-
1.
Inflammation moderates the effects of lifestyle modification on neurocognition among individuals with resistant hypertension.
Avorgbedor, F, Blumenthal, JA, Hinderliter, A, Ingle, K, Lin, PH, Craighead, L, Tyson, C, Kraus, W, Sherwood, A, Smith, PJ
Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2023;25(1):106-110
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Hypertension is one of the primary causes of cardiovascular disease, stroke, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD). Among individuals with hypertension, those with resistant hypertension (RH) appear to have the greatest risk of cerebrovascular disease and associated cognitive impairment. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential influence of individual differences in pre-treatment inflammatory profiles on changes in cognition following lifestyle modification among RH participants in the TRIUMPH clinical trial. This study is a report based on the TRIUMPH study which was a randomised clinical trial. One hundred forty patients with RH were randomised with 2:1 allocation to either a 4-month Centre-based Lifestyle intervention or Standardized Education and Physician Advice. Results show that basal levels of elevated peripheral inflammation may represent an intermediate phenotype of risk for cognitive decline. In fact, individuals with higher levels of c-reactive protein at baseline demonstrated greater improvements in Executive Function/Learning following participation in an intensive lifestyle intervention. Authors conclude that their findings may help inform targeted treatments to reduce ADRD among middle-aged and older adults with cardiovascular disease risk factors.
Abstract
Individuals with resistant hypertension (RH) have the greatest risk of cerebrovascular disease and cognitive impairment among individuals with hypertension. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines may represent a critical yet unexamined factor influencing the impact of healthy lifestyle changes on cognitive function. We explored the influence of inflammation on changes in cognition following lifestyle modification among individuals with RH participating in the TRIUMPH clinical trial. One hundred forty participants with RH completed a battery of neurocognitive tests along with the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and were subsequently randomized to an intensive 4-month lifestyle modification intervention or to education and physician advice control. Results indicated that the effects of lifestyle modification on Executive Function and Learning were moderated by pre-intervention hsCRP levels (P = .049), with treatment efficacy increasing across levels of baseline inflammation levels (low: d = 0.12; mild: d = 0.43; moderate: d = 0.81). We conclude that inflammatory profiles may help identify individuals more likely to improve executive functioning resulting from lifestyle modification.
-
2.
Effect of cocoa flavanol supplementation for the prevention of cardiovascular disease events: the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial.
Sesso, HD, Manson, JE, Aragaki, AK, Rist, PM, Johnson, LG, Friedenberg, G, Copeland, T, Clar, A, Mora, S, Moorthy, MV, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;115(6):1490-1500
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cocoa is made from the bean of the cacao tree and has a long history of potential health benefits based upon its flavanol and procyanidin content. Cocoa extract also contains methylxanthines [alkaloids] such as theobromine and caffeine, which may enhance the vascular and central nervous system effects of cocoa flavanols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the flavanol-rich cocoa extract containing all potential bioactive components of the cocoa bean on clinical cardiovascular outcomes. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial testing a cocoa extract supplement and a multivitamin supplement (COSMOS). This study focuses on the cocoa extract component of the trial. A total of 21,442 participants underwent randomisation to one of the four groups. Results show that after a median of 3.6 years of treatment there was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of total cardiovascular events. However, cocoa flavanol supplementation significantly reduced cardiovascular disease death by 27%, whereas other individual cardiovascular outcomes had no significant reductions in risk. Authors conclude that longer-term follow-up of the trial cohort and ongoing ancillary mechanistic studies in COSMOS may further elucidate the relation between cocoa extract supplementation and clinical cardiovascular events.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cocoa extract is a source of flavanols that favorably influence vascular risk factors in small and short-term trials, yet effects on clinical cardiovascular events are untested. OBJECTIVES We examined whether cocoa extract supplementation decreases total cardiovascular disease (CVD) among older adults. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-by-2 factorial trial of cocoa extract supplementation and multivitamins for prevention of CVD and cancer among 21,442 US adults (12,666 women aged ≥65 y and 8776 men aged ≥60 y), free of major CVD and recently diagnosed cancer. The intervention phase was June 2015 through December 2020. This article reports on the cocoa extract intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to a cocoa extract supplement [500 mg flavanols/d, including 80 mg (-)-epicatechin] or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of confirmed incident total cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, carotid artery disease, peripheral artery surgery, and unstable angina. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 3.6 y, 410 participants taking cocoa extract and 456 taking placebo had confirmed total cardiovascular events (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.02; P = 0.11). For secondary endpoints, HRs were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.98) for CVD death, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.16) for MI, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.70, 1.17) for stroke, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.17) for coronary revascularization, neutral for other individual cardiovascular endpoints, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.03) for all-cause mortality. Per-protocol analyses censoring follow-up at nonadherence supported a lower risk of total cardiovascular events (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.99). There were no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Cocoa extract supplementation did not significantly reduce total cardiovascular events among older adults but reduced CVD death by 27%. Potential reductions in total cardiovascular events were supported in per-protocol analyses. Additional research is warranted to clarify whether cocoa extract may reduce clinical cardiovascular events. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02422745.
