0
selected
-
1.
Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics on depression: results from a meta-analysis.
Zhang, Q, Chen, B, Zhang, J, Dong, J, Ma, J, Zhang, Y, Jin, K, Lu, J
BMC psychiatry. 2023;23(1):477
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder that impairs psychosocial function and quality of life. Recent studies show that prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics reveal a novel way to treat psychiatric disorders such as depression through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics in alleviating depressive symptoms. This study was a meta-analysis of thirteen studies with a total of 786 participants who were allocated to the intervention group (n=427) and the placebo group (n=359). Results showed that the overall effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on depressive symptoms were significantly superior to those of placebo. Additionally, biological sex was a vital factor that influenced patients’ responses to the treatment. Authors concluded that agents that manipulate gut microbiota might become a novel approach to treat patients with mild-to-moderate depression.
Abstract
Accumulating studies have shown the effects of gut microbiota management tools in improving depression. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on patients with depression. We searched six databases up to July 2022. In total, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 786 participants were included. The overall results demonstrated that patients who received prebiotics, probiotics or synbiotics had significantly improved symptoms of depression compared with those in the placebo group. However, subgroup analysis only confirmed the significant antidepressant effects of agents that contained probiotics. In addition, patients with mild or moderate depression could both benefit from the treatment. Studies with a lower proportion of females reported stronger effects for alleviating depressive symptoms. In conclusion, agents that manipulate gut microbiota might improve mild-to-moderate depression. It is necessary to further investigate the benefits of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic treatments relative to antidepressants and follow up with individuals over a longer time before these therapies are implemented in clinical practice.
-
2.
Effect of short-term, high-dose probiotic supplementation on cognition, related brain functions and BDNF in patients with depression: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Schneider, E, Doll, JPK, Schweinfurth, N, Kettelhack, C, Schaub, AC, Yamanbaeva, G, Varghese, N, Mählmann, L, Brand, S, Eckert, A, et al
Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN. 2023;48(1):E23-E33
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often thought of as being solely a mood disorder. However, several studies have shown that sufferers can also experience decreased brain function such as memory loss and poor attention. Current therapies for MDD focus on the balancing of mood and leaves the problem of reduced brain function unattended. The gut microbiota has recently been shown to influence brain function and altered gut microbiota composition has been seen in individuals with MDD. Targeting the gut microbiota may therefore represent a novel target for MDD treatments. This secondary analysis of a randomised control trial aimed to determine whether a probiotic multistrain supplement could improve brain function in 60 individuals with depression. The results showed that probiotics improved the brain function in two different ways, the immediate recall of words, and the improvement of decreased neural function in the hippocampal part of the brain, which has been associated with MDD. It was concluded that probiotic supplementation can enhance verbal episodic memory and improve neural function associated with impaired brain function in MDD. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the health of the gut microbiota can have an influence on brain function and that probiotics may help individuals with MDD who are suffering from poorer memory.
Abstract
BACKGROUND In major depressive disorder (MDD), cognitive dysfunctions strongly contribute to functional impairments but are barely addressed in current therapies. Novel treatment strategies addressing cognitive symptoms in depression are needed. As the gut microbiota-brain axis is linked to depression and cognition, we investigated the effect of a 4-week high-dose probiotic supplementation on cognitive symptoms in depression. METHODS This randomized controlled trial included 60 patients with MDD, of whom 43 entered modified intention-to-treat analysis. A probiotic supplement or indistinguishable placebo containing maltose was administered over 31 days in addition to treatment as usual for depression. Participant scores on the Verbal Learning Memory Test (VLMT), Corsi Block Tapping Test, and both Trail Making Test versions as well as brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels were assessed at 3 different time points: before, immediately after and 4 weeks after intervention. Additionally, brain activation changes during working memory processing were investigated before and immediately after intervention. RESULTS We found a significantly improved immediate recall in the VLMT in the probiotic group immediately after intervention, and a trend for a time × group interaction considering all time points. Furthermore, we found a time × group interaction in hippocampus activation during working memory processing, revealing a remediated hippocampus function in the probiotic group. Other measures did not reveal significant changes. LIMITATIONS The modest sample size resulting from our exclusion of low-compliant cases should be considered. CONCLUSION Additional probiotic supplementation enhances verbal episodic memory and affects neural mechanisms underlying impaired cognition in MDD. The present findings support the importance of the gut microbiota-brain axis in MDD and emphasize the potential of microbiota-related regimens to treat cognitive symptoms in depression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02957591.
-
3.
Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 decreases subjective academic stress in healthy adults: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Wauters, L, Van Oudenhove, L, Accarie, A, Geboers, K, Geysen, H, Toth, J, Luypaerts, A, Verbeke, K, Smokvina, T, Raes, J, et al
Gut microbes. 2022;14(1):2031695
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Previous research has shown a bidirectional relationship between the gut and psychological stress, which could be mediated by intestinal permeability followed by an immune and inflammatory response. However, the exact mechanisms of this relationship are yet to be elucidated. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on intestinal permeability and stress markers during a public speech in healthy students. Participants consumed either milk containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 or acidified milk twice daily for four weeks to assess subjective and objective stress markers and markers of intestinal permeability. Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 reduced the stress-induced hyperpermeability to mannitol and subjective stress markers (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/ STAI). A subgroup of healthy students with stress-induced cortisol >P90 of baseline showed a reduction in perceived stress score following Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 intervention. To evaluate the additional effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on stress and gut health, further robust studies are needed. Healthcare professionals can use the findings of this study to understand the anxiolytic effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690.
Abstract
Psychological stress negatively affects the intestinal barrier function in animals and humans. We aimed to study the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on intestinal permeability and stress-markers during public speech. Healthy students were randomized to L. rhamnosus-containing (test) or acidified (placebo) milk consumed twice daily for 4 weeks, with 46 subjects per treatment group. Small intestinal permeability was quantified by a 2 h urinary lactulose-mannitol ratio (LMR, primary outcome), fractional excretion of lactulose (FEL) and mannitol (FEM). Salivary cortisol, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Perceived Stress scores (PSS) were collected. No between-treatment differences were found for LMR (p = .71), FEL or FEM. Within-treatment analyses showed similar LMR and FEL but a stress-induced increase of FEM with the placebo (p < .05) but not test product. Despite a similar increase in salivary cortisol, the stress-induced increase in STAI was significantly lower with the test product vs. placebo (p = .01). Moreover, a stress-preventative effect of the probiotic was found for PSS and more pronounced in subjects with high stress-induced cortisol (p = .01). While increased FEM was mediated by salivary cortisol levels, the effect of the test product on subjective stress was not mediated by changes in FEM. No serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, we demonstrated that L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 prevented stress-induced hyperpermeability to mannitol. Subjective but not objective stress-markers were reduced with L. rhamnosus vs. placebo, suggesting anxiolytic effects, which were independent of barrier stabilization and attractive for the reduction of stress in both health and disease. Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03408691.
-
4.
Gut Microbiota and Pathophysiology of Depressive Disorder.
Kunugi, H
Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2021;77 Suppl 2:11-20
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Bidirectional communication between the brain and gastrointestinal tract has been established and evidence suggests the microbiota-gut-brain axis may play a role in many psychiatric diseases, including major depression disorder (MDD). Although there is currently no established biochemical marker used in the clinical setting, recent findings have identified four potential mechanisms underlying MDD. The aim of this review is to outline these mechanisms and summarise the current evidence related to the pathophysiology of MDD. The literature suggests the gut microbiota impacts each of the potential mechanisms in the pathophysiology of MDD, and recent clinical trials on probiotics indicate beneficial effects on depression symptoms. Based on these results, the author concludes that practices leading to a healthier gut microbiota may aid in the reduction of depression symptoms. Future research on the microbiota-gut-brain axis in MDD is a promising avenue for better understanding the pathophysiology of disease and developing improved treatments for MDD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accumulating evidence has suggested that the bi-directional communication pathway, the microbiota-gut-brain axis, plays an important role in the pathophysiology of many neuropsychiatric diseases including major depressive disorder (MDD). This review outlines current evidence and promising findings related to the pathophysiology and treatment of MDD. SUMMARY There are at least 4 key biological molecules/systems underlying the pathophysiology of MDD: central dopamine, stress responses by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and autonomic nervous system, inflammation, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Animal experiments in several depression models have clearly indicated that gut microbiota is closely related to these molecules/systems and administration of probiotics and prebitotics may have beneficial effects on them. Although the results of microbiota profile of MDD patients varied from a study to another, multiple studies reported that bacteria which produce short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate and those protective against metabolic diseases (e.g., Bacteroidetes) were reduced. Clinical trials of probiotics have emerged, and the majority of the studies have reported beneficial effects on depression symptoms and related biological markers. Key Messages: The accumulating evidence suggests that research on the microbiota-gut-brain axis in major depressive disorder (MDD) is promising to elucidate the pathophysiology and to develop novel treatment of MDD, although there is still a long distance yet to reach the goals.
-
5.
Small talk: microbial metabolites involved in the signaling from microbiota to brain.
