-
1.
Impact of chronic oral glucocorticoid treatment on mortality in patients with COVID-19: analysis of a population-based cohort.
Einarsdottir, MJ, Kibiwott Kirui, B, Li, H, Olsson, D, Johannsson, G, Nyberg, F, Ragnarsson, O
BMJ open. 2024;(3):e080640
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While glucocorticoid (GC) treatment initiated for COVID-19 reduces mortality, it is unclear whether GC treatment prior to COVID-19 affects mortality. Long-term GC use raises infection and thromboembolic risks. We investigated if patients with oral GC use prior to COVID-19 had increased mortality overall and by selected causes. DESIGN Population-based observational cohort study. SETTINGS Population-based register data in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS All patients infected with COVID-19 in Sweden from January 2020 to November 2021 (n=1 200 153). OUTCOME MEASURES Any prior oral GC use was defined as ≥1 GC prescription during 12 months before index. High exposure was defined as ≥2 GC prescriptions with a cumulative prednisolone dose ≥750 mg or equivalent during 6 months before index. GC users were compared with COVID-19 patients who had not received GCs within 12 months before index. We used Cox proportional hazard models and 1:2 propensity score matching to estimate HRs and 95% CIs, controlling for the same confounders in all analyses. RESULTS 3378 deaths occurred in subjects with any prior GC exposure (n=48 806; 6.9%) and 14 850 among non-exposed (n=1 151 347; 1.3%). Both high (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.87 to 2.09) and any exposure (1.58, 1.52 to 1.65) to GCs were associated with overall death. Deaths from pulmonary embolism, sepsis and COVID-19 were associated with high GC exposure and, similarly but weaker, with any exposure. High exposure to GCs was associated with increased deaths caused by stroke and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION Patients on oral GC treatment prior to COVID-19 have increased mortality, particularly from pulmonary embolism, sepsis and COVID-19.
-
2.
Use of online food retail platforms throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and associated diet-related chronic disease risk factors: A systematic review of emerging evidence.
Jia, SS, Raeside, R, Sainsbury, E, Wardak, S, Phongsavan, P, Redfern, J, Allman-Farinelli, M, Fernandez, MA, Partridge, SR, Gibson, AA
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2024
Abstract
Food accessibility was considerably impacted by restrictions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, leading to growth in the online food retail sector, which offered contact-free delivery. This systematic review aimed to assess the change in use of online food retail platforms during COVID-19. The secondary aim was to identify diet-related chronic disease risk factors including dietary intake, eating behaviors, and/or weight status associated with the use of online food retail platforms during the pandemic. The review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022320498) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine electronic databases were searched between January 2020 and October 2023. Studies that reported the frequency or change in use of online groceries, meal delivery applications, and/or meal-kit delivery services before and during the pandemic were included. A total of 53 studies were identified, including 46 cross-sectional studies, 4 qualitative studies, 2 longitudinal cohort studies, and 1 mixed-methods study. Overall, 96% (43/45) of outcomes showed an increase in the use of online groceries during COVID-19, while 55% (22/40) of outcomes showed a decrease in meal delivery applications. Eight of nine outcomes associated the use of online food retail with weight gain and emotional eating. Further research is needed to investigate the links between online food retail and obesity.
-
3.
Potential use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors during acute illness: a systematic review based on COVID-19.
Tisch, C, Xourgia, E, Exadaktylos, A, Ziaka, M
Endocrine. 2024
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE SGLT-2i are increasingly recognized for their benefits in patients with cardiometabolic risk factors. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests potential applications in acute illnesses, including COVID-19. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of SGLT-2i in patients facing acute illness, particularly focusing on SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, medRxiv, Research Square, and Google Scholar identified 22 studies meeting inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently. RESULTS Out of the 22 studies included in the review, six reported reduced mortality in DM-2 patients taking SGLT-2i, while two found a decreased risk of hospitalization. Moreover, one study demonstrated a lower in-hospital mortality rate in DM-2 patients under combined therapy of metformin plus SGLT-2i. However, three studies showed a neutral effect on the risk of hospitalization. No increased risk of developing COVID-19 was associated with SGLT-2i use in DM-2 patients. Prior use of SGLT-2i was not associated with ICU admission and need for MV. The risk of acute kidney injury showed variability, with inconsistent evidence regarding diabetic ketoacidosis. CONCLUSION Our systematic review reveals mixed findings on the efficacy of SGLT-2i use in COVID-19 patients with cardiometabolic risk factors. While some studies suggest potential benefits in reducing mortality and hospitalizations, others report inconclusive results. Further research is needed to clarify optimal usage and mitigate associated risks, emphasizing caution in clinical interpretation.
