1.
COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is the worst yet to come?
Wostyn, P
Medical hypotheses. 2021;146:110469
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
A proportion of COVID-19 patients develop post-COVID-19 syndrome, with long-term symptoms such as persistent fatigue, muscle pains, depressive symptoms, and non-restorative sleep, similar to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). In this article the author presents his medical hypothesis that, in a subset of patients at least, post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome may result from damage to olfactory (smell) sensory neurons, which in turn may lead to toxic build-up within the central nervous system (CNS) through congestion of the glymphatic system (the waste clearance system of the CNS). Loss of smell and altered sensation of taste have been reported in 33–80% of COVID-19 patients but the underlying mechanisms are not yet known. Most of these patients regain their sense of smell within 1-3 weeks, suggesting that the virus does not affect the olfactory neurons but their surrounding supporting cells. Some patients, however, do not regain their sense of smell for months which may point to the destruction of neurons. A decrease in olfactory neurons may affect the flow of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in an area important for CSF drainage. This may cause an increase in intracranial pressure (idiopathic intracranial hypertension, IIH) and congestion of the glymphatic system, which have been associated with chronic fatigue syndrome, as well as with headaches and tinnitus, symptoms also commonly seen in COVID-19 patients. The author states that if this hypothesis is confirmed, glymphatic-lymphatic drainage therapies, such as osteopathy, should be recommended as early treatment for patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome.
Abstract
There has been concern about possible long-term sequelae resembling myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome in COVID-19 patients. Clarifying the mechanisms underlying such a "post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome" is essential for the development of preventive and early treatment methods for this syndrome. In the present paper, by integrating insights pertaining to the glymphatic system and the nasal cerebrospinal fluid outflow pathway with findings in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and COVID-19, I provide a coherent conceptual framework for understanding the pathophysiology of post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. According to this hypothesis, this syndrome may result from damage to olfactory sensory neurons, causing reduced outflow of cerebrospinal fluid through the cribriform plate, and further leading to congestion of the glymphatic system with subsequent toxic build-up within the central nervous system. I further postulate that patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome may benefit from cerebrospinal fluid drainage by restoring glymphatic transport and waste removal from the brain. Obviously, further research is required to provide further evidence for the presence of this post-viral syndrome, and to provide additional insight regarding the relative contribution of the glymphatic-lymphatic system to it. Other mechanisms may also be involved. If confirmed, the glymphatic-lymphatic system could represent a target in combating post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. Moreover, further research in this area could also provide new insights into the understanding of chronic fatigue syndrome.
2.
Systemic Perturbations in Amine and Kynurenine Metabolism Associated with Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Inflammatory Cytokine Responses.
Lawler, NG, Gray, N, Kimhofer, T, Boughton, B, Gay, M, Yang, R, Morillon, AC, Chin, ST, Ryan, M, Begum, S, et al
Journal of proteome research. 2021;20(5):2796-2811
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Understanding the action of Covid-19 and the host response is paramount to developing personalised treatments and improving recovery rates. This cohort study of 64 individuals aimed to determine underlying biological signatures of individuals with severe and mild Covid-19, to potentially risk stratify patients and provide targeted treatments. The results showed that several biological signatures were disrupted with infection, some increased and some decreased and indicated possible liver, brain, and inflammatory disruptions. There was also evidence of a time-based pattern of biological disruptions, which may be of significance when looking at “long Covid” syndrome. It was concluded that identifying the hosts biological response to the virus offers insights into the viral action on the body. The action of Covid-19 on processes in the brain may indicate a secondary effect of the virus. Using biological markers to predict recovery of individuals suffering from “long Covid” may also be a possibility. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand which biological processes may be disrupted during Covid-19 infection, with the view to testing to understand who may be at risk of long-term complications post recovery.
Abstract
We performed quantitative metabolic phenotyping of blood plasma in parallel with cytokine/chemokine analysis from participants who were either SARS-CoV-2 (+) (n = 10) or SARS-CoV-2 (-) (n = 49). SARS-CoV-2 positivity was associated with a unique metabolic phenotype and demonstrated a complex systemic response to infection, including severe perturbations in amino acid and kynurenine metabolic pathways. Nine metabolites were elevated in plasma and strongly associated with infection (quinolinic acid, glutamic acid, nicotinic acid, aspartic acid, neopterin, kynurenine, phenylalanine, 3-hydroxykynurenine, and taurine; p < 0.05), while four metabolites were lower in infection (tryptophan, histidine, indole-3-acetic acid, and citrulline; p < 0.05). This signature supports a systemic metabolic phenoconversion following infection, indicating possible neurotoxicity and neurological disruption (elevations of 3-hydroxykynurenine and quinolinic acid) and liver dysfunction (reduction in Fischer's ratio and elevation of taurine). Finally, we report correlations between the key metabolite changes observed in the disease with concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines showing strong immunometabolic disorder in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
3.
