-
1.
The influence of vitamin D supplementation and strength training on health biomarkers and chromosomal damage in community-dwelling older adults.
Draxler, A, Franzke, B, Kelecevic, S, Maier, A, Pantic, J, Srienc, S, Cellnigg, K, Solomon, SM, Zötsch, C, Aschauer, R, et al
Redox biology. 2023;61:102640
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Aging is associated with a decline in physiological and physical function resulting in reduced physical activity, all of which are driving factors to the onset of chronic diseases and physical impairment. Older adults are often deficient in micronutrients, specifically vitamin D, which has been shown to have detrimental effects on the immune system, inflammatory and healing processes of fractured bones and also cardiovascular health beyond other musculoskeletal effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different vitamin D regimens in older individuals during an ongoing strength training period of 10 weeks while receiving vitamin D supplementation at the recommended level of 800 IU per day vs. a single dose of 50.000 IU per month. The data presented in this paper are part of the NutriAging Vitamin D study. The study was a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial which recruited one hundred community-dwelling women and men (aged 65–85 years). Participants were randomly allocated into three intervention groups, either the control group, the vitamin D daily (VDD) or the vitamin D monthly group (VDM). Results showed that oxidative stress might have played a role in the detrimental progress on chromosomal stability parameters since the protective effect of GSH (reduced glutathione) was reduced in all study groups at the end of the intervention, but the least reduction occurred in the VDD group. Authors concluded that a supplementation with the recommended dose of 800 IU vitamin D per day might be more advantageous when it comes to chromosomal stability parameters in older, formerly untrained participants undergoing demanding resistance exercise for 10 weeks.
Abstract
Older adults lack of proper physical activity which is often accompanied by vitamin D deficiency. Those factors are known to contribute to health issues in the later years of life. The main goal of this intervention study was to investigate the effect of different vitamin D supplementation strategies for 4 weeks solely or combined with a 10-week strength training program on chromosomal stability in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in community-dwelling older people. One hundred women and men (65-85 years) received either vitamin D3 daily (800 IU), a monthly dose (50.000 IU) or placebo for 17 weeks. All groups received 400 mg calcium daily. The fitness status of the study participants was measured using the 30- second chair stand test, the handgrip strength test and the 6-min walk test. The cytokinesis block micronucleus cytome (CBMN) assay was applied to analyze chromosomal anomalies, including cytotoxic and genotoxic parameters. Changes in antioxidant markers were measured in plasma. Walking distance and chair stand performance improved significantly. Increased levels of the parameters of the CBMN assay were detected for all intervention groups at study end. At baseline micronuclei (MNi) frequency correlated significantly with BMI in both sexes (females: r = 0.369, p = 0.034; males: r = 0.265, p = 0.035), but not with vitamin D serum levels. In females, body fat (r = 0.372, p < 0.001) and functional parameter using the 30-s chair stand test (r = 0.311, p = 0.002) correlated significantly with MNi frequency. Interestingly, not vitamin D supplementation but 10 weeks of resistance training increased MNi frequency indicating elevated chromosomal instability and also adverse effects on antioxidant markers including glutathione and FRAP were detected in the group of community-dwelling older adults.
-
2.
Effects of multi-domain intervention on intrinsic capacity in older adults: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Liao, X, Shen, J, Li, M
Experimental gerontology. 2023;174:112112
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
With the increase of age, the physiological reserve of the elderly decreases, which leads to the increase of physical vulnerability and the decrease of anti-stress ability, showing a series of frailty manifestations. Intrinsic capacity (refers to the comprehensive capacity of all physical and mental capacities of an individual) is central to maintaining function in older adults, and maintaining optimal intrinsic capacity is important to promote healthy aging. The aim of this study was to assess randomised controlled trials of multidomain interventions to further validate their effectiveness in the maintenance and enhancement of function in older adults, and to formulate strategies for preventive care and clinical practice. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-five publications. Results showed that multi-domain interventions can improve indicators of vital domains in older adults and integrate to optimise intrinsic capacity (refers to the comprehensive capacity of all physical and mental capacities of an individual) through potential interaction mechanisms. Authors concluded that because older adults may not be able to receive overly complex interventions due to limitations in their integrative abilities, the involvement of older adults and the sustainability of interventions should be considered before implementing them.
