-
1.
Improving stress management, anxiety, and mental well-being in medical students through an online Mindfulness-Based Intervention: a randomized study.
Fazia, T, Bubbico, F, Nova, A, Buizza, C, Cela, H, Iozzi, D, Calgan, B, Maggi, F, Floris, V, Sutti, I, et al
Scientific reports. 2023;13(1):8214
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Medical students commonly experience anxiety, depression, burnout and emotional discomfort due to the pressures of medical school. This randomised, controlled study of 362 medical students at Italian Universities evaluated the effectiveness of a 5-week online mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), consisting of an introductory session, 8 sessions of 35 min integral meditation and 10 min yoga, and one dietary advice/question and answer session with a nutritionist. The control group received no intervention. Effectiveness was measured through a variety of validated questionnaires for perceived stress, anxiety, wellbeing, emotional health, resilience and cognition. Overall, at baseline, participants of this study fared worse for stress than other studies had shown for general populations. The MBI was effective in improving perceived stress, mental wellbeing, emotional regulation, resilience, tendency to mind-wandering, ability to maintain attention and overall distress, although effect sizes for all outcomes were small. No statistically significant effect was seen for the anxiety rating. Interestingly, two cohorts were included in this study and whilst one benefitted from the programme, the other did not, one explanation of which may be that they were done during different phases of the COVID pandemic. The authors conclude that adopting MBI may help improve students’ wellbeing.
Abstract
Pressures and responsibilities of medical school put a strain on medical student's personal wellbeing, leading among all to high rates of anxiety, emotional discomfort and stress. In this work we evaluated the effectiveness of a comprehensive Mindfulness-Based Intervention (MBI) in reducing this load. The intervention comprised 10 twice-a-week Integral Meditation classes, dietary advice, and brief yoga sessions. We performed a randomized trial on two cohort of medical students from Italian universities: 239 in cohort 1 (106 treated and 133 controls), and 123 in cohort 2 (68 treated and 55 control) for a total sample of 362 students. Nine questionnaires for evaluating the effectiveness of our intervention on stress (PSS), state anxiety (STAIX-1), well-being (WEMWBS), mind-wandering (MW-S), overall distress (PANAS), emotion regulation (DERS), resilience (RS-14), and attentional control (ACS-C and ACS-D) were collected both pre and post intervention. Linear mixed effect models were run on the whole sample showing that, after multiple testing correction, our intervention was effective in reducing perceived stress (β = - 2.57 [- 4.02; - 1.12], p = 0.004), improving mental well-being (β = 2.82 [1.02; 4.63], p = 0.008) and emotional regulation (β = - 8.24 [- 12.98; - 3.51], p = 0.004), resilience (β = 3.79 [1.32; 6.26], p = 0.008), reducing the tendency to wander with the mind (β = - 0.70 [- 0.99; - 0.39], p = 0.0001), ameliorating the ability to maintain attention (AC-S (β = - 0.23 [- 0.44; - 0.02], p = 0.04) and AC-D (β = - 0.19 [- 0.36; - 0.01], p = 0.04)), and the overall distress (β = 1.84 [0.45; 3.23], p = 0.02).
-
2.
A randomized trial of probiotic supplementation in nurses to reduce stress and viral illness.
Slykerman, RF, Li, E
Scientific reports. 2022;12(1):14742
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dynamic communication occurs between the gut microbiota and the central nervous system along multiple physiological pathways. Stress increases glucocorticoid production and activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, affecting immunological function and neuronal changes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether supplementation with the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 could reduce symptoms of stress and anxiety and improve psychological wellbeing in nurses working during the COVID19 pandemic. This study was a large double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of probiotic supplementation with two parallel arms and a ratio of allocation to probiotic or placebo of 1:1. Results showed that following the intervention, stress, anxiety, and psychological wellbeing were not significantly different between nurses supplemented with the probiotic and those who received the placebo. Furthermore, the average number of days per week that nurses reported symptoms of cold or flu-like illness did not significantly differ between the probiotic and placebo supplemented groups. Authors conclude that there weren’t significant differences in outcomes between the probiotic and placebo groups.