Potential causal factors of CFS/ME: a concise and systematic scoping review of factors researched.
Muller, AE, Tveito, K, Bakken, IJ, Flottorp, SA, Mjaaland, S, Larun, L
Journal of translational medicine. 2020;18(1):484
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic fatigue syndrome /myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is complex and probably triggered by several interconnected factors and the identification of these is essential to develop better treatments and preventative measures. This systematic scoping review of 1161 studies aimed to discuss potential causal factors of CFS/ME. The results showed that there were several main causal factors that were investigated in the literature and no single factor dominated the research; immunological, psychological/psychosocial/socioeconomic, infectious, and neuroendocrinal/hormonal/metabolic. Studies varied in their design and methods. Interestingly research in this area was at its highest before 1995 and from 2015-2019, studies have markedly decreased. It was concluded that large variations in methods and design of studies of causal factor studies, is problematic. More large, well designed studies are required especially as research has declined recently and considering post covid-19 fatigue. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand where there are gaps in the research to design more robust studies in the future.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is understood as a complex condition, likely triggered and sustained by an interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors. Little oversight exists of the field of causal research. This systematic scoping review explores potential causal factors of CFS/ME as researched by primary studies. METHODS We searched eight databases for primary studies that examined potential causal factors of CFS/ME. Based on title/abstract review, two researchers independently sorted each study's factors into nine main categories and 71 subordinate categories, using a system developed with input given during a 2018 ME conference, specialists and representatives from a ME patient advocacy group, and using BMJ Best Practice's description of CFS/ME etiology. We also extracted data related to study design, size, diagnostic criteria and comparison groups. RESULTS We included 1161 primary studies published between January 1979 and June 2019. Based on title/abstract analysis, no single causal factor dominated in these studies, and studies reported a mean of 2.73 factors. The four most common factors were: immunological (297 studies), psychological (243), infections (198), and neuroendocrinal (198). The most frequent study designs were case-control studies (894 studies) comparing CFS/ME patients with healthy participants. More than half of the studies (that reported study size in the title/abstract) included 100 or fewer participants. CONCLUSION The field of causal hypotheses of CFS/ME is diverse, and we found that the studies examined all the main categories of possible factors that we had defined a priori. Most studies were not designed to adequately explore causality, rather to establish hypotheses. We need larger studies with stronger study designs to gain better knowledge of causal factors of CFS/ME.
4.
Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease.
Heneka, MT, Golenbock, D, Latz, E, Morgan, D, Brown, R
Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2020;12(1):69
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Covid-19 may cause brain dysfunction evidenced by symptoms individuals experience once they have contracted the disease. Loss of smell, taste and confusion have all been reported by patients and a number of severe cases have reported incidences of stroke. These are all of concern, as Covid-19 can severely affect the elderly who ordinarily are the most likely to suffer from brain disorders. This small review paper of 27 studies stated that there are four possible ways in which Covid-19 may affect the brain, which put Covid-19 sufferers at an increased risk of long-term brain disorders. This was supported by findings, which showed one third of Covid-19 patients leave hospital with evidence of brain dysfunction. Inflammation was heavily reviewed by the authors as a possible causal factor. It was concluded that patients who survive Covid-19 infection are at an increased risk for developing brain disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, however it was acknowledged that further studies are required. Clinicians could use this study to understand the possible need for both short-term and long-term monitoring of brain function in individuals who have survived Covid-19, especially if they are elderly.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that infection with Sars-CoV-2 causes neurological deficits in a substantial proportion of affected patients. While these symptoms arise acutely during the course of infection, less is known about the possible long-term consequences for the brain. Severely affected COVID-19 cases experience high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and acute respiratory dysfunction and often require assisted ventilation. All these factors have been suggested to cause cognitive decline. Pathogenetically, this may result from direct negative effects of the immune reaction, acceleration or aggravation of pre-existing cognitive deficits, or de novo induction of a neurodegenerative disease. This article summarizes the current understanding of neurological symptoms of COVID-19 and hypothesizes that affected patients may be at higher risk of developing cognitive decline after overcoming the primary COVID-19 infection. A structured prospective evaluation should analyze the likelihood, time course, and severity of cognitive impairment following the COVID-19 pandemic.