-
1.
COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW): Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Redruello-Guerrero, P, Ruiz-Del-Pino, M, Jiménez-Gutiérrez, C, Jiménez-Gutiérrez, P, Carrascos-Cáliz, A, Romero-Linares, A, Láinez Ramos-Bossini, AJ, Rivera-Izquierdo, M, Cárdenas-Cruz, A
Medicina intensiva. 2023;47(10):583-593
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
During the Covid-19 pandemic there was an increase in the number of individuals experiencing a collapsed lung, otherwise known as a pneumothorax (PNX) or pneumomediastinum (PNMD). The reasons for increased PNX are unclear and this systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 studies including 4901 individuals with Covid-19 aimed to determine what may be responsible for this. The results showed that 1629 individuals experienced a PNX and 253 a PNMD, and death was higher amongst those who developed PNX and PNMD. There were strong associations between the occurrence of PNX and PNMD and death. It was concluded that PNX and PNMD significantly increased the risk of dying in individuals with Covid-19 and it was proposed that the term Covid-19-Associated Lung Weakness (CALW) should be applied to those who experience PNX of PNMD. There was some concern that the quality of the research used was very low and so this study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that PNX and PNMD in Covid-19 patients should be closely monitored and managed.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess mortality and different clinical factors derived from the development of atraumatic pneumothorax (PNX) and/or pneumomediastinum (PNMD) in critically ill patients as a consequence of COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW). DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis. SETTING Intensive Care Unit (ICU). PARTICIPANTS Original research evaluating patients, with or without the need for protective invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), with a diagnosis of COVID-19, who developed atraumatic PNX or PNMD on admission or during hospital stay. INTERVENTIONS Data of interest were obtained from each article and analyzed and assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The risk of the variables of interest was assessed with data derived from studies including patients who developed atraumatic PNX or PNMD. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST Mortality, mean ICU stay and mean PaO2/FiO2 at diagnosis. RESULTS Information was collected from 12 longitudinal studies. Data from a total of 4901 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 1629 patients had an episode of atraumatic PNX and 253 patients had an episode of atraumatic PNMD. Despite the finding of significantly strong associations, the great heterogeneity between studies implies that the interpretation of results should be made with caution. CONCLUSIONS Mortality among COVID-19 patients was higher in those who developed atraumatic PNX and/or PNMD compared to those who did not. The mean PaO2/FiO2 index was lower in patients who developed atraumatic PNX and/or PNMD. We propose grouping these cases under the term COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW). OBJETIVO Evaluar la mortalidad y diversos factores clínicos derivados del desarrollo de neumotórax (NTX) y/o neumomediastino (NMD) atraumáticos en pacientes críticos como consecuencia de la debilidad pulmonar asociada a COVID-19 (DPAC). DISEÑO: Revisión sistemática con metaanálisis. ÁMBITO Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI). PARTICIPANTES Investigaciones originales en las que se evaluase a pacientes, con o sin necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI), con diagnóstico de COVID-19 que hubiesen desarrollado NTX o NMD atraumáticos al ingreso o durante su estancia hospitalaria. INTERVENCIONES Se obtuvieron los datos de interés de cada artículo que fueron analizados y evaluados por la Escala Newcastle-Ottawa. El riesgo de las variables de interés principales se evaluó por los datos derivados de los estudios que incluyeron a pacientes que desarrollaron NTX o NMD atraumáticos. VARIABLES DE INTERÉS PRINCIPALS Mortalidad, estancia media en la UCI y PaO2/FiO2 media en el momento diagnóstico. RESULTADOS Se recogieron datos de 12 estudios longitudinales. En el metaanálisis se incluyeron datos de un total de 4.901 pacientes, entre los cuales 1.629 presentaron un episodio de NTX y 253 de NMD atraumáticos. A pesar de encontrar asociaciones significativamente fuertes, la alta heterogeneidad entre los estudios hace que la interpretación de los resultados deba hacerse con cautela. CONCLUSIONES La mortalidad de los pacientes COVID-19 fue mayor en los que desarrollaron NTX y/o NMD atraumáticos con respecto a los que no lo hicieron. La media del índice PaO2/FiO2 fue menor en los pacientes que desarrollaron NTX y/o NMD atraumáticos. Proponemos agrupar bajo el término deDPAC estos casos.
