1.
Efficacy of a 2-Month Very Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet (VLCKD) Compared to a Standard Low-Calorie Diet in Reducing Visceral and Liver Fat Accumulation in Patients With Obesity.
Cunha, GM, Guzman, G, Correa De Mello, LL, Trein, B, Spina, L, Bussade, I, Marques Prata, J, Sajoux, I, Countinho, W
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2020;11:607
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Excess fat in the liver, known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), has been shown to increase the risk of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes. Standard treatment regimens consist of low-calorie (LC) diets and exercise, however these may be ineffective at reversing fat accumulation in the liver. A very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) has been proposed as an alternative treatment for NAFLD. This randomised control pilot study of 39 individuals with obesity aimed to compare LC diet and VLCKD on fat accumulation and indicators for NAFLD for two months. The results showed greater weight loss, abdominal fat reduction, liver fat reduction and improvements in liver function with VLCKD compared to the LC diet. Cholesterol was significantly reduced by both diets. However liver stiffness remained unchanged. The authors concluded that VLCKD was more successful at reducing liver fat and abdominal fat accumulation than current standard therapy and has the potential to improve NAFLD. Health care professionals could use this study to improve liver and abdominal fat loss in patients with obesity to improve NAFLD, when standard therapy has been inadequate.
Abstract
Background: Currently the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is based on weight loss through lifestyle changes, such as exercise combined with calorie-restricted dieting. Objectives: To assess the effects of a commercially available weight loss program based on a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and liver fat content compared to a standard low-calorie (LC) diet. As a secondary aim, we evaluated the effect on liver stiffness measurements. Methods: Open, randomized controlled, prospective pilot study. Patients were randomized and treated either with an LC or a VLCKD and received orientation and encouragement to physical activity equally for both groups. VAT, liver fat fraction, and liver stiffness were measured at baseline and after 2 months of treatment using magnetic resonance imaging. Paired t-tests were used for comparison of continuous variables between visits and unpaired test between groups. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2-test. Pearson correlation was used to assess the association between VAT, anthropometric measures, and hepatic fat fraction. A significance level of the results was established at p < 0.05. Results: Thirty-nine patients (20 with VLCKD and 19 with LC) were evaluated at baseline and 2 months of intervention. Relative weight loss at 2 months was -9.59 ± 2.87% in the VLCKD group and -1.87 ± 2.4% in the LC group (p < 0.001). Mean reductions in VAT were -32.0 cm2 for VLCKD group and -12.58 cm2 for LC group (p < 0.05). Reductions in liver fat fraction were significantly more pronounced in the VLCKD group than in the LC group (4.77 vs. 0.79%; p < 0.005). Conclusion: Patients undergoing a VLCKD achieved superior weight loss, with significant VAT and liver fat fraction reductions when compared to the standard LC diet. The weight loss and rapid mobilization of liver fat demonstrated with VLCKD could serve as an effective alternative for the treatment of NAFLD. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04322110.
2.
Bariatric and metabolic surgery during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: DSS recommendations for management of surgical candidates and postoperative patients and prioritisation of access to surgery.
