1.
Association between cognitive function and supplementation with omega-3 PUFAs and other nutrients in ≥ 75 years old patients: A randomized multicenter study.
Baleztena, J, Ruiz-Canela, M, Sayon-Orea, C, Pardo, M, Añorbe, T, Gost, JI, Gomez, C, Ilarregui, B, Bes-Rastrollo, M
PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0193568
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nutrition may play an important role in the prevention of dementia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a multinutrient supplementation rich in omega-3 fatty acids on the cognitive function of adults aged 75 years and over with either no, or mild, cognitive impairment. Participants were given either a multinutrient capsule (each containing DHA 250 mg, EPA 40 mg, vitamin E 5 mg, phosphatidylserine 15 mg, tryptophan 95 mg, vitamin B 12 5 μg, folate 250 μg and ginkgo biloba 60 mg) or a placebo, three times a day for one year. Supplementation with the multinutrient did not improve overall cognitive function in the group. However, it did result in an improvement in memory in a sub-group of older people who were previously well nourished, but not in those with worse nutritional status.
Abstract
A few studies have assessed the association between omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) and cognitive impairment (CI) in very old adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a multinutrient supplementation rich in n-3 PUFA on the cognitive function in an institutionalized ≥75-year-old population without CI or with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). A multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial was conducted between 2012 and 2013. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and after one year using 4 neuropsychological tests. Nutritional status was assessed using Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). Interaction between Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score and nutritional status were analyzed using linear regression models. A total of 99 participants were randomized to receive placebo or pills rich in n-3 PUFA. After 1-year follow-up, both groups decreased their MMSE score (-1.18, SD:0. 53 and -0.82, SD:0. 63, p = 0.67 for the control and the intervention group respectively). The memory subscale of the MMSE showed an improvement (+0.26, SD:0.18) in the intervention group against a worsening in the control group (-0.11, SD: 0.14; p = 0.09 for differences between groups). Patients at intervention group with normal nutritional status (MNA ≥24) showed an improvement in the MMSE (+1.03, p = 0.025 for differences between 1-y and baseline measurements) against a worsening in the group with malnutrition (MNA<24) (-0.4, p = 0.886 for differences between 1-y and baseline; p of interaction p = 0.05). Supplementation with n-3 PUFA did not show an improvement in the global cognitive function in institutionalized elderly people without CI or with MCI. They only suggest an apparent improvement in memory loss if previously they were well nourished.
2.
Inflammation as a predictive biomarker for response to omega-3 fatty acids in major depressive disorder: a proof-of-concept study.
Rapaport, MH, Nierenberg, AA, Schettler, PJ, Kinkead, B, Cardoos, A, Walker, R, Mischoulon, D
Molecular psychiatry. 2016;21(1):71-9
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This study investigated whether Omega 3 (n-3) fatty acids had a clinical effect on five inflammatory biomarkers on individuals diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Individuals were randomised into 3 groups, each of which took 8 weeks of double blind treatment with either eicosapentaenoic acid enriched n-3 fatty acids (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid enriched n-3 fatty acids (DHA), or placebo. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of the groups. However, it was noted that individuals with higher levels of inflammatory markers who took EPA improved more than those on placebo, and less on DHA than placebo. he larger the number of high inflammatory markers, the wider the gap between the improvements of the EPA versus placebo. Individuals with high hs-CRP, IL-6 or leptin responded less well to placebo than those with lower levels of these biomarkers. EPA was less effective than placebo or DHA if subjects had low levels of all 5 biomarkers. The five biomarkers were strongly influenced by gender and weight. The majority of obese women and men had at least one high marker of inflammation, and many of these had 2 high markers. There was no difference in treatment patterns for men and women. This is consistent with literature that suggests that inflammation is associated with obesity. Results suggest that it is important to look at more than one marker of inflammation, and that subjects with a specific combination inflammation markers were more likely to respond to EPA treatment. The authors concluded that anti-inflammation therapy was only beneficial for those with inflammation related MDD, and not helpful and possibly harmful for those with physiologically derived MDD.
Abstract
This study explores whether inflammatory biomarkers act as moderators of clinical response to omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids in subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD). One hundred fifty-five subjects with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) MDD, a baseline 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) score ⩾ 15 and baseline biomarker data (interleukin (IL)-1ra, IL-6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), leptin and adiponectin) were randomized between 18 May 2006 and 30 June 2011 to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)-enriched n-3 1060 mg day(-1), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-enriched n-3 900 mg day(-1) or placebo. Outcomes were determined using mixed model repeated measures analysis for 'high' and 'low' inflammation groups based on individual and combined biomarkers. Results are presented in terms of standardized treatment effect size (ES) for change in HAM-D-17 from baseline to treatment week 8. Although overall treatment group differences were negligible (ES=-0.13 to +0.04), subjects with any 'high' inflammation improved more on EPA than placebo (ES=-0.39) or DHA (ES=-0.60) and less on DHA than placebo (ES=+0.21); furthermore, EPA-placebo separation increased with increasing numbers of markers of high inflammation. Subjects randomized to EPA with 'high' IL-1ra or hs-CRP or low adiponectin ('high' inflammation) had medium ES decreases in HAM-D-17 scores vs subjects 'low' on these biomarkers. Subjects with 'high' hs-CRP, IL-6 or leptin were less placebo-responsive than subjects with low levels of these biomarkers (medium to large ES differences). Employing multiple markers of inflammation facilitated identification of a more homogeneous cohort of subjects with MDD responding to EPA vs placebo in our cohort. Studies are needed to replicate and extend this proof-of-concept work.