-
2.
Effects of mild/asymptomatic COVID-19 on semen parameters and sex-related hormone levels in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Che, BW, Chen, P, Yu, Y, Li, W, Huang, T, Zhang, WJ, Xu, SH, He, J, Liu, M, Tang, KF
Asian journal of andrology. 2023;25(3):382-388
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Various studies have shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause more harm and a higher mortality rate to men. However, the literature does not clearly show that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can cause serious and lasting damage to male reproductive function. The aims of this study were to explore the effects of mild/asymptomatic COVID-19 on semen parameters and sex-related hormone levels and to analyse the relationship between semen parameter values and semen collection time after infection, fever, and severity of COVID-19. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirteen studies of which only five were included in the meta-analysis. Results show that COVID-19 has a certain effect on male reproductive function in the short term especially within about 70 days after infection. Additionally, fever after infection only had a significant effect on sperm concentration. Authors conclude by recommending the avoidance of pregnancy for a short period of time when the male partner has been infected with COVID-19.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has yet to be proven to alter male reproductive function, particularly in the majority of mild/asymptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to explore whether mild/asymptomatic COVID-19 affects semen quality and sex-related hormone levels. To find suitable comparative studies, a systematic review and meta-analysis was done up to January 22, 2022, by using multiple databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to identify and choose the studies. Meta-analysis was used to examine the semen parameters and sex-related hormones of mild/asymptomatic COVID-19 patients before and after infection. The effects of semen collection time, fever, and intensity of verification on semen following infection were also investigated. A total of 13 studies (n = 770) were included in the analysis, including three case-control studies, six pre-post studies, and four single-arm studies. A meta-analysis of five pre-post studies showed that after infection with COVID-19, sperm concentration (I2 = 0; P = 0.003), total sperm count (I2 = 46.3%; P = 0.043), progressive motility (I2 = 50.0%; P < 0.001), total sperm motility (I2 = 76.1%; P = 0.047), and normal sperm morphology (I2 = 0; P = 0.001) decreased. Simultaneously, a systematic review of 13 studies found a significant relationship between semen collection time after infection, inflammation severity, and semen parameter values, with fever having only bearing on semen concentration. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in sex-related hormone levels before and after infection in mild/asymptomatic patients. Mild/asymptomatic COVID-19 infection had a significant effect on semen quality in the short term. It is recommended to avoid initiating a pregnancy during this period of time.
-
3.
Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity among prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sari Motlagh, R, Abufaraj, M, Karakiewicz, PI, Rajwa, P, Mori, K, Mun, DH, Shariat, SF
World journal of urology. 2022;40(4):907-914
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is equal in both sexes; however, disease severity and progression rates are approximately three times higher in the male gender. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and the second-generation androgen receptor targeting therapy were developed to suppress the androgen-activated intracellular cascade that leads to tumour progression and aggressive tumour growth. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the severity of disease in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with ADT. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of six cohort studies. The study results show that there is not a significant association between ADT use and the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in PCa patients. However, results also show that ADT does not worsen COVID-19 risk and trajectory. Authors conclude that ADT, as a cancer treatment, might be safely administered to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Abstract
PURPOSE Androgen-regulated enzymes such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) are involved in the SARS-CoV-2 infection process. The expression of TMPRSS2 and its fusion gene, which are increased in the epithelium of the human prostate gland during prostate carcinogenesis, are regulated by androgens. Our goal was to assess the risk of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the severity of the disease in PCa patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. We queried PubMed and Web of Science databases on 1 July 2021. We used random- and/or fixed-effects meta-analytic models in the presence or absence of heterogeneity according to Cochrane's Q test and I2 statistic, respectively. RESULTS Six retrospective studies (n = 50,220 patients) were selected after considering inclusion and exclusion criteria for qualitative evidence synthesis. Four retrospective studies were included to assess the SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in PCa patients under ADT vs. no ADT and the summarized risk ratio (RR) was 0.8 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.44-1.47). Five retrospective studies were included to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in PCa patients under ADT versus no ADT and the summarized RR was 1.23 (95% CI 0.9-1.68). CONCLUSION We found a non-significant association between the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity in PCa patients treated with ADT. However, our results suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic PCa patients can safely undergo ADT as a cancer therapy without worsening COVID-19 risk and trajectory.