Abstract
Intrinsic capacity is central to the maintenance of function in older adults, and maintaining optimal intrinsic capacity is of great importance to promote healthy aging. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the impact of multi-domain interventions on intrinsic capacity in older adults, intervention components, and potential interactions between components. A total of 6740 published articles were screened until August 2022, and the review included 25 randomized controlled trials that analyzed populations, interventions, control groups, and outcomes. The meta-analysis showed improvements in the primary outcome indicators in the intervention group compared to the control group. These included increased scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination as an indicator of cognitive function, decreased scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) as an indicator of psychological ability and increased scores on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) as an indicator of physical performance, with only the SPPB indicator analyzed showing greater heterogeneity. Significant improvements were also seen in the secondary indicators Time-to-Walk Test (TUG), gait speed, Chair Stand Test (CST), grip strength values and BMI. There was insufficient data for the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) as an indicator of vitality to conduct a meta-analysis. Studies were of moderate to high quality. The results of this review indicate that multi-domain interventions can maintain the level of intrinsic capacity in older adults and are equally effective in older adults with declining self-care abilities.
-
3.
REsCue trial: Randomized controlled clinical trial with extended-release calcifediol in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients.
Bishop, CW, Ashfaq, A, Melnick, JZ, Vazquez-Escarpanter, E, Fialkow, JA, Strugnell, SA, Choe, J, Kalantar-Zadeh, K, Federman, NC, Ng, D, et al
Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.). 2023;107:111899
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Literature shows that vitamin D repletion may reduce the risk for infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), mitigate severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and accelerate recovery. Sufficient serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) is postulated to potentiate COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, boost innate and control adaptive immunity, and reduce post-infection cytokine storm and lung injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended-release calcifediol capsules to treat symptomatic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial titled REsCue. One hundred seventy-one symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients participants were enrolled. Patients were randomised (1:1) to 4 weeks of treatment with extended-release calcifediol (30 mcg/capsule) or matching placebo and a 2-week follow-up. Results show that extended-release calcifediol treatment was effective in increasing serum 25D levels to ≥50 ng/mL, which may have yielded significantly shorter resolution times for three aggregated respiratory symptoms (trouble breathing, chest congestion, and dry or hacking cough) commonly observed in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Authors conclude that the positive findings from this study warrant confirmation in additional larger studies.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This double-blind randomized controlled trial investigated raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) with extended-release calcifediol (ERC) on time to symptom resolution in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. METHODS COVID-19 outpatients received oral ERC (300 mcg on days 1-3 and 60 mcg on days 4-27) or placebo (NCT04551911). Symptoms were self-reported daily. Primary end points were raising 25D to ≥50 ng/mL and decreasing resolution time for five aggregated symptoms (three respiratory). RESULTS In all, 171 patients were randomized, 160 treated and 134 (65 ERC, 69 placebo) retained. The average age was 43 y (range 18-71), 59% were women. The mean baseline 25D was 37 ± 1 (SE) ng/mL. In the full analysis set (FAS), 81% of patients in the ERC group achieved 25D levels of ≥50 ng/mL versus 15% in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). In the per-protocol (PP) population, mean 25D increased with ERC to 82 ± 4 (SE) ng/mL (P < 0.0001) by day 7; the placebo group trended lower. Symptom resolution time was unchanged in the FAS by ERC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.983; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.695-1.390; P = 0.922). In the PP population, respiratory symptoms resolved 4 d faster when 25D was elevated above baseline level at both days 7 and 14 (median 6.5 versus 10.5 d; HR, 1.372; 95% CI, 0.945-1.991; P = 0.0962; Wilcoxon P = 0.0386). Symptoms resolved in both treatment groups to a similar extent by study end. Safety concerns including hypercalcemia were absent with ERC treatment. CONCLUSION ERC safely raised serum 25D to ≥50 ng/mL in outpatients with COVID-19, possibly accelerating resolution of respiratory symptoms and mitigating the risk for pneumonia. These findings warrant further study.
-
4.
The effect of vitamin D supplementation on the gut microbiome in older Australians - Results from analyses of the D-Health Trial.
Pham, H, Waterhouse, M, Rahman, S, Baxter, C, Duarte Romero, B, McLeod, DSA, Ebeling, PR, English, DR, Hartel, G, O'Connell, RL, et al
Gut microbes. 2023;15(1):2221429
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Microbiota are communities of microorganisms that co-exist with the host ecosystem in a specific environment. The term microbiome refers to the microbial genome. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of supplementing older adults with 60,000 IU of vitamin D per month on the gut microbiome for a period of five years, using a subsample (n = 835) of participants recruited from the large population-based D-Health Trial. This study is based on a subsample from the D-Health Trial, which was a randomised, double-blind trial with two parallel arms. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to monthly doses of either 60,000 IU of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) or matching placebo. Results showed that monthly doses of 60,000 IU vitamin D over 5 years did not alter the composition of the gut microbiome in a population that is largely vitamin D replete. Authors conclude that further investigation is required to examine whether non-bolus doses of vitamin D would influence the gut microbiome or whether vitamin D supplementation would be beneficial in populations with a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency.
