1.
High-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D supplementation in older adults with COVID-19 (COVIT-TRIAL): A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial.
Annweiler, C, Beaudenon, M, Gautier, J, Gonsard, J, Boucher, S, Chapelet, G, Darsonval, A, Fougère, B, Guérin, O, Houvet, M, et al
PLoS medicine. 2022;19(5):e1003999
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, mostly in older adults. The aim of this study was to test whether a single oral high-dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults who are positive to COVID-19. This study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, intent-to-treat, randomised controlled superiority clinical trial which involves the collaboration of 9 medical centres. Eligible participants (n=260) were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of either 400,000 IU (n=130) or 50,000 IU (n=130) cholecalciferol on the day of inclusion. Results show: - reduced overall mortality at day 14. - that high-dose cholecalciferol was safe and did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. - that some benefits were also found on the 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 as well as on the overall mortality between day 6 and day 14. - that there was no evidence that the single high-dose vitamin D3 administered early in COVID-19 provided any benefit on overall mortality for up to 28 days. Authors conclude that high-dose oral cholecalciferol supplementation is a simple, safe, and inexpensive treatment which may be of interest as an adjuvant to provide a bridge to recovery for at-risk older adults facing the emergence of immune escape variants.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D supplementation has been proposed as a treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on experimental data and data from small and uncontrolled observational studies. The COvid19 and VITamin d TRIAL (COVIT-TRIAL) study was conducted to test whether a single oral high dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS AND FINDINGS This multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, superiority trial involved collaboration of 9 medical centers in France. Patients admitted to the hospital units or living in nursing homes adjacent to the investigator centers were eligible if they were ≥65 years, had SARS-CoV-2 infection of less than 3 days, and at least 1 COVID-19 worsening risk factor (among age ≥75 years, SpO2 ≤94%, or PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mm Hg). Main noninclusion criteria were organ failure requiring ICU, SpO2 ≤92% despite 5 L/min oxygen, life expectancy <3 months, vitamin D supplementation >800 IU/day during the preceding month, and contraindications to vitamin D supplements. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either a single oral high-dose (400,000 IU) or standard-dose (50,000 IU) cholecalciferol administered under medical supervision within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19. Participants and local study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but the Steering Committee and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board were masked to the randomization group and outcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 14-day overall mortality. Between April 15 and December 17, 2020, of 1,207 patients who were assessed for eligibility in the COVIT-TRIAL study, 254 met eligibility criteria and formed the intention-to-treat population. The median age was 88 (IQR, 82 to 92) years, and 148 patients (58%) were women. Overall, 8 (6%) of 127 patients allocated to high-dose cholecalciferol, and 14 (11%) of 127 patients allocated to standard-dose cholecalciferol died within 14 days (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.39 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.99], P = 0.049, after controlling for randomization strata [i.e., age, oxygen requirement, hospitalization, use of antibiotics, anti-infective drugs, and/or corticosteroids] and baseline imbalances in important prognostic factors [i.e., sex, ongoing cancers, profuse diarrhea, and delirium at baseline]). The number needed to treat for one person to benefit (NNTB) was 21 [NNTB 9 to ∞ to number needed to treat for one person to harm (NNTH) 46]. Apparent benefits were also found on 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 (7 (6%) deaths in high-dose group and 14 (11%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.86], P = 0.02). The protective effect of the single oral high-dose administration was not sustained at 28 days (19 (15%) deaths in high-dose group and 21 (17%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.36], P = 0.29). High-dose cholecalciferol did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. The open-label design and limited study power are the main limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we observed that the early administration of high-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D3 to at-risk older patients with COVID-19 improved overall mortality at day 14. The effect was no longer observed after 28 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344041.
2.
Circulating levels of maternal vitamin D and risk of ADHD in offspring: results from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial.