-
4.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein triggers gut impairment since mucosal barrier to innermost layers: From basic science to clinical relevance.
Nascimento, RR, Aquino, CC, Sousa, JK, Gadelha, KL, Cajado, AG, Schiebel, CS, Dooley, SA, Sousa, PA, Rocha, JA, Medeiros, JR, et al
Mucosal immunology. 2024
Abstract
Studies have reported the occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, primarily diarrhea, in COVID-19. However, the pathobiology regarding COVID-19 in the GI tract remains limited. This work aimed to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein interaction with gut lumen in different experimental approaches. Here, we present a novel experimental model with the inoculation of viral protein in the murine jejunal lumen, in vitro approach with human enterocytes, and molecular docking analysis. Spike protein led to increased intestinal fluid accompanied by Cl- secretion, followed by intestinal edema, leukocyte infiltration, reduced glutathione levels, and increased cytokine levels [interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-1β, IL-10], indicating inflammation. Additionally, the viral epitope caused disruption in the mucosal histoarchitecture with impairment in Paneth and goblet cells, including decreased lysozyme and mucin, respectively. Upregulation of toll-like receptor 2 and toll-like receptor 4 gene expression suggested potential activation of local innate immunity. Moreover, this experimental model exhibited reduced contractile responses in jejunal smooth muscle. In barrier function, there was a decrease in transepithelial electrical resistance and alterations in the expression of tight junction proteins in the murine jejunal epithelium. Additionally, paracellular intestinal permeability increased in human enterocytes. Finally, in silico data revealed that the Spike protein interacts with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and calcium-activated chloride conductance (CaCC), inferring its role in the secretory effect. Taken together, all the events observed point to gut impairment, affecting the mucosal barrier to the innermost layers, establishing a successful experimental model for studying COVID-19 in the GI context.
-
5.
Possible Role of Cannabis in the Management of Neuroinflammation in Patients with Post-COVID Condition.
Cárdenas-Rodríguez, N, Ignacio-Mejía, I, Correa-Basurto, J, Carrasco-Vargas, H, Vargas-Hernández, MA, Albores-Méndez, EM, Mayen-Quinto, RD, De La Paz-Valente, R, Bandala, C
International journal of molecular sciences. 2024;(7)
Abstract
The post-COVID condition (PCC) is a pathology stemming from COVID-19, and studying its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment is crucial. Neuroinflammation causes the most common manifestations of this disease including headaches, fatigue, insomnia, depression, anxiety, among others. Currently, there are no specific management proposals; however, given that the inflammatory component involves cytokines and free radicals, these conditions must be treated to reduce the current symptoms and provide neuroprotection to reduce the risk of a long-term neurodegenerative disease. It has been shown that cannabis has compounds with immunomodulatory and antioxidant functions in other pathologies. Therefore, exploring this approach could provide a viable therapeutic option for PCC, which is the purpose of this review. This review involved an exhaustive search in specialized databases including PubMed, PubChem, ProQuest, EBSCO, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials. Phytocannabinoids, including cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), and Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), exhibit significant antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties and have been shown to be an effective treatment for neuroinflammatory conditions. These compounds could be promising adjuvants for PCC alone or in combination with other antioxidants or therapies. PCC presents significant challenges to neurological health, and neuroinflammation and oxidative stress play central roles in its pathogenesis. Antioxidant therapy and cannabinoid-based approaches represent promising areas of research and treatment for mitigating adverse effects, but further studies are needed.
-
6.
Apathetic Graves' disease with severe hepatic and renal dysfunction induced by COVID-19 infection: Case report and literature review.
