-
1.
Effect of cocoa flavanol supplementation for the prevention of cardiovascular disease events: the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial.
Sesso, HD, Manson, JE, Aragaki, AK, Rist, PM, Johnson, LG, Friedenberg, G, Copeland, T, Clar, A, Mora, S, Moorthy, MV, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;115(6):1490-1500
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cocoa is made from the bean of the cacao tree and has a long history of potential health benefits based upon its flavanol and procyanidin content. Cocoa extract also contains methylxanthines [alkaloids] such as theobromine and caffeine, which may enhance the vascular and central nervous system effects of cocoa flavanols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the flavanol-rich cocoa extract containing all potential bioactive components of the cocoa bean on clinical cardiovascular outcomes. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial testing a cocoa extract supplement and a multivitamin supplement (COSMOS). This study focuses on the cocoa extract component of the trial. A total of 21,442 participants underwent randomisation to one of the four groups. Results show that after a median of 3.6 years of treatment there was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of total cardiovascular events. However, cocoa flavanol supplementation significantly reduced cardiovascular disease death by 27%, whereas other individual cardiovascular outcomes had no significant reductions in risk. Authors conclude that longer-term follow-up of the trial cohort and ongoing ancillary mechanistic studies in COSMOS may further elucidate the relation between cocoa extract supplementation and clinical cardiovascular events.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cocoa extract is a source of flavanols that favorably influence vascular risk factors in small and short-term trials, yet effects on clinical cardiovascular events are untested. OBJECTIVES We examined whether cocoa extract supplementation decreases total cardiovascular disease (CVD) among older adults. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-by-2 factorial trial of cocoa extract supplementation and multivitamins for prevention of CVD and cancer among 21,442 US adults (12,666 women aged ≥65 y and 8776 men aged ≥60 y), free of major CVD and recently diagnosed cancer. The intervention phase was June 2015 through December 2020. This article reports on the cocoa extract intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to a cocoa extract supplement [500 mg flavanols/d, including 80 mg (-)-epicatechin] or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of confirmed incident total cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, carotid artery disease, peripheral artery surgery, and unstable angina. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 3.6 y, 410 participants taking cocoa extract and 456 taking placebo had confirmed total cardiovascular events (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.02; P = 0.11). For secondary endpoints, HRs were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.98) for CVD death, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.16) for MI, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.70, 1.17) for stroke, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.17) for coronary revascularization, neutral for other individual cardiovascular endpoints, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.03) for all-cause mortality. Per-protocol analyses censoring follow-up at nonadherence supported a lower risk of total cardiovascular events (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.99). There were no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Cocoa extract supplementation did not significantly reduce total cardiovascular events among older adults but reduced CVD death by 27%. Potential reductions in total cardiovascular events were supported in per-protocol analyses. Additional research is warranted to clarify whether cocoa extract may reduce clinical cardiovascular events. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02422745.
-
2.
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events in Women vs Men With Type 1 Diabetes.
Braffett, BH, Bebu, I, El Ghormli, L, Cowie, CC, Sivitz, WI, Pop-Busui, R, Larkin, ME, Gubitosi-Klug, RA, Nathan, DM, Lachin, JM, et al
JAMA network open. 2022;5(9):e2230710
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