-
3.
Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease: the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial.
Sesso, HD, Rist, PM, Aragaki, AK, Rautiainen, S, Johnson, LG, Friedenberg, G, Copeland, T, Clar, A, Mora, S, Moorthy, MV, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;115(6):1501-1510
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) formulations are the most common dietary supplement. Numerous adults continue to take MVMs for general health and well-being or to reduce the risk of chronic diseases despite inconsistency among observational studies examining long-term MVM use and risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to test the effects of a common MVM in the prevention of cancer and CVD among women and men. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial testing a cocoa extract supplement and a multivitamin supplement. A total of 21,442 participants underwent randomisation to one of the four groups. Results show that a daily MVM did not reduce the primary outcome of total invasive cancer. Furthermore, MVM supplementation did not have a significant effect on the secondary outcomes of total cardiovascular events, CVD death, or all-cause mortality. Authors conclude that their findings do not support the regular use of MVMs for cancer or CVD prevention among generally healthy older men and women. Future studies are needed to clarify the role of long-term MVM use on nutritional status and the balance of risks and benefits on cancer, CVD, and other aging-related outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although older adults commonly take multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) supplements to promote health, evidence on the use of daily MVMs on invasive cancer is limited. OBJECTIVES The study objective was to determine if a daily MVM decreases total invasive cancer among older adults. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-by-2 factorial trial of a daily MVM and cocoa extract for prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) among 21,442 US adults (12,666 women aged ≥65 y and 8776 men aged ≥60 y) free of major CVD and recently diagnosed cancer. The intervention phase was from June 2015 through December 2020. This article reports on the MVM intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to daily MVM or placebo. The primary outcome was total invasive cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer. Secondary outcomes included major site-specific cancers, total CVD, all-cause mortality, and total cancer risk among those with a baseline history of cancer. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 3.6 y, invasive cancer occurred in 518 participants in the MVM group and 535 participants in the placebo group (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.09; P = 0.57). We observed no significant effect of a daily MVM on breast cancer (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.42) or colorectal cancer (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.80, 2.12). We observed a protective effect of a daily MVM on lung cancer (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.92). The composite CVD outcome occurred in 429 participants in the MVM group and 437 participants in the placebo group (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.12). MVM use did not significantly affect all-cause mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.08). There were no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS A daily MVM supplement, compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the incidence of total cancer among older men and women. Future studies are needed to determine the effects of MVMs on other aging-related outcomes among older adults. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02422745.
-
4.
A Systematic Review of the Association Between Vegan Diets and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.
