-
1.
Association between COVID-19 and Male Fertility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Wang, S, Zhang, A, Pan, Y, Liu, L, Niu, S, Zhang, F, Liu, X
The world journal of men's health. 2023;41(2):311-329
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Several studies have been published documenting possible relationships between Covid-19 and male infertility, but it remains unclear whether Covid-19 affects sperm quality and sex hormones. This meta-analysis and systematic review of observational studies aimed to determine any relationship between Covid-19 infection and male fertility. The results showed that Covid-19 decreased sperm count, sperm concentration, motility, but had no effect on semen volume, immotility, normal morphology or nonprogressive sperm motility. Infection also affected some hormone levels and that effects on hormones were dependent on age of infection onset. Covid-19 infection with or without fever also differentially affected outcomes with those with fever having reduced sperm concentration and progressive sperm motility, which was not seen in those who did not experience fever. Disease severity also affected outcomes with those with moderate Covid-19 having reduced sperm motility, which was not seen in individuals who had mild disease. It was concluded that Covid-19 infection reduced sperm quality and disrupted sex hormones. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that Covid-19 infection may affect the fertility of men.
Abstract
PURPOSE Whether COVID-19 reduces male fertility remains requires further investigation. This meta-analysis and systematic review evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on male fertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS The literature in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to January 01, 2022 was systematically searched, and a meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on male fertility. Totally 17 studies with a total of 1,627 patients and 1,535 control subjects were included in our meta-analysis. RESULTS Regarding sperm quality, COVID-19 decreased the total sperm count (p=0.012), sperm concentration (p=0.001), total motility (p=0.001), progressive sperm motility (p=0.048), and viability (p=0.031). Subgroup analyses showed that different control group populations did not change the results. It was found that during the illness stage of COVID-19, semen volume decreased, and during the recovery stage of COVID-19, sperm concentration and total motility decreased <90 days. We found that sperm concentration and total motility decreased during recovery for ≥90 days. Fever because of COVID-19 significantly reduced sperm concentration and progressive sperm motility, and COVID-19 without fever ≥90 days, the sperm total motility and progressive sperm motility decreased. Regarding disease severity, the moderate type of COVID-19 significantly reduced sperm total motility, but not the mild type. Regarding sex hormones, COVID-19 increased prolactin and estradiol. Subgroup analyses showed that during the illness stage, COVID-19 decreased testosterone (T) levels and increased luteinizing hormone levels. A potential publication bias may have existed in our meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 in men significantly reduced sperm quality and caused sex hormone disruption. COVID-19 had long-term effects on sperm quality, especially on sperm concentration and total motility. It is critical to conduct larger multicenter studies to determine the consequences of COVID-19 on male fertility.
-
2.
Age-Dependent Relationships Between Disease Risk and Testosterone Levels: Relevance to COVID-19 Disease.
Muehlenbein, M, Gassen, J, Nowak, T, Henderson, A, Morris, B, Weaver, S, Baker, E
American journal of men's health. 2023;17(2):15579883221130195
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A growing body of research finds that in men, testosterone levels may be prognostic of clinical outcomes related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 disease). The presence of pre-existing chronic conditions in many patients with COVID-19 disease further complicates the relationship among testosterone and severe outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine whether pre-existing conditions for severe COVID-19 disease were related to serum-free testosterone levels in men who had not been infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. This study obtained data from men (n = 142) who participated in the longitudinal study Waco COVID Survey. All data included in the study was collected as part of the initial intake survey and first laboratory appointment. Results show that serum-free testosterone levels decreased as a function of age. In fact, greater burden of pre-existing conditions for severe COVID-19 disease was related to lower testosterone levels among men younger than 40 years of age. Furthermore, in men older than 40 years of age the decrease in testosterone that accompanies aging attenuated the effect of the clinical risk score on free testosterone levels. Authors conclude that their findings add important insights into the complex role of androgens in chronic and infectious diseases and contribute to the growing body of literature on the relationship between chronic disease and men’s testosterone levels.