Abstract
Observational studies suggest a link between vitamin D and the composition of the gut microbiome, but there is little evidence from randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation. We analyzed data from the D-Health Trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We recruited 21,315 Australians aged 60-84 y and randomized them to 60,000 IU of vitamin D3 or placebo monthly for 5 y. Stool samples were collected from a sample of 835 participants (417 in the placebo and 418 in the vitamin D group) approximately 5 y after randomization. We characterized the gut microbiome using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We used linear regression to compare alpha diversity indices (i.e. Shannon index (primary outcome), richness, inverse Simpson index), and the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes between the two groups. We analyzed between-sample (beta) diversity (i.e. Bray Curtis distance and UniFrac index) using principal coordinate analysis and used PERMANOVA to test for significant clustering according to randomization group. We also assessed the difference in the abundance of the 20 most abundant genera between the two groups using negative binomial regression model with adjustment for multiple testing. Approximately half the participants included in this analysis were women (mean age 69.4 y). Vitamin D supplementation did not alter the Shannon diversity index (mean 3.51 versus 3.52 in the placebo and vitamin D groups, respectively, p = 0.50). Similarly, there was little difference between the groups for other alpha diversity indices, the abundance of different genera, and the Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio. We did not observe clustering of bacterial communities according to randomization group. In conlusion, monthly doses of 60,000 IU of vitamin D supplementation for 5 y did not alter the composition of the gut microbiome in older Australians.
-
5.
A 2-yr Randomized Controlled Trial on Creatine Supplementation during Exercise for Postmenopausal Bone Health.
Chilibeck, PD, Candow, DG, Gordon, JJ, Duff, WRD, Mason, R, Shaw, K, Taylor-Gjevre, R, Nair, B, Zello, GA
Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2023;55(10):1750-1760
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Osteoporosis is a bone disease that gradually develops when bone mineral density (BMD) or bone mass decreases and the quality of bone is impaired. This randomised controlled trial conducted over 2 years wanted to test the effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation on BMD at several bone sites during a supervised resistance training and walking program in post menopausal women. 120 were randomly allocated to creatine and 117 to placebo. All participants received a daily supplement of 500 mg of calcium and 10 μg -400 IU of vitamin D. The researchers were particularly interested in finding out whether the creatine group showed improved (BMD) at the femoral neck, lower spine and upper thigh bone also known as the proximal femur which connects the hip joint. Bone density scans, dual-energy X-ray’s and ultrasounds were used to measure BMD and assess areas of bone. Falls and fractures were recorded for a total of 3 years. Dietary intake and physical activity outside of study requirements was assessed using food frequency and exercise questionnaires. Fasting blood and urine analyses along with 24-h urine analysis were taken. The authors conclude that creatine supplementation during a resistance training and walking program had no effect on BMD at the femoral neck, total hip, or lower spine. They further acknowledge relatively low compliance with the creatine supplements, and exercise protocols, along with a high drop out rate. Further studies of larger sample sizes are needed.