Kaiser, J, van Daalen, KR, Thayyil, A, Cocco, MTARR, Caputo, D, Oliver-Williams, C
The Journal of nutrition. 2021;151(6):1539-1552
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Plant-based diets have increased in popularity due to concerns for the environment and animal welfare and due to perceived health benefits. The aim of this study was to assess the association between vegan diets and risks of primary, intermediate, and recurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study is a systemic review of 7 epidemiological studies comprising over 73,000 participants, of whom at least 7661 were vegans. Results indicate that there was no significant evidence of an association between adherence to a vegan diet and risks of primary CVD or a coronary heart disease event. Authors conclude that further experimental evidence and research in large diverse cohorts is required in order to better understand the clinical relevance and public health implications of the vegan diet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plant-based diets are gaining attention globally due to their environmental benefits and perceived health-protective role. A vegan diet may have cardiovascular benefits; however, evidence remains conflicting and insufficiently assessed. OBJECTIVES We evaluated the utility of the vegan diet in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating the association between vegan diets and cardiovascular outcomes. We searched 5 databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenGrey) through 31 October 2020. Four investigators independently screened the full texts for inclusion, assessed quality, and extracted data from published reports. RESULTS Out of the 5729 identified records, 7 were included, comprising over 73,000 participants, of whom at least 7661 were vegans. Three studies, with at least 73,426 individuals (including at least 7380 vegans), examined risks of primary cardiovascular events (total CVD, coronary heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, total stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and ischemic stroke) in individuals who followed a vegan diet compared to those who did not. None of the studies reported a significantly increased or decreased risk of any cardiovascular outcome. One study suggested that vegans were at greater risk of ischemic stroke compared to individuals who consumed animal products (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.95-2.48). Yet in another study, vegans showed lower common carotid artery intima-media thickness (0.56 ± 0.1 mm vs. 0.74 ± 0.1 mm in controls; P < 0.001), and in 3 studies of recurrent CVD events, vegans had 0-52% lower rates. Furthermore, endothelial function did not differ between vegans and nonvegans. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, evidence was deemed to be of low to very low strength/quality. CONCLUSIONS Among the Western populations studied, evidence weakly demonstrates associations between vegan diets and risk of CVDs, with the direction of associations varying with the specific CVD outcome tested. However, more high-quality research on this topic is needed. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42019146835.
-
5.
Association of Major Dietary Protein Sources With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: Prospective Cohort Study.
Sun, Y, Liu, B, Snetselaar, LG, Wallace, RB, Shadyab, AH, Kroenke, CH, Haring, B, Howard, BV, Shikany, JM, Valdiviezo, C, et al
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;10(5):e015553
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dietary recommendations for human health focusing on total protein intake without considering specific protein sources may be simplistic and insufficient. The aim of this study was to investigate whether different dietary protein sources would be differentially associated with mortality risk. The study is based on data from a large prospective cohort study with up to 18-years of follow-up to investigate the risks of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in relation to animal and plant protein intake, and major sources of dietary protein. Results indicate that intake of plant protein and substitution of animal protein with plant protein, were associated with lower risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and dementia mortality. Furthermore, substitution of red meat, eggs, dairy products, or legumes with nuts was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality. Authors conclude that their findings support the need for consideration of protein sources, in addition to the amount of protein intake, in future dietary guidelines.
Abstract
Background Dietary recommendations regarding protein intake have been focused on the amount of protein. However, such recommendations without considering specific protein sources may be simplistic and insufficient. Methods and Results We included 102 521 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative between 1993 and 1998, and followed them through February 2017. During 1 876 205 person-years of follow-up, 25 976 deaths occurred. Comparing the highest with the lowest quintile, plant protein intake was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91 [0.86, 0.96]), cardiovascular disease mortality (HR, 0.88 [0.79, 0.97]), and dementia mortality (HR, 0.79 [0.67, 0.94]). Among major protein sources, comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of consumption, processed red meat (HR, 1.06 [1.01, 1.10]) or eggs (HR, 1.14 [1.10, 1.19]) was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality. Unprocessed red meat (HR, 1.12 [1.02, 1.23]), eggs (HR, 1.24 [1.14, 1.34]), or dairy products (HR, 1.11 [1.02, 1.22]) was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular disease mortality. Egg consumption was associated with higher risk of cancer mortality (HR, 1.10 [1.02, 1.19]). Processed red meat consumption was associated with higher risk of dementia mortality (HR, 1.20 [1.05, 1.32]), while consumption of poultry (HR, 0.85 [0.75, 0.97]) or eggs (HR, 0.86 [0.75, 0.98]) was associated with lower risk of dementia mortality. In substitution analysis, substituting of animal protein with plant protein was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease mortality, and dementia mortality, and substitution of total red meat, eggs, or dairy products with nuts was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Conclusions Different dietary protein sources have varying associations with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease mortality, and dementia mortality. Our findings support the need for consideration of protein sources in future dietary guidelines.
-
6.
Egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: three large prospective US cohort studies, systematic review, and updated meta-analysis.