Abstract
Testosterone levels in men appear to be prognostic of a number of disease outcomes, including severe COVID-19 disease. Testosterone levels naturally decline with age and are lower in individuals with a number of comorbidities and chronic conditions. Low testosterone may therefore be both a cause and a consequence of illness, including COVID-19 disease. The present project examines whether preexisting conditions for severe COVID-19 disease were themselves related to serum-free testosterone levels in men who had not been infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. A clinical risk score for severe COVID-19 disease was computed based on the results of previously published meta-analyses and cohort studies, and relationships between this score and testosterone levels were tested in 142 men ages 19 to 82 years. Greater burden of preexisting conditions for severe COVID-19 disease was related to lower testosterone levels among men younger than 40 years of age. In older men, the decrease in testosterone that accompanies aging attenuated the effect of the clinical risk score on free testosterone levels. Given that older age itself is a predictor of COVID-19 disease severity, these results together suggest that the presence of preexisting conditions may confound the relationship between testosterone levels and COVID-19 disease outcomes in men. Future research examining relationships among testosterone and outcomes related to infectious and chronic diseases should consider potential confounds, such as the role of preexisting conditions.
-
3.
Electrolyte imbalances as poor prognostic markers in COVID-19: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Song, HJJMD, Chia, AZQ, Tan, BKJ, Teo, CB, Lim, V, Chua, HR, Samuel, M, Kee, A
Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2023;46(2):235-259
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Salt imbalances in individuals with Covid-19 are highly prevalent, however it is not fully understood if they determine whether a patient has a good or bad prognosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 observational studies aimed to determine the associations and prognostic value of different salt imbalances in individuals with Covid-19. The results showed that out of several salt imbalances analysed, high and low sodium levels and low calcium levels could predict poor outcomes in those with Covid-19. High sodium levels were particularly indicative, but this was not due to the relationship between high sodium and inflammation in the body and causal reasons remained undiscovered. It was concluded that sodium imbalances and low calcium levels were associated with poor clinical outcomes in individuals with Covid-19. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that correcting these imbalances may be of benefit to individuals with Covid-19.
Abstract
PURPOSE Serum electrolyte imbalances are highly prevalent in COVID-19 patients. However, their associations with COVID-19 outcomes are inconsistent, and of unknown prognostic value. We aim to systematically clarify the associations and prognostic accuracy of electrolyte imbalances (sodium, calcium, potassium, magnesium, chloride and phosphate) in predicting poor COVID-19 clinical outcome. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. Odds of poor clinical outcome (a composite of mortality, intensive-care unit (ICU) admission, need for respiratory support and acute respiratory distress syndrome) were pooled using mixed-effects models. The associated prognostic sensitivity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + , LR-) and predictive values (PPV, NPV; assuming 25% pre-test probability), and area under the curve (AUC) were computed. RESULTS We included 28 observational studies from 953 records with low to moderate risk-of-bias. Hyponatremia (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.48-2.94, I2 = 93%, N = 8), hypernatremia (OR = 4.32, 95% CI = 3.17-5.88, I2 = 45%, N = 7) and hypocalcemia (OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.24-4.88, I2 = 25%, N = 6) were associated with poor COVID-19 outcome. These associations remained significant on adjustment for covariates such as demographics and comorbidities. Hypernatremia was 97% specific in predicting poor outcome (LR + 4.0, PPV = 55%, AUC = 0.80) despite no differences in CRP and IL-6 levels between hypernatremic and normonatremic patients. Hypocalcemia was 76% sensitive in predicting poor outcome (LR- 0.44, NPV = 87%, AUC = 0.71). Overall quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. CONCLUSION Hyponatremia, hypernatremia and hypocalcemia are associated with poor COVID-19 clinical outcome. Hypernatremia is 97% specific for a poor outcome, and the association is independent of inflammatory marker levels. Further studies should evaluate if correcting these imbalances help improve clinical outcome.
-
4.
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the glycemic control, eating habits, and body compositions of people with diabetes mellitus: A retrospective longitudinal observational study.