-
4.
Efficacy of telemedicine for the management of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kuan, PX, Chan, WK, Fern Ying, DK, Rahman, MAA, Peariasamy, KM, Lai, NM, Mills, NL, Anand, A
The Lancet. Digital health. 2022;4(9):e676-e691
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to transform the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of chronic cardiovascular conditions. Many DHIs are widely deployed in health systems across the world, with adoption rapidly increasing in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The aim of this study was to provide an updated synthesis of evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of cardiovascular diseases. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seventy-two studies with a total of 127,869 participants, of whom 82,818 (65%) were males and 45051 (35%) were females. Results showed reduced cardiovascular-related mortality and hospitalisation for patients with heart failure who received combined remote telemedicine monitoring and consultation compared with usual care. Authors conclude that the findings of their study suggest a definite role for telemedicine in the management of heart failure, particularly in early treatment optimisation, but the value is less clear for long-term management strategy and other cardiovascular diseases. Thus, future research should focus to address the application of these technologies to unselected populations and longer-term effectiveness.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine has been increasingly integrated into chronic disease management through remote patient monitoring and consultation, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting effectiveness of telemedicine interventions for the management of patients with cardiovascular conditions. METHODS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from database inception to Jan 18, 2021. We included randomised controlled trials and observational or cohort studies that evaluated the effects of a telemedicine intervention on cardiovascular outcomes for people either at risk (primary prevention) of cardiovascular disease or with established (secondary prevention) cardiovascular disease, and, for the meta-analysis, we included studies that evaluated the effects of a telemedicine intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors. We excluded studies if there was no clear telemedicine intervention described or if cardiovascular or risk factor outcomes were not clearly reported in relation to the intervention. Two reviewers independently assessed and extracted data from trials and observational and cohort studies using a standardised template. Our primary outcome was cardiovascular-related mortality. We evaluated study quality using Cochrane risk-of-bias and Newcastle-Ottawa scales. The systematic review and the meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021221010) and the Malaysian National Medical Research Register (NMRR-20-2471-57236). FINDINGS 72 studies, including 127 869 participants, met eligibility criteria, with 34 studies included in meta-analysis (n=13 269 with 6620 [50%] receiving telemedicine). Combined remote monitoring and consultation for patients with heart failure was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular-related mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0·83 [95% CI 0·70 to 0·99]; p=0·036) and hospitalisation for a cardiovascular cause (0·71 [0·58 to 0·87]; p=0·0002), mostly in studies with short-term follow-up. There was no effect of telemedicine on all-cause hospitalisation (1·02 [0·94 to 1·10]; p=0·71) or mortality (0·90 [0·77 to 1·06]; p=0·23) in these groups, and no benefits were observed with remote consultation in isolation. Small reductions were observed for systolic blood pressure (mean difference -3·59 [95% CI -5·35 to -1·83] mm Hg; p<0·0001) by remote monitoring and consultation in secondary prevention populations. Small reductions were also observed in body-mass index (mean difference -0·38 [-0·66 to -0·11] kg/m2; p=0·0064) by remote consultation in primary prevention settings. INTERPRETATION Telemedicine including both remote disease monitoring and consultation might reduce short-term cardiovascular-related hospitalisation and mortality risk among patients with heart failure. Future research should evaluate the sustained effects of telemedicine interventions. FUNDING The British Heart Foundation.