Drouin-Chartier, JP, Chen, S, Li, Y, Schwab, AL, Stampfer, MJ, Sacks, FM, Rosner, B, Willett, WC, Hu, FB, Bhupathiraju, SN
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2020;368:m513
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Eggs have a high cholesterol content and have therefore been associated with a risk for heart disease. However, studies to substantiate this have been conflicting, with some studies showing associations and others not. This systematic review and meta-analysis of over five million people and 763 studies aimed to evaluate the association between egg intake and the risk of heart disease. The results showed that higher egg intake was associated with a poor diet. Egg intake was not associated with heart disease and this was evident even in people who ate at least one egg per day. Even in people with other associated diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure, egg intake was not associated with heart disease. It was concluded that egg consumption does not increase an individual’s risk for heart disease. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to justify the recommendation that patients at risk of heart disease or those who have heart disease, can still eat up to one egg per day, without risk of exacerbating their condition.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between egg intake and cardiovascular disease risk among women and men in the United States, and to conduct a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. DESIGN Prospective cohort study, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. SETTING Nurses' Health Study (NHS, 1980-2012), NHS II (1991-2013), Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study (HPFS, 1986-2012). PARTICIPANTS Cohort analyses included 83 349 women from NHS, 90 214 women from NHS II, and 42 055 men from HPFS who were free of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incident cardiovascular disease, which included non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, and stroke. RESULTS Over up to 32 years of follow-up (>5.54 million person years), 14 806 participants with incident cardiovascular disease were identified in the three cohorts. Participants with a higher egg intake had a higher body mass index, were less likely to be treated with statins, and consumed more red meats. Most people consumed between one and less than five eggs per week. In the pooled multivariable analysis, consumption of at least one egg per day was not associated with incident cardiovascular disease risk after adjustment for updated lifestyle and dietary factors associated with egg intake (hazard ratio for at least one egg per day v less than one egg per month 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.05). In the updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (33 risk estimates, 1 720 108 participants, 139 195 cardiovascular disease events), an increase of one egg per day was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk (pooled relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03, I2=62.3%). Results were similar for coronary heart disease (21 risk estimates, 1 411 261 participants, 59 713 coronary heart disease events; 0.96, 0.91 to 1.03, I2=38.2%), and stroke (22 risk estimates, 1 059 315 participants, 53 617 stroke events; 0.99, 0.91 to 1.07, I2=71.5%). In analyses stratified by geographical location (P for interaction=0.07), no association was found between egg consumption and cardiovascular disease risk among US cohorts (1.01, 0.96 to 1.06, I2=30.8%) or European cohorts (1.05, 0.92 to 1.19, I2=64.7%), but an inverse association was seen in Asian cohorts (0.92, 0.85 to 0.99, I2=44.8%). CONCLUSIONS Results from the three cohorts and from the updated meta-analysis show that moderate egg consumption (up to one egg per day) is not associated with cardiovascular disease risk overall, and is associated with potentially lower cardiovascular disease risk in Asian populations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019129650.
-
7.
Associations of Processed Meat, Unprocessed Red Meat, Poultry, or Fish Intake With Incident Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality.
Zhong, VW, Van Horn, L, Greenland, P, Carnethon, MR, Ning, H, Wilkins, JT, Lloyd-Jones, DM, Allen, NB
JAMA internal medicine. 2020;180(4):503-512
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, and fish are major components of the US diet. The main aim of this study was to establish the associations of processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, or fish intake with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. This study is a cohort study based on individual-level data from 6 prospective cohort studies of US adults. It consisted of secondary data analysis of deidentified data. Results indicate that higher intake of processed meat, unprocessed red meat, or poultry, but not fish, was associated with an increased risk of CVD. Whereas, higher intake of processed meat or unprocessed red meat, but not poultry or fish, was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Authors conclude that their findings have important public health implications and should warrant further investigations.
