1.
Effects of a low-carbohydrate diet on insulin-resistant dyslipoproteinemia-a randomized controlled feeding trial.
Ebbeling, CB, Knapp, A, Johnson, A, Wong, JMW, Greco, KF, Ma, C, Mora, S, Ludwig, DS
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;115(1):154-162
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diets high in carbohydrates and particularly processed carbohydrates can increase the risk for developing a dysfunction in the body’s ability to take up sugar from the blood, known as insulin resistance. However how this relates to insulin resistance can contribute to the development of many diseases such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease and stroke, which highlights the importance in preventing this dysfunction. This randomised control trial of 148 individuals aimed to determine the role of low, medium, and high carbohydrate diets with varying saturated fat content on measures for insulin resistance. The results showed that regardless of the fat content, it was the level of carbohydrate that determined the effect on measures of insulin resistance. High saturated fat and low-carbohydrate diets improved insulin resistance and low saturated fat high carbohydrate diets worsened insulin resistance. Improvements were also observed in blood lipids with a high fat low carbohydrate diet. It was concluded that a diet low in carbohydrates, but high in saturated fat improved insulin resistance and blood lipid levels. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that a diet, which replaces fat with carbohydrates may be worsening insulin resistance and that low carbohydrate diets may be of benefit.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbohydrate restriction shows promise for diabetes, but concerns regarding high saturated fat content of low-carbohydrate diets limit widespread adoption. OBJECTIVES This preplanned ancillary study aimed to determine how diets varying widely in carbohydrate and saturated fat affect cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors during weight-loss maintenance. METHODS After 10-14% weight loss on a run-in diet, 164 participants (70% female; BMI = 32.4 ± 4.8 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to 3 weight-loss maintenance diets for 20 wk. The prepared diets contained 20% protein and differed 3-fold in carbohydrate (Carb) and saturated fat as a proportion of energy (Low-Carb: 20% carbohydrate, 21% saturated fat; Moderate-Carb: 40%, 14%; High-Carb: 60%, 7%). Fasting plasma samples were collected prerandomization and at 20 wk. Lipoprotein insulin resistance (LPIR) score was calculated from triglyceride-rich, high-density, and low-density lipoprotein particle (TRL-P, HDL-P, LDL-P) sizes and subfraction concentrations (large/very large TRL-P, large HDL-P, small LDL-P). Other outcomes included lipoprotein(a), triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, adiponectin, and inflammatory markers. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS Retention was 90%. Mean change in LPIR (scale 0-100) differed by diet in a dose-dependent fashion: Low-Carb (-5.3; 95% CI: -9.2, -1.5), Moderate-Carb (-0.02; 95% CI: -4.1, 4.1), High-Carb (3.6; 95% CI: -0.6, 7.7), P = 0.009. Low-Carb also favorably affected lipoprotein(a) [-14.7% (95% CI: -19.5, -9.5), -2.1 (95% CI: -8.2, 4.3), and 0.2 (95% CI: -6.0, 6.8), respectively; P = 0.0005], triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, large/very large TRL-P, large HDL-P, and adiponectin. LDL cholesterol, LDL-P, and inflammatory markers did not differ by diet. CONCLUSIONS A low-carbohydrate diet, high in saturated fat, improved insulin-resistant dyslipoproteinemia and lipoprotein(a), without adverse effect on LDL cholesterol. Carbohydrate restriction might lower CVD risk independently of body weight, a possibility that warrants study in major multicentered trials powered on hard outcomes. The registry is available through ClinicialTrials.gov: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02068885.
2.
Effect of time restricted eating on body weight and fasting glucose in participants with obesity: results of a randomized, controlled, virtual clinical trial.