Rubino, F, Cohen, RV, Mingrone, G, le Roux, CW, Mechanick, JI, Arterburn, DE, Vidal, J, Alberti, G, Amiel, SA, Batterham, RL, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2020;8(7):640-648
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Bariatric surgery has been proven for weight loss in people with severe obesity. However, during the covid-19 pandemic, surgery has been postponed for many individuals. Under normal conditions, patients who are awaiting bariatric surgery are prioritised based on weight, however this does not necessarily reflect severity of their condition. This review paper aimed to develop new criteria in order to help prioritise individuals who are awaiting bariatric surgery. The authors began by reviewing the reasons for delaying bariatric surgery and the need for beds, the risks of covid-19 transmission during the procedure and the severe covid-19 complications that individuals with obesity can experience were discussed. A recommendation was made that all patients having bariatric surgery be tested for Covid-19. Solutions were proposed for those awaiting surgery such as diets, exercise, optimal blood sugar control and the potential use of weight loss medications. Prioritisation of surgery should focus on clinical need; it should be accessible and minimise harm from delays. Individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes should be prioritised based on those who have an increased risk of death, determined by whether the individual; has poor blood sugar control despite maximal use of medications to control it, uses insulin, has previous heart disease, has liver disease or if they have other risk factors. It was concluded that weight alone is inadequate to prioritise candidates for bariatric surgery. Disease severity should be at the centre of decisions, especially when access to surgery is reduced, as is during the Covid -19 pandemic. This paper could be used by healthcare professionals to understand how to prioritise their obese and type 2 diabetic patients who are awaiting bariatric surgery.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is wreaking havoc on society, especially health-care systems, including disrupting bariatric and metabolic surgery. The current limitations on accessibility to non-urgent care undermine postoperative monitoring of patients who have undergone such operations. Furthermore, like most elective surgery, new bariatric and metabolic procedures are being postponed worldwide during the pandemic. When the outbreak abates, a backlog of people seeking these operations will exist. Hence, surgical candidates face prolonged delays of beneficial treatment. Because of the progressive nature of obesity and diabetes, delaying surgery increases risks for morbidity and mortality, thus requiring strategies to mitigate harm. The risk of harm, however, varies among patients, depending on the type and severity of their comorbidities. A triaging strategy is therefore needed. The traditional weight-centric patient-selection criteria do not favour cases based on actual clinical needs. In this Personal View, experts from the Diabetes Surgery Summit consensus conference series provide guidance for the management of patients while surgery is delayed and for postoperative surveillance. We also offer a strategy to prioritise bariatric and metabolic surgery candidates on the basis of the diseases that are most likely to be ameliorated postoperatively. Although our system will be particularly germane in the immediate future, it also provides a framework for long-term clinically meaningful prioritisation.
3.
Changes in Anxiety and Depression Traits Induced by Energy Restriction: Predictive Value of the Baseline Status.
Rodriguez-Lozada, C, Cuervo, M, Cuevas-Sierra, A, Goni, L, Riezu-Boj, JI, Navas-Carretero, S, Milagro, FI, Martinez, JA
Nutrients. 2019;11(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Anxiety and depression are among the most common mental health problems and are associated with obesity and other chronic illnesses. The number of these disorders has not been reduced despite the increased use of cognitive behavioural therapy and pharmacotherapy. Current evidence suggests diet quality as a modifiable risk factor for mental illnesses. Additional studies are required to investigate the effect of dietary patterns as well as weight loss on improving symptoms. The first aim of this study was to investigate the effect of weight loss on overweight and obese patients, using two calorie-restricted diets, on anxiety and depression symptoms. The second aim was to analyse the role of the baseline psychological features in predicting future weight loss. The study was a randomized, longitudinal, and controlled intervention trial which lasted for 16 weeks. The study indicates that weight loss via calorie-controlled diets could improve depression symptoms in obese and overweight patients. Participants that lost more weight showed a larger amelioration in depression symptoms. The study also suggests that greater anxiety symptoms at the beginning of the intervention could predict a higher weight loss. These results, in addition to the positive effect on body composition, show that weight loss could become part of a health improvement plan.
Abstract
Current evidence proposes diet quality as a modifiable risk factor for mental or emotional impairments. However, additional studies are required to investigate the effect of dietary patterns and weight loss on improving psychological symptoms. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of energy-restriction, prescribed to overweight and obese participants, on anxiety and depression symptoms, as well as the potential predictive value of some baseline psychological features on weight loss. Overweight and obese participants (n = 305) were randomly assigned for 16 weeks to two hypocaloric diets with different macronutrient distribution: a moderately high-protein (MHP) diet and a low-fat (LF) diet. Anthropometrical, clinical, psychological, and lifestyle characteristics were assessed at baseline and at the end of the intervention. The nutritional intervention evidenced that weight loss has a beneficial effect on trait anxiety score in women (β = 0.24, p = 0.03), depression score in all population (β = 0.15, p = 0.02), particularly in women (β = 0.22, p = 0.03) and in subjects who followed the LF diet (β = 0.22, p = 0.04). Moreover, weight loss could be predicted by anxiety status at baseline, mainly in women and in those who were prescribed a LF diet. This trial suggests that weight loss triggers an improvement in psychological traits, and that anxiety symptoms could predict those volunteers that benefit most from a balanced calorie-restricted intervention, which will contribute to individualized precision nutrition.