Abstract
Importance: Although the associations between processed meat intake and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality have been established, the associations of unprocessed red meat, poultry, or fish consumption with CVD and all-cause mortality are still uncertain. Objective: To identify the associations of processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, or fish intake with incident CVD and all-cause mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed individual-level data of adult participants in 6 prospective cohort studies in the United States. Baseline diet data from 1985 to 2002 were collected. Participants were followed up until August 31, 2016. Data analyses were performed from March 25, 2019, to November 17, 2019. Exposures: Processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, or fish intake as continuous variables. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratio (HR) and 30-year absolute risk difference (ARD) for incident CVD (composite end point of coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and CVD deaths) and all-cause mortality, based on each additional intake of 2 servings per week for monotonic associations or 2 vs 0 servings per week for nonmonotonic associations. Results: Among the 29 682 participants (mean [SD] age at baseline, 53.7 [15.7] years; 13 168 [44.4%] men; and 9101 [30.7%] self-identified as non-white), 6963 incident CVD events and 8875 all-cause deaths were adjudicated during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 19.0 (14.1-23.7) years. The associations of processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, or fish intake with incident CVD and all-cause mortality were monotonic (P for nonlinearity ≥ .25), except for the nonmonotonic association between processed meat intake and incident CVD (P for nonlinearity = .006). Intake of processed meat (adjusted HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11]; adjusted ARD, 1.74% [95% CI, 0.85%-2.63%]), unprocessed red meat (adjusted HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.06]; adjusted ARD, 0.62% [95% CI, 0.07%-1.16%]), or poultry (adjusted HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.06]; adjusted ARD, 1.03% [95% CI, 0.36%-1.70%]) was significantly associated with incident CVD. Fish intake was not significantly associated with incident CVD (adjusted HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.98-1.02]; adjusted ARD, 0.12% [95% CI, -0.40% to 0.65%]). Intake of processed meat (adjusted HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.05]; adjusted ARD, 0.90% [95% CI, 0.43%-1.38%]) or unprocessed red meat (adjusted HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; adjusted ARD, 0.76% [95% CI, 0.19%-1.33%]) was significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Intake of poultry (adjusted HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.02]; adjusted ARD, -0.28% [95% CI, -1.00% to 0.44%]) or fish (adjusted HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.01]; adjusted ARD, -0.34% [95% CI, -0.88% to 0.20%]) was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that, among US adults, higher intake of processed meat, unprocessed red meat, or poultry, but not fish, was significantly associated with a small increased risk of incident CVD, whereas higher intake of processed meat or unprocessed red meat, but not poultry or fish, was significantly associated with a small increased risk of all-cause mortality. These findings have important public health implications and should warrant further investigations.
-
8.
Systematic review of the prospective association of daily step counts with risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and dysglycemia.
Hall, KS, Hyde, ET, Bassett, DR, Carlson, SA, Carnethon, MR, Ekelund, U, Evenson, KR, Galuska, DA, Kraus, WE, Lee, IM, et al
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2020;17(1):78
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The health benefits of physical activity for people of all ages, fitness levels, and sociodemographic backgrounds are well-documented. The main aim of this study was to provide an updated description of the association between daily step counts and subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity or mortality, dysglycaemia, and all-cause mortality in adults and the patterns of these associations. This study is a systemic review of 17 studies from 13 different cohorts. Participants’ mean age ranged from 49.7 to 78.9 years with samples comprised of 46.9% female participants on average. Results showed that increasing steps per day is beneficial for health: taking more steps per day was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, and lower risk of CVD morbidity or mortality. These associations appear to hold across age, gender, and weight status. Authors conclude that this additional evidence will help guide meaningful volume targets that can be used for health care, education, and behavioural interventions, and potentially inform the development of public health guidelines for steps and health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daily step counts is an intuitive metric that has demonstrated success in motivating physical activity in adults and may hold potential for future public health physical activity recommendations. This review seeks to clarify the pattern of the associations between daily steps and subsequent all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality, and dysglycemia, as well as the number of daily steps needed for health outcomes. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to identify prospective studies assessing daily step count measured by pedometer or accelerometer and their associations with all-cause mortality, CVD morbidity or mortality, and dysglycemia (dysglycemia or diabetes incidence, insulin sensitivity, fasting glucose, HbA1c). The search was performed across the Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to August 1, 2019. Eligibility criteria included longitudinal design with health outcomes assessed at baseline and subsequent timepoints; defining steps per day as the exposure; reporting all-cause mortality, CVD morbidity or mortality, and/or dysglycemia outcomes; adults ≥18 years old; and non-patient populations. RESULTS Seventeen prospective studies involving over 30,000 adults were identified. Five studies reported on all-cause mortality (follow-up time 4-10 years), four on cardiovascular risk or events (6 months to 6 years), and eight on dysglycemia outcomes (3 months to 5 years). For each 1000 daily step count increase at baseline, risk reductions in all-cause mortality (6-36%) and CVD (5-21%) at follow-up were estimated across a subsample of included studies. There was no evidence of significant interaction by age, sex, health conditions or behaviors (e.g., alcohol use, smoking status, diet) among studies that tested for interactions. Studies examining dysglycemia outcomes report inconsistent findings, partially due to heterogeneity across studies of glycemia-related biomarker outcomes, analytic approaches, and sample characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Evidence from longitudinal data consistently demonstrated that walking an additional 1000 steps per day can help lower the risk of all-cause mortality, and CVD morbidity and mortality in adults, and that health benefits are present below 10,000 steps per day. However, the shape of the dose-response relation is not yet clear. Data are currently lacking to identify a specific minimum threshold of daily step counts needed to obtain overall health benefit.
