1.
Comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements in the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Xia, J, Yu, J, Xu, H, Zhou, Y, Li, H, Yin, S, Xu, D, Wang, Y, Xia, H, Liao, W, et al
Pharmacological research. 2023;188:106647
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), characterised by sustained hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance, remains a severe driver of chronic metabolic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the efficacy of vitamin and mineral supplements in the management of glycaemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetic patients to inform clinical practice. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of one hundred and seventy articles with a total of 4223 adults with T2DM. Participants were randomised to either the placebo/no treatment group (n= 6345) or to the treatment group (n= 7878). Results show that: - chromium was the most effective micronutrient for decreasing fasting blood glucose and insulin resistance. - vitamin K was the top-ranked micronutrient in reducing haemoglobin A1C and fasting insulin levels. - vanadium was the top-ranked micronutrient in total cholesterol reductions. - niacin was ranked as the most effective in triglycerides reductions and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. - vitamin E was the top-ranked micronutrient in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions. Authors conclude that micronutrient supplements especially chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be more effective in the management of T2DM compared with other micronutrients.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Clinicians could consider the adjunctive effect of micronutrients supplements, such as chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements in a nutrition protocol to manage T2DM and slow or prevent its complications.
- The study authors state that the vitamin and mineral supplements under review had a statistically significant improvement, however they did not reach the study threshold for clinical significance. Therefore they advise caution in utilising micronutrient supplements in the management of glucose and lipid metabolism for T2DM.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Objectives
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements on managing glycemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methodology
This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO and adhered to PRISMA-2020 guidelines for network meta-analysis
The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk-of-bias tool was used to assess eligible randomised trials
8 prespecified markers identified and assessed in this study : 1) HbA1c (%), 2) fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), 3) total cholesterol (mmol/L), 4) triglycerides (mmol/L), 5) fasting insulin (μIU/mL), 6) HOMA-IR, 7) LDL-c (mmol/L), and 8) HDL-c (mmol/L).
Results
- 170 RCT trials of 14223 participants with T2DM treated with vitamin supplements, mineral supplements, or placebo/no treatment were included
- Low to very low certainty evidence established chromium supplements as the most effective in reducing fasting blood glucose levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SUCRAs: 90.4% and 78.3%, respectively)
- Vitamin K supplements ranked best in reducing glycated haemoglobin A1c and fasting insulin levels (SUCRAs: 97.0% and 82.3%, respectively), with moderate to very low certainty evidence
- Vanadium supplements ranked best in lowering total cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:100%)
- Niacin supplements ranked best in triglyceride reductions and increasing high-density lipo-protein cholesterol levels with low to very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:93.7% and 94.6%, respectively)
- Vitamin E supplements ranked best in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:80.0%).
Conclusion
- Micronutrient supplements, such as chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be efficacious in managing T2DM
- It should be noted that the evidence certainty for all was low.
Clinical practice applications:
- Chromium plays an important role in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and was the most effective micronutrient for decreasing fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR reductions. More pronounced effects were seen for chromium than vitamin E, vitamin C, niacin, selenium, and magnesium supplements
- Vitamin K was the top-ranked micronutrient in reducing HbA1c and fasting insulin levels. The mechanism through which Vitamin K affects glucose metabolism is proposed as activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase/sirtuin 1, that in turn increases phosphocreatine 3-kinase and glucose transporter 2 to decrease insulin resistance and fasting glucose.
- Vanadium was the top-ranked micronutrient in total cholesterol (TC) reductions, where supplementation dosage should be carefully considered, as vanadium compounds can be moderately or highly toxic. Vanadium supplementation is only recommended in cases of vanadium deficiency or diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, where the intake of vanadium from food should be enhanced in preference to supplementation
- Niacin was ranked as the most effective in triglyceride (TG) reductions and increasing HDL cholesterol levels. The dose of niacin could not be determined
- Vitamin E was the top-ranked micronutrient in low-density lipo- protein (LDL) cholesterol reductions.
Considerations for future research:
- Considering the clinical importance of these findings, new research is needed to get better insight into the efficacy of micronutrient supplements in managing T2DM
- Selenium homeostasis, selenoprotein, insulin signaling/secretion, and carbohydrate/lipid metabolism are linked in multiple and complex ways but the authors could not explain why chromium supplementation would lower blood glucose more effectively than selenium supplementation, and suggest more research is needed to clarify this
- While vitamin K status could be an emerging treatment target in T2DM prevention and management, it remains to be determined whether vitamin K supplementation has an advantage over other nutrients in terms of hypoglycemic effect, and further research is necessary
- The beneficial effect of vitamin E and niacin supplements regarding lipid metabolism warrant investigation through more rigorous comparative studies.