-
5.
Clinical applications of detecting IgG, IgM or IgA antibody for the diagnosis of COVID-19: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Chen, M, Qin, R, Jiang, M, Yang, Z, Wen, W, Li, J
International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021;104:415-422
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The rapidly spreading nature of COVID-19 has put an emphasis on the importance of fast diagnosis. Gold standard diagnosis is through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests, which aims to detect the presence of COVID-19. However, challenges with collection techniques and when in the disease lifecycle these tests are taken, can affect their reliability, highlighting a need for alternative methods of testing. Other testing methods exist, which involve testing the body’s own immune response to the presence of COVID-19, however these may also have their limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of testing the body’s own immune reaction for the presence of COVID-19. The results showed that testing the body’s immune reaction was effective, however if the person being tested is at an early stage in the disease, then it may be misdiagnosed. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the use of any type of COVID-19 testing may have its limitations, and although a person may test negative, there is still a possibility that they have the infection if symptoms exist
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a devastating impact worldwide, and timely detection and quarantine of infected patients are critical to prevent spread of disease. Serological antibody testing is an important diagnostic method used increasingly in clinics, although its clinical application is still under investigation. METHODS A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the diagnostic performance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 antibody tests in patients with COVID-19. The test results analysed included: (1) IgM-positive but IgG-negative (IgM+IgG-); (2) IgG-positive but IgM-negative (IgG+IgM-); (3) both IgM-positive and IgG-positive (IgM+IgG+); (4) IgM-positive without IgG information (IgM+IgG+/-); (5) IgG-positive without IgM information (IgG+IgM+/-); (6) either IgM-positive or IgG-positive (IgM+ or IgG+); and (7) IgA-positive (IgA+). RESULTS Sixty-eight studies were included. Pooled sensitivities for IgM+IgG-, IgG+IgM-, IgM+IgG+, IgM+IgG+/-, IgG+IgM+/-, and IgM+ or IgG+ were 6%, 7%, 53%, 68%, 73% and 79% respectively. Pooled specificities ranged from 98% to 100%. IgA+ had a pooled sensitivity of 78% but a relatively low specificity of 88%. Tests conducted 2 weeks after symptom onset showed better diagnostic accuracy than tests conducted earlier. Chemiluminescence immunoassay and detection of S protein as the antigen could offer more accurate diagnostic results. DISCUSSION These findings support the supplemental role of serological antibody tests in the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, their capacity to diagnose COVID-19 early in the disease course could be limited.
-
6.
Case report and systematic review suggest that children may experience similar long-term effects to adults after clinical COVID-19.
Ludvigsson, JF
Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). 2021;110(3):914-921
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The long-term effects of COVID-19 is becoming increasingly documented in adults. Symptoms such as fatigue, headache and depression have all been reported, however data on the possible long-term effects of COVID-19 in children is scarce. The aim of this systematic review and case report was to describe the long-term effects of COVID-19 in five children and support this with other reports in the literature. The results showed that of the five case reports of long COVID, four were girls aged 9-15 years. All subjects reported symptoms lasting between 6-8 months. Most common symptoms were fatigue, difficulty breathing and heart issues. The systematic literature review did not find any publications which documented long COVID in children. It was concluded that children may experience long COVID symptoms and girls may be more susceptible. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that children may also be affected by long COVID and that patients should be monitored for symptoms for at least 6-8 months.