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to examine the effects of 2 yr of creatine monohydrate supplementation and exercise on bone health in postmenopausal women. METHODS Two hundred and thirty-seven postmenopausal women (mean age, 59 yr) were randomized to receive creatine (0.14 g·kg -1 ·d -1 ) or placebo during a resistance training (3 d·wk -1 ) and walking (6 d·wk -1 ) program for 2 yr. Our primary outcome was the femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), with lumbar spine BMD and proximal femur geometric properties as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS Compared with placebo, creatine supplementation had no effect on BMD of the femoral neck (creatine: 0.725 ± 0.110 to 0.712 ± 0.100 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.721 ± 0.102 to 0.706 ± 0.097 g·cm -2 ), total hip (creatine: 0.879 ± 0.118 to 0.872 ± 0.114 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.881 ± 0.111 to 0.873 ± 0.109 g·cm -2 ), or lumbar spine (creatine: 0.932 ± 0.133 to 0.925 ± 0.131 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.923 ± 0.145 to 0.915 ± 0.143 g·cm -2 ). Creatine significantly maintained section modulus (1.35 ± 0.29 to 1.34 ± 0.26 vs 1.34 ± 0.25 to 1.28 ± 0.23 cm 3 (placebo), P = 0.0011), predictive of bone bending strength, and buckling ratio (10.8 ± 2.6 to 11.1 ± 2.2 vs 11.0 ± 2.6 to 11.6 ± 2.7 (placebo), P = 0.011), predictive of reduced cortical bending under compressive loads, at the narrow part of the femoral neck. Creatine reduced walking time over 80 m (48.6 ± 5.6 to 47.1 ± 5.4 vs 48.3 ± 4.5 to 48.2 ± 4.9 s (placebo), P = 0.0008) but had no effect on muscular strength (i.e., one-repetition maximum) during bench press (32.1 ± 12.7 to 42.6 ± 14.1 vs 30.6 ± 10.9 to 41.4 ± 14 kg (placebo)) and hack squat (57.6 ± 21.6 to 84.4 ± 28.1 vs 56.6 ± 24.0 to 82.7 ± 25.0 kg (placebo)). In the subanalysis of valid completers, creatine increased lean tissue mass compared with placebo (40.8 ± 5.7 to 43.1 ± 5.9 vs 40.4 ± 5.3 to 42.0 ± 5.2 kg (placebo), P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS Two years of creatine supplementation and exercise in postmenopausal women had no effect on BMD; yet, it improved some bone geometric properties at the proximal femur.
-
6.
Add-On Effect of Selenium and Vitamin D Combined Supplementation in Early Control of Graves' Disease Hyperthyroidism During Methimazole Treatment.
Gallo, D, Mortara, L, Veronesi, G, Cattaneo, SA, Genoni, A, Gallazzi, M, Peruzzo, C, Lasalvia, P, Moretto, P, Bruno, A, et al
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2022;13:886451
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Graves’ disease (GD) is the most frequent cause of hyperthyroidism in iodine-replete geographical areas. Thionamide anti-thyroid drug therapy is the first-line treatment worldwide under most circumstances, but its major limitation is the high rate of relapses after drug discontinuation. Decreased serum concentrations of selenium (Se) and vitamin D (VitD) have been reported in newly diagnosed GD patients in observational studies. The aim of this study was to determine if concurrent supplementation with Se and VitD in Graves’ patients with suboptimal or low Se and VitD levels may improve early control of hyperthyroidism during methimazole (MMI) [thionamide] treatment. This study is a randomised, single-blinded, controlled, intervention trial. Forty-two patients were randomly assigned to treatment with MMI monotherapy (Group 1, MMI alone group) or MMI combined with Se and VitD (Group 2, intervention group). Results show that supplementation favours a significantly better control of hyperthyroidism, both at short-term (45 days) and long-term (180 and 270 days) assessments. In fact, during MMI treatment, Se and VitD supplementation facilitate restoration of euthyroidism and boost the improvement of quality of life. Authors conclude that Se and VitD status should be assessed at diagnosis of GD, and that Se and VitD supplementation should be offered at adequate and safe dosages even if a slight deficiency of these micronutrients is found.
Abstract
Prompt and stable control of hyperthyroidism is fundamental to avoid the detrimental effects of thyroid hormone excess, and antithyroid drugs, mainly methimazole (MMI), represent the first-line treatment for Graves' disease (GD) hyperthyroidism. Decreased serum concentrations of selenium (Se) and calcifediol (25(OH)D, VitD) have been reported in newly diagnosed GD patients in observational studies. Low Se levels might exacerbate oxidative stress by compromising the antioxidant machinery's response to reactive oxygen species, and low VitD levels might hamper the anti-inflammatory immune response. We performed a randomized controlled clinical trial (EudraCT 2017-00505011) to investigate whether Se and cholecalciferol (VitD) addition to MMI is associated with a prompter control of hyperthyroidism. Forty-two consecutive patients with newly-onset GD and marginal/insufficient Se and VitD levels were randomly assigned to treatment with either MMI monotherapy or MMI combined with Se and VitD. Se treatment was withdrawn after 180 days, while the other treatments were continued. Combination therapy resulted in a significantly greater reduction in serum FT4 concentration at 45 days (-37.9 pg/ml, CI 95%, -43.7 to -32.2 pg/ml) and 180 days (-36.5 pg/ml, CI 95%, -42 to -30.9 pg/ml) compared to MMI monotherapy (respectively: -25.7 pg/ml, CI 95%, -31.6 to -19.7 pg/ml and -22.9 pg/ml, CI 95%, -28 to -17.3 pg/ml, p 0.002). Data at 270 days confirmed this trend (-37.8 pg/ml, CI 95%, -43.6 to -32.1 pg/ml vs -24.4 pg/ml, CI 95%, -30.3 to -18.4 pg/ml). The quality of life (QoL) score was investigated by the validated "Thyroid-related Patient-Reported Outcome" questionnaire (ThyPRO). ThyPRO composite score showed a greater improvement in the intervention group at 45 days (-14.6, CI 95%, -18.8 to -10.4), 180 (-9, CI 95%, -13.9 to -4.2) and 270 days (-14.3, CI 95%, -19.5 to -9.1) compared to MMI group (respectively, -5.2, CI 95%, -9.5 to -1; -5.4, CI 95%, -10.6 to -0.2 and -3.5, CI 95%, -9 to -2.1, p 0-6 months and 6-9 months <0.05). Our results suggest that reaching optimal Se and VitD levels increases the early efficacy of MMI treatment when Se and VitD levels are suboptimal.
