1.
Effect of a dietary intervention based on the Mediterranean diet on the quality of life of patients recovered from depression: Analysis of the PREDIDEP randomized trial.
Cabrera-Suárez, BM, Lahortiga-Ramos, F, Sayon-Orea, C, Hernández-Fleta, JL, González-Pinto, A, Molero, P, Vega-Pérez, R, Sánchez-Villegas, A
Experimental gerontology. 2023;175:112149
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Unipolar depression is a prevalent and disabling condition that negatively influences quality of life. Patients with depression are more vulnerable to have a poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of 2-year intervention with Mediterranean Diet enriched with extra virgin olive oil on HRQoL. This study is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, single-blind trial. The study included 52 men and 144 women aged between 18 and 86 years who had suffered at least one depression episode and who were in a stage of clinical remission. The participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Results show that a Mediterranean diet–based nutritional intervention enriched with extra virgin olive oil compared with usual care, resulted in a significantly greater increase in HRQoL in recovered depressed patients. This association was greater for the mental dimensions rather than the physical dimensions. Furthermore, this association was also observed for participants aged 60 or more. Authors conclude that since depression is an important condition for its high prevalence, economic cost and personal suffering, it is important to evaluate cost-effective, safe, and inexpensive interventions, such as Mediterranean Diet nutritional interventions.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is substantial evidence supporting that improving diet quality leads to improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our major aim was to assess the effectiveness of a Mediterranean diet-based nutritional intervention to improve HRQoL in the context of a secondary prevention trial of depression. Secondarily to assess its effectiveness among adults aged 60 or more years. METHODS The PREDIDEP study is a 2-year multicentre, randomized, single-blinded nutritional trial. At baseline and at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, SF-36 health survey questionnaire was collected to evaluate participants' HRQoL (total and specific range for each of the 8 dimensions: 0 to 100 points). Mixed effect linear models were used to assess changes in HRQoL according to adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.govNCT03081065. RESULTS After 2 years of intervention, the Mediterranean Diet intervention group compared to control group (without nutritional intervention, only usual clinical care) showed an improvement in some dimensions of HRQoL such as Mental Health (7.22; 95 % CI = 2.22-12.22) (between-group difference: 6.79; 95 % CI -0.14-13.73, p = 0.055); Vitality (9.51; 95 % CI = 4.00-15.03) (between-group difference: 9.00; 95 % CI 1.75-16.25, p = 0.020); Mental Summary Component (2.83; 95 % CI = 0.55-5.11) (between-group difference: 1.17; 95 % CI = -1.96-4.30, p = 0.462); and General Health (10.70; 95 % CI = 5.58-15.81) (between-group difference: 6.20; 95 % CI = -0.89-13.28, p = 0.086). Similar results were observed for participants aged 60 or more years. CONCLUSION The intervention based on Mediterranean diet in patients with previous depression seems to be effective in improving HRQoL, especially the mental dimensions. This effect is also observed among participants aged 60 or more years.
2.
Inflammation as a predictive biomarker for response to omega-3 fatty acids in major depressive disorder: a proof-of-concept study.
Rapaport, MH, Nierenberg, AA, Schettler, PJ, Kinkead, B, Cardoos, A, Walker, R, Mischoulon, D
Molecular psychiatry. 2016;21(1):71-9
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This study investigated whether Omega 3 (n-3) fatty acids had a clinical effect on five inflammatory biomarkers on individuals diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Individuals were randomised into 3 groups, each of which took 8 weeks of double blind treatment with either eicosapentaenoic acid enriched n-3 fatty acids (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid enriched n-3 fatty acids (DHA), or placebo. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of the groups. However, it was noted that individuals with higher levels of inflammatory markers who took EPA improved more than those on placebo, and less on DHA than placebo. he larger the number of high inflammatory markers, the wider the gap between the improvements of the EPA versus placebo. Individuals with high hs-CRP, IL-6 or leptin responded less well to placebo than those with lower levels of these biomarkers. EPA was less effective than placebo or DHA if subjects had low levels of all 5 biomarkers. The five biomarkers were strongly influenced by gender and weight. The majority of obese women and men had at least one high marker of inflammation, and many of these had 2 high markers. There was no difference in treatment patterns for men and women. This is consistent with literature that suggests that inflammation is associated with obesity. Results suggest that it is important to look at more than one marker of inflammation, and that subjects with a specific combination inflammation markers were more likely to respond to EPA treatment. The authors concluded that anti-inflammation therapy was only beneficial for those with inflammation related MDD, and not helpful and possibly harmful for those with physiologically derived MDD.
Abstract
This study explores whether inflammatory biomarkers act as moderators of clinical response to omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids in subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD). One hundred fifty-five subjects with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) MDD, a baseline 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) score ⩾ 15 and baseline biomarker data (interleukin (IL)-1ra, IL-6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), leptin and adiponectin) were randomized between 18 May 2006 and 30 June 2011 to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)-enriched n-3 1060 mg day(-1), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-enriched n-3 900 mg day(-1) or placebo. Outcomes were determined using mixed model repeated measures analysis for 'high' and 'low' inflammation groups based on individual and combined biomarkers. Results are presented in terms of standardized treatment effect size (ES) for change in HAM-D-17 from baseline to treatment week 8. Although overall treatment group differences were negligible (ES=-0.13 to +0.04), subjects with any 'high' inflammation improved more on EPA than placebo (ES=-0.39) or DHA (ES=-0.60) and less on DHA than placebo (ES=+0.21); furthermore, EPA-placebo separation increased with increasing numbers of markers of high inflammation. Subjects randomized to EPA with 'high' IL-1ra or hs-CRP or low adiponectin ('high' inflammation) had medium ES decreases in HAM-D-17 scores vs subjects 'low' on these biomarkers. Subjects with 'high' hs-CRP, IL-6 or leptin were less placebo-responsive than subjects with low levels of these biomarkers (medium to large ES differences). Employing multiple markers of inflammation facilitated identification of a more homogeneous cohort of subjects with MDD responding to EPA vs placebo in our cohort. Studies are needed to replicate and extend this proof-of-concept work.