1.
Personalised nutrition advice reduces intake of discretionary foods and beverages: findings from the Food4Me randomised controlled trial.
Livingstone, KM, Celis-Morales, C, Navas-Carretero, S, San-Cristobal, R, Forster, H, Woolhead, C, O'Donovan, CB, Moschonis, G, Manios, Y, Traczyk, I, et al
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2021;18(1):70
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Food4Me is an internet-based personalised nutrition study that evaluates the effectiveness of personalized dietary advice in avoiding discretionary foods compared to conventional advice. In different countries, discretionary foods are classified differently. Therefore, this study included two measures of discretionary foods identified by the Food4Me Food Frequency Questionnaire, which covered 22 discretionary foods classified by Food Standards Scotland and 59 discretionary foods identified by Australian Dietary Guidelines. For six months, 1607 participants from seven European countries were randomly assigned to receive generalised dietary advice or one of three levels of personalised nutrition advice (based on diet [L1], phenotype [L2] and genotype [L3]). Personalised nutrition advice was found to be effective in reducing discretionary foods when categorisation included foods high in fat, added sugar and salt. There was a greater reduction in energy, sugar, salt, and saturated fat intakes in people who received personalised nutrition advice [L1-3] as compared to generalised dietary advice after six months. Results of this study can be used by healthcare professionals to support personalised nutrition strategies in the general population targeting discretionary foods to increase compliance with personalised nutrition strategies and achieve better health outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of personalised nutrition advice on discretionary foods intake is unknown. To date, two national classifications for discretionary foods have been derived. This study examined changes in intake of discretionary foods and beverages following a personalised nutrition intervention using these two classifications. METHODS Participants were recruited into a 6-month RCT across seven European countries (Food4Me) and were randomised to receive generalised dietary advice (control) or one of three levels of personalised nutrition advice (based on diet [L1], phenotype [L2] and genotype [L3]). Dietary intake was derived from an FFQ. An analysis of covariance was used to determine intervention effects at month 6 between personalised nutrition (overall and by levels) and control on i) percentage energy from discretionary items and ii) percentage contribution of total fat, SFA, total sugars and salt to discretionary intake, defined by Food Standards Scotland (FSS) and Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG) classifications. RESULTS Of the 1607 adults at baseline, n = 1270 (57% female) completed the intervention. Percentage sugars from FSS discretionary items was lower in personalised nutrition vs control (19.0 ± 0.37 vs 21.1 ± 0.65; P = 0.005). Percentage energy (31.2 ± 0.59 vs 32.7 ± 0.59; P = 0.031), percentage total fat (31.5 ± 0.37 vs 33.3 ± 0.65; P = 0.021), SFA (36.0 ± 0.43 vs 37.8 ± 0.75; P = 0.034) and sugars (31.7 ± 0.44 vs 34.7 ± 0.78; P < 0.001) from ADG discretionary items were lower in personalised nutrition vs control. There were greater reductions in ADG percentage energy and percentage total fat, SFA and salt for those randomised to L3 vs L2. CONCLUSIONS Compared with generalised dietary advice, personalised nutrition advice achieved greater reductions in discretionary foods intake when the classification included all foods high in fat, added sugars and salt. Future personalised nutrition approaches may be used to target intake of discretionary foods. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01530139 . Registered 9 February 2012.
2.
Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity But Not Sedentary Time Is Associated With Musculoskeletal Health Outcomes in a Cohort of Australian Middle-Aged Women.
Wu, F, Wills, K, Laslett, LL, Oldenburg, B, Jones, G, Winzenberg, T
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2017;32(4):708-715
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Bone mineral density (BMD), muscle strength, and balance are all important aspects of musculoskeletal health. The aim of the study was to describe associations between objectively‐measured physical activity and sedentary time and musculoskeletal health outcomes in middle‐aged women. The study is a cross-sectional analysis of data from a population-based sample of 309 women with an age range between 36 and 57 years. Results indicate that in middle‐aged women, greater total physical activity was associated with better musculoskeletal health. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity appears more important than light physical activity or sedentary time for many musculoskeletal outcomes in middle‐aged women. Authors conclude that their findings are important for developing interventions to improve habitual physical activity that are targeted at improving musculoskeletal health amongst women in midlife when an accelerated process of decline in BMD, muscle strength, and balance begins.
Abstract
Associations between physical activity and time spent sedentary and musculoskeletal outcomes remain unclear in middle-aged adults. This study aimed to describe associations between objectively-measured physical activity and sedentary time and musculoskeletal health outcomes in middle-aged women. This cross-sectional study from a population-based sample of 309 women (age 36 to 57 years) examined associations of total physical activity (accelerometer counts/min of wear time), and time spent sedentary, in light physical activities and moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA) (by Actigraph GT1M accelerometer) with lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), lower limb muscle strength (LMS), and functional mobility and balance tests (timed up and go test [TUG], functional reach test [FRT], lateral reach test [LRT], and step test [ST]) using linear regression. Total physical activity was beneficially associated with FN BMD (values are β; 95% CI) (0.011 g/cm2 ; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.019 g/cm2 ), LMS (2.13 kg; 95% CI, 0.21 to 4.06 kg), and TUG (-0.080 s; 95% CI, -0.129 to -0.030 s), after adjustment for confounders. MVPA was also beneficially associated with FN BMD (0.0050 g/cm2 ; 95% CI, 0.0007 to 0.0094 g/cm2 ), LMS (1.48 kg; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.52 kg), ST (0.12 steps; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.23 steps), and TUG (-0.043 s; 95% CI, -0.070 to -0.016 s). Associations between MVPA and LMS, TUG and ST persisted after further adjustment for sedentary time. Only TUG was associated with sedentary time, with a detrimental effect (0.075 s; 95% CI, 0.013 to 0.137 s) and this did not persist after further adjustment for MVPA. Light physical activity was not associated with any outcome. MVPA appears more important than light physical activity or sedentary time for many musculoskeletal outcomes in middle-aged women. This needs to be considered when developing interventions to improve habitual physical activity that aim to improve musculoskeletal health. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.