Chu, SH, Huang, M, Kelly, RS, Kachroo, P, Litonjua, AA, Weiss, ST, Lasky-Su, J
International journal of epidemiology. 2022;51(3):910-918
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acting as both a nutrient and a hormone, vitamin D has been found to play a critical role in neurodevelopment across sensitive periods in utero, infancy and early childhood. Among neurodevelopmental and behavioural disorders in early life, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common among children worldwide. Low levels of circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] have been shown to associate with prevalent ADHD. The aims of this study were to (i) determine the association between maternal vitamin D levels in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy and the risk of offspring ADHD by age 6 years or later; and (ii) to identify potential sensitive periods in utero during which vitamin D levels might be most important for reducing risk of ADHD. This is an ancillary study of the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART). The VDAART was a randomised, double-blinded, multicentre, clinical trial in which 876 participating mothers were recruited between 10–18 weeks of gestation and assigned to receive either 4400 or 400 IU/day of vitamin D throughout pregnancy. Results show protective associations between maternal 25(OH)D sufficiency in the third trimester and child ADHD, but not at baseline. Furthermore, both at baseline and in the third trimester, there were higher odds of ADHD in male offspring as compared with female offspring with 25(OH)D insufficient mothers (analyses limited by small sample sizes) Authors conclude that higher levels of maternal vitamin D during pregnancy may play a protective role against risk of ADHD in offspring, but further studies are needed to confirm this association and any therapeutic potential therein.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Ensure that women in pregnancy, and possibly also those seeking to conceive, have adequate vitamin D status in order to reduce the risk of ADHD in offspring.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
This paper describes a secondary data analysis from an RCT that looked at the effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on risk of childhood asthma in offspring. Enrolled women aged 18–39 years with a history of asthma, eczema or allergic rhinitis, or whose partner (biological father of child) had a history of the aforementioned condition, received either 400 IU or 4400 IU vitamin D daily for the duration of their pregnancy. Offspring follow-up is still ongoing.
Aims
The current study aims were twofold: (i) to determine the association between maternal vitamin D levels in trimesters 1 and 3 and the risk of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in offspring diagnosed by age 6 years or later; and (ii) to identify potentially sensitive periods during gestation in which vitamin D levels may be especially important for reducing risk of ADHD.
Methods
The analytical sample included 679 mother-child pairs, from the original sample of 876 participating mothers. No sample size calculation was reported, though the sample was considered representative of the overall RCT study population.
Maternal vitamin D (serum 25(OH)D) was classified as follows
- Highly deficient <12 ng/mL
- Deficient 12 ng/mL to 19.9 ng/mL
- Insufficient 20 ng/mL to 29.9 ng/mL
- Sufficient ≥30 ng/mL
ADHD status was assessed through parental reporting between ages 6 and 9 years.
Results
No baseline associations between a vitamin D sufficient status and offspring ADHD in maternal samples collected during trimester 1 were observed (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.51–2.19; P.0.871), though this association became statistically significant at trimester 3 (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26–0.84; P.0.011). This translated to a 53% less chance of having a child with ADHD at age 6 or later among mothers with vitamin D sufficiency compared with children of mothers with vitamin D deficiency. There was also a linear trend in the protective association of vitamin D sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL) on reduced risk of offspring ADHD at age 6 years or later in data from trimester 3. Stratified analyses revealed a protective association for sufficient maternal vitamin D status and offspring ADHD among males (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.94).
Conclusions
The authors concluded that vitamin D sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL) in the 3rd trimester of gestation may decrease the risk of ADHD development in offspring.
Notes: The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Ensuring a sufficient vitamin D status by the 3rd trimester of pregnancy may help to lessen the risk of ADHD in offspring. Nutritional therapists and other clinicians working with pregnant women or women looking to conceive should consider checking vitamin D status and providing corrective supplementation and lifestyle advice to augment vitamin D levels where indicated.
Considerations for future research:
The authors of this study postulated that the statistically significant protective association between vitamin D at trimester 3 and ADHD in offspring was not significant in trimester 1 due to a low observed variability in vitamin D status (>75% of women were vitamin D insufficient), and thus the statistical test being underpowered to see difference between groups with sufficient or insufficient status.
