1.
The effects of two vitamin D regimens on ulcerative colitis activity index, quality of life and oxidant/anti-oxidant status.
Karimi, S, Tabataba-Vakili, S, Yari, Z, Alborzi, F, Hedayati, M, Ebrahimi-Daryani, N, Hekmatdoost, A
Nutrition journal. 2019;18(1):16
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a type of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which involves the immune system attacking healthy bowel tissue. Vitamin D has an effect on the immune response, possibly by reducing inflammation, promoting immune system tolerance and improving the health of the bowel lining. Several studies have found a link between vitamin D deficiency and IBD, but the optimum dosage for vitamin D supplementation is not yet known. The aim of this study was to look at the effects of two dosages of vitamin D supplementation on serum vitamin D, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant status (TOS), quality of life, and disease activity index in patients with UC. In this double blind randomised clinical trial, 50 patients with mild to moderate UC received either 1,000 (‘low dose’) or 2,000 (‘high dose’) IU/day of vitamin D for 12 weeks. At the end of study, serum 25-OHD levels had significantly increased in the high dose group and the increase was significantly more (6.7 ± 3.8 ng/mL) than the low dose (0.2 ± 0.5 ng/mL) group. Serum TOS concentration decreased significantly (- 0.37 ± 0.26) only in the high dose group. There was no significant change in serum TAC between two groups during the study. The quality of life score significantly improved in the high dose group compared to the low dose group and disease activity index score reduce in both groups but was significant only in the high dose group. The authors concluded that 2,000 IU a day of vitamin D can increase serum 25-OHD concentration and quality of life, and reduce disease activity in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. They recommend that all patients with UC should have their vitamin D status assessed because they may benefit from vitamin D therapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum dosage for vitamin D supplementation has not yet been elucidated in patients with Ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two vitamin D regimens in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. METHODS In this double blind randomized clinical trial, 50 patients with mild to moderate UC, who met inclusion criteria, received either 1000 or 2000 IU/day of vitamin D (as low dose or high dose group, respectively) for 12 weeks. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OHD) level, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and Total Oxidant Status (TOS), the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire - 9 (IBDQ-9) score and the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index Questionnaire (SCCAI) score were assessed before and after intervention. RESULTS At the end of study, serum 25-OHD levels significantly increased in the high dose group (P < 0.001) and the increase was significantly more than low dose group (6.7 ± 3.8 ng/mL in the high dose group versus 0.2 ± 0.5 ng/mL in the low dose group) (P < 0.001). Serum TOS concentration decreased significantly (- 0.37 ± 0.26) only in the high dose group (P value = 0.023). There was no statistically significant change in serum TAC between two groups during the study. IBDQ-9 mean score significantly increased in high dose group compared to the low dose group (P value = 0.001) and SCCAI score in both groups reduced (- 2.58 ± 2.16 and - 0.9 ± 0.3 in high dose and low dose respectively), while this reduction was significant only in the high dose group (P value ≥0.001). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that 2000 IU daily dose of vitamin D can increase serum 25-OHD concentration, and quality of life, while it reduces disease activity in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. We recommend assessment of the vitamin D status in all patients with UC because they may benefit from vitamin D therapy.
2.
Low free 25-hydroxyvitamin D and high vitamin D binding protein and parathyroid hormone in obese Caucasians. A complex association with bone?
Saarnio, E, Pekkinen, M, Itkonen, ST, Kemi, V, Karp, H, Ivaska, KK, Risteli, J, Koivula, MK, Kärkkäinen, M, Mäkitie, O, et al
PloS one. 2018;13(2):e0192596
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obese people are at a higher risk of vitamin D deficiency, and this could have an impact on bone mineral density. This study examined whether there were any differences between obese, overweight and normal-weight adults in levels of vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein (DBP), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone density. More than 500 healthy Finnish men and women aged 37-47 years took part in the study. Vitamin D levels were found to be lower in obese than in normal weight people. Levels of DBP and PTH were higher in obese than normal weight women. Some measures of bone density were higher in obese women. Markers of bone turnover were lower in obese people than those of normal weight. The findings of this study suggest that obese people may differ from normal weight subjects in vitamin D metabolism. It is not yet clear what impact this has on bone health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown altered vitamin D metabolism in obesity. We assessed differences between obese and normal-weight subjects in total, free, and bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D, 25(OH)DFree, and 25(OH)DBio, respectively), vitamin D binding protein (DBP), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone traits. METHODS 595 37-47-year-old healthy Finnish men and women stratified by BMI were examined in this cross-sectional study. Background characteristic and intakes of vitamin D and calcium were collected. The concentrations of 25(OH)D, PTH, DBP, albumin and bone turnover markers were determined from blood. 