-
7.
High-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D supplementation in older adults with COVID-19 (COVIT-TRIAL): A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial.
Annweiler, C, Beaudenon, M, Gautier, J, Gonsard, J, Boucher, S, Chapelet, G, Darsonval, A, Fougère, B, Guérin, O, Houvet, M, et al
PLoS medicine. 2022;19(5):e1003999
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, mostly in older adults. The aim of this study was to test whether a single oral high-dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults who are positive to COVID-19. This study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, intent-to-treat, randomised controlled superiority clinical trial which involves the collaboration of 9 medical centres. Eligible participants (n=260) were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of either 400,000 IU (n=130) or 50,000 IU (n=130) cholecalciferol on the day of inclusion. Results show: - reduced overall mortality at day 14. - that high-dose cholecalciferol was safe and did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. - that some benefits were also found on the 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 as well as on the overall mortality between day 6 and day 14. - that there was no evidence that the single high-dose vitamin D3 administered early in COVID-19 provided any benefit on overall mortality for up to 28 days. Authors conclude that high-dose oral cholecalciferol supplementation is a simple, safe, and inexpensive treatment which may be of interest as an adjuvant to provide a bridge to recovery for at-risk older adults facing the emergence of immune escape variants.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D supplementation has been proposed as a treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on experimental data and data from small and uncontrolled observational studies. The COvid19 and VITamin d TRIAL (COVIT-TRIAL) study was conducted to test whether a single oral high dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS AND FINDINGS This multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, superiority trial involved collaboration of 9 medical centers in France. Patients admitted to the hospital units or living in nursing homes adjacent to the investigator centers were eligible if they were ≥65 years, had SARS-CoV-2 infection of less than 3 days, and at least 1 COVID-19 worsening risk factor (among age ≥75 years, SpO2 ≤94%, or PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mm Hg). Main noninclusion criteria were organ failure requiring ICU, SpO2 ≤92% despite 5 L/min oxygen, life expectancy <3 months, vitamin D supplementation >800 IU/day during the preceding month, and contraindications to vitamin D supplements. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either a single oral high-dose (400,000 IU) or standard-dose (50,000 IU) cholecalciferol administered under medical supervision within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19. Participants and local study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but the Steering Committee and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board were masked to the randomization group and outcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 14-day overall mortality. Between April 15 and December 17, 2020, of 1,207 patients who were assessed for eligibility in the COVIT-TRIAL study, 254 met eligibility criteria and formed the intention-to-treat population. The median age was 88 (IQR, 82 to 92) years, and 148 patients (58%) were women. Overall, 8 (6%) of 127 patients allocated to high-dose cholecalciferol, and 14 (11%) of 127 patients allocated to standard-dose cholecalciferol died within 14 days (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.39 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.99], P = 0.049, after controlling for randomization strata [i.e., age, oxygen requirement, hospitalization, use of antibiotics, anti-infective drugs, and/or corticosteroids] and baseline imbalances in important prognostic factors [i.e., sex, ongoing cancers, profuse diarrhea, and delirium at baseline]). The number needed to treat for one person to benefit (NNTB) was 21 [NNTB 9 to ∞ to number needed to treat for one person to harm (NNTH) 46]. Apparent benefits were also found on 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 (7 (6%) deaths in high-dose group and 14 (11%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.86], P = 0.02). The protective effect of the single oral high-dose administration was not sustained at 28 days (19 (15%) deaths in high-dose group and 21 (17%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.36], P = 0.29). High-dose cholecalciferol did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. The open-label design and limited study power are the main limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we observed that the early administration of high-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D3 to at-risk older patients with COVID-19 improved overall mortality at day 14. The effect was no longer observed after 28 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344041.