Sawada, M, Ohkuma, K, Aihara, M, Doi, S, Sekine, R, Kaneko, T, Iimuro, S, Ichi, I, Usami, S, Ohe, K, et al
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2023;14(2):321-328
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted to evaluate the prognosis of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in people with diabetes mellitus have reported an approximately two- to three-fold higher risk of mortality from COVID-19 in people with diabetes mellitus compared with those without diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the state of emergency on the glycaemic control, eating habits, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus. This study is a retrospective, longitudinal observational study in outpatients with diabetes mellitus. A total of 408 participants were included in this study, including 239 men (58.6%) and 169 women (41.4%). People with type 2 diabetes mellitus were predominant in this study (96.8%). Results show that: - there was a significant increase of the haemoglobin A1c level in people with diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic. - there was an increase in the changes in body weight and percent fat (increased) and skeletal muscle masses (decreased). Authors conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic caused a negative impact on the glycaemic control and body composition in people with diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the increase of body weight and fat mass and the decrease of the skeletal muscle mass during the pandemic were associated with poor glycaemic control, independent of the age and sex, in people with diabetes mellitus.
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the glycemic control, eating habits, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus; to identify the determinants of worsening glycemic control in people with diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, longitudinal observational study was performed in outpatients with diabetes mellitus who visited our hospital between April 2019 and March 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period) and continued for follow up from April 2020 to March 2021 (COVID-19 period). We compared the glycemic control, nutritional intakes, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus between the two periods. The changes in the HbA1c values (ΔHbA1c) and other study variables were compared between the two periods. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the increase of HbA1c levels. RESULTS A significant increase of HbA1c was observed during the COVID-19 period. The percent fat mass (FM) also increased, while the percent skeletal muscle mass (SMM) decreased during the COVID-19 period. After adjustments for age and sex, the ΔBMI (OR:2.33), ΔFM (OR:1.45), and ΔSMM (OR:0.51) were identified as being associated with elevated levels of HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the glycemic control and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus. The increased body weight and FM and decreased SMM observed during the pandemic were associated with poor glycemic control in people with diabetes mellitus.
-
5.
REsCue trial: Randomized controlled clinical trial with extended-release calcifediol in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients.
Bishop, CW, Ashfaq, A, Melnick, JZ, Vazquez-Escarpanter, E, Fialkow, JA, Strugnell, SA, Choe, J, Kalantar-Zadeh, K, Federman, NC, Ng, D, et al
Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.). 2023;107:111899
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Literature shows that vitamin D repletion may reduce the risk for infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), mitigate severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and accelerate recovery. Sufficient serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) is postulated to potentiate COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, boost innate and control adaptive immunity, and reduce post-infection cytokine storm and lung injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended-release calcifediol capsules to treat symptomatic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial titled REsCue. One hundred seventy-one symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients participants were enrolled. Patients were randomised (1:1) to 4 weeks of treatment with extended-release calcifediol (30 mcg/capsule) or matching placebo and a 2-week follow-up. Results show that extended-release calcifediol treatment was effective in increasing serum 25D levels to ≥50 ng/mL, which may have yielded significantly shorter resolution times for three aggregated respiratory symptoms (trouble breathing, chest congestion, and dry or hacking cough) commonly observed in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Authors conclude that the positive findings from this study warrant confirmation in additional larger studies.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This double-blind randomized controlled trial investigated raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) with extended-release calcifediol (ERC) on time to symptom resolution in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. METHODS COVID-19 outpatients received oral ERC (300 mcg on days 1-3 and 60 mcg on days 4-27) or placebo (NCT04551911). Symptoms were self-reported daily. Primary end points were raising 25D to ≥50 ng/mL and decreasing resolution time for five aggregated symptoms (three respiratory). RESULTS In all, 171 patients were randomized, 160 treated and 134 (65 ERC, 69 placebo) retained. The average age was 43 y (range 18-71), 59% were women. The mean baseline 25D was 37 ± 1 (SE) ng/mL. In the full analysis set (FAS), 81% of patients in the ERC group achieved 25D levels of ≥50 ng/mL versus 15% in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). In the per-protocol (PP) population, mean 25D increased with ERC to 82 ± 4 (SE) ng/mL (P < 0.0001) by day 7; the placebo group trended lower. Symptom resolution time was unchanged in the FAS by ERC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.983; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.695-1.390; P = 0.922). In the PP population, respiratory symptoms resolved 4 d faster when 25D was elevated above baseline level at both days 7 and 14 (median 6.5 versus 10.5 d; HR, 1.372; 95% CI, 0.945-1.991; P = 0.0962; Wilcoxon P = 0.0386). Symptoms resolved in both treatment groups to a similar extent by study end. Safety concerns including hypercalcemia were absent with ERC treatment. CONCLUSION ERC safely raised serum 25D to ≥50 ng/mL in outpatients with COVID-19, possibly accelerating resolution of respiratory symptoms and mitigating the risk for pneumonia. These findings warrant further study.