Peeke, PM, Greenway, FL, Billes, SK, Zhang, D, Fujioka, K
Nutrition & diabetes. 2021;11(1):6
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Time-restricted eating (TRE) has been identified as an effective method of losing weight in the face of rising obesity worldwide. Fasting for at least 12 hours has a beneficial effect on weight management and cardiometabolic health. Overnight fasting longer than 12 hours may result in fat-burning or ketosis. A high-fat, low-protein, low-carbohydrate snack during a 14-hour fast is believed not to raise blood sugar levels and helps with hunger management. This 8-week virtual, pilot, randomised, comparator-controlled clinical trial evaluated the benefits of following a commercial weight loss programme combined with TRE on body weight and fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels. The commercial weight loss programme included calculated calories and macronutrient content in their customised meal plans, as well as coaching and troubleshooting sessions. The participants were randomly assigned to 14-hour fasting (14:10) or 12-hour fasting (control). The 14:10 group also consumed 200 kcal of mixed nuts as a snack at hour 12 to determine the effect on blood glucose levels. After the intervention for 8 weeks, the 14:10 group showed a significant reduction in body weight (11kg) and FBG (8mg/dl), and the 12:12 group significantly lost 9kg of body weight and showed a non-significant reduction in FBG (3mg/dl). Participants with higher baseline FBG levels showed a greater reduction in FBG, indicating potential greater improvements in people with diabetes. A comparison of the two groups did not show a statistically significant difference in intervention effects. A fasting snack at 12 hours did not affect FBG in the 14:10 group, which may help adherence. Due to the exploratory nature of this study, larger robust studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of 14:10 and 12:12 time-restricted fasting regimens with commercial weight loss programmes. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the beneficial effects of different time-restricted fasting regimens on cardiometabolic health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Time restricted eating (TRE) is an emerging dietary intervention for weight loss that is hypothesized to reinforce the metabolic benefits of nightly fasting/ketosis. This pilot study investigated the effectiveness of a daily 14-h metabolic fast (14:10 TRE beginning after dinner, a "fasting snack" at hour 12, and ending with breakfast 14 h later) combined with a commercial weight management program on body weight and fasting blood glucose (FBG) in individuals with obesity. We also investigated the effect of the low-calorie, high-fat, low-carbohydrate, and low-protein "fasting snack" on blood glucose. METHODS This 8-week, randomized, controlled, clinical trial included men and women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) between June and October 2020. Study procedures were conducted remotely. Participants were randomized to 14:10 or 12-h TRE (12:12, active comparator) and prescribed a diet (controlled for calories and macronutrient composition) and exercise program that included weekly customized counseling and support. The primary outcome was change from baseline in body weight in the 14:10 group. RESULTS Of the 78 randomized participants, 60 (n = 30/group) completed 8 weeks. The LS mean change from baseline in weight in the 14:10 group was -8.5% (95% CI -9.6 to -7.4; P < 0.001) and -7.1% (-8.3 to -5.8; P < 0.001) in the 12:12 group (between group difference -1.4%; -2.7 to -0.2; P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant LS mean change from baseline to week 8 in FBG in the 14:10 group of -7.6 mg/dl (95% CI -15.1 to -0.1; P < 0.05) but not in the 12:12 group (-3.1 mg/dl, -10.0 to 3.7; P = NS). Both interventions resulted in a larger reduction in FBG in participants with elevated FBG (≥100 mg/dl) at baseline (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In participants with obesity who completed 8 weeks of the 14:10 TRE schedule combined with a commercial weight loss program, there was statistically significant and clinically meaningful weight loss and improvements in FBG.
3.
The Weight Optimization Revamping Lifestyle using the Dietary Guidelines (WORLD) Study: Sustained Weight Loss Over 12 Months.
Psota, TL, Tindall, AM, Lohse, B, Miller, PE, Petersen, KS, Kris-Etherton, PM
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2020;28(7):1235-1244
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Effective long-term weight loss strategies to reduce the risk of death and diseases associated with being obese or overweight are required, as restrictive programmes are difficult to sustain, and weight loss may be heavily influenced by behavioural factors. This randomised control trial of 101 premenopausal women with obesity or overweight aimed to compare a lower-fat and moderate-fat diets, both with nutrition education for 12 months. The results showed that both treatment groups lost weight. Both groups consumed the same amount of fat but increased their diet quality. Diet quality and greater attendance at nutritional education sessions were associated with greater weight loss. Cholesterol was significantly lower in both groups, but blood pressure remained unchanged. Interestingly there were a large number of women who did not complete the trial. It was concluded that irrespective of the amount of fat consumed, nutrition education can help to achieve sustained weight loss, improve diet quality and decrease heart disease risk for at least 12 months. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that recommending fat-based targets for weight loss may be ineffective and the importance of emotional and behavioural support for individuals on a weight loss regime to improve their risk for heart disease.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare two energy-restricted, nutrient-dense diets at the upper or lower ends of the dietary fat recommendation range (lower fat [20% energy from fat] versus moderate fat [35%]) on weight loss using behavioral theory-based nutrition education. METHODS A total of 101 premenopausal women with overweight or obesity were randomized to an energy-restricted lower-fat or moderate-fat diet for 1 year. Interventions included 28 behavioral theory-based nutrition education sessions plus weekly exercise sessions. RESULTS Both treatment groups experienced weight loss (-5.0 kg for lower fat and -4.3 kg for moderate fat; P < 0.0001), but there was no difference in weight loss or fat intake between groups. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased (-3. 4 mg/dL and -3.8 mg/dL; P < 0.05), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased (1.9 mg/dL; P < 0.05) in both groups at 12 months. Diet quality, assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, increased significantly at 4 months versus baseline (70.8 [0.9] vs. 77.8 [1.0]) and was maintained through 12 months. Higher Healthy Eating Index scores were associated with greater weight loss at 4 months (r = -0.2; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the context of a well-resourced, free-living weight-loss intervention, total fat intake did not change; however, theory-based nutrition education underpinned by food-based recommendations resulted in caloric deficits, improvements in diet quality, and weight loss that was sustained for 1 year.