Abstract
Animal studies demonstrate how the gut microbiota influence psychological health and immunity to viral infections through their actions along multiple dynamic pathways in the body. Considerable interest exists in probiotics to reduce stress and illness symptoms through beneficial effects in the gut, but translating pre-clinical evidence from animal models into humans remains challenging. We conducted a large trial in nurses working during the 2020 COVID19 pandemic year to establish whether daily ingestion of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 reduced perceived stress and the number of days participants reported symptoms of a viral illness. Our results showed no significant difference in perceived stress or the average number of illness days between probiotic supplemented nurses and the placebo group. Stress and viral illness symptoms reduced during the study for all participants, a trajectory likely influenced by societal-level factors. The powerful effect of a well-managed public health response to the COVID19 pandemic and the elimination of COVID19 from the community in 2020 may have altered the trajectory of stress levels and reduced circulating viral infections making it difficult to detect any effect of probiotic supplementation. Our study highlights the challenge in controlling environmental factors in human trials.
-
3.
Effects of sandplay therapy in reducing emotional and behavioural problems in school-age children with chronic diseases: A randomized controlled trial.
Tan, J, Yin, H, Meng, T, Guo, X
Nursing open. 2021;8(6):3099-3110
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Children with chronic diseases are more likely to suffer emotional-behavioural problems than healthy children, which can also impact the family. Sandplay has successfully been used as a therapy in children with autism spectrum disorder and this randomised control trial aimed to determine the effect of sandplay therapy in 62 children with chronic diseases and their caregivers. The results showed that sandplay reduced anxiety, depression, withdrawal and social behavioural problems and improved behaviour in children with chronic diseases. Depression and anxiety were also improved in the caregivers of those children who participated in sandplay. It was concluded that sandplay therapy is an effective clinical tool to improve several psychological domains in children with chronic diseases.
Abstract
PURPOSE Children with chronic diseases exhibit a higher incidence of emotional-behavioural problems. Though sandplay therapy is a universally recognized psychological treatment method, experimental evidence for this form of therapy is lacking. Our aims were to examine the effectiveness of sandplay therapy in reducing emotional and behavioural problems in school-age children with chronic diseases as well as anxiety and depression in their caregivers. DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 60 children and their caregivers were enrolled in the present study between January and October 2019. A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China. Participants were divided into an intervention and a control group. Both groups received regular treatment, and the intervention group received additional sandplay therapy. Four behavioural rating scales were used to evaluate the differences between the two groups. The children's scores on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) before and after the intervention were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was also employed to compare the median results before and after treatment. RESULTS The total scores for CBCL, anxiety and depression, withdrawal, and social behavioural problems for children in the intervention group were all lower than the corresponding scores for those in the control group (p < .05). The EPQ scores for emotional stability and psychosis in the intervention group were both lower than those in the control group (p < .05). The SAS and SDS scores for the caregivers of children in the intervention group were also lower than the corresponding scores for those in the control group (p < .05). CONCLUSION Sandplay therapy can reduce anxiety, withdrawal, and social behavioural problems in school-age children with chronic diseases, as well as relieve anxiety and depression symptoms in their caregivers. Our study provided evidence for the clinical application of sandplay therapy and highlights the importance of offering and integrating psychological treatment in clinical nursing care.
-
4.