In the general population, women have a lower absolute risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with men. However, among individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, the relative risk of CVD is similar or higher in women compared with men. The aim of this study was to assess sex differences in achieving recommended CVD risk management targets and associations with CVD events. This is a cohort study which included a total of 1441 (men n= 736) participants with type 1 diabetes. Results show that the prevalence and mean levels of most cardiometabolic risk factors (except for pulse rate and haemoglobin A1c) were consistent with a less atherogenic profile among women compared with men. Furthermore, achieving treatment targets for blood pressure, lipids, and glucose was associated with significantly decreased risk of CVD in both women and men. Authors conclude that their findings argue for a recalibration of CVD risk factor stratification in revised clinical care guidelines and therapeutic recommendations by sex for individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among women compared with men in the general population may be diminished among those with diabetes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate cardiometabolic risk factors and their management in association with CVD events in women vs men with type 1 diabetes enrolled in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used data obtained during the combined DCCT (randomized clinical trial, conducted 1983-1993) and EDIC (observational study, conducted 1994 to present) studies through April 30, 2018 (mean [SD] follow-up, 28.8 [5.8] years), at 27 clinical centers in the US and Canada. Data analyses were performed between July 2021 and April 2022. EXPOSURE During the DCCT phase, patients were randomized to intensive vs conventional diabetes therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD events were assessed via detailed medical history and focused physical examinations. Blood and urine samples were assayed centrally. CVD events were adjudicated by a review committee. Linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated sex differences in cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD risk over follow-up. RESULTS A total of 1441 participants with type 1 diabetes (mean [SD] age at DCCT baseline, 26.8 [7.1] years; 761 [52.8%] men; 1390 [96.5%] non-Hispanic White) were included. Over the duration of the study, compared with men, women had significantly lower body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; β = -0.43 [SE, 0.16]; P = .006), waist circumference (β = -10.56 cm [SE, 0.52 cm]; P < .001), blood pressure (systolic: β = -5.77 mm Hg [SE, 0.35 mm Hg]; P < .001; diastolic: β = -3.23 mm Hg [SE, 0.26 mm Hg]; P < .001), and triglyceride levels (β = -10.10 mg/dL [SE, 1.98 mg/dL]; P < .001); higher HDL cholesterol levels (β = 9.36 mg/dL [SE, 0.57 mg/dL]; P < .001); and similar LDL cholesterol levels (β = -0.76 mg/dL [SE, 1.22 mg/dL]; P = .53). Women, compared with men, achieved recommended targets more frequently for blood pressure (ie, <130/80 mm Hg: 90.0% vs 77.4%; P < .001) and triglycerides (ie, <150 mg/dL: 97.3% vs 90.5%; P < .001). However, sex-specific HDL cholesterol targets (ie, ≥50 mg/dL for women, ≥40 mg/dL for men) were achieved less often (74.3% vs 86.6%; P < .001) and cardioprotective medications were used less frequently in women than men (ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker: 29.6% [95% CI, 25.7%-33.9%] vs 40.0% [95% CI, 36.1%-44.0%]; P = .001; lipid-lowering medication: 25.3% [95% CI, 22.1%-28.7%] vs 39.6% [95% CI, 36.1%-43.2%]; P < .001). Women also had significantly higher pulse rates (mean [SD], 75.2 [6.8] beats per minute vs 71.8 [6.9] beats per minute; P < .001) and hemoglobin A1c levels (mean [SD], 8.3% [1.0%] vs 8.1% [1.0%]; P = .01) and achieved targets for tighter glycemic control less often than men (ie, hemoglobin A1c <7%: 11.2% [95% CI, 9.3%-13.3%] vs 14.0% [95% CI, 12.0%-16.3%]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that despite a more favorable cardiometabolic risk factor profile, women with type 1 diabetes did not have a significantly lower CVD event burden than men, suggesting a greater clinical impact of cardiometabolic risk factors in women vs men with diabetes. These findings call for conscientious optimization of the control of CVD risk factors in women with type 1 diabetes.
-
3.
Effect of a Comprehensive Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Intervention in Persons With Serious Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Daumit, GL, Dalcin, AT, Dickerson, FB, Miller, ER, Evins, AE, Cather, C, Jerome, GJ, Young, DR, Charleston, JB, Gennusa, JV, et al
JAMA network open. 2020;3(6):e207247
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Heart disease death rates in individuals with serious mental illness are double that of the general population, indicating a concerted effort is needed to help this group of people. However, previous studies on interventions have failed to show improvements indicating a requirement to identify effective solutions. This randomised control trial of 269 individuals with mental illness aimed to determine the effectiveness of an 18-month management plan to reduce heart disease risk. The results showed that heart disease risk was significantly decreased when individuals with mental illness were in a closely monitored management programme. This programme consisted of behavioural counselling and care coordination. It was concluded that a multi-faceted care management plan can significantly reduce the risk of heart disease in individuals with serious mental illness. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand that individuals with mental illness are at a higher risk of death from heart disease and that they need to consider enrolling them into a closely monitored management plan.