Abstract
AIM: Persistent symptoms in adults after COVID-19 are emerging and the term long COVID is increasingly appearing in the literature. However, paediatric data are scarce. METHODS This paper contains a case report of five Swedish children and the long-term symptoms reported by their parents. It also includes a systematic literature review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases and the medRxiv/bioRxiv pre-print servers up to 2 November 2020. RESULTS The five children with potential long COVID had a median age of 12 years (range 9-15) and four were girls. They had symptoms for 6-8 months after their clinical diagnoses of COVID-19. None were hospitalised at diagnosis, but one was later admitted for peri-myocarditis. All five children had fatigue, dyspnoea, heart palpitations or chest pain, and four had headaches, difficulties concentrating, muscle weakness, dizziness and sore throats. Some had improved after 6-8 months, but they all suffered from fatigue and none had fully returned to school. The systematic review identified 179 publications and 19 of these were deemed relevant and read in detail. None contained any information on long COVID in children. CONCLUSION Children may experience similar long COVID symptoms to adults and females may be more affected.
-
7.
Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults.
Ludvigsson, JF
Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). 2020;109(6):1088-1095
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which was also previously known as 2019-nCoV. This study is a systematic literature review which summarises the findings on the current knowledge of COVID-19 in children. The review includes 45 scientific papers and letters. Results showed that children have so far accounted for 1%-5% of diagnosed cases. Children often are asymptomatic, have milder disease than adults, and deaths have been extremely rare. Diagnostic findings have been similar to adults, with fever and respiratory symptoms being prevalent. Authors conclude that the disease course in paediatric COVID-19 was milder than in adults, children had a better prognosis and deaths were extremely rare.
Abstract
AIM: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected hundreds of thousands of people. Data on symptoms and prognosis in children are rare. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out to identify papers on COVID-19, which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), using the MEDLINE and Embase databases between January 1 and March 18, 2020. RESULTS The search identified 45 relevant scientific papers and letters. The review showed that children have so far accounted for 1%-5% of diagnosed COVID-19 cases, they often have milder disease than adults and deaths have been extremely rare. Diagnostic findings have been similar to adults, with fever and respiratory symptoms being prevalent, but fewer children seem to have developed severe pneumonia. Elevated inflammatory markers were less common in children, and lymphocytopenia seemed rare. Newborn infants have developed symptomatic COVID-19, but evidence of vertical intrauterine transmission was scarce. Suggested treatment included providing oxygen, inhalations, nutritional support and maintaining fluids and electrolyte balances. CONCLUSIONS The coronavirus disease 2019 has occurred in children, but they seemed to have a milder disease course and better prognosis than adults. Deaths were extremely rare.
-
8.
Chinese herbal medicine for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiong, X, Wang, P, Su, K, Cho, WC, Xing, Y
Pharmacological research. 2020;160:105056
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Coronavirus- 2019 (COVID-19) infection, the cause of a global pandemic, can lead to respiratory failure and death. Whilst no specific antiviral drugs or vaccines were available in the early stages of the outbreak, in China Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) had been widely used since the beginning. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy of CHM to conventional Western medicine treatments for COVID-19 infections, involving 2275 patients from 18 trials. The outcome suggested that the use of CHM exhibited many positive effects on the course of the disease, including fever severity, length of hospital stay, cough, fatigue, anti-inflammatory markers and lung imaging, therefore presenting a promising treatment for reducing the severity and duration of the disease, whilst having little to no side effects. The trials included various formulations predominantly based on traditional Chinese herbal medicine, with the therapeutic principles of ‘dispelling cold’, ‘relieving exterior’, ‘dissipating phlegm’, ‘clearing away heat’, ‘invigorating spleen’, and ‘replenishing qi’. In the included trials a total of 100 different herbs were identified. The five most frequently used herbs being Liquorice Root (Glycyrrhiza spp.), Baikal Skullcap Root (Scutellaria baicalensis), Pinellia Rhizome (Pinelliae tematae), Forsythia Fruit (Forsythia suspensa), and Bitter Apricot Seed (Armeniacae amarum). The treatment course ranged from 5 to 15 days and the most common dosage were tea preparations. The authors describe the meta-analysis as one of the larger ones conducted so far and briefly discuss some of the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of the herbs most used. This meta-analysis yields evidence for alternative strategies in the support and management of COVID-19 infections.
