1.
Sociodemographic and lifestyle-related risk factors for identifying vulnerable groups for type 2 diabetes: a narrative review with emphasis on data from Europe.
Kyrou, I, Tsigos, C, Mavrogianni, C, Cardon, G, Van Stappen, V, Latomme, J, Kivelä, J, Wikström, K, Tsochev, K, Nanasi, A, et al
BMC endocrine disorders. 2020;20(Suppl 1):134
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) results from progressive loss of insulin secretion, which is typically combined with various degrees of insulin resistance. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of key sociodemographic and lifestyle-related risk factors for identifying vulnerable groups for T2DM with emphasis on data from Europe. This study is a narrative review which includes 101 publications. Literature shows that prevention of T2DM should be a collaborative effort which mobilizes multiple partners/ stakeholders at a national and international (e.g. European) level. In addition, a holistic approach is becoming increasingly essential in order to put into effect multidimensional public health programs and integrated interventions for effective T2DM prevention which will take into account both traditional and socioeconomic/socioecological factors. Authors conclude that a multidimensional approach for the prevention of T2DM may have a broader impact against the current diabesity epidemic within and across countries in Europe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) comprises the vast majority of all diabetes cases in adults, with alarmingly increasing prevalence over the past few decades worldwide. A particularly heavy healthcare burden of diabetes is noted in Europe, where 8.8% of the population aged 20-79 years is estimated to have diabetes according to the International Diabetes Federation. Multiple risk factors are implicated in the pathogenesis of T2DM with complex underlying interplay and intricate gene-environment interactions. Thus, intense research has been focused on studying the role of T2DM risk factors and on identifying vulnerable groups for T2DM in the general population which can then be targeted for prevention interventions. METHODS For this narrative review, we conducted a comprehensive search of the existing literature on T2DM risk factors, focusing on studies in adult cohorts from European countries which were published in English after January 2000. RESULTS Multiple lifestyle-related and sociodemographic factors were identified as related to high T2DM risk, including age, ethnicity, family history, low socioeconomic status, obesity, metabolic syndrome and each of its components, as well as certain unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. As Europe has an increasingly aging population, multiple migrant and ethnic minority groups and significant socioeconomic diversity both within and across different countries, this review focuses not only on modifiable T2DM risk factors, but also on the impact of pertinent demographic and socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSION In addition to other T2DM risk factors, low socioeconomic status can significantly increase the risk for prediabetes and T2DM, but is often overlooked. In multinational and multicultural regions such as Europe, a holistic approach, which will take into account both traditional and socioeconomic/socioecological factors, is becoming increasingly crucial in order to implement multidimensional public health programs and integrated community-based interventions for effective T2DM prevention.
2.
Dietary acrylamide and cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis.
Pelucchi, C, Bosetti, C, Galeone, C, La Vecchia, C
International journal of cancer. 2015;136(12):2912-22
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acrylamide is formed in a variety of foods, and some evidence suggests it may cause cancer. The aim of this study was to update their quantitative meta-analysis on dietary acrylamide intake and cancer risk. The study is a meta-analysis based on systemic-literature focusing on the estimate of total dietary acrylamide. A total of 32 publications were reviewed. Results indicate that there is a lack of association between dietary acrylamide and most cancer sites. However, there is a potential small increase in the risk between high levels of acrylamide intake and kidney, endometrial and ovarian cancer in non-smoking women. Authors conclude that dietary acrylamide is not related to the risk of most common cancers.
Abstract
The debate on the potential carcinogenic effect of dietary acrylamide is open. In consideration of the recent findings from large prospective investigations, we conducted an updated meta-analysis on acrylamide intake and the risk of cancer at several sites. Up to July 2014, we identified 32 publications. We performed meta-analyses to calculate the summary relative risk (RR) of each cancer site for the highest versus lowest level of intake and for an increment of 10 µg/day of dietary acrylamide, through fixed-effects or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity test. Fourteen cancer sites could be examined. No meaningful associations were found for most cancers considered. The summary RRs for high versus low acrylamide intake were 0.87 for oral and pharyngeal, 1.14 for esophageal, 1.03 for stomach, 0.94 for colorectal, 0.93 for pancreatic, 1.10 for laryngeal, 0.88 for lung, 0.96 for breast, 1.06 for endometrial, 1.12 for ovarian, 1.00 for prostate, 0.93 for bladder and 1.13 for lymphoid malignancies. The RR was of borderline significance only for kidney cancer (RR = 1.20; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.00-1.45). All the corresponding continuous estimates ranged between 0.95 and 1.03, and none of them was significant. Among never-smokers, borderline associations with dietary acrylamide emerged for endometrial (RR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00-1.51) and ovarian (RR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.97-2.00) cancers. This systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies indicates that dietary acrylamide is not related to the risk of most common cancers. A modest association for kidney cancer, and for endometrial and ovarian cancers in never smokers only, cannot be excluded.