Abstract
Importance: Persons with serious mental illness have a cardiovascular disease mortality rate more than twice that of the overall population. Meaningful cardiovascular risk reduction requires targeted efforts in this population, who often have psychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of an 18-month multifaceted intervention incorporating behavioral counseling, care coordination, and care management for overall cardiovascular risk reduction in adults with serious mental illness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2013 to November 2018 at 4 community mental health outpatient programs in Maryland. The study recruited adults with at least 1 cardiovascular disease risk factor (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, current tobacco smoking, and/or overweight or obesity) attending the mental health programs. Of 398 participants screened, 269 were randomized to intervention (132 participants) or control (137 participants). Data collection staff were blinded to group assignment. Data were analyzed on the principle of intention to treat, and data analysis was performed from November 2018 to March 2019. Interventions: A health coach and nurse provided individually tailored cardiovascular disease risk reduction behavioral counseling, collaborated with physicians to implement appropriate risk factor management, and coordinated with mental health staff to encourage attainment of health goals. Programs offered physical activity classes and received consultation on serving healthier meals; intervention and control participants were exposed to these environmental changes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in the risk of cardiovascular disease from the global Framingham Risk Score (FRS), which estimates the 10-year probability of a cardiovascular disease event, from baseline to 18 months, expressed as percentage change for intervention compared with control. Results: Of 269 participants randomized (mean [SD] age, 48.8 [11.9] years; 128 men [47.6%]), 159 (59.1%) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, 67 (24.9%) had bipolar disorder, and 38 (14.1%) had major depressive disorder. At 18 months, the primary outcome, FRS, was obtained for 256 participants (95.2%). The mean (SD) baseline FRS was 11.5% (11.5%) (median, 8.6%; interquartile range, 3.9%-16.0%) in the intervention group and 12.7% (12.7%) (median, 9.1%; interquartile range, 4.0%-16.7%) in the control group. At 18 months, the mean (SD) FRS was 9.9% (10.2%) (median, 7.7%; interquartile range, 3.1%-12.0%) in the intervention group and 12.3% (12.0%) (median, 9.7%; interquartile range, 4.0%-15.9%) in the control group. Compared with the control group, the intervention group experienced a 12.7% (95% CI, 2.5%-22.9%; P = .02) relative reduction in FRS at 18 months. Conclusions and Relevance: An 18-month behavioral counseling, care coordination, and care management intervention statistically significantly reduced overall cardiovascular disease risk in adults with serious mental illness. This intervention provides the means to substantially reduce health disparities in this high-risk population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02127671.
-
4.
Egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: three large prospective US cohort studies, systematic review, and updated meta-analysis.
Drouin-Chartier, JP, Chen, S, Li, Y, Schwab, AL, Stampfer, MJ, Sacks, FM, Rosner, B, Willett, WC, Hu, FB, Bhupathiraju, SN
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2020;368:m513
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Eggs have a high cholesterol content and have therefore been associated with a risk for heart disease. However, studies to substantiate this have been conflicting, with some studies showing associations and others not. This systematic review and meta-analysis of over five million people and 763 studies aimed to evaluate the association between egg intake and the risk of heart disease. The results showed that higher egg intake was associated with a poor diet. Egg intake was not associated with heart disease and this was evident even in people who ate at least one egg per day. Even in people with other associated diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure, egg intake was not associated with heart disease. It was concluded that egg consumption does not increase an individual’s risk for heart disease. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to justify the recommendation that patients at risk of heart disease or those who have heart disease, can still eat up to one egg per day, without risk of exacerbating their condition.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between egg intake and cardiovascular disease risk among women and men in the United States, and to conduct a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. DESIGN Prospective cohort study, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. SETTING Nurses' Health Study (NHS, 1980-2012), NHS II (1991-2013), Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study (HPFS, 1986-2012). PARTICIPANTS Cohort analyses included 83 349 women from NHS, 90 214 women from NHS II, and 42 055 men from HPFS who were free of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incident cardiovascular disease, which included non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, and stroke. RESULTS Over up to 32 years of follow-up (>5.54 million person years), 14 806 participants with incident cardiovascular disease were identified in the three cohorts. Participants with a higher egg intake had a higher body mass index, were less likely to be treated with statins, and consumed more red meats. Most people consumed between one and less than five eggs per week. In the pooled multivariable analysis, consumption of at least one egg per day was not associated with incident cardiovascular disease risk after adjustment for updated lifestyle and dietary factors associated with egg intake (hazard ratio for at least one egg per day v less than one egg per month 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.05). In the updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (33 risk estimates, 1 720 108 participants, 139 195 cardiovascular disease events), an increase of one egg per day was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk (pooled relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03, I2=62.3%). Results were similar for coronary heart disease (21 risk estimates, 1 411 261 participants, 59 713 coronary heart disease events; 0.96, 0.91 to 1.03, I2=38.2%), and stroke (22 risk estimates, 1 059 315 participants, 53 617 stroke events; 0.99, 0.91 to 1.07, I2=71.5%). In analyses stratified by geographical location (P for interaction=0.07), no association was found between egg consumption and cardiovascular disease risk among US cohorts (1.01, 0.96 to 1.06, I2=30.8%) or European cohorts (1.05, 0.92 to 1.19, I2=64.7%), but an inverse association was seen in Asian cohorts (0.92, 0.85 to 0.99, I2=44.8%). CONCLUSIONS Results from the three cohorts and from the updated meta-analysis show that moderate egg consumption (up to one egg per day) is not associated with cardiovascular disease risk overall, and is associated with potentially lower cardiovascular disease risk in Asian populations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019129650.
