995-1996 community-based survey of English-speaking adults aged 25-74 (N=2290). Reported experiences of weight/height discrimination included a variety of institutional settings and interpersonal relationships. Multivariate regression analyses were used to predict weight/height discrimination controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and body weight status. RESULTS The prevalence of weight/height discrimination ranged from 5% among men to 10% among women, but these average percentages obscure the much higher risk of weight discrimination among heavier individuals (40% for adults with body mass index (BMI) of 35 and above). Younger individuals with a higher BMI had a particularly high risk of weight/height discrimination regardless of their race, education and weight status. Women were at greater risk for weight/height discrimination than men, especially women with a BMI of 30-35 who were three times more likely to report weight/height discrimination compared to male peers of a similar weight. DISCUSSION Weight/height discrimination is prevalent in American society and is relatively close to reported rates of racial discrimination, particularly among women. Both institutional forms of weight/height discrimination (for example, in employment settings) and interpersonal mistreatment due to weight/height (for example, being called names) were common, and in some cases were even more prevalent than discrimination due to gender and race.
4.
Being 'fat' in today's world: a qualitative study of the lived experiences of people with obesity in Australia.
Thomas, SL, Hyde, J, Karunaratne, A, Herbert, D, Komesaroff, PA
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. 2008;11(4):321-30
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The obesity epidemic is one of the most pressing contemporary public health problems. The aim of this study was to develop a picture of both lived experiences of obesity and the impact of socio-cultural factors on obesity. The study adopted a qualitative research design (n=76) . A broad interview schedule was developed by the authors aimed at individuals from a broad range of backgrounds and experiences of obesity. Results indicate that: (a) the experiences of obesity are diverse but there are common themes. (b) people living with obesity have heard the messages but find it difficult to act upon them. (c) interventions should be tailored to address both individual and community needs. (d) there should be a different approach towards obesity interventions. Authors conclude that interventions should respond directly to the social and cultural dimensions of communities and clusters of individuals.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop an in-depth picture of both lived experience of obesity and the impact of socio-cultural factors on people living with obesity. DESIGN Qualitative methodology, utilizing in-depth semi-structured interviews with a community sample of obese adults (body mass index >or=30). Community sampling methods were supplemented with purposive sampling techniques to ensure a diverse range of individuals were included. RESULTS Seventy-six individuals (aged 16-72) were interviewed. Most had struggled with their weight for most of their lives (n=45). Almost all had experienced stigma and discrimination in childhood (n=36), as adolescents (n=41) or as adults (n=72). About half stated that they had been humiliated by health professionals because of their weight. Participants felt an individual responsibility to lose weight, and many tried extreme forms of dieting to do so. Participants described an increasing culture of 'blame' against people living with obesity perpetuated by media and public health messages. Eighty percent said that they hated or disliked the word obesity and would rather be called fat or overweight. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION There are four key conclusions: (i) the experiences of obesity are diverse, but there are common themes, (ii) people living with obesity have heard the messages but find it difficult to act upon them, (iii) interventions should be tailored to address both individual and community needs and (iv) we need to rethink how to approach obesity interventions to ensure that avoid recapitulating damaging social stereotypes and exacerbating social inequalities.