Effectiveness of Mindfulness Meditation vs Headache Education for Adults With Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Wells, RE, O'Connell, N, Pierce, CR, Estave, P, Penzien, DB, Loder, E, Zeidan, F, Houle, TT
JAMA internal medicine. 2021;181(3):317-328
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), a standardized mind-body treatment that teaches momentary awareness with decreased sensory percept judgment, is associated with improvements in many chronic pain conditions. Mindfulness may be particularly helpful for migraine, as it diminishes affective responses to stress, the most common migraine trigger. This study is a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial of MBSR vs headache education for adults with migraine. The study enrolled 96 participants out of which 89 participants attended at least 1 class and completed at least 1 headache log (MBSR, 45; headache education, 44) across 7 cohorts. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two arms. Results indicate that participants in both groups demonstrated a reduction of migraine days per month from baseline at 12 weeks. Furthermore, both groups sustained reductions in frequency of migraine and headache without group differences. Compared with headache education, MBSR participants had improvements in headache-related disability, quality of life, depression scores, self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, and decreased experimentally induced pain intensity and unpleasantness out to 36 weeks. Authors conclude that mindfulness may help treat the total burden of migraine. However, a larger, more definitive study is needed to understand the impact of mindfulness on migraine.
Abstract
Importance: Migraine is the second leading cause of disability worldwide. Most patients with migraine discontinue medications due to inefficacy or adverse effects. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) may provide benefit. Objective: To determine if MBSR improves migraine outcomes and affective/cognitive processes compared with headache education. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial of MBSR vs headache education included 89 adults who experienced between 4 and 20 migraine days per month. There was blinding of participants (to active vs comparator group assignments) and principal investigators/data analysts (to group assignment). Interventions: Participants underwent MBSR (standardized training in mindfulness/yoga) or headache education (migraine information) delivered in groups that met for 2 hours each week for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in migraine day frequency (baseline to 12 weeks). Secondary outcomes were changes in disability, quality of life, self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, depression scores, and experimentally induced pain intensity and unpleasantness (baseline to 12, 24, and 36 weeks). Results: Most participants were female (n = 82, 92%), with a mean (SD) age of 43.9 (13.0) years, and had a mean (SD) of 7.3 (2.7) migraine days per month and high disability (Headache Impact Test-6: 63.5 [5.7]), attended class (median attendance, 7 of 8 classes), and followed up through 36 weeks (33 of 45 [73%] of the MBSR group and 32 of 44 [73%] of the headache education group). Participants in both groups had fewer migraine days at 12 weeks (MBSR: -1.6 migraine days per month; 95% CI, -0.7 to -2.5; headache education: -2.0 migraine days per month; 95% CI, -1.1 to -2.9), without group differences (P = .50). Compared with those who participated in headache education, those who participated in MBSR had improvements from baseline at all follow-up time points (reported in terms of point estimates of effect differences between groups) on measures of disability (5.92; 95% CI, 2.8-9.0; P < .001), quality of life (5.1; 95% CI, 1.2-8.9; P = .01), self-efficacy (8.2; 95% CI, 0.3-16.1; P = .04), pain catastrophizing (5.8; 95% CI, 2.9-8.8; P < .001), depression scores (1.6; 95% CI, 0.4-2.7; P = .008), and decreased experimentally induced pain intensity and unpleasantness (MBSR group: 36.3% [95% CI, 12.3% to 60.3%] decrease in intensity and 30.4% [95% CI, 9.9% to 49.4%] decrease in unpleasantness; headache education group: 13.5% [95% CI, -9.9% to 36.8%] increase in intensity and an 11.2% [95% CI, -8.9% to 31.2%] increase in unpleasantness; P = .004 for intensity and .005 for unpleasantness, at 36 weeks). One reported adverse event was deemed unrelated to study protocol. Conclusions and Relevance: Mindfulness-based stress reduction did not improve migraine frequency more than headache education, as both groups had similar decreases; however, MBSR improved disability, quality of life, self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, and depression out to 36 weeks, with decreased experimentally induced pain suggesting a potential shift in pain appraisal. In conclusion, MBSR may help treat total migraine burden, but a larger, more definitive study is needed to further investigate these results. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02695498.
-
5.
Using psychoneuroimmunity against COVID-19.