-
6.
Efficacy and Safety of the Adjuvant Use of Probiotic Bacillus clausii Strains in Pediatric Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Vázquez-Frias, R, Consuelo-Sánchez, A, Acosta-Rodríguez-Bueno, CP, Blanco-Montero, A, Robles, DC, Cohen, V, Márquez, D, Perez, M
Paediatric drugs. 2023;25(1):115-126
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is considered both a health and a socioeconomic burden. Curative treatment for IBS is currently not available and current management strategies vary. Gut microbiota dysbiosis is increasingly considered as a vital factor in the etiopathogenetic of IBS; thus, gut microbiota are a potential therapeutic target. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of Bacillus clausii plus conventional treatment, compared with placebo plus conventional treatment, in children with IBS in Mexico. This study is a phase III, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel clinical trial. Patients (n=259) were centrally randomised 1:1 to treatment with either B. clausii or placebo. Results show that IBS symptom relief in children was very high in both groups (B. clausii and placebo). In fact, there weren’t any significant differences between groups for proportion of patients with clinical improvements at Week 8 or any of the key secondary endpoints. Furthermore, the adverse event profile was similar between groups. Authors conclude that their study was not able to demonstrate the efficacy of B. clausii as an adjuvant to conventional treatment of patients with IBS.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) treatments have limited efficacy and probiotics like Bacillus clausii (B. clausii) were found to be effective in the management of several gastrointestinal disorders. This phase III trial assessed the efficacy and safety of adding B. clausii (four strains: O/C, N/R, SIN, T), versus placebo, to conventional treatment of pediatric IBS in Mexico. METHODS Patients aged 6-17 years 11 months with IBS (Rome IV) for at least 2 months were randomized to receive either B. clausii (oral suspension, total dose 4 billion spores/day) or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. All patients also received conventional treatment. The primary endpoint was the difference in the proportion of patients with clinical improvements at Week 8 (Global Assessment Questions [GAQ]). Secondary endpoints included responders by Subject's Global Assessment of Relief for Children with IBS (SGARC); number/consistency of stools; abdominal distention/bloating; abdominal pain/intensity; and IBS behavior. RESULTS 73.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.3-80.0; B. clausii n = 129) and 78.5% (95% CI 72.5-84.4; placebo n = 130) of patients had symptom improvement (p = 0.8182). For Week 8 SGARC, 19.2% (B. clausii) and 20.9% (placebo) reported complete symptom relief. Stool evaluations, bloating, abdominal pain/intensity, and IBS behavior were similar between groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION No significant differences in efficacy between B. clausii and placebo were demonstrated in addition to conventional treatment. The sample size calculation was based on an expected placebo/conventional treatment response of 30-40%. However, the actual treatment response observed was 80% and, thus, a study with larger population would be warranted. In addition, this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, when such controlled social conditions may have resulted in better diet, greater family stability, less psychological stress, and lower risk of infections exacerbating IBS, thereby improving symptoms in both groups. EUDRACT NUMBER 2018-004519-31.
-
7.
Hypnotherapy, Intermittent Fasting, and Exercise Group Programs in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Controlled Explorative Clinical Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Rotter, G, Teut, M, Schleicher, R, Dell'Oro, M, Ortiz, M, Binting, S, Tissen-Diabaté, T, Roll, S, Michalsen, A, Staab, D, et al
Journal of integrative and complementary medicine. 2023;29(2):99-110
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Relaxation techniques, diet, and exercise can diminish atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms. Patients with AD worry about the side-effects of the medical treatment for AD thus the majority try to engage in potentially healthy lifestyle behaviours. The aim of this study was to exploratively investigate the effectiveness of hypnotherapy, fasting with diet adjustments, and exercise in adult AD patients This study is a four-armed, randomised controlled, single-centre, open explorative clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups: i) hypnotherapy group program (HTP), ii) intermittent fasting with diet adjustment group program (IFDP), iii) an exercise group program or the control group. The study was strongly impacted by confinements and research restrictions due to the coronavirus 2019 pandemic. However, results showed potential beneficial changes to baseline in perceived itching intensity, disease severity, and disease-specific quality of life for HTP and IFDP. Authors conclude that further high-quality clinical trials should be performed investigating the effectiveness and safety of hypnotherapy, fasting with diet adjustments, as well as exercise.