-
8.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of candidate gene association studies of benign prostate hyperplasia.
Lin, L, Li, P, Liu, X, Xie, X, Liu, L, Singh, AK, Singh, HN
Systematic reviews. 2022;11(1):60
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a non-malignant enlargement of the prostate which can cause urinary dysfunction and may affect the quality of life of patients. Polymorphism in several genes has been linked to the high susceptibility of BPH. The aim of this study was to analyse genetic variations in important genes towards the susceptibility of BPH. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-three case-control studies (11 for CYP17 [gene], 10 for VDR - vitamin D receptor [a member of the steroid/ thyroid hormone receptor family] and 4 for ACE - angiotensin-converting enzyme [component of the renin–angiotensin system] polymorphisms). The sample size in each study ranged from 20 to 588 participants. Results show that genetic polymorphism in the ACE gene was significantly associated with the risk of BPH when compared with control subjects. Whereas there was a negative association for the polymorphism located in VDR and CYP17 genes with the risk of BPH. Authors conclude that larger studies with prospective data and larger sample sizes are required.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common urological problem in elderly males. Recent studies have reported polymorphism in various metabolic genes in BPH. However, their association with the susceptibility of BPH is still inconsistent. Here, we systematically reviewed and performed a meta-analysis of CYP17, VDR, and ACE genes to determine their precise association with the risk of BPH. METHODS A comprehensive literature search for published studies on candidate gene associations involving vitamin D receptor (VDR), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and CYP17 genes with the risk of BPH was done up to April 2020 in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar databases. Fixed/random effects models were used to estimate the odd's ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Begg's funnel plot was used to assess the potential for publication bias. RESULTS We found a total of 23 studies containing 3461 cases and 3833 controls for these gene polymorphisms. A significant association of ACE gene polymorphism was observed under the recessive (II vs. ID + DD) model for BPH susceptibility compared to control subjects (overall OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.03-2.73). Similar trends were observed for ACE gene polymorphism in Caucasian (OR = 6.18, 95% CI = 1.38-27.68) and Asian (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.99-2.03) populations under study. No significant association was observed in VDR and CYP17 gene polymorphisms in any dominant or recessive models. CONCLUSION Significant OR demonstrated the implication of ACE gene polymorphism in the proliferation of prostate tissue, which in turn is associated with BPH susceptibility. However, prospective studies at large scale and sample size are needed to confirm the current findings.
-
9.
Circulating levels of maternal vitamin D and risk of ADHD in offspring: results from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial.
Chu, SH, Huang, M, Kelly, RS, Kachroo, P, Litonjua, AA, Weiss, ST, Lasky-Su, J
International journal of epidemiology. 2022;51(3):910-918
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acting as both a nutrient and a hormone, vitamin D has been found to play a critical role in neurodevelopment across sensitive periods in utero, infancy and early childhood. Among neurodevelopmental and behavioural disorders in early life, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common among children worldwide. Low levels of circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] have been shown to associate with prevalent ADHD. The aims of this study were to (i) determine the association between maternal vitamin D levels in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy and the risk of offspring ADHD by age 6 years or later; and (ii) to identify potential sensitive periods in utero during which vitamin D levels might be most important for reducing risk of ADHD. This is an ancillary study of the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART). The VDAART was a randomised, double-blinded, multicentre, clinical trial in which 876 participating mothers were recruited between 10–18 weeks of gestation and assigned to receive either 4400 or 400 IU/day of vitamin D throughout pregnancy. Results show protective associations between maternal 25(OH)D sufficiency in the third trimester and child ADHD, but not at baseline. Furthermore, both at baseline and in the third trimester, there were higher odds of ADHD in male offspring as compared with female offspring with 25(OH)D insufficient mothers (analyses limited by small sample sizes) Authors conclude that higher levels of maternal vitamin D during pregnancy may play a protective role against risk of ADHD in offspring, but further studies are needed to confirm this association and any therapeutic potential therein.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Ensure that women in pregnancy, and possibly also those seeking to conceive, have adequate vitamin D status in order to reduce the risk of ADHD in offspring.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
This paper describes a secondary data analysis from an RCT that looked at the effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on risk of childhood asthma in offspring. Enrolled women aged 18–39 years with a history of asthma, eczema or allergic rhinitis, or whose partner (biological father of child) had a history of the aforementioned condition, received either 400 IU or 4400 IU vitamin D daily for the duration of their pregnancy. Offspring follow-up is still ongoing.