Kim, SW, Su, KP
Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2020;87:4-5
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This viewpoint article raises awareness of the threat of COVID-19 poses to psychiatric patients who are in mental health hospitals. Those patients appear to have a much elevated mortality rate and are potentially more vulnerable to the effects of panic/anxiety due to the pandemic. Their lifestyle choices, influenced by fears about the virus, may also have a negative effect on their immunity. The article also raises the issue of the effects the pandemic and associated changes to day-to-day life can have on the mental and general health of the rest of the population, and in particular to mental health professionals, whose ability to care for their psychiatric patients may be impaired. The authors also briefly discuss the psychological and immunological mechanisms that connect our mental state to the ability of our immune system to fight infections, and the impact of our lifestyles and environments. To summarise they state that infected patients, uninfected quarantined individuals and medical professionals all require mental health supporting strategies, and that epidemiological studies of potential long-term psychiatric consequences are essential.
Abstract
The worldwide outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) raises concerns of widespread panic and anxiety in individuals subjected to the real or perceived threat of the virus. Compared to general populations, patients who are institutionalized in a closed unit are also very vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and complications. This crisis touched on difficult issues of not only psychiatric care and ethics, but also psychological impacts to psychiatric care givers. In this Viewpoint, we address both physical and biopsychosocial aspects of this infection, as well as the psychoneuroimmunity of preventive strategies of healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, balanced nutrition, quality sleep and a strong connection with people. Social distancing and wearing masks might help us from pathogen exposure, yet such these measures also prevent us from expressing compassion and friendliness. Therefore, all forms of psychological support should be routinely implemented not only to consider psychological resilience but also to enhance psychoneuroimmunity against COVID-19.
-
6.
Anxiety reduction through art therapy in women. Exploring stress regulation and executive functioning as underlying neurocognitive mechanisms.
Abbing, A, de Sonneville, L, Baars, E, Bourne, D, Swaab, H
PloS one. 2019;14(12):e0225200
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Anxiety treatments currently involve medication and changing an individual’s beliefs through cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Art therapy (AT) is often used as a CBT treatment strategy, although little is known about its effectiveness. This randomised control trial of 47 adult women with anxiety aimed to understand the role of AT in anxiety treatment over three months. The results showed improvements in self-reported measures of anxiety, the ability to control emotions, memory and the ability to manage tasks with AT, however subjects were just as susceptible to stress following treatment. It was concluded that anxiety reduction was related to improvements in emotions, memory and task management and this was as a result of AT. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend AT to individuals with symptoms of anxiety as part of their treatment management plan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore possible working mechanisms of anxiety reduction in women with anxiety disorders, treated with art therapy (AT). METHODS A RCT comparing AT versus waiting list (WL) condition on aspects of self-regulation. Stress regulation (heart rate and heart rate variability) and executive functioning (daily behavioural and cognitive performance aspects of executive functioning (EF)) were evaluated in a pre-post design. Participants were women, aged 18-65 years with moderate to severe anxiety symptoms. RESULTS Effectiveness of AT compared to WL was demonstrated in a higher resting HRV post treatment, improvements in aspects of self-reported daily EF (emotion control, working memory, plan/organize and task monitor), but not in cognitive performance of EF, stress responsiveness and down regulation of stress. The decrease in anxiety level was associated with improvements in self-reported daily EF. CONCLUSIONS AT improves resting HRV and aspects of EF, the latter was associated with art therapy-related anxiety reduction.
-
7.
Healthy ageing at work- Efficacy of group interventions on the mental health of nurses aged 45 and older: Results of a randomised, controlled trial.
