1.
Comparing Acute, High Dietary Protein and Carbohydrate Intake on Transcriptional Biomarkers, Fuel Utilisation and Exercise Performance in Trained Male Runners.
Furber, M, Pyle, S, Roberts, M, Roberts, J
Nutrients. 2021;13(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dietary modification to improve exercise endurance has become a popular strategy. The reduction of carbohydrates to enhance adaptations due to training has been shown on a cellular level. In low carbohydrate diets, fat is the usual substitute, however long-term adherence to this is often difficult. Using protein instead of fat may be an alternative, but there is little research on this. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a short-term high-protein, reduced carbohydrate diet compared to a high-carbohydrate diet in combination with endurance running on exercise performance and cellular adaptations. The results showed that any cellular adaptations were due to fuel availability, rather than the fuel type and that a high protein diet compromised high intensity exercise performance. It was concluded that a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet in combination with endurance training is of no benefit to endurance running performance. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend that athletes and especially runners who wish to improve endurance do not switch to a high-protein, low carbohydrate diet and that other dietary modifications are investigated.
Abstract
Manipulating dietary macronutrient intake may modulate adaptive responses to exercise, and improve endurance performance. However, there is controversy as to the impact of short-term dietary modification on athletic performance. In a parallel-groups, repeated measures study, 16 trained endurance runners (maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max): 64.2 ± 5.6 mL·kg-1·min-1) were randomly assigned to, and provided with, either a high-protein, reduced-carbohydrate (PRO) or a high-carbohydrate (CHO) isocaloric-matched diet. Participants maintained their training load over 21-consecutive days with dietary intake consisting of 7-days habitual intake (T1), 7-days intervention diet (T2) and 7-days return to habitual intake (T3). Following each 7-day dietary period (T1-T3), a micro-muscle biopsy was taken for assessment of gene expression, before participants underwent laboratory assessment of a 10 km treadmill run at 75% V˙O2max, followed by a 95% V˙O2max time to exhaustion (TTE) trial. The PRO diet resulted in a modest change (1.37-fold increase, p = 0.016) in AMPK expression, coupled with a significant increase in fat oxidation (0.29 ± 0.05 to 0.59 ± 0.05 g·min-1, p < 0.0001). However, a significant reduction of 23.3% (p = 0.0003) in TTE post intervention was observed; this reverted back to pre levels following a return to the habitual diet. In the CHO group, whilst no change in sub-maximal fuel utilisation occurred at T2, a significant 6.5% increase in TTE performance (p = 0.05), and a modest, but significant, increase in AMPK (p = 0.042) and PPAR (p = 0.029) mRNA expression compared to T1 were observed; with AMPK (p = 0.011) and PPAR (p = 0.044) remaining significantly elevated at T3. In conclusion, a 7-day isocaloric high protein diet significantly compromised high intensity exercise performance in trained runners with no real benefit on gene markers of training adaptation. A significant increase in fat oxidation during submaximal exercise was observed post PRO intervention, but this returned to pre levels once the habitual diet was re-introduced, suggesting that the response was driven via fuel availability rather than cellular adaptation. A short-term high protein, low carbohydrate diet in combination with endurance training is not preferential for endurance running performance.
2.
Effect of Low-Fat vs Low-Carbohydrate Diet on 12-Month Weight Loss in Overweight Adults and the Association With Genotype Pattern or Insulin Secretion: The DIETFITS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Gardner, CD, Trepanowski, JF, Del Gobbo, LC, Hauser, ME, Rigdon, J, Ioannidis, JPA, Desai, M, King, AC
JAMA. 2018;319(7):667-679
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity is a major public health challenge and different dietary strategies are employed to lose weight. This randomised clinical trial of 609 obese adults between the age of 18 and 50 aimed to determine the effects of a healthy low-fat diet in comparison to a healthy low-carbohydrate diet on weight change over a 12 month period. The study also assessed whether 3 genetic markers and blood sugar management affected weight loss in the 2 groups. Participants in the study were offered 22 group sessions of health coaching to support adherence to the programme. 481 participants completed the study. The low-carbohydrate group lost on average 6kg and the low-fat group lost on average 5.4kg. The difference between the 2 groups did not achieve significance for weight loss. There was also no significant genetic or blood sugar management effect in relation to dietary pattern and weight loss. The authors of this study conclude that the results of this study do not help in identifying which dietary type is better for whom in relation to 3 genetic markers and blood sugar management.