Abstract
Medical nutrition treatment can manage diabetes and slow or prevent its complications. The comparative effects of micronutrient supplements, however, have not yet been well established. We aimed at evaluating the comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements on managing glycemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to inform clinical practice. Electronic and hand searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed until June 1, 2022. We selected RCTs enrolling patients with T2DM who were treated with vitamin supplements, mineral supplements, or placebo/no treatment. Data were pooled via frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses. A total of 170 eligible trials and 14223 participants were included. Low to very low certainty evidence established chromium supplements as the most effective in reducing fasting blood glucose levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SUCRAs: 90.4% and 78.3%, respectively). Vitamin K supplements ranked best in reducing glycated hemoglobin A1c and fasting insulin levels (SUCRAs: 97.0% and 82.3%, respectively), with moderate to very low certainty evidence. Vanadium supplements ranked best in lowering total cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:100%). Niacin supplements ranked best in triglyceride reductions and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with low to very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:93.7% and 94.6%, respectively). Vitamin E supplements ranked best in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:80.0%). Our analyses indicated that micronutrient supplements, especially chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be more efficacious in managing T2DM than other micronutrients. Considering the clinical importance of these findings, new research is needed to get better insight into this issue.
2.
White rice, brown rice and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu, J, Balaji, B, Tinajero, M, Jarvis, S, Khan, T, Vasudevan, S, Ranawana, V, Poobalan, A, Bhupathiraju, S, Sun, Q, et al
BMJ open. 2022;12(9):e065426
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has continued to increase worldwide, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. Since rice is a staple food in many cultures and is predominant in most Asian diets, it is hypothesised that improving diet quality by replacing white rice with brown rice could play an important role in the prevention of T2D. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between rice intake and the risk of T2D. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nineteen studies – 8 cohort studies and 11 randomised controlled trials. Results from the meta-analyses of the cohort studies show a positive association between intake of white rice and risk of T2D. The associations were stronger in women compared with men. Additionally, brown rice was inversely associated with risk of T2D however, the results are based on limited data. Furthermore, the randomised controlled trials showed that the between-group difference in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was statistically significant in favour of the brown rice group. Authors conclude that replacing white rice with brown rice or other whole grains has the potential to be a low-cost and feasible lifestyle strategy to improve diet quality and help reduce T2D risk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intake of white rice has been associated with elevated risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), while studies on brown rice are conflicting. To inform dietary guidance, we synthesised the evidence on white rice and brown rice with T2D risk. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched through November 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Prospective cohort studies of white and brown rice intake on T2D risk (≥1 year), and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing brown rice with white rice on cardiometabolic risk factors (≥2 weeks). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted by the primary reviewer and two additional reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models and reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for prospective cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs. Strength of the meta-evidence was assessed using NutriGrade. RESULTS Nineteen articles were included: 8 cohort studies providing 18 estimates (white rice: 15 estimates, 25 956 cases, n=5 77 426; brown rice: 3 estimates, 10 507 cases, n=1 97 228) and 11 RCTs (n=1034). In cohort studies, white rice was associated with higher risk of T2D (pooled RR, 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.32) comparing extreme categories. At intakes above ~300 g/day, a dose-response was observed (each 158 g/day serving was associated with 13% (11%-15%) higher risk of T2D). Intake of brown rice was associated with lower risk of T2D (pooled RR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.97) comparing extreme categories. Each 50 g/day serving of brown rice was associated with 13% (6%-20%) lower risk of T2D. Cohort studies were considered to be of good or fair quality. RCTs showed an increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (0.06 mmol/L; 0.00 to 0.11 mmol/L) in the brown compared with white rice group. No other significant differences in risk factors were observed. The majority of RCTs were found to have some concern for risk of bias. Overall strength of the meta-evidence was moderate for cohort studies and moderate and low for RCTs. CONCLUSION Intake of white rice was associated with higher risk of T2D, while intake of brown rice was associated with lower risk. Findings from substitution trials on cardiometabolic risk factors were inconsistent. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020158466.