Maatouk, I, Müller, A, Angerer, P, Schmook, R, Nikendei, C, Herbst, K, Gantner, M, Herzog, W, Gündel, H
PloS one. 2018;13(1):e0191000
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
According to the German statistics office, nurses frequently suffer from emotional distress or mental disorders, due to the physical and social demands of the nursing profession in comparison to other professions. The high psychological burden was one of the main factors that was associated with an intention to leave the nursing profession by nurses. The aim of this study was to implement an intervention programme for nursing staff aged 45 and older, with the primary purpose of reducing work-related distress in order to maintain mental health and wellbeing until retirement age. The intervention included several strategies for stress prevention including group dynamic principles and cognitive behavioural techniques. Nurses attended seven weekly session of 120 min with a booster session after six weeks as part of a randomised control trial carried out in four hospital sites in Germany. The outcomes were measured via self –reported questionnaire. Significant positive effects were noted in relation to mental health, but with regards to psychological health only small significant effect was noted in the intervention group. The authors concluded that the ageing workforce should be reached via a specifically designed intervention adapted to their profession.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a small-group intervention promoting successful ageing at work in older nurses (aged ≥45). METHOD A sample of 115 nurses aged ≥45 from 4 trial sites in Germany were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG), that received a small-group intervention of seven weekly sessions of 120 min with a booster session after six weeks or to a wait-list control condition (WLC). Outcomes were measured via validated self-report questionnaires at baseline (T1) and at post-treatment (T2). Primary outcomes were mental health-related well-being and mental health-related quality of life (QOL). The secondary outcomes included mental health-related and work-related measures. RESULTS The intention to treat (ITT) analysis showed significant positive effects of the intervention on mental health. A significant small effect (d = 0.3) in favour of the IG was found for psychological health-related quality of life. Positive small effects (d = 0.24 to d = 0.31) were also found for work related mental strain. CONCLUSIONS Our small-group intervention based on a theory of successful ageing for nurses aged ≥45 was found to be effective with regard to improvements of psychological health related quality of life and other mental health-related outcomes. Thus, our study shows that the ageing workforce can be reached through specifically designed preventive interventions. The components of our intervention could be easily adapted to the belongings of other professions. Our results suggest that these components should be evaluated in various settings outside the healthcare sector.
-
8.
A mindfulness-based intervention to increase resilience to stress in university students (the Mindful Student Study): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Galante, J, Dufour, G, Vainre, M, Wagner, AP, Stochl, J, Benton, A, Lathia, N, Howarth, E, Jones, PB
The Lancet. Public health. 2018;3(2):e72-e81
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There has been a recent increase in students accessing university counselling services, though the reasons for this are currently unclear. Mindfulness-based stress reduction has gained increased attention as evidence has shown mindfulness training can improve anxiety and depression. The aim of this trial was to therefore assess whether a mindfulness course, Mindfulness Skills for Students (MSS), would improve university students’ resilience to stress. Participants were randomly assigned to either enrol in the 8-week MSS course alongside mental health support or receive mental health support alone. A total of 449 participants completed the study and self-reported psychological distress was the primary outcome. Students enrolled in MSS showed reduced distress scores during the examination period compared with those receiving support as usual. Based on these results, the authors conclude that offering mindfulness training could be an effective, feasible component of a wider university mental health strategies. Further controlled studies are required to better understand preventative mental health interventions for students.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rising number of young people going to university has led to concerns about an increasing demand for student mental health services. We aimed to assess whether provision of mindfulness courses to university students would improve their resilience to stress. METHODS We did this pragmatic randomised controlled trial at the University of Cambridge, UK. Students aged 18 years or older with no severe mental illness or crisis (self-assessed) were randomly assigned (1:1), via remote survey software using computer-generated random numbers, to receive either an 8 week mindfulness course adapted for university students (Mindfulness Skills for Students [MSS]) plus mental health support as usual, or mental health support as usual alone. Participants and the study management team were aware of group allocation, but allocation was concealed from the researchers, outcome assessors, and study statistician. The primary outcome was self-reported psychological distress during the examination period, as measured with the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), with higher scores indicating more distress. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12615001160527. FINDINGS Between Sept 28, 2015, and Jan 15, 2016, we randomly assigned 616 students to the MSS group (n=309) or the support as usual group (n=307). 453 (74%) participants completed the CORE-OM during the examination period and 182 (59%) MSS participants completed at least half of the course. MSS reduced distress scores during the examination period compared with support as usual, with mean CORE-OM scores of 0·87 (SD 0·50) in 237 MSS participants versus 1·11 (0·57) in 216 support as usual participants (adjusted mean difference -0·14, 95% CI -0·22 to -0·06; p=0·001), showing a moderate effect size (β -0·44, 95% CI -0·60 to -0·29; p<0·0001). 123 (57%) of 214 participants in the support as usual group had distress scores above an accepted clinical threshold compared with 88 (37%) of 235 participants in the MSS group. On average, six students (95% CI four to ten) needed to be offered the MSS course to prevent one from experiencing clinical levels of distress. No participants had adverse reactions related to self-harm, suicidality, or harm to others. INTERPRETATION Our findings show that provision of mindfulness training could be an effective component of a wider student mental health strategy. Further comparative effectiveness research with inclusion of controls for non-specific effects is needed to define a range of additional, effective interventions to increase resilience to stress in university students. FUNDING University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East of England.
-
9.
The influence of hazardous drinking on psychological functioning, stress and sleep during and after treatment in patients with mental health problems: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled intervention study.
Strid, C, Andersson, C, Öjehagen, A
BMJ open. 2018;8(3):e019128
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Hazardous drinking can negatively affect physical and mental health. It is unclear how hazardous drinking influences the chance of success of treatment in people with mental health problems. The aim of this study was to examine whether hazardous drinking, measured using a scale called AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption), influences psychological functioning, stress and sleep, during and after treatment in patients with mental ill health. This study was part of a larger trial aimed at comparing Internet-based cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) and physical exercise with usual treatment on patients with mental ill health. The study involved 871 participants who completed the AUDIT at baseline and were assessed during and after treatment on psychological functioning, stress and sleep. At baseline, hazardous drinkers were more depressed and had lower scores on psychological functioning than non-hazardous drinkers, while there were no differences on stress and sleep. During the follow-ups, hazardous drinking negatively influenced perception of stress, and the results remained after controlling for depression. There were no differences during the follow-ups regarding psychological functioning and sleep. The findings of the study emphasise the importance of screening for alcohol habits in mental health patients, since risky drinking may affect the outcomes of treatment.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hazardous drinking could negatively affect health and lead to alcohol use disorders, but it is unclear how hazardous drinking affects treatment outcomes of depression and anxiety and stress-related mental health problems. The aim of this study was to examine whether hazardous drinking, measured by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C), influences the outcomes of repeated assessments of psychological functioning (Outcome Questionnaire-45), stress (Perceived Stress Scale) and sleep (Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire), during and after treatment in patients with mental ill health. METHODS The study was conducted within REGASSA, a randomised controlled trial aimed at comparing Internet-based cognitive-behaviour therapy and physical exercise with treatment as usual on primary care patients with mental ill health. The study involved 871 participants who completed the AUDIT at baseline and who were assessed repeatedly during and after treatment on psychological functioning, stress and sleep by interactive voice response, a computerised, automated telephone technology. RESULTS At baseline, hazardous drinkers were more depressed and had lower scores on psychological functioning than non-hazardous drinkers, while there were no differences on stress and sleep. During the follow-ups, hazardous drinking negatively influenced perceived stress, that is, hazardous drinkers seemed to have less treatment effect on stress, and the results remained after controlling for depression. There were no differences during the follow-ups regarding psychological functioning and sleep. CONCLUSIONS Hazardous drinking negatively influenced perceived stress. The findings of the study emphasise the importance of screening for alcohol habits in mental ill-health patients, since risky drinking may affect the outcomes of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00008745; Post-results.