Abstract
Background: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) frequently use healthy lifestyle behaviors, although their benefits are unclear. This study's aim was to investigate the effectiveness of hypnotherapy, fasting with diet adjustments, and exercise in AD patients. Methods: In a four-armed randomized controlled monocenter open explorative clinical trial, adult patients with mild-to-moderate severe AD underwent, over 16 weeks, a five-session hypnotherapy group program (HTP), a five-session intermittent fasting with diet adjustment group program (IFDP), a five-session exercise group program (EP), or no study intervention (control) as add-on to topical corticosteroid use if required. Endpoints included subjectively perceived itching on a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100 mm); disease severity by SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD); and adverse events (AEs). Endpoints were analyzed descriptively in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, relevant changes to the study protocol included online in addition to "in-presence" group interventions, closing the study arm EP and premature trial termination before randomization of 120 intended patients. Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, study recruitment was poor. The FAS included 20 patients (17 female) with 35.0 ± 12.1 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) years of age. At baseline, mean ± SD for HTP (n = 6), IFDP (n = 4), EP (n = 1), and control (n = 9) were VAS itching 63.2 ± 18.0, 65.0 ± 13.9, 43.0 mm, 62.1 ± 17.3; SCORAD 43.0 ± 13.6, 47.0 ± 21.0, 60.3, 39.1 ± 15.6. After 16 weeks, endpoints were VAS itching 26.0 ± 16.4, 31.7 ± 9.9, 23.0 mm, 39.3 ± 27.0; SCORAD 24.1 ± 12.2, 29.1 ± 19.1, 49.1, 25.5 ± 14.4. No serious AEs related to the interventions were observed. Conclusion: Despite very small groups, study results indicated potential beneficial changes to baseline in perceived itching intensity, disease severity, and disease-specific quality of life for HTP and IFDP. Therefore, further clinical trials should be performed investigating the effectiveness and safety of all interventions. Clinical Trial Registration: January 31, 2020 German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00020557, Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1247-1512.
-
8.
Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity among prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sari Motlagh, R, Abufaraj, M, Karakiewicz, PI, Rajwa, P, Mori, K, Mun, DH, Shariat, SF
World journal of urology. 2022;40(4):907-914
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is equal in both sexes; however, disease severity and progression rates are approximately three times higher in the male gender. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and the second-generation androgen receptor targeting therapy were developed to suppress the androgen-activated intracellular cascade that leads to tumour progression and aggressive tumour growth. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the severity of disease in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with ADT. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of six cohort studies. The study results show that there is not a significant association between ADT use and the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in PCa patients. However, results also show that ADT does not worsen COVID-19 risk and trajectory. Authors conclude that ADT, as a cancer treatment, might be safely administered to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Abstract
PURPOSE Androgen-regulated enzymes such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) are involved in the SARS-CoV-2 infection process. The expression of TMPRSS2 and its fusion gene, which are increased in the epithelium of the human prostate gland during prostate carcinogenesis, are regulated by androgens. Our goal was to assess the risk of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the severity of the disease in PCa patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. We queried PubMed and Web of Science databases on 1 July 2021. We used random- and/or fixed-effects meta-analytic models in the presence or absence of heterogeneity according to Cochrane's Q test and I2 statistic, respectively. RESULTS Six retrospective studies (n = 50,220 patients) were selected after considering inclusion and exclusion criteria for qualitative evidence synthesis. Four retrospective studies were included to assess the SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in PCa patients under ADT vs. no ADT and the summarized risk ratio (RR) was 0.8 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.44-1.47). Five retrospective studies were included to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in PCa patients under ADT versus no ADT and the summarized RR was 1.23 (95% CI 0.9-1.68). CONCLUSION We found a non-significant association between the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity in PCa patients treated with ADT. However, our results suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic PCa patients can safely undergo ADT as a cancer therapy without worsening COVID-19 risk and trajectory.