Aims
The current study aims were twofold: (i) to determine the association between maternal vitamin D levels in trimesters 1 and 3 and the risk of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in offspring diagnosed by age 6 years or later; and (ii) to identify potentially sensitive periods during gestation in which vitamin D levels may be especially important for reducing risk of ADHD.
Methods
The analytical sample included 679 mother-child pairs, from the original sample of 876 participating mothers. No sample size calculation was reported, though the sample was considered representative of the overall RCT study population.
Maternal vitamin D (serum 25(OH)D) was classified as follows
- Highly deficient <12 ng/mL
- Deficient 12 ng/mL to 19.9 ng/mL
- Insufficient 20 ng/mL to 29.9 ng/mL
- Sufficient ≥30 ng/mL
ADHD status was assessed through parental reporting between ages 6 and 9 years.
Results
No baseline associations between a vitamin D sufficient status and offspring ADHD in maternal samples collected during trimester 1 were observed (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.51–2.19; P.0.871), though this association became statistically significant at trimester 3 (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26–0.84; P.0.011). This translated to a 53% less chance of having a child with ADHD at age 6 or later among mothers with vitamin D sufficiency compared with children of mothers with vitamin D deficiency. There was also a linear trend in the protective association of vitamin D sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL) on reduced risk of offspring ADHD at age 6 years or later in data from trimester 3. Stratified analyses revealed a protective association for sufficient maternal vitamin D status and offspring ADHD among males (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.94).
Conclusions
The authors concluded that vitamin D sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL) in the 3rd trimester of gestation may decrease the risk of ADHD development in offspring.
Notes: The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Ensuring a sufficient vitamin D status by the 3rd trimester of pregnancy may help to lessen the risk of ADHD in offspring. Nutritional therapists and other clinicians working with pregnant women or women looking to conceive should consider checking vitamin D status and providing corrective supplementation and lifestyle advice to augment vitamin D levels where indicated.
Considerations for future research:
The authors of this study postulated that the statistically significant protective association between vitamin D at trimester 3 and ADHD in offspring was not significant in trimester 1 due to a low observed variability in vitamin D status (>75% of women were vitamin D insufficient), and thus the statistical test being underpowered to see difference between groups with sufficient or insufficient status.
Further research could expand upon this hypothesis to test whether vitamin D status in trimester 1, or preconceptually, may offer a protective association for ADHD and other related neurological conditions that may manifest in early life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low levels of circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] have been shown to associate with prevalent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but few studies have examined the association between 25(OH)D during fetal development and risk of childhood ADHD. METHODS Maternal plasma 25(OH)D was measured at 10-18 and 32-38 weeks of gestation, with sufficiency defined as 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/ml. Offspring ADHD status between ages 6-9 years was measured by parent report of clinical ADHD diagnosis among 680 mother-child pairs from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial. Association between maternal 25(OH)D and child ADHD was assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age, race and ethnicity. Effect modification by offspring sex was also assessed. RESULTS No associations between maternal 25(OH)D at 10-18 weeks of gestation and offspring ADHD were observed. In the third trimester, we observed associations between maternal vitamin D sufficiency and offspring ADHD [odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.84], in addition to maternal 25(OH)D sufficiency category, comparing the deficient (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.94), insufficient (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.15-1.10) and sufficient (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.54) categories against highly deficient 25(OH)D, respectively. Stratified analyses revealed a protective association for sufficient maternal 25(OH)D and child ADHD among males (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.94); the synergy index for additive effect modification of risk was 1.78 (95% CI 0.62-5.08). CONCLUSIONS Higher levels of maternal vitamin D in the third trimester are associated with lower risk of ADHD in offspring, with modest evidence for a stronger effect among male offspring. However, larger studies will be necessary to confirm these findings.
-
10.
Vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of COVID-19: a living systematic review.