Deng, L, Zhang, Y, Sun, H
Medicine. 2024;(11):e37456
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
RATIONALE A rare and intractable case of apathetic Graves' disease (GD) with severe liver and kidney damage induced by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) carries a certain risk of missing diagnosis and delayed treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENT CONCERN A 60-year-old female patient developed anorexia, exhaustion, jaundice, nausea, and vomiting 10 days after COVID-19 infection. She was admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department because of recurring symptoms for more than a month. DIAGNOSIS Based on the patient's epidemiological history, clinical symptoms, and prior history, she was preliminarily diagnosed with GD induced by COVID-19 with severe hyperthyroid-related liver injury and chronic kidney disease stage 4. Drug-induced and radiation-induced liver injuries occurred sequentially throughout the therapy. INTERVENTION Methimazole (MMI) (10 mg/d) was administered for 1 week, and the patient's symptoms, thyroid function, and liver and kidney function improved. Nevertheless, the aforementioned symptoms and liver and kidney function deteriorated 20 days after increasing the MMI dose (20 mg/d). Therefore, in the presence of an artificial liver, hemodialysis, and other medical conditions, the treatment schedule was adjusted to individualized 131I anti-hyperthyroidism therapy. OUTCOME After 131I treatment, the patient's liver function returned to almost normal levels after a month, but worsened when the hepatoprotective drugs were stopped. Renal function did not deteriorate significantly and returned to baseline after 3 months. Thyroid function was restored to normal approximately 4 months later. CONCLUSION COVID-19 may induce GD. Multidisciplinary collaboration can be initiated as early as possible. Individualized 131I therapy or long-term low-dose MMI (10 mg/d) can be considered to manage hyperthyroidism in GD patients with liver and kidney dysfunction and to prolong liver protection therapy appropriately.
-
7.
Survival and Long-Term Functional Status of COVID-19 Patients Requiring Prolonged Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.
Martínez-Martínez, M, Schmidt, M, Broman, LM, Roncon-Albuquerque, R, Langouet, E, Campos, I, Argudo, E, Domènech Vila, JM, Sastre, SM, Gallart, E, et al
Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2024;(3):449-455
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Rationale: Severe cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may require prolonged (>28 d) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In nonresolving disease, recovery is uncertain, and lung transplant may be proposed. Objectives: This study aims to identify the variables influencing survival and to describe the functional status of these patients at 6 months. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study including patients requiring ECMO support for coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related ARDS for >28 days. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression in preselected variables and in least absolute shrinkage and selection operator selected variables. In a post hoc analysis to account for confounders and differences in awake strategy use by centers, treatment effects of the awake strategy were estimated using an augmented inverse probability weighting estimator with robust standard errors clustered by center. Results: Between March 15, 2020 and March 15, 2021, 120 patients required ECMO for >28 days. Sixty-four patients (53.3%) survived decannulation, 62 (51.7%) were alive at hospital discharge, and 61 (50.8%) were alive at 6-month follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, age (1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.15; P = 0.002) and an awake ECMO strategy (defined as the patient being awake, cooperative, and performing rehabilitation and physiotherapy with or without invasive mechanical ventilation at any time during the extracorporeal support) (0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.47; P = 0.003) were found to be predictors of hospital survival. At 6 months, 51 (42.5%) patients were at home, 42 (84.3%) of them without oxygen therapy. A cutoff point of 47 ECMO days had a 100% (95% CI, 76.8-100%) sensitivity and 60% (95% CI, 44.3-73.6%) specificity for oxygen therapy at 6 months, with 100% specificity being found in 97 days. Conclusions: Patients with COVID-19 who require ECMO for >28 days can survive with nonlimiting lung impairment. Age and an awake ECMO strategy may be associated with survival. Longer duration of support correlates with need for oxygen therapy at 6 months.
-
8.
Comparison of virtual vs face-to-face medical nutrition therapy in patients with hyperlipidemia.
Zoulek, S, Shriver, J, Kaur, N, Kuznicki, B, Brandt, EJ
Journal of clinical lipidology. 2024;(1):e44-e49
Abstract
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, utilization of telemedicine visits has increased. The outcomes of virtual compared to face-to-face (F2F) visits for treating hyperlipidemia are uncharacterized. This observational study compared pre- to post-visit change in lipid markers between 41 virtual and 151 F2F visits with a registered dietitian nutritionist at the University of Michigan Preventive Cardiology program from 3/31/2019-9/31/2022. Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides (TG) were collected pre- and post-visit with a median 33 days between collections. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) was calculated using the Sampson equation. We used paired T-tests to evaluate mean change in lipid markers for each visit type between pre and post timepoints, and linear regression to compare virtual to F2F visits. There was a significant decrease in TC, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C for both visit types. There was no significant difference in mean change in lipid markers between virtual and F2F visits. Telehealth is a promising strategy for increasing access to medical nutrition therapy.