25(OH)DFree and 25(OH)DBio were calculated. pQCT was performed at radius and tibia. RESULTS Mean±SE (ANCOVA) 25(OH)DFree (10.8±0.6 vs 12.9±0.4 nmol/L; P = 0.008) and 25(OH)DBio (4.1±0.3 vs 5.1±0.1 nmol/L; P = 0.003) were lower in obese than in normal-weight women. In men, 25(OH)D (48.0±2.4 vs 56.4±2.0 nmol/L, P = 0.003), 25(OH)DFree (10.3±0.7 vs 12.5±0.6 pmol/L; P = 0.044) and 25(OH)DBio (4.2±0.3 vs 5.1±0.2 nmol/L; P = 0.032) were lower in obese. Similarly in all subjects, 25(OH)D, 25(OH)DFree and 25(OH)DBio were lower in obese (P<0.001). DBP (399±12 vs 356±7mg/L, P = 0.008) and PTH (62.2±3.0 vs 53.3±1.9 ng/L; P = 0.045) were higher in obese than in normal-weight women. In all subjects, PTH and DBP were higher in obese (P = 0.047and P = 0.004, respectively). In obese women, 25(OH)D was negatively associated with distal radius trabecular density (R2 = 0.089, P = 0.009) and tibial shaft cortical strength index (CSI) (R2 = 0.146, P = 0.004). 25(OH)DFree was negatively associated with distal radius CSI (R2 = 0.070, P = 0.049), radial shaft cortical density (CorD) (R2 = 0.050, P = 0.045), and tibial shaft CSI (R2 = 0.113, P = 0.012). 25(OH)DBio was negatively associated with distal radius CSI (R2 = 0.072, P = 0.045), radial shaft CorD (R2 = 0.059, P = 0.032), and tibial shaft CSI (R2 = 0.093, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS The associations between BMI and 25(OH)D, 25(OH)DFree, and 25(OH)DBio, DBP, and PTH suggest that obese subjects may differ from normal-weight subjects in vitamin D metabolism. BMI associated positively with trabecular bone traits and CSI in our study, and slightly negatively with cortical bone traits. Surprisingly, there was a negative association of free and bioavailable 25(OH)D and some of the bone traits in obese women.
3.
Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancy and Lactation and Infant Growth.
Roth, DE, Morris, SK, Zlotkin, S, Gernand, AD, Ahmed, T, Shanta, SS, Papp, E, Korsiak, J, Shi, J, Islam, MM, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2018;379(6):535-546
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
In Bangladesh, 30% of newborns are small for gestational age and 36% of children under 5-years of age have stunted growth. Some previous studies suggest that supplementing mums-to-be with vitamin D during and/or after pregnancy may improve foetal and infant growth. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the dose-dependent effects of vitamin D supplementation on infant growth in Bangladesh. Over 1,100 pregnant women were split into five groups. One group received no vitamin D (placebo group). Three groups received supplementation from mid pregnancy in doses of 4200 IU, 16,800 IU, and 28,000 IU per week. The fifth group received 28,000 IU vitamin D per week during pregnancy, as well as 28,000 IU weekly for 26 weeks after childbirth. At the start of the study, 64% of women were vitamin D deficient (defined as 25(OH)D<30 nmol/L). The vitamin D status of the women was similar across the groups. Among 1,164 infants assessed at 1 year of age, there were no significant differences across groups in the length-for-age scores. Other anthropometric measures, birth outcomes, and morbidity did not differ significantly across groups. The researchers concluded that maternal vitamin D supplementation from mid pregnancy until birth or until 6 months post-partum did not improve foetal or infant growth. The findings of the study do not support routine vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy or lactation to improve birth outcomes or infant growth, even in communities with endemic vitamin D deficiency and foetal-infant growth restriction.
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation improves fetal and infant growth in regions where vitamin D deficiency is common. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Bangladesh to assess the effects of weekly prenatal vitamin D supplementation (from 17 to 24 weeks of gestation until birth) and postpartum vitamin D supplementation on the primary outcome of infants' length-for-age z scores at 1 year according to World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standards. One group received neither prenatal nor postpartum vitamin D (placebo group). Three groups received prenatal supplementation only, in doses of 4200 IU (prenatal 4200 group), 16,800 IU (prenatal 16,800 group), and 28,000 IU (prenatal 28,000 group). The fifth group received prenatal supplementation as well as 26 weeks of postpartum supplementation in the amount of 28,000 IU (prenatal and postpartum 28,000 group). RESULTS Among 1164 infants assessed at 1 year of age (89.5% of 1300 pregnancies), there were no significant differences across groups in the mean (±SD) length-for-age z scores. Scores were as follows: placebo, -0.93±1.05; prenatal 4200, -1.11±1.12; prenatal 16,800, -0.97±0.97; prenatal 28,000, -1.06±1.07; and prenatal and postpartum 28,000, -0.94±1.00 (P=0.23 for a global test of differences across groups). Other anthropometric measures, birth outcomes, and morbidity did not differ significantly across groups. Vitamin D supplementation had expected effects on maternal and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium concentrations, maternal urinary calcium excretion, and maternal parathyroid hormone concentrations. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of adverse events across groups, with the exception of a higher rate of possible hypercalciuria among the women receiving the highest dose. CONCLUSIONS In a population with widespread prenatal vitamin D deficiency and fetal and infant growth restriction, maternal vitamin D supplementation from midpregnancy until birth or until 6 months post partum did not improve fetal or infant growth. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01924013 .).