Caspani, G, Swann, J
Current opinion in pharmacology. 2019;48:99-106
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut-brain axis (GBA) is the communication network between the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system. An array of gut bacteria-derived metabolites mediates this interaction between the gastrointestinal system and the brain, influencing physiological and pathological processes in direct and indirect ways. Thus a variation in the gut microbiome can alter the functional capacity and output of the gut-brain-communication. In this review, the authors summarise key bacterial metabolites from the gut and their effect on the brain. Addressed are short-chain fatty acids, their impact on gut and brain barrier integrity, their role in appetite regulation, and their association with anxiety and depressive disorders amongst other aspects. Secondly, bile acids, which are processed by the microbiome, can activate several receptors. And thus divergence gut bacteria can alter the composition of bile acids and change their signalling capacity. Bile acids can also directly modify gut and blood-brain barrier function and may carry a signalling role in the brain. A few neurotransmitters are covered in this article, as several types of gut bacteria synthesize neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and dopamine. Though, it is uncertain whether all gut-derived neurotransmitters can reach the brain. However, certain GABA-producing bacteria have been shown to elicit higher GABA levels in the brain. The microbiota can also be involved with the conversion of neurotransmitters such as dopamine. The final section briefly capture the evidence of other brain health-relevant molecules derived from the intestinal microbiota, including Lipopolysaccharides, choline, lactate and B-Vitamins. This review yields a short and comprehensive summary highlighting the many ways the gut can influence brain function and health and could be of interest to those providing mental health support in light of gut function.
Abstract
The wealth of biotransformational capabilities encoded in the microbiome expose the host to an array of bioactive xenobiotic products. Several of these metabolites participate in the communication between the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system and have potential to modulate central physiological and pathological processes. This biochemical interplay can occur through various direct and indirect mechanisms. These include binding to host receptors in the brain, stimulation of the vagus nerve in the gut, alteration of central neurotransmission, and modulation of neuroinflammation. Here, the potential for short chain fatty acids, bile acids, neurotransmitters and other bioactive products of the microbiome to participate in the gut-brain axis will be reviewed.
-
6.
Gut microbiota varies by opioid use, circulating leptin and oxytocin in African American men with diabetes and high burden of chronic disease.
Barengolts, E, Green, SJ, Eisenberg, Y, Akbar, A, Reddivari, B, Layden, BT, Dugas, L, Chlipala, G
PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0194171
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) can lead to alterations of the composition of the gut microbiota. The gut microbiota, in turn, has been suggested to play a role in the development of psychological conditions, such as anxiety, depression and drug addiction. This cross-sectional study included 99 mostly overweight/obese African American men, with or without T2D, and with or without opioid addiction and other psychiatric disorders. The aim of the study was to determine, whether the gut microbiota composition was linked to T2D and the use of opioids in these patients. Furthermore, the researchers looked at the associations between leptin and oxytocin levels in the blood and the gut microbiota, and whether these hormone biomarkers could be indicative of obesity and psychosocial behaviour, such as opioid addiction. The authors found that some bacterial species in the gut were affected by T2D, diabetes medication and opioid use in the studied subjects. A relationship was also observed between leptin and oxytocin levels and the abundance of certain bacteria in the gut in subjects without T2D. The authors conclude that targeting the gut microbiota could be used for the management of T2D and associated psychiatric disorders. However, more studies are needed to provide further understanding of the connections between the gut microbiota and the brain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The gut microbiota is known to be related to type 2 diabetes (T2D), psychiatric conditions, and opioid use. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that variability in gut microbiota in T2D is associated with psycho-metabolic health. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among African American men (AAM) (n = 99) that were outpatients at a Chicago VA Medical Center. The main outcome measures included fecal microbiota ecology (by 16S rRNA gene sequencing), psychiatric disorders including opioid use, and circulating leptin and oxytocin as representative hormone biomarkers for obesity and psychological pro-social behavior. RESULTS The study subjects had prevalent overweight/obesity (78%), T2D (50%) and co-morbid psychiatric (65%) and opioid use (45%) disorders. In the analysis of microbiota, the data showed interactions of opioids, T2D and metformin with Bifidobacterium and Prevotella genera. The differential analysis of Bifidobacterium stratified by opioids, T2D and metformin, showed significant interactions among these factors indicating that the effect of one factor was changed by the other (FDR-adjusted p [q] < 0.01). In addition, the pair-wise comparison showed that participants with T2D not taking metformin had a significant 6.74 log2 fold increase in Bifidobacterium in opioid users as compared to non-users (q = 2.2 x 10-8). Since metformin was not included in this pair-wise comparison, the significant 'q' suggested association of opioid use with Bifidobacterium abundance. The differences in Bifidobacterium abundance could possibly be explained by opioids acting as organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) inhibitors. Analysis stratified by lower and higher leptin and oxytocin (divided by the 50th percentile) in the subgroup without T2D showed lower Dialister in High-Leptin vs. Low-Leptin (p = 0.03). Contrary, the opposite was shown for oxytocin, higher Dialister in High-Oxytocin vs. Low-Oxytocin (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated for the first time that Bifidobacterium and Prevotella abundance was affected by interactions of T2D, metformin and opioid use. Also, in subjects without T2D Dialister abundance varied according to circulating leptin and oxytocin.