Sponsored Journal Article
9.
Probiotic improves symptomatic and viral clearance in Covid19 outpatients: a randomized, quadruple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
Gut Microbes is an open access journal which publishes research on intestinal microbiota, gastrointestinal, liver and cardiac disease, cancer, and irritable and inflammatory bowel conditions. The intestinal microbiota plays a pivotal role in human physiology. Characterizing its structure and function has implications for health and disease, impacting nutrition and obesity, brain function, allergic responses, immunity, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, cancer development, cardiac disease, liver disease, and others. Gut Microbes provides a platform for presenting and discussing cutting-edge research on all aspects of microorganisms populating the intestine.
2022
Abstract
Covid-19 is a disease of the lungs, which differentially affects those it infects. There are currently no therapies that have been approved for use in Covid-19 patients. However recent evidence has highlighted a possible link between the gut and the lungs, known as the gut-lung axis indicating a new avenue for investigation. Previous trials on probiotics have indicated a role in infections such as cold and flu highlighting a possible role in Covid-19 infection. This randomised control trial of 300 Covid-19 patients aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of a probiotic known as AB21 containing several strains of Lactoplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici. The results showed that after 30 days, the rate of remission from Covid-19 was higher in those who were given the probiotic, which was regardless of age, sex, confounding metabolic illness, viral load, and days from symptom start. Symptom duration and viral load were also reduced with probiotic use. Higher amounts of Covid-19 associated immune activity and lower biomarkers of inflammation were also reported following probiotic use. Probiotic use was shown to be safe during Covid-19 infection. It was concluded that the use of AB21 in Covid-19 patients was safe and associated with increased viral and symptom resolution compared to placebo, possibly driven by immune alterations via the gut-lung axis. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to seriously consider the use of this probiotic to stimulate immune activity and aid viral and symptom resolution in patients suffering from Covid-19.
-
10.
The Influence of a blend of Probiotic Lactobacillus and Prebiotic Inulin on the Duration and Severity of Symptoms among Individuals with Covid-19
Gavin Publishers is an international open access journal publishers. We publish research, review, mini review, case report, case series, editorial, short communication, opinion, perspective, rapid communication, commentary, and brief report peer reviewed articles in best Clinical, Medical, Pharma, Life Sciences, and Engineering Subject Journals. All our journals are Double Blind Peer Reviewed Journals and our website have more than 10 Million readers, all papers publishing in our Journals are globally accepted. Our conferences have more than 5000 renowned Speakers combined in an event with interactive sessions and Poster presentations. Gavin Publishers is combination of Journals and Conferences, currently we are publishing articles in more than 150+ best Journals and organizing 100 Conferences all over the world. Our open access journals committed to disseminating top notch academic research and academic journals throughout the world covering various disciplines of science, technology and medicine.
2022
Abstract
Gut microbial irregularities can lead to increased gut inflammation and gut membrane damage in people with long covid. Symptoms such as cough and breathlessness are apparent in Covid 19 patients with harmful gut bacterial overgrowth. In Covid patients, antibiotic and dexamethasone treatment also aggravates gut microbial imbalances. Lactobacillus supplementation has been shown to lessen upper respiratory tract infection, increase gut bacterial diversity, improve gut wall integrity, reduce gastrointestinal symptoms and gut inflammation, decrease oxidative stress and improve immunity. This study analysed the efficacy of probiotics and prebiotics combined supplements in reducing the severity and longevity of symptomatic Covid infection. 126 participants with Covid symptoms consumed two capsules a day for a month of a supplement containing 5 species of Lactobacillus and chicory inulin. 32% of participants were in the early phase of infection, and 68% were in the late phase. Both early and late phase participants showed significant improvements in cough, fatigue, and subjective wellbeing after 30 days of intervention. The gut symptoms of 82% of the participants improved after a month of intervention. Inulin and Lactobacillus strains need to be studied further robustly to determine whether they provide additional benefits. Healthcare practitioners can use the results of this study to consider symbiotic interventions for those with Covid symptoms.
