1.
Effect of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Acute Fracture Healing: A Phase II Screening Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Slobogean, GP, Bzovsky, S, O'Hara, NN, Marchand, LS, Hannan, ZD, Demyanovich, HK, Connelly, DW, Adachi, JD, Thabane, L, Sprague, S
JBMR plus. 2023;7(1):e10705
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Almost half of all adult patients with fractures are vitamin D deficient. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of different vitamin D regimens on the healing of acute tibia and femur fractures. 102 18-50-year-old patients were enrolled in the study and randomised to receive a) two high doses (150,000 IU) at time of injury and after 6 weeks, b) 4000 IU daily, c) 600 IU daily or d) placebo for 3 months. After 3 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the 3 intervention groups with respect to clinical or radiographic outcomes of fracture healing. The authors report a significantly better clinical, but not radiographic, outcome for 4000 IU per day versus placebo with a p-value of 0.15 (note: generally, to be considered statistically significant, p should be < 0.05). Similar results were observed after 12 months. There was no significant correlation between vitamin D levels and fracture healing. The authors concluded that high dose vitamin D may confer a modest benefit for fracture healing but that this requires confirmation from a larger clinical trial.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The evidence base for the use of vitamin D supplements in isolation to support fracture healing is weak.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
- Low levels of vitamin D can have negative effects on bone metabolism and healing of fractures
- Almost half of all adult fracture patients are vitamin D deficient
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of supplementing vitamin D3 (VD3) to improve tibia and femur fracture healing.
Methods
- Four-arm, double-blind, randomised, phase II screening, placebo-controlled trial
- 102 adult patients (aged 18-50 years) with a non-osteoporotic tibial or femoral shaft fracture were randomised into 1 of 4 treatment groups
- Just over half (56%) of participants were vitamin D3 deficient at baseline
- Intervention groups: 1) 150,000 IU VD3 loading dose at injury and at 6 weeks (high loading) plus daily placebo; 2) placebo loading doses plus 4000 IU VD3 daily (high dose); 3) placebo loading doses plus 600 IU VD3 daily (low dose); 4) placebo loading dose plus placebo daily
- Duration: 3 months intervention, further 9 months follow-up. Vitamin D levels were assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months.
Primary outcome measures at 3 months:
- Clinical assessment using the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT)
- Radiographic assessment using the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST).
Secondary outcomes: as above at 6, 9 and 12 months.
Results at 3 months:
- No statistically significant difference between high loading and high dose, high and low dose or low dose and placebo for either clinical or radiological assessment (all p-values ≥0.4)
- Post-hoc analysis of any dose vs placebo showed no significant difference with either clinical or radiological assessment (all p-values ≥0.25)
- Post-hoc analysis of high dose vs placebo showed no significant difference for radiological assessment (p=0.76) whilst it was reported as statistically significant for clinical assessment with p=0.16, with a benefit of VD3 supplementation.
- Similar results were seen at 12 months with reported benefit of high dose VD3 for fracture healing with p=0.18
- Vitamin D levels improved in all 3 VD3 groups from baseline to 6 weeks
- There was no statistically significant correlation between fracture healing and vitamin D level.
Conclusion
The authors conclude that VD3 supplementation may be of modest benefit for fracture healing, but further, larger trials are needed to confirm this.
Clinical practice applications:
- When working with clients who present with a fracture, it should be noted that the evidence for benefit of vitamin D supplementation alone for fracture healing is weak.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger studies to increase the statistical power to detect smaller benefits are required
- Larger studies may also identify differences in potential benefits between patient populations with different baseline levels of vitamin D.