Abstract
Importance: Dietary modification remains key to successful weight loss. Yet, no one dietary strategy is consistently superior to others for the general population. Previous research suggests genotype or insulin-glucose dynamics may modify the effects of diets. Objective: To determine the effect of a healthy low-fat (HLF) diet vs a healthy low-carbohydrate (HLC) diet on weight change and if genotype pattern or insulin secretion are related to the dietary effects on weight loss. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Diet Intervention Examining The Factors Interacting with Treatment Success (DIETFITS) randomized clinical trial included 609 adults aged 18 to 50 years without diabetes with a body mass index between 28 and 40. The trial enrollment was from January 29, 2013, through April 14, 2015; the date of final follow-up was May 16, 2016. Participants were randomized to the 12-month HLF or HLC diet. The study also tested whether 3 single-nucleotide polymorphism multilocus genotype responsiveness patterns or insulin secretion (INS-30; blood concentration of insulin 30 minutes after a glucose challenge) were associated with weight loss. Interventions: Health educators delivered the behavior modification intervention to HLF (n = 305) and HLC (n = 304) participants via 22 diet-specific small group sessions administered over 12 months. The sessions focused on ways to achieve the lowest fat or carbohydrate intake that could be maintained long-term and emphasized diet quality. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was 12-month weight change and determination of whether there were significant interactions among diet type and genotype pattern, diet and insulin secretion, and diet and weight loss. Results: Among 609 participants randomized (mean age, 40 [SD, 7] years; 57% women; mean body mass index, 33 [SD, 3]; 244 [40%] had a low-fat genotype; 180 [30%] had a low-carbohydrate genotype; mean baseline INS-30, 93 μIU/mL), 481 (79%) completed the trial. In the HLF vs HLC diets, respectively, the mean 12-month macronutrient distributions were 48% vs 30% for carbohydrates, 29% vs 45% for fat, and 21% vs 23% for protein. Weight change at 12 months was -5.3 kg for the HLF diet vs -6.0 kg for the HLC diet (mean between-group difference, 0.7 kg [95% CI, -0.2 to 1.6 kg]). There was no significant diet-genotype pattern interaction (P = .20) or diet-insulin secretion (INS-30) interaction (P = .47) with 12-month weight loss. There were 18 adverse events or serious adverse events that were evenly distributed across the 2 diet groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this 12-month weight loss diet study, there was no significant difference in weight change between a healthy low-fat diet vs a healthy low-carbohydrate diet, and neither genotype pattern nor baseline insulin secretion was associated with the dietary effects on weight loss. In the context of these 2 common weight loss diet approaches, neither of the 2 hypothesized predisposing factors was helpful in identifying which diet was better for whom. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01826591.
3.
Micronutrient Gaps in Three Commercial Weight-Loss Diet Plans.
G Engel, M, J Kern, H, Brenna, JT, H Mitmesser, S
Nutrients. 2018;10(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Globally, around 39% of adults are overweight and 13% obese, and more than one third of American adults are obese. Being overweight or obese is associated with many chronic conditions, such as heart disease, high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes. Weight loss, even at moderate level, can reduce the risk of these obesity-related chronic conditions. Commercial weight-loss diet plans can vary greatly, not only in energy content but also in macronutrient and micronutrient composition. Most plans restrict calories or certain macronutrients, particularly carbohydrate or fat, and in doing so, often overlook micronutrient, i.e. vitamin and mineral, content. Previous studies have shown that many weight-loss plans do not provide adequate amounts of all micronutrients, and in order to reach the reference daily intakes for various vitamins and minerals, dieters would need to increase their calorie intake significantly and often unrealistically. The authors of this paper analysed seven single-day menus of three select commercial diet plans to determine their micronutrient sufficiency. The diet plans included were Eat to Live-Vegan, Aggressive Weight Loss (ETL-VAWL), Fast Metabolism Diet (FMD), and Eat, Drink and Be Healthy (EDH). ETL-VAWL diet provided less than 90% of recommended amounts for B12, B3, D, E, calcium, selenium and zinc. The FMD diet was low in B1, D, E, calcium, magnesium and potassium, while EDH diet didn’t meet the recommended amounts for vitamin D, calcium and potassium. Even after adjusting all the plans to an intake of 2000 kcal/day, several micronutrients were found to remain inadequate (vitamin B12 in ETL-VAWL, calcium in FMD and EDH and vitamin D in all diets). The authors conclude that, in order to reduce the risk of micronutrient deficiencies, more attention needs to be paid to micronutrient rich foods when designing commercial diet plans. Alternatively, these nutrient gaps should be filled in other ways, e.g. using appropriate dietary supplements.
Abstract
Weight-loss diets restrict intakes of energy and macronutrients but overlook micronutrient profiles. Commercial diet plans may provide insufficient micronutrients. We analyzed nutrient profiles of three plans and compared their micronutrient sufficiency to Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) for male U.S. adults. Hypocaloric vegan (Eat to Live-Vegan, Aggressive Weight Loss; ETL-VAWL), high-animal-protein low-carbohydrate (Fast Metabolism Diet; FMD) and weight maintenance (Eat, Drink and Be Healthy; EDH) diets were evaluated. Seven single-day menus were sampled per diet (n = 21 menus, 7 menus/diet) and analyzed for 20 micronutrients with the online nutrient tracker CRON-O-Meter. Without adjustment for energy intake, the ETL-VAWL diet failed to provide 90% of recommended amounts for B12, B₃, D, E, calcium, selenium and zinc. The FMD diet was low (<90% DRI) in B₁, D, E, calcium, magnesium and potassium. The EDH diet met >90% DRIs for all but vitamin D, calcium and potassium. Several micronutrients remained inadequate after adjustment to 2000 kcal/day: vitamin B12 in ETL-VAWL, calcium in FMD and EDH and vitamin D in all diets. Consistent with previous work, micronutrient deficits are prevalent in weight-loss diet plans. Special attention to micronutrient rich foods is required to reduce risk of micronutrient deficiency in design of commercial diets.