-
5.
Walnuts and Vegetable Oils Containing Oleic Acid Differentially Affect the Gut Microbiota and Associations with Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Follow-up of a Randomized, Controlled, Feeding Trial in Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.
Tindall, AM, McLimans, CJ, Petersen, KS, Kris-Etherton, PM, Lamendella, R
The Journal of nutrition. 2020;150(4):806-817
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Recent evidence suggests that microbes present in the gut may have a role in the risk of heart disease development. Walnuts have in previous studies shown to be of benefit for cardiovascular health and gut microbes are thought to be the mediator of this. This secondary analysis of a randomised control trial aimed to assess diets which differentiated in walnut composition on the species diversity of gut microbes and heart disease risk in 46 individuals with obesity over an 18-week period. The results showed that a diet of walnuts and the fats they contain enriched the microbes present in the gut compared to a Western-style diet. Interestingly, a whole walnut diet showed enrichment of a species that is better able to break down and use the components of walnuts compared to a diet where only the walnut fats were present. When on a diet rich in walnuts, an increase in a species of gut bacteria related to improved heart disease risk factors was observed. It was concluded that the positive effects of walnuts on gut bacteria and heart disease risk are due to the fibre and bioactive compounds, not simply the fats they contain. This study could be used by health care professionals to recommend the inclusion of whole walnuts into the diet of individuals with obesity to enrich gut bacteria that are involved in reducing heart disease risk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether the favorable effects of walnuts on the gut microbiota are attributable to the fatty acids, including α-linolenic acid (ALA), and/or the bioactive compounds and fiber. OBJECTIVE This study examined between-diet gut bacterial differences in individuals at increased cardiovascular risk following diets that replace SFAs with walnuts or vegetable oils. METHODS Forty-two adults at cardiovascular risk were included in a randomized, crossover, controlled-feeding trial that provided a 2-wk standard Western diet (SWD) run-in and three 6-wk isocaloric study diets: a diet containing whole walnuts (WD; 57-99 g/d walnuts; 2.7% ALA), a fatty acid-matched diet devoid of walnuts (walnut fatty acid-matched diet; WFMD; 2.6% ALA), and a diet replacing ALA with oleic acid without walnuts (oleic acid replaces ALA diet; ORAD; 0.4% ALA). Fecal samples were collected following the run-in and study diets to assess gut microbiota with 16S rRNA sequencing and Qiime2 for amplicon sequence variant picking. RESULTS Subjects had elevated BMI (30 ± 1 kg/m2), blood pressure (121 ± 2/77 ± 1 mmHg), and LDL cholesterol (120 ± 5 mg/dL). Following the WD, Roseburia [relative abundance (RA) = 4.2%, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) = 4], Eubacterium eligensgroup (RA = 1.4%, LDA = 4), LachnospiraceaeUCG001 (RA = 1.2%, LDA = 3.2), Lachnospiraceae UCG004 (RA = 1.0%, LDA = 3), and Leuconostocaceae (RA = 0.03%, LDA = 2.8) were most abundant relative to taxa in the SWD (P ≤ 0.05 for all). The WD was also enriched in Gordonibacter relative to the WFMD. Roseburia (3.6%, LDA = 4) and Eubacterium eligensgroup (RA = 1.5%, LDA = 3.4) were abundant following the WFMD, and Clostridialesvadin BB60group (RA = 0.3%, LDA = 2) and gutmetagenome (RA = 0.2%, LDA = 2) were most abundant following the ORAD relative to the SWD (P ≤ 0.05 for all). Lachnospiraceae were inversely correlated with blood pressure and lipid/lipoprotein measurements following the WD. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate similar enrichment of Roseburia following the WD and WFMD, which could be explained by the fatty acid composition. Gordonibacter enrichment and the inverse association between Lachnospiraceae and cardiovascular risk factors following the WD suggest that the gut microbiota may contribute to the health benefits of walnut consumption in adults at cardiovascular risk. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02210767.