Stroehlein, JK, Wallqvist, J, Iannizzi, C, Mikolajewska, A, Metzendorf, MI, Benstoem, C, Meybohm, P, Becker, M, Skoetz, N, Stegemann, M, et al
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021;5:CD015043
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This study is part of a series of Cochrane Reviews investigating treatments and therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). COVID-19 is a rapidly spreading infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Therapeutic interventions to treat COVID-19 are being investigated with immense emphasis. Recently, vitamin D supplementation for treatment of COVID-19 gained attention, since studies suggested an association between vitamin D deficiency and risk or prognosis of the disease. The aim of this study was to assess whether vitamin D supplementation is effective and safe for the treatment of COVID-19 This study is a living systematic review of seven records (three randomised controlled studies – 356 adult participants). Results for the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for participants with COVID-19 are inconclusive. Moreover, inconsistency in the reporting of adverse and serious adverse events impeded evaluation of safety of vitamin D supplementation. Authors conclude that to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of vitamin D supplementation for individuals with COVID-19, more randomised controlled trials are needed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of vitamin D supplementation as a treatment for COVID-19 has been a subject of considerable discussion. A thorough understanding of the current evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 based on randomised controlled trials is required. OBJECTIVES To assess whether vitamin D supplementation is effective and safe for the treatment of COVID-19 in comparison to an active comparator, placebo, or standard of care alone, and to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, Web of Science and the WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease to identify completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions to 11 March 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We followed standard Cochrane methodology. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating vitamin D supplementation for people with COVID-19, irrespective of disease severity, age, gender or ethnicity. We excluded studies investigating preventive effects, or studies including populations with other coronavirus diseases (severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed standard Cochrane methodology. To assess bias in included studies, we used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB 2) for RCTs. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for the following prioritised outcome categories: individuals with moderate or severe COVID-19: all-cause mortality, clinical status, quality of life, adverse events, serious adverse events, and for individuals with asymptomatic or mild disease: all-cause mortality, development of severe clinical COVID-19 symptoms, quality of life, adverse events, serious adverse events. MAIN RESULTS We identified three RCTs with 356 participants, of whom 183 received vitamin D. In accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical progression scale, two studies investigated participants with moderate or severe disease, and one study individuals with mild or asymptomatic disease. The control groups consisted of placebo treatment or standard of care alone. Effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for people with COVID-19 and moderate to severe disease We included two studies with 313 participants. Due to substantial clinical and methodological diversity of both studies, we were not able to pool data. Vitamin D status was unknown in one study, whereas the other study reported data for vitamin D deficient participants. One study administered multiple doses of oral calcifediol at days 1, 3 and 7, whereas the other study gave a single high dose of oral cholecalciferol at baseline. We assessed one study with low risk of bias for effectiveness outcomes, and the other with some concerns about randomisation and selective reporting. All-cause mortality at hospital discharge (313 participants) We found two studies reporting data for this outcome. One study reported no deaths when treated with vitamin D out of 50 participants, compared to two deaths out of 26 participants in the control group (Risk ratio (RR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 2.13). The other study reported nine deaths out of 119 individuals in the vitamin D group, whereas six participants out of 118 died in the placebo group (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.55 to 4.04]. We are very uncertain whether vitamin D has an effect on all-cause mortality at hospital discharge (very low-certainty evidence). Clinical status assessed by the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (237 participants) We found one study reporting data for this outcome. Nine out of 119 participants needed invasive mechanical ventilation when treated with vitamin D, compared to 17 out of 118 participants in the placebo group (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.13). Vitamin D supplementation may decrease need for invasive mechanical ventilation, but the evidence is uncertain (low-certainty evidence). Quality of life We did not find data for quality of life. Safety of vitamin D supplementation for people with COVID-19 and moderate to severe disease We did not include data from one study, because assessment of serious adverse events was not described and we are concerned that data might have been inconsistently measured. This study reported vomiting in one out of 119 participants immediately after vitamin D intake (RR 2.98, 95% CI 0.12 to 72.30). We are very uncertain whether vitamin D supplementation is associated with higher risk for adverse events (very low-certainty). Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D supplementation for people with COVID-19 and asymptomatic or mild disease We found one study including 40 individuals, which did not report our prioritised outcomes, but instead data for viral clearance, inflammatory markers, and vitamin D serum levels. The authors reported no events of hypercalcaemia, but recording and assessment of further adverse events remains unclear. Authors administered oral cholecalciferol in daily doses for at least 14 days, and continued with weekly doses if vitamin D blood levels were > 50 ng/mL. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the benefits and harms of vitamin D supplementation as a treatment of COVID-19. The evidence for the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of COVID-19 is very uncertain. Moreover, we found only limited safety information, and were concerned about consistency in measurement and recording of these outcomes. There was substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity of included studies, mainly because of different supplementation strategies, formulations, vitamin D status of participants, and reported outcomes. There is an urgent need for well-designed and adequately powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with an appropriate randomisation procedure, comparability of study arms and preferably double-blinding. We identified 21 ongoing and three completed studies without published results, which indicates that these needs will be addressed and that our findings are subject to change in the future. Due to the living approach of this work, we will update the review periodically.