-
9.
Breakfast Skipping, Body Composition, and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Bonnet, JP, Cardel, MI, Cellini, J, Hu, FB, Guasch-Ferré, M
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2020;28(6):1098-1109
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Breakfast has been considered the most important meal of the day. However, despite the fairly consistent association of breakfast consumption with decreased body weight, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown equivocal results. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating the effect of skipping breakfast on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors over a period of at least 4 weeks. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. A total of 425 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Participant range of age was 18 to 65 years old, with a mean age of 35 years. This study demonstrates that breakfast skipping compared with breakfast consumption over the short-term (4 to 16 weeks) results in weight loss without significant changes in other body composition parameters. Furthermore, breakfast skipping, as compared with breakfast consumption, led to significant increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Authors conclude that although breakfast skipping had a modest impact on weight loss in the short term, its long-term impact on body composition and cardiometabolic health requires further study.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of skipping breakfast on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors. METHODS This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating breakfast skipping compared with breakfast consumption. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 18, intervention duration ≥ 4 weeks, ≥ 7 participants per group, and ≥ 1 body composition measure. Random-effects meta-analyses of the effect of breakfast skipping on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors were performed. RESULTS Seven RCTs (n = 425 participants) with an average duration of 8.6 weeks were included. Compared with breakfast consumption, breakfast skipping significantly reduced body weight (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.54 kg [95% CI: -1.05 to -0.03], P = 0.04, I2 = 21.4%). Percent body fat was reported in 5 studies and was not significantly different between breakfast skippers and consumers. Three studies reported on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), which was increased in breakfast skippers as compared with breakfast consumers (WMD = 9.24 mg/dL [95% CI: 2.18 to 16.30], P = 0.01). Breakfast skipping did not lead to significant differences in blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, insulin, fasting glucose, leptin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, or ghrelin. CONCLUSIONS Breakfast skipping may have a modest impact on weight loss and may increase LDL in the short term. Further studies are needed to provide additional insight into the effects of breakfast skipping.
-
10.
Associations of habitual fish oil supplementation with cardiovascular outcomes and all cause mortality: evidence from a large population based cohort study.
Li, ZH, Zhong, WF, Liu, S, Kraus, VB, Zhang, YJ, Gao, X, Lv, YB, Shen, D, Zhang, XR, Zhang, PD, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2020;368:m456
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fish oil is a rich source of long chain omega 3 fatty acids, a group of polyunsaturated fats that primarily include eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of habitual use of fish oils with the risk of certain outcomes (the incidence of, and mortality from, cardiovascular disease (CVD) as well as all-cause mortality) and to explore modifying factors that might affect these associations. This study is a large-scale cohort study of 427 678 participants aged between 40 to 69 years. Results showed that a considerable proportion (31.2%) of all participants reported habitual use of fish oil supplements. Findings also indicate that habitual fish oil supplementation was associated with a significantly lower all-cause mortality and incidence of, and mortality from, CVD and myocardial infarction. Authors conclude that habitual use of fish oils is beneficial for CVD events in the general population, supporting their use for the prevention of mortality from all causes and CVD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the associations of habitual fish oil supplementation with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in a large prospective cohort. DESIGN Population based, prospective cohort study. SETTING UK Biobank. PARTICIPANTS A total of 427 678 men and women aged between 40 and 69 who had no CVD or cancer at baseline were enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and followed up to the end of 2018. MAIN EXPOSURE All participants answered questions on the habitual use of supplements, including fish oil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES All cause mortality, CVD mortality, and CVD events. RESULTS At baseline, 133 438 (31.2%) of the 427 678 participants reported habitual use of fish oil supplements. The multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for habitual users of fish oil versus non-users were 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.90) for all cause mortality, 0.84 (0.78 to 0.91) for CVD mortality, and 0.93 (0.90 to 0.96) for incident CVD events. For CVD events, the association seemed to be stronger among those with prevalent hypertension (P for interaction=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Habitual use of fish oil seems to be associated with a lower risk of all cause and CVD mortality and to provide a marginal benefit against CVD events among the general population.