3.
Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a summary review of meta-analytical studies.
Maisonneuve, P, Lowenfels, AB
International journal of epidemiology. 2015;44(1):186-98
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the four or five most common causes of cancer mortality in developed countries. The aim of this review was to summarize results from pooled analyses and meta-analyses to estimate the fraction of PCs attributable to many different risk factors. A comprehensive review of the literature was carried out by searching for meta-analytical studies on the association between specific risk factors and PC risk or multiple cancer sites. Results indicate that PC has a multifactorial aetiology. All identified factors can be combined into a specific aetiological (the philosophy or study of causation) pathway for PC. The main pathways include insulin resistance (central adiposity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome), inflammation (tobacco, alcohol, pancreatitis), DNA damage (tobacco, red meat) and haemostasis (blood group, history of thrombosis). Authors conclude that about two-thirds of the major risk factors associated with PC are potentially modifiable, affording a unique opportunity for preventing one of our deadliest cancers.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aetiology of pancreatic cancer (PC) has been extensively studied and is the subject of numerous meta-analyses and pooled analyses. We have summarized results from these pooled and meta-analytical studies to estimate the fraction of PCs attributable to each of the identified risk factors. METHODS Using a comprehensive strategy, we retrieved 117 meta-analytical or pooled reports dealing with the association between specific risk factors and PC risk. We combined estimates of relative risk and estimates of exposure to calculate the fraction of PCs caused or prevented by a particular exposure. RESULTS Tobacco smoking ('strong' evidence) and Helicobacter pylori infection ('moderate' evidence) are the major risk factors associated with PC, with respective estimated population attributable fractions of 11-32% and 4-25%. The major protective factors are history of allergy ('strong' evidence) and increasing fruit or folate intake ('moderate' evidence), with respective population preventable fractions of 3-7% and 0-12%. CONCLUSIONS We summarized results of 117 meta-analytical or pooled data reports dealing with 37 aetiological exposures, to obtain robust information about the suspected causes of PC. By combining these estimates with their prevalences in the population, we calculated population attributable or population preventable fractions. About two-thirds of the major risk factors associated with PC are potentially modifiable, affording a unique opportunity for preventing one of our deadliest cancers.
4.
Glycemic response and health--a systematic review and meta-analysis: relations between dietary glycemic properties and health outcomes.
Livesey, G, Taylor, R, Hulshof, T, Howlett, J
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2008;87(1):258S-268S
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
All carbohydrates are ranked based on their glycaemic impact, or the response they provoke in blood glucose after consumption. It has been proposed that diets with a low impact on blood glucose are associated with a reduction in disease risk, however the specific dietary factors and degree of influence of this association remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess which glycaemic impact factors are important for affecting the maintenance of health and management of disease. Data from 45 relevant publications were included to investigate various health risk markers of overweight and obesity, diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease. This review found that diets with a reduced glycaemic impact and higher unavailable carbohydrate are associated with favourable changes for all examined health risk markers. The authors conclude that these interventions led to improved glycaemic control, therefore provide a compelling diet for managing chronic disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reduction of dietary glycemic response has been proposed as a means of reducing the risk of diabetes and coronary heart disease. The impact of glycemic response on markers of health remains to be elucidated. OBJECTIVE We assessed the evidence relating the glycemic impact of foods to measures relevant for health maintenance and management of disease. DESIGN This was a systematic review and synthesis of interventional evidence from literature reported on glycemic index and markers of health through the use of meta-analyses and meta-regression models. RESULTS Data from 45 relevant publications were found to January 2005. Lower glycemic index (GI) diets reduced both fasting blood glucose and glycated proteins independently of variance in available and unavailable carbohydrate intakes. Elevated unavailable carbohydrate added to improvements in both blood glucose and glycated protein control. These effects were greater in persons with poor fasting blood glucose control. No effects were seen on fasting insulin<100 pmol/L; above this, study numbers were few but consistent with prevention of hyperinsulinemia in some but not all overweight persons. Insulin sensitivity according to a variety of measurement methods was improved by lower GI, higher unavailable carbohydrate interventions in persons with type 2 diabetes, in overweight and obese persons, and in all studies combined. Fasting triacylglycerol in addition to body weight reduction related more to glycemic load than to GI. Glycemic load reduction by >17 g glucose equivalents/d was associated with reduced body weight. CONCLUSIONS Consumption of reduced glycemic response diets are followed by favorable changes in the health markers examined. The case for the use of such diets looks compelling. Unavailable carbohydrate intake is equally important.