Further research could expand upon this hypothesis to test whether vitamin D status in trimester 1, or preconceptually, may offer a protective association for ADHD and other related neurological conditions that may manifest in early life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low levels of circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] have been shown to associate with prevalent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but few studies have examined the association between 25(OH)D during fetal development and risk of childhood ADHD. METHODS Maternal plasma 25(OH)D was measured at 10-18 and 32-38 weeks of gestation, with sufficiency defined as 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/ml. Offspring ADHD status between ages 6-9 years was measured by parent report of clinical ADHD diagnosis among 680 mother-child pairs from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial. Association between maternal 25(OH)D and child ADHD was assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age, race and ethnicity. Effect modification by offspring sex was also assessed. RESULTS No associations between maternal 25(OH)D at 10-18 weeks of gestation and offspring ADHD were observed. In the third trimester, we observed associations between maternal vitamin D sufficiency and offspring ADHD [odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.84], in addition to maternal 25(OH)D sufficiency category, comparing the deficient (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.94), insufficient (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.15-1.10) and sufficient (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.54) categories against highly deficient 25(OH)D, respectively. Stratified analyses revealed a protective association for sufficient maternal 25(OH)D and child ADHD among males (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.94); the synergy index for additive effect modification of risk was 1.78 (95% CI 0.62-5.08). CONCLUSIONS Higher levels of maternal vitamin D in the third trimester are associated with lower risk of ADHD in offspring, with modest evidence for a stronger effect among male offspring. However, larger studies will be necessary to confirm these findings.
3.
Effects of a 2-Week 5000 IU versus 1000 IU Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Recovery of Symptoms in Patients with Mild to Moderate Covid-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sabico, S, Enani, MA, Sheshah, E, Aljohani, NJ, Aldisi, DA, Alotaibi, NH, Alshingetti, N, Alomar, SY, Alnaami, AM, Amer, OE, et al
Nutrients. 2021;13(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A highly contagious virus called SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic. Vitamin D adjuvant therapy has been identified as a promising strategy for reducing the severity of Covid-19 outcomes in the elderly. Also, a low Vitamin D status significantly correlates with Covid-19 severity. This multi-centre randomised, open-label clinical trial evaluated the beneficial effects of 5000 IU versus 1000 IU Vitamin D3 daily supplementation for two weeks on recovery of symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate Covid-19 and suboptimal Vitamin D status. Thirty-six Covid-19 patients received 5000 IU Vitamin D3 daily, and thirty-three Covid-19 patients received 1000 IU Vitamin D3 daily. The 5000 IU Vitamin D3 group was significantly younger and had a significantly lower BMI than the 1000 IU Vitamin D3 group. The 5000 IU Vitamin D3 group showed significant improvements in the severity of the Covid-19 symptoms compared to the 1000 IU Vitamin D3 group. Further robust studies are needed to evaluate the effects of Vitamin D3 supplementation in patients with high BMI, severe Covid-19 symptoms, and prevention of Covid-19. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the effects of different doses of Vitamin D3 supplements in patients with mild-to-moderate Covid-19 symptoms and suboptimal Vitamin D status.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 severity. This multi-center randomized clinical trial aims to determine the effects of 5000 IU versus 1000 IU daily oral vitamin D3 supplementation in the recovery of symptoms and other clinical parameters among mild to moderate COVID-19 patients with sub-optimal vitamin D status. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A total of 69 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) SARS-CoV-2 positive adults who were hospitalized for mild to moderate COVID-19 disease were allocated to receive once daily for 2 weeks either 5000 IU oral vitamin D3 (n = 36, 21 males; 15 females) or 1000 IU oral vitamin D3 (standard control) (n = 33, 13 males; 20 females). Anthropometrics were measured and blood samples were taken pre- and post-supplementation. Fasting blood glucose, lipids, serum 25(OH)D, and inflammatory markers were measured. COVID-19 symptoms were noted on admission and monitored until full recovery. RESULTS Vitamin D supplementation for 2 weeks caused a significant increase in serum 25(OH)D levels in the 5000 IU group only (adjusted p = 0.003). Within-group comparisons also showed a significant decrease in BMI and IL-6 levels overtime in both groups (p-values < 0.05) but was not clinically significant in between-group comparisons. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the 5000 IU group had a significantly shorter time to recovery (days) than the 1000 IU group in resolving cough, even after adjusting for age, sex, baseline BMI, and D-dimer (6.2 ± 0.8 versus 9.1 ± 0.8; p = 0.039), and ageusia (loss of taste) (11.4 ± 1.0 versus 16.9 ± 1.7; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION A 5000 IU daily oral vitamin D3 supplementation for 2 weeks reduces the time to recovery for cough and gustatory sensory loss among patients with sub-optimal vitamin D status and mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms. The use of 5000 IU vitamin D3 as an adjuvant therapy for COVID-19 patients with suboptimal vitamin D status, even for a short duration, is recommended.