Abstract
Nearly half of adult fracture patients are vitamin D deficient (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels <20 ng/mL). Many surgeons advocate prescribing vitamin D supplements to improve fracture healing outcomes; however, data supporting the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplements to improve acute fracture healing are lacking. We tested the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation for improving tibia and femur fracture healing. We conducted a single-center, double-blinded phase II screening randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Patients aged 18-50 years receiving an intramedullary nail for a tibia or femoral shaft fracture were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive (i) 150,000 IU loading dose vitamin D3 at injury and 6 weeks (n = 27); (ii) 4000 IU vitamin D3 daily (n = 24); (iii) 600 IU vitamin D3 daily (n = 24); or (iv) placebo (n = 27). Primary outcomes were clinical fracture healing (Function IndeX for Trauma [FIX-IT]) and radiographic fracture healing (Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures [RUST]) at 3 months. One hundred two patients with a mean age of 29 years (standard deviation 8) were randomized. The majority were male (69%), and 56% were vitamin D3 deficient at baseline. Ninety-nine patients completed the 3-month follow-up. In our prespecified comparisons, no clinically important or statistically significant differences were detected in RUST or FIX-IT scores between groups when measured at 3 months and over 12 months. However, in a post hoc comparison, high doses of vitamin D3 were associated with improved clinical fracture healing relative to placebo at 3 months (mean difference [MD] 0.90, 80% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 1.79; p = 0.16) and within 12 months (MD 0.89, 80% CI, 0.05 to 1.74; p = 0.18). The study was designed to identify potential evidence to support the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation in improving acute fracture healing. Vitamin D3 supplementation, particularly high doses, might modestly improve acute tibia or femoral shaft fracture healing in healthy adults, but confirmatory studies are required. The Vita-Shock trial was awarded the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's (OTA) Bovill Award in 2020. This award is presented annually to the authors of the most outstanding OTA Annual Meeting scientific paper. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
2.
The association of calcium and vitamin D with risk of colorectal adenomas.
Hartman, TJ, Albert, PS, Snyder, K, Slattery, ML, Caan, B, Paskett, E, Iber, F, Kikendall, JW, Marshall, J, Shike, M, et al
The Journal of nutrition. 2005;135(2):252-9
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Calcium and vitamin D may play a role in colorectal cancer incidence. One possible explanation is that they may act synergistically on a number of mechanisms to protect against recurrence of colonic adenomas. The aim of the study was to determine the effects of a high-fibre, high-fruit and vegetable, and low-fat diet on the recurrence of adenomatous polyps in the large bowel. For the present study, 1905 participants from the 2079 Polyp Prevention Trial participants who completed the full trial follow-up were evaluated. The participants’ diet was assessed at baseline and annually, and they also received full colonoscopies at baseline, their 1-year visit and at the end of the trial i.e. 4 years after randomization. Results show that there were no significant associations between any of the adenoma recurrence outcome variables and dietary or total calcium intake, consumption of low or high-fat dairy products or dietary vitamin D intake. However, total vitamin D intake was weakly inversely associated with adenoma recurrence. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation were also inversely associated with single and multiple adenoma recurrence. The study shows that calcium and vitamin D intake may provide weakly protective associations with the risk for recurrence of adenoma polyps.
Abstract
The Polyp Prevention Trial (PPT) was a multicenter randomized clinical trial designed to determine the effects of a high-fiber, high-fruit and vegetable, low-fat diet on the recurrence of adenomatous polyps in the large bowel. Detailed dietary intake and supplement use data were collected at baseline and at each of 4 annual study visits. Adenoma recurrence was ascertained by complete colonoscopy at baseline and after 1 and 4 y. Recurrence was found in 754 of the 1905 trial participants. We evaluated the association between calcium and vitamin D intake and adenomatous polyp recurrence after adjusting for intervention group, age, gender, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, total energy intake, and the interaction of gender and intervention group. Vitamin D models were also adjusted for the location of the clinic site. Dietary variables were adjusted for total energy intake via the residual method. There were no overall significant associations between adenoma recurrence and dietary calcium intake [odds ratio (OR) for the 5th compared with the lowest quintile = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.67-1.23; P-trend = 0.68], total calcium intake (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.62-1.18; P-trend = 0.20), or dietary vitamin D intake (OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.69-1.25; P-trend = 0.43) averaged over follow-up. Total vitamin D intake was weakly inversely associated with adenoma recurrence (OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.62-1.13; P-trend = 0.03). Supplemental calcium and vitamin D use during follow-up also were inversely associated with adenoma recurrence (OR for any compared with no use = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.68-0.99; and OR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.68-0.99; for calcium and vitamin D, respectively). Slightly stronger associations were noted for the prevention of multiple recurrences. Our analyses did not suggest a significant effect modification between total calcium and total vitamin D intake (P = 0.14) on risk for adenoma recurrence. This trial cohort provides some evidence that calcium and vitamin D may be inversely associated with adenoma recurrence.