1.
A 12-Month Lifestyle Intervention Program Improves Body Composition and Reduces the Prevalence of Prediabetes in Obese Patients.
König, D, Hörmann, J, Predel, HG, Berg, A
Obesity facts. 2018;11(5):393-399
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity and its impact on the prevalence of diabetes and subsequent cardiovascular disease is one of the major health burdens in Western societies. Lifestyle intervention studies have shown that weight loss combined with increased physical activity can improve metabolic risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme on weight and metabolic risk factors in 5884 obese individuals. The programme included 61 sessions over 12 months, including 41 exercise sessions, 12 psychological/self-management sessions and 8 nutritional counselling sessions (based on a low glycaemic index, low fat diet). After 12 months there was a significant reduction in weight (average 6%), waist circumference, physical fitness and all metabolic parameters (including blood sugar and fat metabolism). Overall, in 839 (38%) of the 2,227 participants who were pre-diabetic before intervention, the criteria of pre-diabetes were no longer detectable after 12 months, whilst only 66 (3%) progressed to type 2 diabetes mellitus. 46.7% of the 1,641 participants fulfilling the criteria of metabolic syndrome before the intervention, did not show any signs of this syndrome after the intervention; whilst only 120 participants (+7.3%) newly developed metabolic syndrome. The authors concluded that the intensive lifestyle intervention programme was successful, even in obese people with pre-diabetes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study investigated the effects of a 12-month interdisciplinary standardized lifestyle program addressing physical activity and changes in dietary and lifestyle behavior in 2,227 obese prediabetic participants. METHODS Measures of obesity (BMI, waist circumference), cardiopulmonary fitness, and metabolic parameters were determined before and after the intervention period. RESULTS From the 2,227 participants who were initially prediabetic, 839 participants (-37.7%) did no longer show the criteria of prediabetes after the intervention and had normal HbA1c levels. CONCLUSION The clinical effects are substantial, and it is likely that the applied intense and multidisciplinary lifestyle interventions could reduce the risk of developing diabetes and the prevalence of a full-blown metabolic syndrome in obese and prediabetic patients.
2.
Adolescent diet and subsequent serum hormones, breast density, and bone mineral density in young women: results of the Dietary Intervention Study in Children follow-up study.
Dorgan, JF, Liu, L, Klifa, C, Hylton, N, Shepherd, JA, Stanczyk, FZ, Snetselaar, LG, Van Horn, L, Stevens, VJ, Robson, A, et al
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2010;19(6):1545-56
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Population and animal studies suggest that fat in the diet may have an influence on the development of breast cancer, but the results of studies in humans are inconsistent. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine the effects of a lower-fat diet during childhood and adolescence on markers associated with breast cancer risk in adults. Female participants were initially recruited at age 8-10 years old, as part of a study to test the effects of lower-fat diets on cholesterol levels in children. The study diet limited total fat intake to 28% of calories (<8% saturated fat, <9% polyunsaturated fat, remainder monounsaturated), cholesterol was limited to 150mg/day and consumption of fibre was encouraged. The children followed the diet for 7 years, when the trial was terminated. This follow-up study was conducted 9 years later, when the participants were aged 25 to 29 years old. After adjusting for current diet, the lower-fat diet group had significantly higher oestradiol levels and bone mineral density. Progesterone concentrations and breast density did not differ between the two groups. The authors concluded that consumption of a lower-fat diet during adolescence does not appear to affect factors associated with breast cancer risk. Current diet may be more important than adolescent diet in determining hormone levels in premenopausal women.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent diet is hypothesized to influence breast cancer risk. We evaluated the long-term effects of an intervention to lower fat intake among adolescent girls on biomarkers that are related to breast cancer risk in adults. METHODS A follow-up study was conducted on 230 girls who participated in the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC), in which healthy, prepubertal, 8 to 10 year olds were randomly assigned to usual care or to a behavioral intervention that promoted a reduced fat diet. Participants were 25 to 29 years old at follow-up visits. All tests of statistical significance are two-sided. RESULTS In analyses that did not take account of diet at the time of the follow-up visit, the only statistically significant treatment group difference was higher bone mineral content in intervention group participants compared with usual care group participants; their mean bone mineral contents were 2,444 and 2,377 g, respectively. After adjustment for current diet, the intervention group also had statistically significantly higher bone mineral density and luteal phase serum estradiol concentrations. Serum progesterone concentrations and breast density did not differ by treatment group in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS Results do not support the hypothesis that consumption of a lower fat diet during adolescence reduces breast cancer risk via effects on subsequent serum estradiol and progesterone levels, breast density, or bone mineral density. It remains unclear, however, if the results are specific to the DISC intervention or are more broadly applicable. IMPACT Modest reductions in fat intake during adolescence are unlikely to lower later breast cancer risk via long-term effects on the biomarkers measured.