Abstract
Currently, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which can lead to severe respiratory failure and death, is now a global pandemic with no specific anti-viral drugs or vaccines. However, It is worth noting that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), especially Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), has been widely applied in mainland China since outbreak, bringing new hope for the prevention and control of COVID-19. A comprehensive literature searching was conducted in 7 electronic databases from their inception up to June 21, 2020 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CHM for COVID-19. Eighteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2275 patients were enrolled. Most of CHMs were originated from classical Chinese herbal formulas. Liquoric Root (Gancao, Radix Glycyrrhizae), Baical Skullcap Root (Huangqin, Radix Scutellariae Baicalensis), Pinellia Rhizome (Banxia, Rhizoma Pinelliae Tematae), Forsythia Fruit (Lianqiao, Fructus Forsythiae Suspensae), and Bitter Apricot Seed (Kuxingren, Semen Armeniacae Amarum) were most frequently used Chinese herbs. The most commonly used dosage formulation was decoction. Our meta-analyses found that comparing CHM group and conventional western medicine group, CHM group has improvements in several clinical parameters including lung CT, clinical cure rate, ranging from mild to critical cases, length of hospital stay, total score of clinical symptoms, fever reduction time, symptom score of fever, number of cough reduction cases, symptom score of cough, number of fatigue reduction cases, symptom score of fatigue, disappearing time of fatigue, TCM syndrome, viral nucleic acid testing, and inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein). Besides, no severe adverse effects was identified by CHM. CHM, especially classical Chinese herbal formulas, could be used as potential candidates for COVID-19 in this battle.
-
9.
Potential causal factors of CFS/ME: a concise and systematic scoping review of factors researched.
Muller, AE, Tveito, K, Bakken, IJ, Flottorp, SA, Mjaaland, S, Larun, L
Journal of translational medicine. 2020;18(1):484
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic fatigue syndrome /myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is complex and probably triggered by several interconnected factors and the identification of these is essential to develop better treatments and preventative measures. This systematic scoping review of 1161 studies aimed to discuss potential causal factors of CFS/ME. The results showed that there were several main causal factors that were investigated in the literature and no single factor dominated the research; immunological, psychological/psychosocial/socioeconomic, infectious, and neuroendocrinal/hormonal/metabolic. Studies varied in their design and methods. Interestingly research in this area was at its highest before 1995 and from 2015-2019, studies have markedly decreased. It was concluded that large variations in methods and design of studies of causal factor studies, is problematic. More large, well designed studies are required especially as research has declined recently and considering post covid-19 fatigue. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand where there are gaps in the research to design more robust studies in the future.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is understood as a complex condition, likely triggered and sustained by an interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors. Little oversight exists of the field of causal research. This systematic scoping review explores potential causal factors of CFS/ME as researched by primary studies. METHODS We searched eight databases for primary studies that examined potential causal factors of CFS/ME. Based on title/abstract review, two researchers independently sorted each study's factors into nine main categories and 71 subordinate categories, using a system developed with input given during a 2018 ME conference, specialists and representatives from a ME patient advocacy group, and using BMJ Best Practice's description of CFS/ME etiology. We also extracted data related to study design, size, diagnostic criteria and comparison groups. RESULTS We included 1161 primary studies published between January 1979 and June 2019. Based on title/abstract analysis, no single causal factor dominated in these studies, and studies reported a mean of 2.73 factors. The four most common factors were: immunological (297 studies), psychological (243), infections (198), and neuroendocrinal (198). The most frequent study designs were case-control studies (894 studies) comparing CFS/ME patients with healthy participants. More than half of the studies (that reported study size in the title/abstract) included 100 or fewer participants. CONCLUSION The field of causal hypotheses of CFS/ME is diverse, and we found that the studies examined all the main categories of possible factors that we had defined a priori. Most studies were not designed to adequately explore causality, rather to establish hypotheses. We need larger studies with stronger study designs to gain better knowledge of causal factors of CFS/ME.