-
9.
Effectiveness of Drug Repurposing and Natural Products Against SARS-CoV-2: A Comprehensive Review.
Velásquez, PA, Hernandez, JC, Galeano, E, Hincapié-García, J, Rugeles, MT, Zapata-Builes, W
Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications. 2024;:1-25
Abstract
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a betacoronavirus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, causing respiratory disorders, and even death in some individuals, if not appropriately treated in time. To face the pandemic, preventive measures have been taken against contagions and the application of vaccines to prevent severe disease and death cases. For the COVID-19 treatment, antiviral, antiparasitic, anticoagulant and other drugs have been reused due to limited specific medicaments for the disease. Drug repurposing is an emerging strategy with therapies that have already tested safe in humans. One promising alternative for systematic experimental screening of a vast pool of compounds is computational drug repurposing (in silico assay). Using these tools, new uses for approved drugs such as chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, zidovudine, ribavirin, lamivudine, remdesivir, lopinavir and tenofovir/emtricitabine have been conducted, showing effectiveness in vitro and in silico against SARS-CoV-2 and some of these, also in clinical trials. Additionally, therapeutic options have been sought in natural products (terpenoids, alkaloids, saponins and phenolics) with promising in vitro and in silico results for use in COVID-19 disease. Among these, the most studied are resveratrol, quercetin, hesperidin, curcumin, myricetin and betulinic acid, which were proposed as SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors. Among the drugs reused to control the SARS-CoV2, better results have been observed for remdesivir in hospitalized patients and outpatients. Regarding natural products, resveratrol, curcumin, and quercetin have demonstrated in vitro antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and in vivo, a nebulized formulation has demonstrated to alleviate the respiratory symptoms of COVID-19. This review shows the evidence of drug repurposing efficacy and the potential use of natural products as a treatment for COVID-19. For this, a search was carried out in PubMed, SciELO and ScienceDirect databases for articles about drugs approved or under study and natural compounds recognized for their antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2.
-
10.
Cardiovascular Safety of Azithromycin in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Prespecified Pooled Analysis of the COALITION I and COALITION II Randomized Clinical Trials.
Furtado, RHM, Barros E Silva, PGM, Fonseca, HAR, Serpa-Neto, A, Correa, TD, Guimarães, HP, Pereira, AJ, Olivato, GB, Zampieri, FG, Lisboa, T, et al
The American journal of cardiology. 2024;:18-24
Abstract
The cardiovascular safety from azithromycin in the treatment of several infectious diseases has been challenged. In this prespecified pooled analysis of 2 multicenter randomized clinical trials, we aimed to assess whether the use of azithromycin might lead to corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation or clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmias. In the COALITION COVID Brazil I trial, 667 patients admitted with moderate COVID-19 were randomly allocated to hydroxychloroquine, hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, or standard of care. In the COALITION COVID Brazil II trial, 447 patients with severe COVID-19 were randomly allocated to hydroxychloroquine alone versus hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin. The principal end point for the present analysis was the composite of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or ventricular arrhythmias. The addition of azithromycin to hydroxychloroquine did not result in any prolongation of the QTc interval (425.8 ± 3.6 ms vs 427.9 ± 3.9 ms, respectively, mean difference -2.1 ms, 95% confidence interval -12.5 to 8.4 ms, p = 0.70). The combination of azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine compared with hydroxychloroquine alone did not result in increased risk of the primary end point (proportion of patients with events at 15 days 17.2% vs 16.0%, respectively, hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.49, p = 0.65). In conclusion, in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 already receiving standard-of-care management (including hydroxychloroquine), the addition of azithromycin did not result in the prolongation of the QTc interval or increase in cardiovascular adverse events. Because azithromycin is among the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents, our results may inform clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04322123, NCT04321278.